Settlement Alerts:
  • $9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
  • $6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
  • $81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
  • $18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
  • $13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
  • $225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
  • $70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
  • $100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
  • $150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
  • $40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
  • $30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
  • $100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
  • $45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
  • $200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
  • $1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
  • $200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
  • $26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
  • $800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
  • $925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
  • $20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
  • $1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
  • $210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
  • $100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
  • $975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
  • $4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25
View All
What Is My Case Worth?

CALL US NOW

304-355-5565
What Is My Case Worth?
5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Storage Tank Cleaning Lawyer in Webster Springs

TENORM Tank Claims

task_01k8xe9w49ejj9vdxqyjfs2gz7_1761924784_img_2.webp

Understanding Storage Tank Cleaning and TENORM Liability

Storage tank cleaning involving TENORM presents a distinct set of health, environmental, and legal concerns for property owners, workers, and nearby communities in Webster Springs and across West Virginia. TENORM refers to naturally occurring radioactive material that becomes concentrated through human activities, and when cleaning or maintaining tanks that held such materials, exposure risks and contamination pathways can arise. If you or your property may have been affected by tank-related TENORM contamination, the immediate priorities include documenting conditions, preserving evidence, and understanding potential claims tied to property damage, personal injury, medical monitoring, or regulatory violations. Our information here is designed to help you identify issues and next steps for pursuing a claim or protecting your interests.

Many incidents connected to storage tank cleaning and TENORM exposure involve delayed discovery and complex technical details, requiring careful fact-gathering and timely action. In Webster Springs and surrounding areas, property owners, contractors, and employees should consider documenting tank histories, maintenance records, inspection reports, and any testing that has been done. Promptly preserving samples, photographs, and witness names can strengthen a later claim. If contamination or exposure is suspected, consider medical evaluation and environmental testing while also keeping records of expenses and losses. For help assessing potential legal options, reach out to Stephen New & Associates in Beckley at 304-355-5565 to discuss next steps and available remedies.

Why Addressing TENORM Tank Cleaning Matters for Health and Liability

Addressing TENORM contamination associated with storage tank cleaning can protect public health, limit continued environmental harm, and create pathways for financial recovery when negligence or regulatory failures are involved. Proper legal assessment helps determine who may be responsible for cleanup costs, medical monitoring, lost income, and property depreciation. Legal action can also prompt more thorough remediation and compel responsible parties to cover third-party testing, long-term monitoring, and potential relocations when hazards persist. By taking early, informed action, those affected can preserve important evidence, pursue compensation, and seek to prevent recurrence in the community while complying with reporting obligations and regulatory timelines.

Talk to a Lawyer

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Approach to TENORM Claims

Stephen New & Associates, based in Beckley, West Virginia, represents clients across Webster County and the surrounding region in matters involving personal injury, environmental contamination, and property damage. The firm assists individuals, families, and property owners with claims arising from exposure to hazardous substances, including incidents during storage tank cleaning where TENORM concentrations may be present. Our approach emphasizes thorough investigation, careful preservation of technical data and records, clear client communication, and practical guidance through regulatory and legal processes. If contamination or exposure has affected you or your property, the firm can help evaluate potential claims and coordinate necessary testing and documentation.
Schedule a Consultation
bulb.webp

What Storage Tank Cleaning and TENORM Issues Involve

TENORM refers to naturally occurring radioactive materials that become concentrated or released through industrial operations, including production, processing, or storage activities. When tanks that previously held oil, sludge, brine, or other industrial fluids are cleaned, deposits containing elevated levels of naturally occurring radionuclides can be disturbed and spread. Understanding the scientific and regulatory aspects of TENORM involves environmental testing, chain-of-custody for samples, facility records review, and assessment of exposure pathways for workers and residents. Legal evaluation focuses on liability sources, whether contractors followed safety protocols, whether owners complied with disposal rules, and how contamination impacts health and property values.
A legal case related to tank cleaning and TENORM typically requires reconstruction of events, coordination with qualified environmental testing labs, and consultation with medical professionals if exposures occurred. Potential claims may include compensation for medical expenses, property remediation costs, lost income, and diminished property value, as well as coverage for testing and long-term monitoring when warranted. Claimants must also navigate agency reporting requirements and deadlines for filing claims or notifying insurers. Early preservation of maintenance logs, manifests, contractor communications, and testing results strengthens the ability to show responsibility and quantify damages in settlement discussions or formal litigation.

