Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

PFAS Lawyer in West Virginia

Accountability for Toxic Exposure

Understanding PFAS Lawsuits and Your Legal Options

PFAS, sometimes called “forever chemicals,” have been used in products and industrial processes for decades. When these substances enter drinking water, soil, or the food chain, families can be left with serious questions about what happened, who knew, and what should have been done to prevent harm. Stephen New & Associates helps individuals and households in Beckley and throughout West Virginia evaluate potential PFAS-related claims within a mass tort framework. Our role is to listen to your concerns, review available information, and explain the steps that may be available to pursue financial recovery and accountability.

A PFAS claim is not only about a single incident; it often involves long-term exposure and complex proof issues. Many people first learn about PFAS after a contamination notice, a well test, or media reports about nearby facilities and firefighting foam use. If you suspect you were exposed, it helps to document your timeline, water source, and any communications you received from public agencies or utilities. We can discuss whether your situation aligns with ongoing PFAS mass tort litigation, what records may matter most, and how a claim may proceed while your day-to-day life continues.

Why PFAS Mass Tort Representation Matters

PFAS litigation can involve corporate documents, environmental testing, medical records, and scientific studies that are difficult for a single person to gather and interpret alone. Working with a law firm on a mass tort approach may help level the playing field by coordinating investigation, preserving evidence, and presenting your story in a way that fits the broader litigation while still reflecting your individual damages. Potential benefits can include pursuing compensation for medical monitoring, out-of-pocket costs, lost income, and other losses connected to contamination or exposure. Just as importantly, these cases can press for transparency and safer practices going forward.

About Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving Beckley and communities across West Virginia. Our practice includes serious injury matters, wrongful death, product liability, and complex claims where wrongdoing or unsafe products lead to lasting consequences. PFAS cases often overlap with these themes because they can involve corporate decisions, warnings that were not provided, and contamination that affects entire communities. We provide straightforward guidance, responsive communication, and careful preparation from the first call through resolution. If you want to talk through a potential PFAS mass tort claim, call 304-355-5565 to schedule a confidential conversation.

What PFAS Mass Tort Cases Involve

A mass tort is a legal process used when many people are harmed by similar conduct, products, or exposures, but each person’s damages are still individual. PFAS cases may involve contamination from industrial sites, landfills, wastewater discharges, or the use of firefighting foam. Claims can focus on how PFAS entered the environment, what testing showed, what was communicated to the public, and whether safer alternatives or warnings were available. Because exposure can occur over years, these cases often rely on a clear timeline, location history, and records tying a water supply or area to identified PFAS compounds.

PFAS litigation may proceed in state court, federal court, or coordinated proceedings with other cases raising similar issues. While some people expect a quick settlement, these claims frequently move in stages, including investigation, filing, evidence exchange, and negotiations. Your participation may include providing documents, answering questions, and possibly a deposition, but much of the legal work happens behind the scenes. Our job is to explain what to expect, help you gather the right information, and pursue outcomes that reflect the impact on your health, finances, and peace of mind.

Need More Information?

PFAS Case Glossary (Plain-Language Terms)

PFAS

PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a large group of man-made chemicals used to resist heat, water, and stains. They can persist in the environment and may accumulate over time. In legal claims, “PFAS” usually refers to specific compounds found in testing results, drinking water supplies, soil samples, or consumer products. The exact PFAS identified, the levels detected, and the time period involved can all affect what evidence is needed and which entities may be responsible for contamination or exposure in a particular area.

Medical Monitoring

Medical monitoring is a type of requested relief that focuses on the cost of reasonable health screening tied to a documented exposure. Instead of waiting for a condition to develop, a claim may seek funding for testing and follow-up care recommended by healthcare providers when exposure increases risk. Whether medical monitoring is available depends on the facts, the proof of exposure, and how courts apply the law. In PFAS matters, monitoring requests may rely on environmental data, personal history, and medical guidance about appropriate evaluations.

AFFF Firefighting Foam

AFFF stands for aqueous film-forming foam, a type of firefighting foam historically used for fuel fires at airports, military sites, and industrial facilities. Some AFFF formulations contained PFAS compounds that can migrate into groundwater and surface water. In litigation, AFFF-related claims may examine where the foam was used, how runoff was handled, what the product labels and safety data said at the time, and what manufacturers and users knew about environmental persistence and potential health concerns. These facts can help establish responsibility for contamination.

Contamination Pathway

A contamination pathway describes how a chemical moves from its source to people or property. For PFAS, that pathway might include industrial discharge to waterways, seepage into groundwater, runoff from training areas, or disposal in landfills. It also includes how exposure occurs, such as through drinking water, private wells, food, or dust. Identifying the pathway can help connect test results to a likely source and clarify who had control over the activities that led to contamination. It is often a key part of proving causation in a PFAS claim.

PRO TIPS

Save Every Notice and Test Result

Keep copies of any letters from water utilities, health departments, employers, or landlords that mention PFAS testing, advisories, or filter programs. If you have lab reports for well water or household testing, store them in a single folder along with the date, address, and the lab’s contact information. These documents can help establish timing and location, which are often central issues in PFAS mass tort investigations.

