Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

PFAS Lawyer in Huntington

Holding Polluters Accountable

PFAS Litigation and Claim Guidance

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS, are a group of persistent chemicals linked to contamination of water supplies and long-term health concerns. Residents of Huntington and surrounding areas may face exposure from industrial sites, firefighting foam, or contaminated runoff. If you believe you were exposed to PFAS and have experienced health problems or property damage, pursuing a mass tort or related claim can help address the harm. Stephen New & Associates serves clients across West Virginia and can explain legal options, timelines, and potential recovery. Contact the firm at 304-355-5565 to discuss how PFAS claims are handled and what steps to take next.

PFAS contamination cases often involve many affected people and complex scientific evidence about chemical concentrations and health outcomes. These matters can include claims against manufacturers, suppliers, municipal systems, or entities that used PFAS-containing products. A successful claim generally depends on documenting exposure, demonstrating harm, and connecting contamination to responsible parties. In Huntington, local environmental testing and medical records are frequently important pieces of evidence. The process can include negotiations, settlement discussions, or court proceedings, and understanding how to preserve records and evidence early is a significant part of protecting your rights and seeking fair compensation.

Why Pursue PFAS Claims

Pursuing a PFAS claim can bring several benefits to individuals and communities affected by contamination. Legal actions can lead to compensation for medical care, monitoring costs, property devaluation, and other economic losses, while also pushing responsible parties to remediate pollution sources and prevent further exposure. Collective actions in mass tort contexts can increase leverage in settlement talks and streamline claims for many people exposed by the same source. Additionally, bringing claims can assist in generating testing and cleanup resources for affected areas and support broader public accountability that may reduce future environmental harm in Huntington and the surrounding regions.

About Stephen New & Associates in West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving Huntington, Beckley, and communities across West Virginia, offering representation in mass tort and other injury claims. The firm focuses on helping clients navigate complex environmental and medical issues, working to gather critical evidence such as medical records, water testing results, and historical use data. The team is committed to clear communication about case options, likely timelines, and potential outcomes, and can be reached at 304-355-5565 to arrange a case review. Clients are encouraged to preserve records and note exposure details to support any potential PFAS claim.

Understanding PFAS Mass Tort Claims

PFAS mass tort claims are designed to address situations where a large number of people have been exposed to the same harmful substance and seek compensation for injuries or losses. These claims require a demonstration of exposure pathways, such as contaminated drinking water, and evidence of injuries or increased risk of disease tied to PFAS chemicals. Mass tort procedures allow individual claimants to pursue recovery while benefiting from coordinated discovery and litigation tools that handle complex scientific information. In many cases, plaintiffs in Huntington and elsewhere rely on environmental testing, medical documentation, and expert analysis to support their assertions that PFAS caused or contributed to their harms.

Key elements of a PFAS claim commonly include identifying the source of contamination, measuring chemical levels, linking those levels to human exposure, and connecting that exposure to specific health outcomes or property impacts. Timely action is important because evidence can deteriorate and statutes of limitation may apply. Gathering comprehensive medical records, water testing results, and witness accounts helps build a claim. Plaintiffs may pursue claims through coordinated mass tort efforts, individual lawsuits, or settlement programs depending on how cases develop and how responsible parties respond to allegations of contamination.

Need More Information?

PFAS Claims Glossary

PFAS

PFAS refers to a large family of man-made chemicals used in industrial processes and consumer products for their resistance to heat, water, and grease. These substances are persistent in the environment, do not break down easily, and can accumulate in soil, water, and living organisms. Over time, PFAS contamination has been detected in drinking water systems, groundwater, and areas near industrial facilities or sites where firefighting foam was used. Health agencies have linked certain PFAS compounds to adverse effects, and these chemicals are the focus of growing regulatory and legal attention because of their environmental persistence and potential human health impacts.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a type of civil action where many individuals file separate claims against one or more common defendants for similar injuries caused by the same product, substance, or event. Unlike a class action, mass tort plaintiffs typically retain individual claims that are managed together for purposes of discovery, pretrial procedures, and sometimes settlement. Mass torts are common in environmental contamination cases because they allow each claimant to present their unique medical history and damages while benefiting from coordinated litigation strategies that address widespread issues of causation and liability across many affected parties.

