Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Product Liability Lawyer in Huntington

Holding Manufacturers Accountable

Product Liability Claims Guide

If you or a loved one suffered harm from a defective or dangerous product in Huntington, West Virginia, it is important to understand your rights and options under personal injury law. Stephen New & Associates represents clients in product liability matters, helping them assess causes of injury, preserve evidence, and pursue compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Our office serves the Huntington and Cabell County communities and can be reached at 304-355-5565. This guide outlines common claim types, the legal process, and practical steps to protect your interests while a claim or lawsuit is prepared.

Product liability cases may arise from consumer goods, children’s toys, medical devices, automotive parts, household appliances, or workplace tools. Injuries can range from minor to catastrophic and sometimes involve long-term disability or wrongful death. Determining whether a claim involves a manufacturing defect, design flaw, or inadequate warning requires careful factual investigation and review of technical information. This overview explains what to expect when pursuing a claim in Huntington, including timelines, evidence gathering, and how state law allocates responsibility among manufacturers, distributors, and retailers.

The Importance and Benefits of a Product Liability Claim

Pursuing a product liability claim can provide financial recovery and accountability when a dangerous product causes injury. Compensation can cover current and future medical treatment, lost income while recovering, rehabilitation costs, and compensation for diminished quality of life. Beyond individual recovery, successful claims can encourage safer manufacturing practices and trigger product recalls that protect other consumers. A thorough legal approach helps ensure critical evidence is preserved, complex technical issues are investigated, and liability is evaluated across all parties in the distribution chain so injured people are not left bearing the costs of harm caused by unsafe products.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Practice

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving clients across West Virginia, including Huntington and Cabell County. The firm handles a wide range of injury matters such as motor vehicle collisions, medical malpractice, traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries, product liability claims, and wrongful death actions. Our attorneys focus on thorough investigation, collaboration with technical and medical professionals, and tailored strategies to pursue the best possible outcomes for injured clients. We assist families with documentation, claims management, and litigation when necessary to secure fair compensation and accountability.

Understanding Product Liability Claims

Product liability law covers situations in which a product causes injury due to a defect in its design, manufacture, or labeling. Victims may bring claims against manufacturers, distributors, retailers, or others in the supply chain depending on the facts. Each claim requires careful evidence collection, including the damaged product, purchase records, medical reports, and any warnings or instructions that accompanied the item. Investigations often involve technical analysis of the product, consultations with engineers or medical professionals, and reconstruction of how the product was used to determine whether the product performed as intended or deviated from reasonable safety standards.

In West Virginia, legal theories often used in product liability matters include negligence, breach of warranty, and defect-based liability. The appropriate legal approach depends on the nature of the defect and available evidence. Plaintiffs must show that the product was defective and that the defect caused the injury. Claims may involve complex causation issues, multiple responsible parties, and regulatory or industry standards that influence liability. A prompt and methodical response helps safeguard rights, prevents loss of critical evidence, and positions a claim for the strongest possible recovery through negotiation or litigation.

Need More Information?

Key Terms & Glossary

Strict Liability

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that can make a manufacturer or seller liable for harm caused by a defective product even when there was no proof of negligence or intent. Under this approach, the focus is on the product’s condition and whether it was unreasonably dangerous when it left the defendant’s control. Plaintiffs must still show that the defect existed and that it caused the injury, but they do not have to prove that the defendant acted carelessly. This theory is commonly applied in cases involving dangerous consumer products or manufacturing defects where fault is difficult to show through traditional negligence standards.

Design Defect

A design defect exists when a product’s inherent design is unreasonably dangerous for its intended use, meaning every unit made to that design presents the same risk. Determining a design defect often requires comparing the challenged design to feasible, safer alternatives and evaluating whether the benefits of the original design outweigh the foreseeable risks. Courts and factfinders consider industry practices, available technology, and cost-benefit analyses. Liability for a design defect may be imposed when a safer design was available but not used, and that defective design led directly to the consumer’s injury.