Document Your Exposure Timeline

Write down where you lived, worked, or attended school, especially if you relied on a private well or were near a facility linked to PFAS use. Note any periods when you used bottled water, installed filtration, or received boil or advisory notices, and keep receipts if you have them. A clear timeline helps connect your personal history to environmental data and makes it easier to evaluate whether your situation aligns with known contamination areas.

Do Not Discard Filters or Samples

If you installed a filtration system because of PFAS concerns, keep records of the model, installation date, and maintenance schedule. Avoid throwing away used filter cartridges until you have guidance, because in some situations they may help show what was captured over time. If you plan additional water testing, follow the lab’s collection instructions carefully so results are reliable and useful for a legal review.

Comparing PFAS Legal Options: Mass Tort, Individual Claims, and Other Paths

When a Full PFAS Case Evaluation Makes Sense:

Multiple Potential Sources of Contamination

PFAS can come from more than one place, such as industrial operations, firefighting foam use, or waste handling. When there are multiple possible sources, it usually takes a deeper investigation to sort out who may be responsible and how contamination traveled. A comprehensive approach allows for review of maps, sampling data, public records, and timelines to build a clearer picture of causation.

Significant Financial or Health-Related Impacts

If you have incurred substantial costs for medical care, testing, filtration, bottled water, or property-related losses, the value of the claim often depends on careful documentation and proof. Health concerns can also raise questions about medical monitoring, future expenses, and how to present damages in a responsible way. A fuller legal review helps ensure the claim is supported by records that defendants and insurers typically demand.

When a Narrower Legal Step May Be Enough:

You Mainly Need Help Gathering the Right Records

Sometimes the first hurdle is simply assembling documentation, such as water quality reports, property records, and prior addresses. In those situations, an initial consultation and targeted guidance can help you prioritize what to request and where to obtain it. Once records are organized, it becomes easier to determine whether a formal claim is appropriate or whether more testing is needed.

Early-Stage Concerns Without Confirmed Exposure Data

If you suspect PFAS exposure but do not yet have testing results or a clear link to a known contamination area, the next step may be fact-finding rather than immediate litigation. A limited approach may focus on evaluating public data, identifying likely sources, and discussing safe, practical options for water testing. This can prevent unnecessary costs while still preserving your ability to act if later information supports a claim.

Common Situations That Lead to PFAS Claims

Private Well or Municipal Water Testing Shows PFAS

Many people first suspect a problem after seeing PFAS results in a water report or a notice from a utility or agency. Those results can provide a starting point for evaluating where contamination may have originated and what damages may be recoverable.

Living or Working Near Potential PFAS Use Sites

Facilities that used certain firefighting foams or handled industrial chemicals may be linked to PFAS contamination in surrounding areas. A residence or workplace history can help connect your exposure concerns to known sampling locations and timelines.

Out-of-Pocket Costs for Filters, Bottled Water, or Property Impacts

Families often spend money to protect themselves once PFAS concerns arise, including filtration systems, maintenance, and alternative water sources. Those expenses, along with property-related losses in some circumstances, may be part of a broader damages analysis.

PFAS Mass Tort Attorney for Beckley, WV

Why Clients Choose Stephen New & Associates for PFAS Claims

PFAS litigation can feel overwhelming because it mixes science, corporate conduct, and long-term exposure questions. We focus on making the process understandable: what facts matter, what documents to collect, how mass tort litigation works, and what realistic outcomes may look like. Our team takes time to learn your story and evaluate your situation in context, rather than forcing it into a one-size-fits-all template. If the case is a good fit, we move forward with careful preparation and consistent communication, so you are not left guessing about the next step.

As a Beckley-based firm serving West Virginia, we value practical guidance and responsiveness. We can help you organize exposure information, coordinate record requests, and assess potential damages such as medical costs, monitoring needs, lost income, and household expenses tied to contamination concerns. We also understand that many PFAS issues affect families and neighborhoods, so we approach these conversations with care and privacy. To discuss a potential PFAS mass tort claim, call Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565 and we will help you decide what comes next.

Talk With Our Team About Your PFAS Concerns

People Also Search For

PFAS lawsuit West Virginia

PFAS water contamination attorney

AFFF firefighting foam claims

forever chemicals mass tort

PFAS drinking water claims

medical monitoring PFAS

toxic exposure lawsuit Beckley WV

PFAS settlement eligibility

Related Services

FAQS

What are PFAS and why are they called “forever chemicals”?

PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals used in many applications because they resist heat, grease, and water. They are often called “forever chemicals” because they can persist in the environment for long periods and may remain in the body over time. Common compounds discussed in litigation include PFOA and PFOS, though many other PFAS exist. In a legal context, the term matters because persistence can increase the chance of ongoing exposure through water and soil. Cases frequently focus on when PFAS use began, whether risks were known or discussed internally, and what warnings or safeguards were provided to the public. Understanding the specific PFAS involved and the route of exposure is an important first step in evaluating any claim.

Do I have a PFAS case if my water tested positive but I am not sick?