Class Action

A class action consolidates many similarly situated individuals into a single lawsuit when common legal and factual issues predominate for the group, and it can provide an efficient way to resolve shared claims. In environmental contexts, class actions may be used when the injuries and claims of the group are sufficiently similar and representative plaintiffs can adequately protect the interests of the class. However, class actions can limit individual control over settlement terms and awards, while other approaches like mass torts preserve individual claims and compensation determinations, which may be preferable when injuries and financial losses vary widely among affected people.

Exposure Pathways

Exposure pathways describe how people come into contact with PFAS compounds, including ingestion of contaminated drinking water, consumption of locally grown food, inhalation of dust or airborne particles near contamination sites, and dermal contact during recreational activities or occupational tasks. Determining the specific pathway is important to demonstrating a link between contamination and an individual’s health outcomes. Investigations often include water sampling, soil testing, and lifestyle or occupational histories to identify likely routes of exposure and to support claims that a particular source contributed to measurable human contact with PFAS chemicals.

PRO TIPS

Document Your Water Use

Keep a detailed record of how you used water at your home and workplace, noting dates, frequency, and any unusual tastes or odors that you observed, as these notes can help establish exposure timelines. Photograph water sources, utility bills, and any advisories issued by local authorities, and save correspondence or notices related to water quality. These records provide context for claims and can be critical when coordinating environmental testing, medical evaluation, and legal timelines for PFAS-related matters.

Preserve Medical Records

Request and retain complete medical records, test results, and treatment summaries from all providers who evaluated conditions you believe are related to PFAS exposure, including primary care, specialists, and diagnostic laboratories. Maintain copies of billing statements and insurance communications that reflect diagnoses, monitoring, or treatment linked to potential PFAS-related health issues. Thorough medical documentation is a cornerstone of environmental injury claims and helps connect exposure to observable health outcomes for purposes of filing a mass tort or individual lawsuit.

Save Environmental Evidence

Collect and preserve any environmental testing results, neighbor reports, municipal notices, or media stories suggesting contamination in your area, and make records of dates, locations, and sources for each item. If possible, obtain professional water or soil testing and retain original reports and chain-of-custody documentation, as credible testing is often central to PFAS claims. These materials help establish the presence, concentration, and persistence of PFAS chemicals in Huntington communities and support coordinated legal strategies when multiple parties are affected.

Comparing Legal Paths for PFAS Claims

When Full Representation Is Advisable:

Widespread Contamination

In cases where contamination extends across public water systems, neighborhoods, or multiple properties, full representation helps coordinate discovery, testing, and communications among many plaintiffs, which can strengthen claims and improve resource allocation. A coordinated approach enables efficient management of scientific experts, environmental testing, and legal motions that address common liability issues and defenses. For communities in Huntington affected by large-scale PFAS releases, consolidated legal efforts can produce more comprehensive remedies and facilitate negotiation with responsible parties and regulators on cleanup and compensation matters.

Complex Scientific Evidence

PFAS litigation often hinges on interpretation of technical data such as contaminant concentrations, exposure modeling, and epidemiological studies, so cases with intricate scientific questions benefit from sustained legal representation that can coordinate testing and expert analysis. Managing technical discovery, depositions of corporate or municipal witnesses, and admissibility challenges requires ongoing attention and resources that are typically available through full representation. When scientific complexity threatens to delay or derail claims, having a consistent legal team can ensure that evidence is developed effectively and presented clearly to courts, agencies, or settlement negotiators.