Negligence

Negligence in product liability claims involves showing that a manufacturer, distributor, or retailer failed to act with reasonable care in designing, manufacturing, inspecting, or warning about risks associated with a product. This approach looks at the specific conduct of the parties, such as lapses in quality control, inadequate testing, or failure to provide adequate instructions. Plaintiffs must demonstrate that the party breached a duty of care and that the breach caused the injury. Negligence claims often involve detailed factual inquiries into corporate practices, safety protocols, and foreseeability of harm.

Failure to Warn

A failure to warn claim alleges that a product lacked adequate instructions or warnings about known risks, making it unsafe when used as reasonably expected. Manufacturers and sellers have a responsibility to provide clear, conspicuous warnings and guidance on proper use, foreseeable misuse, and potential hazards. Establishing this claim requires showing that a warning was necessary, that its absence or inadequacy caused the injury, and that a reasonable warning could have reduced the risk. These claims often examine labeling, manuals, advertising, and industry standards for risk communication.

PRO TIPS

Document and Preserve Evidence

Preserving the product and relevant evidence after an incident is essential to building a strong claim. Keep the damaged item, packaging, receipts, photographs, and any witness contact information, and avoid discarding or repairing the product before it can be inspected. Early documentation of injuries and the scene supports later investigation and helps demonstrate causation and liability.

Seek Prompt Medical Care

Obtaining timely medical treatment documents the extent of injuries and creates a medical record that links harm to the product. Describe your symptoms and the circumstances of the incident clearly to health care providers, and follow recommended treatment and testing. Accurate medical records are important when calculating damages and proving that the product caused lasting harm.

Avoid Giving Recorded Statements

Insurance companies and manufacturers may request statements soon after an incident; avoid providing recorded remarks without legal guidance. Early statements can be misinterpreted or used to minimize liability, so consult with counsel before discussing details with opposing parties or their insurers. Direct communication through legal representation helps protect your rights while preserving evidence and negotiating effectively.

Comparing Legal Options for Product Claims

When Comprehensive Representation Is Needed:

Complex Defects and Multiple Parties

Comprehensive legal representation is often necessary when defects involve complex engineering, multiple manufacturers, or intertwined supply chains that require coordinated investigation. These cases typically demand expert analysis, product testing, and careful discovery to identify all responsible parties and determine how the defect arose. A full-service approach manages the technical, medical, and legal work needed to present a cohesive case for compensation and accountability.

Severe or Long-Term Injuries

When an injury leads to long-term disability, significant medical expenses, or permanent impairment, a comprehensive strategy is typically appropriate to secure sufficient compensation. These claims require careful evaluation of future care needs, vocational impacts, and life-care planning to calculate damages. A thorough approach advocates for full recovery that addresses both current losses and anticipated ongoing costs associated with the injury.

When a Limited Approach May Be Sufficient:

Clear Single-Party Liability

A more limited approach can work when liability is straightforward and a single responsible party is clearly identifiable, such as a defective batch from a known manufacturer. In those situations, focused negotiation or a streamlined claim process may resolve the dispute without extensive litigation. The decision depends on the extent of damages and the willingness of the responsible party to offer fair compensation.

Minor Injuries and Low Economic Loss

When injuries are minor and economic damages are limited, a shorter claims process or settlement negotiation may be an efficient way to obtain compensation. Plaintiffs should still document injuries and preserve evidence, but the complexity of expert testimony and extended discovery may be unnecessary. Each case should be evaluated on its specific facts to determine the appropriate level of representation.

Common Circumstances Leading to Product Liability Claims

Defective Consumer Products

Injuries from household appliances, power tools, or everyday consumer goods often result from design or manufacturing defects that make the product unsafe. These incidents can cause burns, lacerations, fractures, or long-term impairments and frequently involve analysis of product design, labeling, and quality control.

Dangerous Medical Devices

Medical device failures, defects in implants, or malfunctioning surgical equipment can produce severe patient harm and complex litigation. Claims often involve medical records review, device testing, and coordination with health care professionals to establish a link between the device and the injury.