Need More Information?

Find Out If You Have a Case

Key Terms and Glossary for TENORM and Tank Cleaning

TENORM

TENORM refers to naturally occurring radioactive materials that have been concentrated or mobilized by human activities, creating conditions that may present exposure or contamination risks. In the context of storage tanks, TENORM can accumulate in sludge, scale, or sediment and then become airborne or otherwise mobile during cleaning, maintenance, or disposal. Determining whether material qualifies as TENORM requires laboratory testing and interpretation by qualified environmental analysts, and the findings influence disposal requirements, worker safety measures, and potential legal claims. For those affected, understanding TENORM helps clarify health risks, remediation obligations, and avenues for recovering cleanup and medical costs.

Contamination Pathway

A contamination pathway describes the means by which hazardous material moves from a source, such as tank sludge or residues, to receptors like workers, residents, soil, groundwater, or surface water. Identifying the pathway is essential to proving exposure and resulting harm; it may involve inhalation of dust during cleaning, skin contact with contaminated liquids, or migration of contaminants into nearby wells. Establishing the pathway typically requires site inspection, sampling, and expert interpretation of test results to show how and when contamination occurred and who may have been exposed. Documentation of operational practices during cleaning can help clarify potential pathways and responsible parties.

Chain of Custody

Chain of custody refers to the documented process that tracks environmental samples from the moment they are collected through transport, laboratory analysis, and storage, ensuring the integrity and admissibility of test results. Proper chain-of-custody records are critical in legal matters involving TENORM because they show samples were handled without contamination or tampering and that results reflect site conditions. Records typically include who collected samples, sampling methods, time and date, sealing methods, and lab receipts. Strong chain-of-custody documentation supports the reliability of testing that underpins claims for cleanup costs, medical monitoring, or property damage.

Remediation and Monitoring

Remediation and monitoring describe the steps taken to clean, contain, or manage contamination and to observe conditions over time to protect health and the environment. For TENORM related to storage tank cleaning, remediation can include removal of contaminated sediment, safe disposal of wastes per regulatory requirements, decontamination of structures, and soil or water cleanup where migration has occurred. Monitoring involves periodic testing of air, soil, water, or biological indicators to ensure remediation has been effective and that hazards do not recur. Legal claims may seek funding for both remediation actions and the ongoing monitoring necessary to confirm long-term safety.

PRO TIPS

Document Conditions Immediately

If you suspect contamination from tank cleaning, document site conditions immediately with photos, videos, and written notes that describe dates, times, and observations. Preserve maintenance logs, manifests, and any communications with contractors, owners, or regulators, as these records can show what procedures were followed and when. Timely documentation and preservation of records improve the ability to identify responsible parties, support testing results, and demonstrate the sequence of events that may have led to exposure or property damage.

Secure Testing and Chain of Custody

Arrange for reputable environmental testing that follows strict chain-of-custody procedures so results will be admissible and reliable if legal action becomes necessary. Work with qualified labs to analyze samples for radioactive constituents and document sampling methods, sample transport, and laboratory reports. Prompt, well-documented testing clarifies the nature and extent of contamination and supports claims for cleanup, monitoring, and related losses.

Protect Health and Records

Anyone who may have been exposed during tank cleaning should seek medical evaluation, track symptoms, and keep records of medical visits and expenses, as these details form part of a claim for injury or monitoring. Keep copies of test reports, receipts for remediation expenses, and notes about communications with employers or contractors. Preserving both health and site records strengthens the factual foundation for recovery and ensures accurate documentation of the impacts of contamination.

Comparing Legal Options for TENORM and Tank Cleaning Cases

When Full Legal Guidance Is Advisable:

Complex Technical or Long-Term Contamination

Situations involving complex environmental testing, migration to groundwater, or potential long-term health impacts often require a broad legal approach to coordinate scientific resources, medical reviews, and regulatory engagement. Where contamination may affect several properties, public resources, or require extended monitoring, comprehensive representation helps ensure all available remedies are pursued and appropriate parties are held accountable. A coordinated strategy supports recovery for cleanup, monitoring, medical costs, and property damages while managing deadlines and regulatory reporting obligations.