When a Narrow Approach May Suffice:

Clear Liability and Low Damages

When responsibility for contamination is clear, the affected area is small, and individual damages are limited and well documented, a more focused or limited legal approach may resolve matters efficiently without full scale litigation. In such cases, targeted demand letters, local agency complaints, or negotiation with property owners or small entities may secure remediation or compensation with less expense and delay. However, even limited claims should be backed by adequate testing and documentation to ensure that any settlement or remedy fairly addresses the nature of the contamination and the claimant’s losses.

Short Statute of Limitations

If time is short under the applicable statute of limitations, taking immediate, targeted legal steps to preserve claims and file necessary paperwork can be more important than pursuing broad discovery or lengthy coordination efforts. A limited approach focused on meeting filing deadlines and preserving evidence can protect legal rights while planning longer term strategies. It remains important to document exposure and health impacts even when the initial response is narrow, because later phases of a claim may require more extensive proof and coordination with other affected individuals or entities.

Common PFAS Exposure Situations

Contaminated Drinking Water

Contaminated drinking water is one of the most frequent sources of PFAS exposure, affecting homes, businesses, and public systems when industrial discharges, firefighting foam use, or landfill leachate reaches groundwater or distribution lines; documenting water quality results, consumption habits, and notification history helps establish how and when exposure occurred. Residents experiencing changes in water smell or taste should retain testing reports, utility notices, and medical information to build a comprehensive record for claims related to drinking water contamination.

Industrial Site Runoff

Runoff from industrial sites and manufacturing facilities can introduce PFAS into nearby soil and waterways, impacting neighbors, agricultural operations, and local ecosystems when chemicals migrate offsite over time and concentrate in sediments or surface water; mapping historical operations and obtaining environmental sampling are essential to link contamination to responsible parties. In these scenarios, securing site records, discharge permits, and community complaints can provide context for exposure and support claims seeking remediation and compensation for affected residents and landowners.

Firefighting Foam Use

Aqueous film forming foams used for firefighting and training have been a notable source of PFAS contamination at airports, military bases, and training facilities, where release onto grounds and subsequent runoff can reach groundwater and drinking wells; tracking historical foam use, training schedules, and maintenance records helps document likely contamination events. Collecting testimony from local officials, property owners, and workers, alongside environmental test results, strengthens claims that link foam use to community exposures and potential health risks.

Huntington PFAS Attorney Services

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for PFAS Claims

Stephen New & Associates represents individuals and families in Huntington and across West Virginia on matters involving PFAS contamination and mass tort claims. The firm emphasizes careful investigation of exposure pathways, coordination of environmental testing, and thorough collection of medical documentation and records to support claims. Clients receive clear explanations of legal options, possible timelines, and the steps needed to preserve evidence, and the office can be reached at 304-355-5565 to discuss case specifics. The firm also assists with communication with regulatory agencies and other parties involved in cleanup efforts.

Beyond PFAS matters, Stephen New & Associates handles a range of personal injury and mass tort matters, including catastrophic injuries, medical malpractice, and product liability, providing a breadth of litigation experience that supports complex toxic tort cases. The firm serves communities such as Huntington and Beckley while maintaining close attention to local conditions and available remedies. Clients benefit from a focus on practical case development, regular updates, and assistance evaluating settlement offers against the long term needs for medical monitoring and remediation in affected areas.

Request a Case Review Now

People Also Search For

PFAS litigation Huntington

PFAS lawyer Huntington WV

PFAS contamination claims West Virginia

mass tort PFAS Huntington

PFAS water contamination lawsuit

toxic chemical exposure claims

perfluoroalkyl substance claims

Huntington mass tort attorney

FAQS

What are PFAS and why do they matter for Huntington residents?