Automotive and Equipment Failures

Defects in automotive parts, tires, or heavy equipment can lead to crashes and catastrophic injuries that implicate manufacturers and parts suppliers. These matters commonly require reconstruction, regulatory records, and expert analysis to determine the source of the failure and responsible parties.

Huntington Product Liability Attorney

Why Hire Stephen New & Associates for Product Liability

Our Huntington and West Virginia practice focuses on helping injured people pursue recovery after harm caused by defective products. We emphasize careful evidence preservation, coordination with medical and technical professionals, and strategic negotiation with manufacturers and insurers. Clients benefit from local representation that understands state law and court procedures, and we work to explain legal options clearly while pursuing fair compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and non-economic losses such as pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life.

From initial investigation through settlement or trial, our team assists clients with documentation, claim preparation, and litigation tasks as required. We evaluate product failures, consult with appropriate technical reviewers, and identify all potentially responsible parties in the distribution chain. Our office assists families with claim management and communication with insurers to help reduce stress and keep the focus on recovery and rehabilitation while pursuing full and fair resolution of the matter.

Contact Our Huntington Office Today

People Also Search For

product liability lawyer Huntington

Huntington defective product claim

product injury attorney West Virginia

manufacturer liability Huntington WV

defective medical device Huntington

product recall legal help Huntington

automotive defect claim Huntington

consumer product injury Huntington WV

Related Services

FAQS

What types of defects support a product liability claim?

Product liability claims commonly arise from three categories of defects: design defects, manufacturing defects, and failures to warn or instruct. A design defect means the product’s blueprint is inherently unsafe; a manufacturing defect means a specific item deviated from its intended design and became dangerous; and a failure to warn involves inadequate labeling or instructions about known risks. Each category requires a different legal focus and types of proof, such as technical analysis, testing, and comparison to industry standards. Determining which theory applies depends on the facts of the incident and available evidence, including the physical product, purchase records, and medical documentation. Early preservation of the product and documentation of how it was used are important. Consulting with counsel promptly helps identify which defect theory is most appropriate and shapes the investigation needed to build a claim against the responsible parties.

How soon should I seek legal help after a product injury?

You should seek legal guidance as soon as possible after a product-related injury to preserve important evidence and protect your rights. The damaged product, packaging, receipts, and photographs of the scene and injuries should be kept intact and not repaired or discarded. Witness information and contemporaneous notes about the incident can also be helpful when investigators and technical reviewers begin their analysis. Prompt contact with an attorney also helps ensure compliance with any time limits for filing claims and can prevent loss of critical information that weakens a case. Early involvement enables coordinated evidence collection, consultation with medical and technical professionals, and strategic decisions about communications with manufacturers and insurers while you focus on recovery.

Who can be held liable in a product liability case?

Liability in product claims may attach to manufacturers, designers, component suppliers, distributors, retailers, or others in the supply chain depending on the facts. The responsible party is the one whose role or conduct led to the defective condition or failure to warn. For example, a supplier of a faulty part may share liability with the final product manufacturer if that component caused the malfunction and injury. Identifying all potential defendants requires investigation into the product’s origin and distribution history. An attorney can subpoena manufacturing records, purchase information, and quality control documents to trace responsibility. Multiple parties are often added to claims to ensure full recovery and to reflect each party’s role in creating or allowing the dangerous condition.

What evidence do I need to support a product liability claim?

Critical evidence includes the damaged product itself, packaging and labels, proof of purchase, photographs of the scene and injuries, medical records documenting treatment, and contact information for witnesses. Technical documentation such as maintenance records, inspection logs, or manufacturing specifications can be essential when proving that a defect existed. Preserving the product in its post-incident condition often provides vital information during testing and analysis. Medical records and bills are necessary to establish the nature and extent of injuries and to calculate damages, while documentation of any lost income supports economic loss claims. Early documentation and preservation are key, so avoid altering or disposing of the product and seek legal advice about how to secure physical and electronic evidence safely.