Multiple Potentially Responsible Parties

When ownership, contracting, and operations involve several entities, a comprehensive legal approach can identify which parties bear responsibility for cleanup and compensation and can pursue coordinated claims or litigation. Complex liability scenarios often require document review, depositions, and collaboration with technical consultants to establish causation and apportion responsibility among owners, operators, and service providers. Addressing multi-party responsibility helps maximize recovery and ensures remediation obligations are assigned where appropriate.

When a Narrow or Targeted Approach May Be Appropriate:

Isolated, Well-Documented Incidents

A more limited approach can be appropriate when contamination is confined, liability is clear, and the scope of cleanup or compensation is straightforward, allowing faster resolution through direct negotiation or a focused claim. In such cases, careful documentation and a targeted demand to the responsible party or insurer may resolve the matter without prolonged proceedings. Even with a narrow case, preserving evidence and obtaining reliable testing remain important to ensure fair remediation and compensation.

Low-Level, Short-Term Exposure With Minimal Damage

If monitoring and testing indicate only low-level or short-term exposure with minor impacts, a limited approach focusing on immediate stabilization and a single-source claim may be efficient. Parties may negotiate directly for testing costs, short-term monitoring, and minor remediation without pursuing broader litigation. Careful cost-benefit assessment helps determine whether a focused demand or a more expansive claim best serves the affected parties’ interests.

Common Circumstances That Lead to Storage Tank Cleaning Claims

Contractor Cleaning Without Adequate Controls

Claims often arise when contractors perform tank cleaning without adequate containment, testing, or worker protections, releasing contaminated sediments into the environment or exposing workers to hazardous residues. In these situations, documentation of work practices, safety measures used, and communication between owners and contractors is key to establishing responsibility and the extent of harm.

Improper Waste Disposal or Transport

Improper disposal or transport of tank waste can spread TENORM contamination beyond the original site, affecting soil, water, or receiving facilities and leading to broader remediation needs. Records of waste manifests, disposal locations, and contractor billing help trace the source and extent of migration for cleanup and recovery efforts.

Hidden Historical Contamination During Maintenance

Hidden or long-accumulated residues discovered during maintenance can reveal previously unknown TENORM hazards that impact workers and property owners long after the original operations ceased. Historical documents, prior inspection records, and worker testimony play an important role in understanding when contamination began and who may bear responsibility.

Stephen Transparent

Webster Springs TENORM and Storage Tank Cleaning Attorney

Contact Us About Your Case

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM and Tank Cleaning Matters

Stephen New & Associates serves clients across Webster County and the broader West Virginia area in cases involving hazardous exposures, property contamination, and personal injury. The firm brings a practical, client-centered approach to complex technical matters, working to secure testing, documentation, and compensation for remediation and related losses. Whether you are a property owner, contractor, or employee affected by storage tank cleaning activities, the firm can help you understand legal options, preserve critical evidence, and pursue remedies through negotiation or court proceedings as needed.

Clients benefit from coordinated support that includes gathering environmental records, arranging appropriate testing, documenting medical impacts, and communicating with regulators and insurers. The firm also helps clients navigate insurance coverages and demand processes to seek reimbursement for cleanup, monitoring, medical care, and property impacts. For those in Webster Springs and nearby communities, prompt consultation can protect rights, meet reporting deadlines, and position claimants to pursue fair compensation for the harms they have suffered.

Contact Stephen New & Associates to Discuss TENORM Tank Cleaning Concerns

304-355-5565

People Also Search For

TENORM tank cleaning lawyer Webster Springs

storage tank TENORM contamination West Virginia

tank cleaning liability claims Webster County

environmental contamination attorney Beckley WV

TENORM exposure medical monitoring claims

contractor negligence tank cleaning claims

property contamination remediation legal help

storage tank sludge testing chain of custody

Related Services

TENORM Services

Community Contamination
Community Contamination
Drilling Mud and Sludge Exposure
Drilling Mud and Sludge Exposure
Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning
Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning
Filter Sock Handling
Filter Sock Handling
Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure
Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure
Landfill Worker Exposure
Landfill Worker Exposure
Oil and Gas Field Worker Exposure
Oil and Gas Field Worker Exposure
Pipe Yard Worker Exposure
Pipe Yard Worker Exposure
Produced Water Handling
Produced Water Handling
Storage Tank Cleaning
Storage Tank Cleaning
Waste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure
Waste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure

