Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Produced Water Handling Lawyer in Parkersburg

Safety, Liability, Compensation

A Practical Guide to TENORM and Produced Water Handling

Handling produced water that contains technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, or TENORM, raises a range of legal, environmental, and health concerns for individuals, landowners, and businesses in and around Parkersburg, West Virginia. Whether produced water was used for irrigation, stored on a property, spilled during transportation, or disposed of improperly, affected people may face long-term contamination and complex claims. This guide explains how produced water and TENORM can affect private property and personal injury matters, outlines common legal options for seeking compensation, and describes what to look for when evaluating potential claims arising from exposure or property contamination.

Residents, workers, and landowners often do not realize how produced water handling practices can create liability and leave lasting contamination on soil, groundwater, or structures. Claims involving TENORM may implicate multiple parties, including drilling operators, waste transporters, and facility operators, and can involve complicated timelines and technical reports. This introduction provides an overview of the types of incidents that typically lead to claims, the kinds of damages that may be recoverable, and the practical steps people should consider to document harm and protect their legal rights while environmental testing and regulatory reviews proceed.

Why Addressing TENORM and Produced Water Matters

Addressing produced water and TENORM contamination promptly can limit further harm to property, reduce potential health risks, and preserve the ability to seek compensation for losses. Early investigation and clear documentation of contamination pathways, exposure history, and property impacts may strengthen claims and support remediation demands. In addition to monetary recovery for cleanup and property damage, pursuing legal action can compel responsible parties to remediate contamination, implement safer handling practices, and provide replacement housing or business interruption relief where necessary. Taking timely action can also help avoid evidence loss and ensure testing results are reliable for legal use.

About Stephen New & Associates in West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates serves clients across West Virginia, including Parkersburg and Wood County, handling complex personal injury and environmental claims involving produced water and TENORM. The firm represents individuals, families, and property owners affected by contamination, working to document damages, coordinate environmental testing, and pursue compensation through negotiation or litigation when needed. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical case planning, and coordination with environmental professionals to translate technical findings into legal claims. Clients receive help understanding potential claims, timelines, and realistic outcomes at each stage of the process.

Understanding Claims Related to Produced Water and TENORM

Claims arising from produced water handling and TENORM typically begin with an incident such as a spill, improper disposal, or prolonged onsite storage that leads to contamination of soil, surface water, or groundwater. Affected parties may experience property devaluation, agricultural losses, medical monitoring needs, or personal injury symptoms depending on exposure. Establishing liability often requires tracing contamination sources, identifying responsible entities, and working with environmental consultants to produce reliable sampling and reporting. Timely legal intervention helps ensure sampling preserves evidence and that notices or claims are submitted within applicable deadlines.

Legal remedies can include seeking compensation for cleanup costs, diminution in property value, relocation expenses, medical monitoring, and other economic losses as well as non-economic damages in appropriate cases. Some claims may be resolved through settlement discussions with operators or insurers, while others require filing suit and presenting technical evidence in court. Regulatory enforcement actions and administrative cleanup programs may also run in parallel and affect legal strategy. An early, coordinated plan that balances environmental testing, regulatory reporting, and legal claims tends to produce the most useful outcomes for affected individuals.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Definitions for Produced Water and TENORM

TENORM Defined

TENORM, or technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, refers to materials that contain naturally occurring radionuclides concentrated or exposed through industrial activities like oil and gas production. When produced water or other waste streams concentrate naturally occurring radioactive elements, those materials present different handling, disposal, and regulatory considerations than ordinary waste. Understanding what constitutes TENORM is important for identifying appropriate testing methods, containment procedures, and legal responsibilities of operators or waste handlers when contamination occurs on private property or public land.

Produced Water Explained

Produced water is the fluid brought to the surface during oil and gas extraction and can contain a mix of salts, organic compounds, and naturally occurring radioactive materials depending on the formation. Because produced water composition varies by site, testing is necessary to determine whether it contains harmful constituents or radionuclide concentrations that require special handling. Produced water spills or improper disposal can lead to contamination of soil and groundwater, which can cause property damage and potential health concerns that may give rise to legal claims against responsible parties.

Remediation and Cleanup

Remediation refers to the process of assessing contamination and taking the necessary steps to clean or contain pollutants to protect human health and the environment. Cleanup can include soil removal, groundwater treatment, in-place containment, or engineering controls depending on the contaminant and site conditions. Legal claims may seek reimbursement for remediation costs and oversight to ensure cleanup meets regulatory standards and restores property usability where possible.