Can I pursue a claim if the product was used incorrectly?

An injury resulting from improper use does not always bar a claim, particularly when the misuse was foreseeable or when a product lacks clear warnings about risks associated with normal or common misuse. Courts consider whether a reasonable user could anticipate the misuse and whether the manufacturer provided adequate instructions or warnings. If misuse was extreme or unforeseeable, liability may be reduced or negated, but each case requires careful factual analysis. Legal evaluation focuses on whether the product design or labeling reasonably protected users and whether manufacturers anticipated likely modes of use. Even when misuse is a factor, other parties in the supply chain may still bear responsibility in certain circumstances. Documenting how the product was used and any instructions provided will be important to the assessment.

How are damages calculated in product liability cases?

Damages in product liability cases typically include economic losses like medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, and lost wages, as well as non-economic damages such as pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. When injuries are severe or result in permanent impairment, calculations often consider future medical needs, ongoing care, and diminished earning capacity. Accurate assessment often requires medical, vocational, and life-care evaluations to estimate long-term impacts and costs. Some cases may also permit recovery for punitive damages if the defendant’s conduct was especially reckless or showed gross indifference to consumer safety, subject to state legal standards. Calculating damages involves compiling medical bills, employment records, expert assessments, and persuasive presentation of the claimant’s experience and needs to insurers or a jury.

What is the typical timeline for resolving a product liability claim?

The timeline for resolving a product liability claim varies widely based on the case’s complexity, number of parties, and whether technical testing or expert review is needed. A straightforward claim may resolve in months through negotiation, while complex cases involving significant discovery, expert testimony, and contested liability can take a year or more to reach settlement or trial. Factors such as court schedules and appeal possibilities also affect timing. Clients should expect an initial investigative phase followed by negotiation and possible litigation. Keeping thorough records, cooperating with timely discovery requests, and engaging experienced technical and medical reviewers can help move a case along efficiently while protecting the client’s ability to obtain fair compensation.

Will the manufacturer always be responsible for a defective product?

A manufacturer is frequently responsible when a product leaves its control with a defect in design, manufacturing, or warnings, but liability is not automatic in every situation. Other parties, such as component suppliers, assemblers, retailers, or distributors, can also share responsibility if their actions contributed to the product’s dangerous condition. The legal outcome depends on the roles each played and the evidence establishing the source of the defect. Claims often involve multiple defendants to ensure all possible sources of recovery are available. Investigation into manufacturing processes, supply chain records, and quality control practices helps determine which parties should be named, and comparative fault principles can affect how responsibility and damages are apportioned among responsible entities.

How do recalls affect my claim for injuries caused by a product?

A product recall may provide helpful evidence that a manufacturer recognized a safety problem, but a recall does not automatically determine civil liability or the full value of an injury claim. Recalls can support a plaintiff’s case by demonstrating that the product presented a known hazard, yet each plaintiff must still show that the defect caused the specific injury and that damages resulted from that harm. Recalls may also create opportunities to gather documentation about the scope of the problem and internal communications that reveal knowledge of risk. Legal counsel can help evaluate recall information, pursue discovery into the recall process, and use that evidence to strengthen a claim for compensation where appropriate.

What should I do if a loved one died because of a defective product?

When a loved one dies because of a defective product, family members may have wrongful death claims to pursue compensation for funeral costs, lost financial support, and the emotional loss of companionship. These cases require careful investigation to establish cause of death, link the fatal injury to the defective product, and identify responsible parties. Medical records, autopsy reports, product evidence, and witness testimony are central to building a wrongful death claim related to a product defect. Timely action is important to preserve evidence and meet any statutory filing deadlines for wrongful death claims in West Virginia. An attorney can assist with gathering records, coordinating with medical and technical reviewers, and pursuing damages on behalf of surviving family members while explaining legal options and the claim process during a difficult time.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services