Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Roundup Lawyer in Huntington

Huntington Roundup Claims

Understanding Roundup Mass Tort Actions

If you or a loved one used Roundup (a glyphosate-based herbicide) and later received a diagnosis such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, you may be eligible to pursue a mass tort claim in Huntington, West Virginia. This guide explains how Roundup litigation works, what types of injuries and diagnoses have been associated with glyphosate exposure, and how local residents can take initial steps to protect their legal rights. Stephen New & Associates serves clients in Cabell County and surrounding areas, helping people evaluate potential claims, preserve evidence, and understand possible outcomes. Call 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and timing for potential action.

Roundup cases are handled as mass torts because many individuals across different jurisdictions allege similar harms tied to a common product. These matters can involve complex scientific and medical evidence, regulatory history, and multiple manufacturers or distributors. While some claims resolve through settlements, others proceed through litigation and trials. In Huntington and broader West Virginia, key considerations include the applicable statute of limitations, medical documentation linking exposure to diagnosis, and preserving records of product use. Our goal is to help clients understand options, timelines, and potential recovery for medical costs, lost income, and other damages associated with a Roundup-related illness.

Benefits of Bringing a Roundup Claim

Pursuing a Roundup mass tort claim can provide opportunities for financial recovery to cover medical expenses, ongoing care needs, lost income, and pain and suffering linked to a diagnosis allegedly caused by glyphosate exposure. Beyond compensation, bringing a claim can help ensure manufacturers are held accountable for product warnings and labeling, and it can support broader public awareness about potential risks. For Huntington residents, joining coordinated claims or pursuing individual actions can also provide access to legal resources and investigators who can collect product records, medical histories, and other evidence that individual claimants might otherwise struggle to assemble on their own.

Stephen New & Associates — Local Personal Injury Firm

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving Beckley, Huntington, and other West Virginia communities, including Cabell County. Our practice addresses a wide range of serious injury matters, including mass torts like Roundup claims, motor vehicle collisions, workplace injuries, medical negligence, and wrongful death. We aim to provide clear guidance, thorough case evaluation, and attentive client communication throughout the life of a matter. Residents who contact our office can expect practical information on next steps, record preservation, and how timelines under West Virginia law might affect their ability to pursue compensation for harms linked to herbicide exposure.

What Roundup Litigation Entails

Roundup litigation generally centers on allegations that long-term exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, contributed to the development of certain cancers, most commonly non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Mass tort claims collect similar individual cases against common defendants and combine resources to manage discovery, expert testimony, and legal strategy. Plaintiffs typically need medical records documenting diagnosis and treatment, evidence of product use over time, and information about exposure routes. The litigation process often includes medical examinations, document discovery, depositions, and potentially mediation or trial if parties cannot reach a settlement.

In Huntington and across West Virginia, plaintiffs face deadlines under state statutes of limitations that determine how long they have to file a claim after discovering an injury. Scientific evidence, peer-reviewed studies, and expert medical opinions frequently play key roles in establishing causation. While regulatory findings and agency classifications may inform the legal record, courts evaluate evidence presented by both sides. A careful review of your medical history, product purchase or use records, and employment or landscaping history can help determine whether a Roundup-related claim is appropriate and how best to proceed.

Need More Information?

Key Terms You Should Know

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the active chemical ingredient found in many herbicide formulations, including Roundup. It functions as a broad-spectrum weed killer used in residential, agricultural, and commercial settings to control unwanted plants. In litigation contexts, glyphosate is referenced because some studies and lawsuits allege a connection between prolonged exposure and certain types of cancer. Understanding glyphosate involves looking at product formulations, concentrations, application methods, and frequency of use, as well as the medical and toxicological literature that researchers and attorneys analyze when assessing potential links between exposure and adverse health outcomes.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a legal process that coordinates large numbers of individual claims that allege similar injuries from the same product or conduct. Unlike a class action, mass torts typically maintain individual case records and damage assessments while consolidating discovery and common legal issues to improve efficiency. In Roundup matters, mass tort procedures help manage medical records, common scientific evidence, and depositions across many claimants. Each plaintiff’s circumstance is still examined on its own facts, allowing for individualized compensation for medical costs, lost wages, and other damages where appropriate.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a category of blood cancers that originate in the lymphatic system. Symptoms can include swollen lymph nodes, fatigue, unexplained weight loss, and night sweats, and diagnosis typically involves imaging, biopsy, and specialist evaluation. In product liability and mass tort cases, non-Hodgkin lymphoma is often the diagnosis alleged to be linked with long-term exposure to certain chemicals or herbicides. Establishing a connection between exposure and diagnosis generally requires medical documentation, treatment records, and opinions from treating physicians or medical reviewers familiar with oncologic conditions.