Chain of Custody and Sampling

Chain of custody describes the documented process that tracks environmental samples from collection through laboratory analysis to ensure data integrity and admissibility in legal proceedings. Proper sampling protocol and chain of custody are essential when produced water or TENORM contamination is disputed because unreliable sampling can undermine claims. When contamination is suspected, timely, documented sampling by qualified labs helps establish exposure levels and supports legal and regulatory actions.

PRO TIPS

Document and Photograph the Scene

When you suspect a produced water spill or improper handling of wastes containing TENORM, take time-stamped photographs and thorough notes describing visible contamination, odors, and any health symptoms experienced by residents or animals. Preserve any records of communications with operators, transporters, or regulators and keep copies of notices, invoices, and property reports to support later claims. Detailed documentation collected early strengthens the factual record and helps environmental professionals and legal counsel assess next steps for testing and possible remediation.

Secure Professional Sampling Quickly

Promptly arranging for environmental sampling by a reputable laboratory or qualified sampling team helps capture representative conditions before evidence is disturbed or diluted. Ensure samples are collected with a documented chain of custody and follow recognized protocols for radionuclide and water quality testing to ensure results are legally defensible. Early, reliable testing results can clarify the scope of contamination, inform emergency response measures, and guide decisions about whether to pursue cleanup cost recovery or other claims against responsible parties.

Preserve Records and Avoid Wasting Evidence

Keep records of any health care visits, veterinary care, property damage estimates, or business interruptions that might be connected to produced water handling or contamination events. Avoid altering areas affected by suspected contamination before professionals can assess them, unless doing so is necessary for immediate safety or regulatory compliance; documenting any required actions is important. Maintaining careful records and preserving evidence enables a clearer evaluation of potential damages and supports claims for remediation, compensation, or other legal remedies.

Comparing Legal Approaches for TENORM and Produced Water Claims

When a Broad Legal Response Is Appropriate:

Widespread or Long-Term Contamination

A broad legal response is often necessary when contamination affects multiple properties, groundwater systems, or public resources and requires coordinated cleanup across a wide area. In such cases, claims may involve multiple defendants, complex causation questions, and long-term monitoring obligations that require a structured legal strategy and coordination with environmental professionals. Seeking comprehensive remedies can address cleanup costs, property devaluation, and ongoing monitoring to protect public health and restore affected land.

Multiple Responsible Parties and Complex Liability

When several companies or contractors may share responsibility for produced water handling, apportioning liability and tracing contamination pathways can become legally complex and fact-intensive. Cases with multiple responsible parties may require discovery into operational records, waste handling practices, and contractual relationships to determine who should pay for cleanup and damages. A comprehensive approach helps assemble the necessary technical and documentary evidence to pursue claims against the appropriate parties and to negotiate coordinated remediation efforts.

When a Narrow Legal Response May Be Enough:

Isolated Incidents with Clear Responsibility

A limited legal response may suffice when a single documented spill or mishandling event clearly identifies the responsible party and the contamination is localized. In such situations, targeted claims for cleanup costs, property damage, and related expenses can often be resolved through settlement discussions or administrative claims with the party or its insurer. Focusing on discrete damages and a narrow scope of remediation can reduce legal costs and speed resolution for affected property owners.

Straightforward Damage and Remediation Paths

A limited strategy can also be appropriate where remediation options are straightforward, such as removal of contaminated soil and replacement with clean fill, and where testing shows no ongoing groundwater impact. When the pathway to restoring property is clear, parties may agree to specific remediation steps and cost sharing without protracted litigation. This approach focuses on practical cleanup and compensation while avoiding the expense and delay of broader actions.

Common Situations That Lead to Produced Water and TENORM Claims

Spills During Transport or Storage

Spills from transport tanks, pipelines, or temporary storage pits can release produced water and concentrated radionuclides onto private land or waterways, creating immediate contamination concerns that require testing and cleanup coordination. These incidents often generate records such as incident reports and transport manifests that are useful in tracing responsibility and seeking remediation or compensation.

Improper Disposal or Land Application

When produced water is disposed of improperly, used for land application, or otherwise handled outside regulatory limits, soil and crops can become contaminated and property values may decline, triggering claims for cleanup and economic losses. Evidence of disposal practices, permits, and communications with operators can be central to proving liability.

Long-Term Storage and Facility Releases

Surface impoundments, tanks, or poorly maintained storage facilities can leak or overflow over time, causing diffuse contamination that may be harder to detect without systematic testing and monitoring. Long-term releases often require coordinated remediation and monitoring plans, and affected parties may need legal help to secure appropriate cleanup and long-term protections.