PFAS are a broad group of synthetic chemicals used for their resistance to heat, oil, stains, and water, appearing in products such as nonstick coatings, stain-resistant fabrics, and firefighting foam. These compounds are persistent in the environment and can migrate into soil and water supplies, making them a concern for communities that rely on local wells or public water systems. For Huntington residents, PFAS matter because local contamination can affect drinking water, recreation areas, and property, raising concerns about health monitoring, cleanup, and compensation for losses. Identifying the presence of PFAS in a community typically involves environmental testing of water, soil, and sometimes indoor dust, combined with historical review of nearby industrial activities, foam use, and disposal practices. Public notices, municipal testing reports, and sampling by independent laboratories provide key data points. Residents who learn of elevated PFAS levels should preserve records, obtain medical evaluations if needed, and consider legal review to determine whether a mass tort or other claim is warranted based on the scope of contamination and documented impacts.

How can I tell if I was exposed to PFAS?

Determining PFAS exposure generally requires a combination of environmental testing and personal history of contact with contaminated sources. Testing of drinking water, private wells, and nearby surface water can identify concentrations of PFAS chemicals, while documentation such as utility notices, local advisories, or testing results from public agencies can help show that contamination reached areas where people live or work. Personal habits, such as reliance on well water for cooking and drinking, use of certain consumer products, or work history near industrial sites, also inform exposure assessments. Medical testing for PFAS is available in some contexts, but linking particular health conditions directly to PFAS exposure typically requires detailed medical records, timelines of symptoms, and sometimes epidemiological or clinical studies showing an association. Consulting with healthcare providers about symptoms and obtaining thorough medical documentation are important steps. If testing shows contamination in your water supply or property, preserving records and contacting legal counsel can help protect your right to pursue remediation or compensation if appropriate.

What types of harms or illnesses are linked to PFAS exposure?

Research has associated certain PFAS compounds with a range of potential health outcomes, depending on levels and duration of exposure, though the scientific picture continues to evolve. Reported concerns include effects on cholesterol levels, changes in liver enzymes, impacts on immune response, and associations with certain pregnancy-related issues; some studies have suggested links with particular cancers or thyroid problems under certain exposure conditions. Health outcomes vary by compound, exposure level, and individual susceptibility, so medical evaluation and monitoring are often recommended when contamination is suspected. Because PFAS-related health effects may develop over time and can be influenced by multiple factors, legal claims typically rely on careful documentation of medical histories, clinician notes, diagnostic tests, and expert interpretation of how exposure plausibly relates to observed conditions. Ongoing medical monitoring may be part of a claim for compensation, as well as coverage for testing and treatment costs when a connection between exposure and health effects is supported by available data and medical records.

What evidence is needed to support a PFAS claim?

Supporting a PFAS claim usually involves assembling environmental and medical evidence that together show contamination, exposure, and harm. Environmental evidence can include water and soil sampling results, municipal testing reports, records of industrial discharges or foam use, and documentation of any cleanup or remediation activities. Chain-of-custody records for samples, laboratory reports, and contemporaneous notices or advisories strengthen the reliability of environmental data used in claims. Medical documentation is equally important and typically includes primary care and specialist records, diagnostic tests, treatment histories, and billing information that reflect the health impacts being attributed to PFAS exposure. Statements from affected individuals about symptoms and exposure history also play a role, and in many cases technical or medical consultants assist in interpreting how environmental data and clinical findings align to support allegations of injury or risk in litigation or settlement discussions.

How does a mass tort differ from a class action in PFAS cases?

A class action groups many claimants into a single representative lawsuit when their legal and factual claims are sufficiently similar, whereas a mass tort coordinates many individual lawsuits that remain separate claims for each plaintiff. In PFAS contexts, class actions may be appropriate when injuries and damages are largely uniform across a group, but mass torts are often chosen when individual plaintiffs have varying degrees of injury or distinct economic losses that require individualized evaluation and compensation determinations. Mass tort procedures allow plaintiffs to share discovery, expert resources, and pretrial management while preserving the ability to pursue individual trials or negotiated settlements tailored to each claimant’s circumstances. The choice between a class action and mass tort depends on the nature of the harms, the goals of the plaintiffs, and strategic considerations about how best to achieve remediation and compensation in complex environmental contamination cases.