FAQS

What is TENORM and why does it matter for storage tank cleaning?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, and it becomes a concern when routine industrial processes concentrate naturally occurring radionuclides to levels that may present health or environmental risks. In storage tank cleaning, residues such as scale, sludge, or sediment can concentrate TENORM and become mobilized during cleaning, disposal, or transport, potentially exposing workers and nearby communities. Understanding the presence and concentration of TENORM requires laboratory analysis, proper sampling, and interpretation of results to determine whether health protections, disposal rules, or remediation measures are needed. From a legal perspective, identifying TENORM is the first step in assessing potential claims for medical monitoring, cleanup costs, property damage, or lost income. Documentation of operations, maintenance histories, and sampling chain of custody supports causal connections between tank activities and contamination. If you suspect TENORM was disturbed during cleaning, prompt testing and record preservation improve the ability to establish liability and pursue recovery for related harms.

If contamination is discovered during tank cleaning, prioritize safety and documentation by ensuring affected individuals receive medical attention if needed and by recording site conditions with photographs, notes, and sample collection where safe to do so. Secure maintenance records, manifests, and communications with contractors or owners, and limit access to the area to preserve evidence. Prompt notification to relevant regulatory agencies may be required depending on the material and local rules, so consult applicable reporting requirements while documenting each step you take. Simultaneously, arrange for environmental testing that follows chain-of-custody procedures so results will be reliable for legal or insurance purposes. Keep detailed logs of expenses, medical visits, and any disruptions to business operations, and consider contacting legal counsel to evaluate options for preserving rights, notifying insurers, and seeking prompt remediation or compensation for incurred costs and potential long-term monitoring needs.

Responsibility for TENORM contamination can rest with multiple parties depending on contractual arrangements, operations, and regulatory compliance. Owners of tanks, operators who managed contents, and contractors hired to perform cleaning or disposal can all potentially bear responsibility if unsafe practices, inadequate containment, or improper disposal contributed to contamination. Determining liability requires review of contracts, safety procedures, industry standards, and communications to identify deviations from accepted practices and who had control over the work at the relevant times. Insurers may also play a role depending on coverage terms and reported losses, and government agencies may assess penalties or require remediation when regulations were not followed. In many cases, a thorough investigation that includes site records, witness statements, and technical testing is necessary to allocate responsibility and pursue appropriate claims against the parties who caused or contributed to the contamination.

Proving contamination typically depends on properly collected and analyzed samples from the site, surrounding soils, groundwater, air, or materials removed during cleaning. Laboratories using accepted methodologies test for radionuclide concentrations and other contaminants, and chain-of-custody documentation ensures samples are legally admissible. Correlating test results with site operations, historical records, and exposure pathways helps establish causation and the scope of contamination that must be addressed through cleanup or compensation. Expert interpretation of results is often necessary to translate laboratory findings into actionable legal claims, showing how concentrations compare to regulatory thresholds and what remediation is required. Timely sampling, documented sampling protocols, and clear laboratory reporting strengthen the evidentiary foundation for claims seeking remediation costs, monitoring, medical evaluation, and other remedies tied to contamination.

You may be able to recover medical expenses and monitoring costs if you can show that exposure to contamination during tank cleaning likely caused or increased the risk of health impacts and that another party is responsible. Medical monitoring claims often arise when exposures raise the need for ongoing testing, diagnostic screening, or preventive care to detect early signs of illness. Careful documentation of medical visits, tests ordered, and related expenses will be important when seeking compensation for these items. Legal claims for medical monitoring generally require demonstration of exposure, credible scientific concern for future harm, and linkage to a responsible party. Insurers and responsible parties may cover immediate medical testing as well as future monitoring where justified, and an informed legal approach helps quantify costs and negotiate coverage or pursue formal claims where necessary.

Recoverable remediation costs often include expenses for site investigation, removal and disposal of contaminated materials, decontamination of structures or equipment, soil or groundwater cleanup, and long-term monitoring to confirm the effectiveness of remediation. Additional recoverable items can include testing costs, engineering or consultant fees, and relocation or temporary accommodation costs if contamination requires short-term displacement. Detailed records of remediation work and associated invoices support claims for reimbursement of these kinds of expenses. In addition to physical cleanup, claimants may seek compensation for diminished property value resulting from contamination, lost business income if operations were interrupted, and reasonable costs for environmental consultants retained to document ongoing risks. The specific remedies available depend on the facts of each case, regulatory obligations, and applicable insurance coverage that may apply to cleanup responsibilities.