Parkersburg TENORM and Produced Water Claims — Local Representation

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM Matters

Stephen New & Associates understands the local regulatory framework and the practical realities of oil and gas operations in West Virginia, including Wood County and the Parkersburg area. We assist clients in documenting contamination, coordinating environmental testing, and communicating with regulators and responsible parties to seek remediation and compensation. The firm helps clients assemble the factual record, evaluate potential claims, and pursue the most appropriate legal or administrative path to address contamination and its financial and health impacts.

Clients receive direct guidance about potential remedies, timelines, and realistic outcomes at each step, including options for settlement, administrative claims, or litigation when necessary. We work to protect clients’ interests while managing the procedural and technical aspects of these cases, ensuring that environmental reports, sampling results, and damage estimates are used effectively when negotiating with insurers or presenting claims in court. Our goal is practical resolution that prioritizes health, property remediation, and fair compensation.

Contact Our Parkersburg Office to Discuss Your Situation

People Also Search For

TENORM produced water Parkersburg

produced water contamination West Virginia

TENORM legal claims Wood County

produced water spill lawyer Parkersburg

environmental contamination compensation WV

radionuclide contamination produced water

cleanup cost recovery TENORM

Parkersburg produced water handling claims

FAQS

What is TENORM and why does it matter for produced water?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material and refers to naturally occurring radionuclides concentrated by industrial activities, including those associated with oil and gas production. In the context of produced water, TENORM can become concentrated in sludge, scale, or fluid waste streams that are stored, transported, or disposed of improperly. Recognizing whether a material is TENORM requires laboratory testing for specific radionuclides, and understanding those results helps determine handling, disposal, and remediation obligations under applicable regulations. Because TENORM may pose environmental and health concerns depending on concentration and exposure pathways, identifying it in produced water incidents is important for deciding cleanup methods, protective measures, and potential legal claims. Testing results that confirm elevated radionuclide levels can support claims for remediation costs, property damage, and monitoring, and they can guide regulators and responsible parties in implementing appropriate containment and cleanup plans to reduce future risks to residents and the environment.

How can I tell if produced water contaminated my property?

Signs that produced water may have contaminated property include visible staining or oily residues on soil or water, unusual odors, unexplained vegetation die-off, and reports of nearby spills or transport accidents. Observed changes to private wells, such as altered taste, color, or sudden increases in certain contaminants, can also indicate potential groundwater impact. However, many constituents associated with produced water are not visible or detectable without laboratory testing, so visual signs alone are not definitive. To confirm contamination, arrange for prompt environmental sampling that follows established protocols and chain of custody procedures so that results are admissible in legal or regulatory proceedings. Document observations with dated photographs and written notes, and collect records of communications with operators, transporters, or local authorities. Combining timely sampling results with thorough documentation helps determine the presence, extent, and likely source of contamination and informs the choice of legal and remediation steps.

Who can be held responsible for produced water contamination?

Liability for produced water contamination may fall on a range of parties depending on the circumstances, including operators who generated the waste, contractors or haulers who transported it, disposal facilities that accepted it, and site managers who stored or maintained containment systems. Contractual relationships, permits, and operational records often help identify which entities had responsibility for handling, storage, or disposal at the relevant time. In many cases, insurers of those entities may also play a key role when pursuing compensation for cleanup and damages. Determining who can be held responsible typically requires investigation into records, incident reports, and operational practices. Environmental testing that traces contaminants to specific sources, along with witness statements and documentation like manifests or inspection reports, helps support claims against the appropriate parties. A coordinated approach that combines legal inquiry with technical assessment is often necessary to allocate responsibility and pursue remediation or compensation.

What steps should I take immediately after suspecting a produced water spill?

If you suspect a produced water spill, prioritize health and safety by moving away from the area if you detect strong odors or acute symptoms and by keeping children and animals away from the potential contamination. Notify local authorities and, if appropriate, the operator or transporter involved in the incident so that immediate containment measures can be considered. Taking time-stamped photographs and written notes about what you observe, including the location, extent, and any identifiable vehicles or containers, preserves important evidence for later evaluation. After securing safety and documenting the scene, arrange for prompt environmental testing using a laboratory familiar with radionuclide and produced water analyses and insist on proper chain of custody for samples. Keep all records of communications, medical visits, and property impacts, and consider consulting with legal counsel to understand reporting obligations, potential claims, and strategies to pursue remediation and compensation while preserving your rights.

What types of compensation can I seek for produced water contamination?