Settlement

A settlement is an agreement between parties to resolve a legal claim without a trial. In Roundup litigation, settlements can involve structured payments, lump-sum compensation, or other arrangements to address medical expenses, lost income, and non-economic harms. Settlements often follow negotiations that weigh the strength of medical and scientific evidence, the projected costs of litigation, and the needs of individual plaintiffs. Accepting a settlement ends a claim in exchange for agreed compensation and typically includes releases of liability, so claimants should understand terms and long-term implications before finalizing any agreement.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Medical and Product Records

Keep thorough records of medical visits, diagnoses, treatment plans, and prescriptions related to any suspected illness tied to herbicide exposure. Preserve labels, product containers, purchase receipts, photographs of the product and usage areas, and any application logs that show how often and in what context Roundup was used. These records form the foundation of a potential claim and help attorneys and medical reviewers assess timing, causation, and damages.

Seek Prompt and Ongoing Medical Care

If you have symptoms or a diagnosis potentially linked to Roundup exposure, obtain and maintain regular medical care and follow recommended testing and treatment plans. Documentation from medical professionals establishes a clear timeline and offers evidence of the nature and extent of injuries, which is important for both treatment and any legal claim. Timely, consistent healthcare documentation can also support a plaintiff’s assertions about when symptoms emerged and how they progressed.

Avoid Discarding Evidence and Make Notes

Do not throw away product labels, containers, or anything showing where and how Roundup was used; photographs and storage of remaining product can be important. Keep a written or digital log noting dates, locations, and circumstances of use, including who applied the product and whether protective equipment was used. These practical steps can strengthen a claim by helping recreate exposure patterns and corroborating medical records.

Comparing Legal Paths for Roundup Claims

When a Broad Legal Approach Is Helpful:

Multiple Claims, Multiple Issues

A comprehensive approach becomes important when a claim involves multiple injuries, complex medical histories, or interactions with other products or medications that could affect causation. Coordinating discovery across several claimants, compiling extensive medical records, and managing expert reviews can demand more resources and organizational support than a limited filing. For clients in Huntington who face long-term care needs or potential loss of earning capacity, a broad strategy helps ensure all aspects of damages and liability are fully considered before settlement or trial.

Complex Evidence or Multiple Manufacturers

When litigation requires in-depth review of scientific studies, manufacturing records, or interactions among product lines, a more comprehensive legal approach is warranted to marshal the appropriate experts and investigative resources. Cases that involve multiple manufacturers, distributors, or reformulations of a product may require coordinated legal strategy to trace responsibility and document differing roles in exposure and labeling. That broader approach can help Huntington claimants obtain a thorough evaluation of potential defendants and a coherent plan for presenting evidence in negotiations or court.

When a Narrower Approach May Be Appropriate:

Clear Single-Product Link

A narrower approach may be sufficient where the factual record shows a straightforward pattern of exposure to a single product and the medical causation is well supported by treating physicians. In such situations, limited discovery and focused negotiation may resolve the matter more quickly with less expense. However, even when a case appears straightforward, careful documentation of exposure, treatment, and damages remains essential to achieve fair compensation for medical costs and related losses.

Minor or Well-Documented Injuries

If injuries are relatively minor, short-term, and fully documented with minimal dispute over causation, a streamlined claim process can be appropriate to recover medical bills and related costs without prolonged litigation. A focused effort can expedite resolution for clients who prefer a quicker settlement and who do not face ongoing or severe impairments. Even in these cases, Huntington residents should ensure paperwork is complete and that any settlement fairly addresses foreseeable future needs tied to the injury.

Common Situations Leading to Roundup Claims

Residential or Lawn Use Over Time

Many claims involve homeowners or landscapers who used Roundup repeatedly for years in residential or commercial settings without recognizing potential long-term health consequences. Regular, long-term exposure in close proximity to the product, particularly when protective measures were not used, can be an important element in evaluating whether a claim should be pursued and how exposure may have contributed to a later diagnosis.