Statutes of limitation and other timing rules in West Virginia govern how long you have to bring a claim related to contamination or exposure, and the applicable deadlines can vary by the type of claim, whether the harm was immediately discoverable, and whether claims involve property damage, personal injury, or environmental statutes. Some claims may begin to run at the time of exposure, while others may be subject to discovery rules that toll deadlines until harm or contamination is discovered. Because timing can affect legal rights, it is important to seek early legal review to identify deadlines and preserve claims. In certain environmental matters, regulatory reporting deadlines or administrative procedures may also apply before filing lawsuits, and missing these steps can affect recoveries. Prompt documentation, preservation of evidence, and early consultation with counsel help ensure legal options remain available and that any required notices or filings are completed within applicable windows.

An environmental test will only show TENORM contamination if samples are collected correctly, the right analytes are tested for, and laboratory methods are appropriate for the materials at issue. Not all routine tests include radionuclide analysis, so specifying TENORM testing and following chain-of-custody protocols is essential. Testing strategy should be informed by site history, the type of residues present, and potential exposure pathways to ensure sampling captures the relevant contaminants and concentrations. Negative or inconclusive tests may reflect insufficient sampling, inappropriate test methods, or localized contamination that was missed, rather than a clean site. If initial tests are inconclusive, additional targeted sampling guided by historical records and site inspectors can provide a clearer picture and help determine whether remediation or monitoring is warranted.

Notifying your insurer after discovering a potential TENORM issue is generally advisable because coverage may exist for cleanup costs, third-party claims, or property damage under certain policies. Early notice allows insurers to investigate, assign adjusters, and consider coverage positions while preserving rights under the policy, but it is important to review policy terms and consider legal advice to understand potential effects on coverage and claims handling. Keep careful records of communications with insurers and any instructions they provide regarding testing or remediation. Insurers may also direct certain steps, such as approved labs or contractors, so balancing insurer involvement with independent documentation is important. Consulting with counsel can help manage insurer interactions, protect claimants’ rights, and ensure that necessary testing and remediation proceed in a way that preserves potential claims against responsible third parties as well as any applicable insurance coverage.

Preserving evidence at a site where tank cleaning revealed residues begins with documenting conditions thoroughly through photos, videos, and written logs that describe locations, dates, and observed materials. Preserve maintenance logs, contracts, manifests, and communications with contractors or owners, and retain any samples taken with full chain-of-custody records. Restrict access where appropriate to prevent disturbance and coordinate with environmental testing professionals to collect representative samples using accepted protocols that will hold up in later claims. Avoid altering the site or discarding materials until after proper sampling and documentation are completed, unless public safety requires immediate action, in which case document the emergency measures taken. Keeping detailed records of who accessed the site, what remediation or testing occurred, and costs incurred supports legal claims for cleanup and damages and strengthens the ability to identify responsible parties and quantify losses.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services

Personal Injury

All Personal InjuryBirth InjuriesBoating & Jet Ski AccidentsBurn InjuriesBus AccidentsCar AccidentsCatastrophic InjuryConstruction Site InjuriesDaycare & School InjuriesDefective Medical DevicesHospital & Nursing NegligenceMedical MalpracticeMisdiagnosis & Delayed DiagnosisMotorcycle AccidentsPedestrian AccidentsProduct LiabilitySpinal Cord Injury & ParalysisSurgical ErrorsToxic Exposure & Chemical InjuriesTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Truck AccidentsWorkplace AccidentsWrongful Death

Mass Torts

All Mass TortsAsbestos MesotheliomaJUUL Vaping Lung InjuriesLead PaintNEC Baby FormulaPFASProton Pump InhibitorsRoblox Gaming Sexual HarassmentRoundupSocial Media HarmTalcum PowderToxic Baby FoodUber/Lyft Sexual Assault

TENORM

All TENORMCommunity ContaminationDrilling Mud & Sludge ExposureEquipment Maintenance & CleaningFilter Sock HandlingFracking Worker ExposureLandfill Worker ExposureOil & Gas Field Worker ExposurePipe Yard Worker ExposureProduced Water HandlingStorage Tank CleaningWaste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure

Insurance Law

All Insurance LawBad Faith LitigationFirst Party Property ClaimsUM/UIM Auto Claims

Civil Rights

All Civil RightsPrisoner Rights & ConditionsSection 1983 Civil Rights Claims

Legal Services