Compensation for produced water contamination can include reimbursement for cleanup and remediation costs, loss of property value, expenses related to temporary relocation or business interruption, agricultural losses, and medical monitoring when exposure risks exist. Where people suffer physical injury, medical expenses, lost wages, and non-economic damages may also be available depending on the facts and applicable law. Recovering these damages often depends on credible environmental testing, documentation of economic losses, and proof of causal connection to the contamination source. Other recoverable items can include costs of long-term monitoring and engineering controls required to protect health and property, as well as attorney fees and litigation costs in some circumstances. Settlement negotiations with responsible parties or their insurers commonly address remedial actions and monetary compensation, while complex or large-scale contamination may require litigation to secure appropriate cleanup and long-term protections for affected communities and properties.

How long do I have to file a claim related to TENORM exposure or contamination?

Time limits for bringing claims related to TENORM exposure or produced water contamination vary by claim type and jurisdiction, and they often depend on when the harm was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. Some environmental claims may be subject to statutes of limitation or repose that begin to run at different times, so determining the applicable deadline requires examining the specific legal theories being asserted and the timing of discovery. Prompt consultation and documentation help preserve legal options and avoid forfeiture of claims due to missed deadlines. Because procedural deadlines and discovery rules can be complex, affected parties should seek guidance to determine the applicable filing periods for cleanup cost recovery, property damage, personal injury, or other claims. Early action also helps secure necessary evidence, such as timely sampling results and eyewitness reports, which can become harder to obtain as time passes. Initiating a careful review soon after discovering contamination will maximize the ability to pursue all available remedies.

Will testing always show TENORM contamination if present?

Testing is the definitive way to determine whether TENORM contamination is present, but results depend on sampling location, timing, and the analytical methods used. Some contaminants can migrate or dilute over time, and improper sampling techniques or lapses in chain of custody can produce unreliable results. Therefore, representative sampling plans designed by knowledgeable environmental analysts and conducted with documented chain of custody are essential to detect TENORM when it is present and to provide defensible data for legal or regulatory use. If initial tests are inconclusive, additional targeted sampling and long-term monitoring may be required to capture intermittent releases or to evaluate subsurface migration. Multiple lines of evidence, including historical records, operational logs, and environmental testing, often combine to provide a clearer picture of contamination. Ensuring that testing follows recognized protocols increases the likelihood that results accurately reflect site conditions and supports legal claims or cleanup planning.

Can regulatory agencies help with cleanup of produced water contamination?

Regulatory agencies can play important roles in responding to produced water contamination by conducting inspections, ordering emergency containment, and overseeing cleanup actions when public health or the environment is at risk. Agencies may also require operators to submit remediation plans, perform corrective actions, and provide reporting on monitoring results. While agency involvement can accelerate cleanup in some cases, regulatory processes do not always result in full compensation for property damage or non-economic losses, which is why private legal claims may still be necessary for affected individuals to recover the full scope of their damages. Working with counsel helps ensure that regulatory complaints and communications complement private claims, and that evidence collected for administrative matters is preserved for civil proceedings when appropriate. Timely reporting to agencies can prompt inspections and remediation orders, but private legal action can pursue broader remedies such as compensation for diminished property value, relocation costs, or long-term monitoring expenses that regulatory responses may not address fully.

How does produced water contamination affect property value and use?

Produced water contamination can reduce property values, limit the use of land for agriculture or residential purposes, and create ongoing costs for remediation, monitoring, or engineering controls. Properties with confirmed radionuclide contamination or ongoing groundwater impacts may be subject to restrictions that affect saleability and financing, and disclosure obligations can further influence market interest. Documenting the scope of contamination, remediation steps taken, and future monitoring plans helps potential buyers and lenders evaluate risk, but legal remedies are often needed to recover the loss in market value and related expenses. When contamination affects a property’s usability, owners may incur expenses for temporary relocation, repair, or replacement of affected structures and systems such as wells. Claims for diminution in value and out-of-pocket costs are common in produced water cases, and securing timely cleanup and long-term monitoring can mitigate ongoing losses. Legal action can help ensure responsible parties pay for necessary remediation and compensate owners for the financial impacts on their property and livelihood.

How do you coordinate environmental testing with legal action?

Coordinating environmental testing with legal action requires early communication between affected parties, environmental professionals, and counsel to ensure sampling is timely, documented, and defensible for later use in claims. Legal counsel can advise on appropriate sampling strategies, chain of custody requirements, and the scope of analyses needed to detect relevant radionuclides and constituents associated with produced water. Establishing this coordination from the outset prevents common pitfalls such as improperly collected samples or loss of evidence that could weaken a future claim. During this coordination, counsel also helps manage communications with regulators, insurers, and responsible parties to preserve rights while allowing necessary remedial steps to proceed. A well-designed plan balances immediate safety and containment needs with the preservation of evidence for claims, enabling environmental results to be used effectively in settlement discussions or litigation to secure remediation and compensation for affected individuals and property owners.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services