Agricultural or Occupational Exposure

Farm workers, landscapers, and other professionals who handled or applied herbicides as part of their jobs often face higher levels of exposure, making work history and employer records relevant to a claim. Employment-related use can create avenues for documenting frequency and duration of exposure, which is important when establishing a timeline from exposure to diagnosis and when assessing potential damages tied to lost income or changes in work capacity.

Use Near Home or Garden Activities

Individuals who used Roundup for gardening, lawn care, or neighborhood upkeep over many years may later develop health concerns that prompt investigation into possible links with herbicide exposure. Gathering product labels, receipts, and photographs of the application area can help reconstruct exposure patterns and support a potential claim in Huntington or surrounding counties.

Huntington Roundup Legal Help

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Roundup Claims

Clients in Huntington and nearby West Virginia communities work with Stephen New & Associates for attentive case evaluation, clear communication, and thorough collection of medical and exposure records. Our approach emphasizes practical guidance on evidence preservation, timelines, and options for coordinated litigation when appropriate. We assist claimants in understanding potential recoveries for medical expenses, lost earnings, and other harms while keeping them informed about developments in mass tort proceedings and settlement discussions that may affect case outcomes.

When evaluating Roundup-related claims, we prioritize listening to each client’s history, documenting product use, and reviewing all relevant medical records to build a complete factual picture. For individuals who live or worked in Cabell County, our familiarity with local courts and procedures helps us navigate filings, deadlines, and communication with medical providers. We provide straightforward explanations of possible next steps so clients can make informed decisions about pursuing a claim or participating in coordinated litigation efforts.

Contact Our Huntington Office to Discuss Your Claim

People Also Search For

Roundup lawyer Huntington WV

glyphosate litigation Cabell County

Roundup mass tort West Virginia

Huntington Roundup claim help

non-Hodgkin lymphoma Roundup link

Roundup settlement West Virginia

glyphosate exposure legal advice

Stephen New & Associates Roundup

FAQS

Who may be eligible to file a Roundup claim?

Eligibility generally depends on whether an individual used or was exposed to Roundup or a glyphosate product and later developed a diagnosis that medical providers consider consistent with alleged exposure-related conditions, commonly non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Documentation such as medical records, treatment summaries, and proof of product use or purchase helps establish a viable claim. Age, occupation, duration and frequency of exposure, and medical history are all factors evaluated when determining eligibility for a mass tort action. A careful intake review will compare the claimant’s medical timeline with exposure history and available research. Even if exposure occurred years earlier, timely medical documentation and a credible exposure narrative can support a claim. For Huntington residents, employment or landscaping records, photographs of products, and detailed personal notes about use can strengthen the case and clarify whether joining coordinated litigation or filing an individual claim is appropriate.

How long do I have to file a Roundup lawsuit in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitations set deadlines for filing lawsuits, and these time limits vary by state and by the nature of the claim. In West Virginia, the timing can depend on when the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered by the claimant, so the clock may start at diagnosis rather than at first exposure. Understanding how these rules apply requires reviewing the specifics of each case to avoid missing critical filing deadlines. Because medical conditions linked to exposure can take years to manifest, prompt consultation with legal counsel is important to preserve rights. Even where the statute of limitations appears to allow more time, early action helps secure documentary evidence, obtain medical records, and collect product information before it becomes harder to locate or reconstruct. Contacting a knowledgeable local firm can clarify the applicable deadlines and necessary next steps.

What types of evidence are needed to support a Roundup claim?

Key evidence typically includes medical records showing diagnosis and treatment, physician notes, pathology reports, and diagnostic imaging that document the condition allegedly linked to glyphosate exposure. Exposure evidence can include product labels, purchase receipts, photographs, application logs, and witness statements about how and when a product was used. Employment or landscaping records can be particularly useful when exposure occurred in a workplace setting. Scientific studies and expert medical opinions are often used to address causation and to connect exposure to diagnosis. While regulatory actions and published research inform the overall matter, courts assess the specific medical and factual record for each claimant. Collecting contemporaneous medical documentation and exposure information early improves the ability to make a persuasive case during negotiations or litigation.

What kinds of compensation might be available in a Roundup case?

Compensation in a Roundup claim may cover past and future medical expenses related to diagnosis and treatment, lost wages for time away from work, reductions in future earning capacity, and compensation for pain, suffering, and diminished quality of life. In wrongful death cases, recoverable damages may also include funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and loss of companionship, depending on state law and family circumstances. Settlement or jury awards vary based on the severity of the injury, the clarity of causation evidence, medical prognosis, and the claimant’s economic losses. Each case is evaluated individually, and a thorough review of medical bills, employment records, and projected future needs helps calculate a fair demand or claim value during negotiations or litigation.