A positive water test can still be meaningful even if you have not been diagnosed with a condition. Some claims focus on costs associated with reducing exposure, such as filtration, bottled water, or other household expenses, and some cases may involve requests for medical monitoring depending on the facts and the law. The availability of these claims can vary, so it helps to review your situation carefully. Even without a diagnosis, documentation matters. Keep the test results, notes about your water source, and any communications from agencies or utilities. A lawyer can help evaluate whether your circumstances align with existing PFAS litigation, whether additional testing would be helpful, and what options may be available based on your exposure history and losses.

How do PFAS mass tort cases differ from a class action?

Mass tort cases and class actions both involve many people harmed by similar conduct, but they are structured differently. In many mass tort proceedings, each person keeps an individual claim, with damages and personal facts considered separately even if pretrial work is coordinated. That structure can be important when exposure levels, medical history, and financial impacts vary from one person to another. A class action typically aims to resolve claims on a more uniform basis for the entire group, which may not fit well when losses are highly individualized. PFAS matters can involve different compounds, different water systems, and different timeframes, so coordination through a mass tort can allow shared investigation while still accounting for each person’s unique story and damages.

What information should I bring to a PFAS consultation?

Helpful items include any water test results, utility or health department notices, and records showing your address history and water source during the relevant years. If you installed filtration or purchased bottled water because of contamination concerns, receipts and installation documents can help show out-of-pocket costs. If you have medical records related to symptoms or diagnoses you believe are connected, those can also be useful, but you do not need to have everything gathered before calling. It also helps to write down key details you may forget in the moment, such as when you first learned about PFAS, whether you used a private well, and whether you lived or worked near a potential source site. During the consultation, we can explain what additional records may matter and how to obtain them without creating unnecessary expense or disruption.

Who can be held responsible for PFAS contamination?

Depending on the facts, responsibility may involve PFAS manufacturers, companies that used PFAS-containing products, or entities involved in storage, disposal, or discharge. In some cases, firefighting foam use is part of the story, which can bring in additional parties connected to production, supply, or use at particular locations. Determining who is responsible often requires looking at historical operations, purchasing records, and environmental sampling. Because contamination pathways can be complex, it is common for investigations to examine multiple potential sources before narrowing the focus. A legal review can help identify which parties may be connected to the contamination in your area and what evidence supports that connection. The goal is to match your exposure history to provable facts rather than assumptions.

How long do PFAS cases usually take?

PFAS cases can take time, particularly when they involve extensive evidence, scientific issues, and many parties. The process often includes investigation, filing, exchanging information, and addressing legal motions before meaningful settlement talks occur. Some cases resolve sooner than others, but it is wise to expect that the timeline may be measured in months to years rather than weeks. Even when litigation moves slowly, there are practical steps you can take early, such as preserving records, documenting expenses, and confirming your water source history. We keep clients informed about major developments and what they mean for the individual claim. If a resolution opportunity arises, we explain the terms in plain language so you can make an informed decision.

Will I need to travel or go to court for a PFAS mass tort claim?

Many clients can participate with minimal travel. Depending on how the litigation is organized, some proceedings may occur in courts outside your county, but your involvement is often limited to providing documents, answering written questions, and possibly giving testimony once. If testimony is needed, it may sometimes be arranged closer to home or by remote means when allowed. We prepare you for each step so you understand the purpose of the request and what to expect. Our goal is to reduce disruption while still building a strong, well-documented claim. If court appearances become necessary, we discuss logistics in advance and help you plan so there are no surprises.

What types of compensation might be available in a PFAS claim?

Compensation in PFAS cases depends on the evidence and the harm involved. Potential categories can include medical expenses, costs of monitoring and follow-up testing, lost income, and out-of-pocket expenses for filtration systems, bottled water, or related household measures. In some situations, property-related losses may also be evaluated when contamination affects use or value. Every claim is fact-specific, and defendants often challenge causation and damages. That is why documentation matters, including receipts, medical records, and clear exposure history. During a consultation, we can discuss which damages categories may apply to your situation and what proof is typically needed to support them in negotiations or court.

What if I used a private well or moved away from the area?

Private well users often have different documentation needs than those on municipal water, but they may still have viable claims when testing shows PFAS or when nearby sampling indicates contamination. If you moved away, your address history can still be important because PFAS exposure can be tied to specific locations and time periods. Moving does not automatically prevent a claim, but it can make timelines and records more important. If you no longer have access to your prior water source, we can discuss alternatives, such as public sampling data, neighbor results, or agency investigations. Keep any old mail, lease documents, or property records that confirm where you lived and when. These details can help connect you to the area of concern and support the exposure portion of the case.

How can I contact a PFAS mass tort lawyer in Beckley, WV?

To speak with a PFAS mass tort lawyer in Beckley, you can contact Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565. We can help you set up a confidential consultation to discuss your concerns, your exposure history, and what documentation may be useful. If you are unsure whether your situation fits PFAS litigation, that is still a good reason to call and ask questions. During the conversation, we will explain the mass tort process in plain terms and outline possible next steps. If we determine additional information is needed, we will tell you what to gather and why it matters. Our goal is to help you make an informed decision without pressure and with a clear understanding of your options.

Our Practice Areas

Comprehensive legal representation across West Virginia