What steps should I take right away if I suspect PFAS contamination?

If you suspect PFAS contamination, begin by preserving evidence and documenting your observations, including dates you noticed issues, any communications from local authorities, and photographs of possible contamination sources. Arrange for water testing through certified labs if possible, and keep all test results, bills, and correspondence related to testing, reminders, or notices about water quality. Early documentation helps preserve critical facts and supports later evaluation of potential claims. Simultaneously, seek medical evaluation if you have symptoms that concern you, and request copies of all relevant medical records and test results. Contact legal counsel to discuss the results and explore next steps, especially if testing shows elevated PFAS levels or if a local investigation indicates a wider contamination problem. Legal review can identify deadlines, advise on preserving further evidence, and help coordinate testing or claims with other affected residents.

How long do I have to file a PFAS-related claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitation set time limits for filing legal claims and can vary by the specific cause of action and the jurisdiction, so it is important to act promptly when contamination or injury is suspected. In West Virginia, the applicable deadlines depend on factors such as the type of claim, when the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, and whether tolling or other legal doctrines apply. Determining exact timelines requires review of the facts, including when contamination was first known to the claimant or public authorities. Because calculation of filing deadlines can be complex in environmental cases that involve latent injuries or long-term exposure, consulting an attorney early helps ensure preservation of legal rights and timely filing. Taking steps to document exposure, secure records, and discuss next steps with counsel can prevent inadvertent loss of claims while allowing time to develop the scientific and medical evidence needed to pursue compensation.

Will I have to go to court for a PFAS claim?

Many PFAS claims resolve through settlement negotiations, which can occur before trial or during coordinated mass tort proceedings, but some matters proceed to court when parties cannot reach agreement on liability, causation, or damages. Whether a particular claim requires going to trial depends on the strength of the evidence, the positions of the defendants, and the willingness of parties to negotiate, and plaintiffs should be prepared for both negotiated resolutions and litigation. Courts and mediators often encourage settlement where broader remediation and compensation can be achieved without protracted trials. Even when cases settle, careful negotiation is necessary to ensure that settlements cover medical monitoring, cleanup, property impacts, and any anticipated future costs related to exposure. Plaintiffs should seek clear terms about the scope of releases, the handling of future claims, and how compensation will be allocated, and legal counsel can help evaluate offers and represent interests in mediation or court proceedings as needed.

Can property owners seek compensation for decreased property value?

Property owners affected by PFAS contamination may have claims for diminished property values if contamination reduces marketability or imposes costs for remediation and testing, and proof typically requires documentation of contamination, testing results, and expert opinion on how contamination affects property value. Real estate appraisals, sales records, and comparative market analyses can help quantify diminution, while correspondence or notices from authorities can support assertions that contamination has created stigma or required corrective action that impacts value. Claims for property devaluation can be pursued alongside claims for personal injury or medical monitoring, and plaintiffs should document repair costs, testing expenses, and efforts to disclose or manage contamination in selling property. Negotiations or litigation may resolve these claims through compensation for reduced value, cleanup costs, or other remedies depending on the evidence and the defendants’ willingness to address property-related harms.

How can Stephen New & Associates help with my PFAS case?

Stephen New & Associates assists clients with PFAS matters by reviewing environmental and medical documentation, advising on claim options, and coordinating necessary testing and records collection to build a case. The firm provides guidance on timelines, preserves evidence, communicates with regulatory agencies when appropriate, and represents clients in negotiations or formal litigation as needed. For Huntington residents, the firm combines local knowledge with focused case development to pursue remedies that address both personal harms and broader contamination impacts. The firm can help prioritize actions such as obtaining water tests, gathering medical records, and identifying potentially responsible parties, and it will explain the possible outcomes of pursuing a mass tort or individual claim. To begin a review, contact Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565 to schedule a consultation and discuss the specific facts of your situation, including any testing results or medical information you have already obtained.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services