How is a mass tort different from a class action for Roundup claims?

A mass tort consolidates many individual claims that arise from the same product or conduct while preserving each claimant’s right to individualized damages, whereas a class action represents a group under a single recovery structure that generally distributes identical relief to class members. In Roundup matters, mass torts are common because each plaintiff’s medical condition, exposure history, and damages vary, so individualized assessment is important for fair compensation. Mass tort procedures allow coordinated discovery and common legal tasks, increasing efficiency while maintaining separate damage assessments for each plaintiff. This approach can be preferable for claimants whose injuries and medical needs differ and who seek compensation tailored to their circumstances rather than the uniform relief that often accompanies a class action settlement.

Will pursuing a Roundup claim require going to trial?

Not all Roundup claims must go to trial. Many cases resolve through negotiated settlements after discovery and expert analysis, especially when parties prefer to avoid the time and expense of trial. Settlements can offer claimants predictable outcomes and reduce the uncertainty associated with jury decisions, and plaintiffs weigh settlement offers against the projected strength of their case and the costs of continued litigation. However, some claims may proceed to trial if parties cannot agree on a fair resolution or if a claimant seeks a public resolution of liability issues. Trials involve witness testimony, expert analysis, and presentation of medical and scientific evidence. Decisions about whether to proceed to trial are made in consultation with counsel and based on the specifics of each claim and the client’s goals.

How much does it cost to pursue a Roundup claim?

Many firms handle Roundup mass tort claims on a contingency fee basis, meaning the client does not pay attorney fees unless a recovery is obtained. Contingency arrangements allow individuals to pursue claims without upfront legal fees, with the attorney’s fees taken as a percentage of any settlement or award. Additional costs for expert witnesses, medical records, and litigation expenses may be advanced by counsel and repaid from any recovery as agreed in the fee arrangement. Before proceeding, clients should review fee agreements carefully to understand percentages, how costs are handled if there is no recovery, and any other responsibilities. Clear communication about fees, billing practices, and expected timelines helps Huntington residents assess whether pursuing a claim aligns with their needs and financial circumstances.

Can family members pursue a claim for a loved one who died?

Family members or representatives may be able to pursue claims if a loved one has died from an illness alleged to be linked to exposure, depending on the cause of death and applicable state wrongful death statutes. These claims can seek compensation for funeral expenses, lost financial support, and non-economic losses such as loss of companionship, with specific recoverable damages determined under West Virginia law and the deceased’s circumstances. Pursuing a wrongful death claim usually requires gathering the decedent’s medical records, employment history, and proof of exposure to the product. Timely consultation is important to preserve evidence and meet filing deadlines. An intake review can determine who has standing to bring a claim and what damages may be available for surviving family members in Huntington and surrounding counties.

What should I do right now if I think I have a Roundup-related illness?

If you suspect a Roundup-related illness, seek medical attention promptly and follow your healthcare provider’s recommendations, ensuring that test results, diagnoses, and treatment plans are documented in your medical record. Maintaining complete and organized medical records, including physician notes and pathology reports, creates the necessary documentation for both treatment and any potential claim. Also preserve product labels, photos, receipts, and any notes about exposure, including dates and application methods. After addressing medical needs, consider contacting a local law firm to discuss whether your situation merits further legal action. Early legal consultation can clarify applicable deadlines, help obtain and organize evidence, and guide decisions about participating in coordinated litigation or pursuing an individual claim. Acting sooner rather than later improves the ability to gather records and corroborating evidence.

How long does it take to resolve a Roundup claim?

The time to resolve a Roundup claim varies widely depending on the complexity of medical issues, the volume of required discovery, and whether the matter settles or proceeds to trial. Some cases reach resolution in months through negotiated settlements, while others involving extensive expert analysis or trial preparation can take several years. Factors such as the number of defendants, the need for specialized medical review, and court schedules also influence timeline. Clients should expect periodic updates about progress and possible milestones such as completion of discovery, mediation, or depositions. Working with counsel to gather medical records, preserve evidence, and participate in needed evaluations can help move a claim forward efficiently. Individual circumstances and desired outcomes ultimately shape how long the process will take in Huntington and across West Virginia.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services