Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure Lawyer in Kenova

Protecting Worker Rights

Guide to TENORM and Hydraulic Fracturing Exposure Claims

Workers in and around hydraulic fracturing operations can face unique hazards tied to TENORM, short for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material. If you have worked on fracking sites near Kenova and believe you were exposed to contaminated water, scale, or other materials that could affect your health, you may have legal options. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley represents injured people across West Virginia and helps gather records, medical documentation, and site evidence to evaluate potential claims. We can review employment history, monitoring reports, and incident details to determine whether exposure may have contributed to illness and what steps to take next.

TENORM exposures often develop over time and can be complicated to connect to workplace events. Early investigation is important because evidence, maintenance logs, and witness recollection can fade. For many workers, recovery of medical expenses, lost wages, and compensation for ongoing care or pain and suffering may be available through legal claims or insurance channels. Our office can explain whether a claim is realistic based on the facts of your case, help preserve critical documentation, and guide you on how to report the exposure while protecting your legal rights and future recovery possibilities.

How Legal Help Benefits Workers Exposed to TENORM

Legal representation in TENORM and fracking exposure matters helps workers secure access to medical records, coordinate with treating clinicians for documentation, and preserve workplace evidence that links exposure to injury. An attorney can also handle communications with insurers and employers so injured workers can focus on recovery rather than negotiations. Pursuing a claim may result in compensation for medical care, rehabilitation, lost income, and non‑economic damages when appropriate. Beyond financial recovery, legal action can support safer workplace practices by holding responsible parties accountable and encouraging improvements to monitoring, waste handling, and worker protections at drilling and production sites.

About Stephen New & Associates — Kenova and West Virginia Practice

Stephen New & Associates is a Personal Injury Law Firm based in Beckley serving clients across West Virginia, including Kenova and Wayne County. The firm handles a wide range of serious injury matters such as workplace accidents, catastrophic injury, toxic exposure, and wrongful death. Our team focuses on investigating claims, developing medical evidence, and pursuing fair recoveries through negotiation or litigation when necessary. We value clear communication and practical guidance, helping clients understand potential timelines, possible outcomes, and the types of documentation that strengthen a case after exposure at a fracking site or related industrial location.

Understanding TENORM Exposure Claims from Fracking Work

TENORM refers to natural radioactive materials that become more concentrated or accessible due to industrial activity, including hydraulic fracturing and associated operations. Sources can include scale, sludge, drill cuttings, and produced water that may carry elevated levels of radium and other radionuclides. Worker exposure can occur through inhalation of dust, direct contact with contaminated fluids, or improper handling of waste and equipment. Identifying what material was present, how it was handled, and whether monitoring was done are all key components in understanding potential health effects and liability for exposure incidents at drilling and production sites.

A legal claim involving TENORM exposure typically requires establishing that the employer or a third party owed a duty to maintain a safe workplace, breached that duty through negligent actions or omissions, and that the breach caused measurable harm. Medical documentation linking symptoms or conditions to the exposure, environmental sampling, maintenance logs, and witness statements all play roles in building a case. Time is important because records and evidence degrade; an early legal review can prioritize what to preserve and identify the investigative steps needed to support a claim.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for TENORM Claims

TENORM (Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material)

TENORM describes naturally occurring radioactive elements that have become concentrated or changed in form due to human activities, such as drilling, production, and waste handling in the oil and gas industry. In fracking operations, scale and produced fluids can contain higher levels of radium and related decay products that would not normally present in the same concentration. Understanding TENORM is important because its presence can create long‑term contamination risks and occupational exposure pathways that differ from other chemical hazards commonly associated with industrial work.

Produced Water

Produced water is the fluid that returns to the surface during drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations; it often contains salts, hydrocarbons, and naturally occurring radioactive materials. This fluid must be managed, stored, treated, or disposed of safely to prevent worker contact and environmental release. Improper handling of produced water, inadequate containment, or failures in treatment systems can create direct exposure risks for workers who handle tanks, pipelines, or waste containment systems on site.

Exposure Pathway

An exposure pathway is the route by which a hazardous substance reaches a person, such as inhalation of airborne dust, dermal contact with contaminated liquids, or ingestion through hand‑to‑mouth transfer. For TENORM, common pathways include breathing dust from disturbed scale, touching contaminated equipment or surfaces, and splash or spill contact with produced water. Mapping exposure pathways helps investigators determine how and when a worker may have been exposed and guides testing and medical evaluation strategies.

Latency Period

Latency period refers to the time between initial exposure to a hazardous agent and the onset of detectable symptoms or diagnosis. For certain conditions linked to radioactive exposures, symptoms or illnesses may not appear immediately and can develop over months or years. Latency affects evidentiary strategies, because medical records, employment history, and exposure documentation from years earlier may be necessary to connect a later diagnosis to prior workplace conditions.

PRO TIPS

Document Exposures Immediately

As soon as an exposure event occurs or a worker suspects contact with contaminated materials, document everything in detail. Take photographs of the site, equipment, containers, and any visible residue; record names of coworkers and supervisors who witnessed the incident; and note dates and times of activities linked to the exposure. Keep copies of safety logs, pay records, incident reports, and any environmental monitoring results you can access, as this information may later help establish what happened and who was responsible.

Preserve Medical and Employment Records

Secure all medical documentation related to symptoms, testing, and treatment, including ER visits, imaging, lab results, and provider notes that reference workplace exposure. Maintain employment records, safety training certificates, and job descriptions that show tasks performed at the site. These records help create a timeline connecting workplace conditions to medical outcomes and are often critical when compiling a comprehensive claim for damages or working with medical professionals to establish causation.

Report the Incident and Seek Care Promptly

Report suspected exposures through established workplace channels and request that the incident be documented in writing. Begin medical evaluation quickly to identify any immediate health issues and to create contemporaneous records that can support a legal claim later. Prompt reporting and treatment also support recovery and may reveal exposure pathways and early indicators that help characterize the extent of contamination or hazard at the site.

Comparing Legal Options for TENORM Claims

When a Comprehensive Legal Approach Is Appropriate:

Multiple Exposure Sources or Parties

When a worker’s exposure involves several potential sources, such as contractors, equipment manufacturers, and waste handlers, a broad legal approach is often necessary to identify all responsible parties. Investigating multiple entities requires coordinating technical testing, depositions, and document requests to establish how each actor’s conduct contributed to the exposure. A comprehensive claim can pursue recovery from the range of parties whose actions or omissions combined to create hazardous conditions on site and may be more effective than a narrow, single‑party strategy.

Long-Term or Progressive Health Conditions

If exposure has led to chronic illness, progressive symptoms, or conditions that require ongoing care, a full assessment of present and future damages is necessary. This includes gathering expert medical opinion, projecting future medical needs and lost earning capacity, and addressing long term quality of life impacts. A comprehensive claim builds a complete picture of past treatment and anticipated long‑term needs to seek adequate compensation that reflects the full scope of harm caused by workplace exposure.

When a Limited Legal Approach May Work:

Isolated, Well‑Documented Incident

A more focused approach may be appropriate when an exposure event is isolated, promptly documented, and clearly linked to an identifiable accident or safety lapse. In such cases, pursuing a targeted claim against a single responsible party may resolve quickly with limited discovery. Even when taking a limited route, careful preservation of site photos, incident reports, and contemporaneous medical records remains important to support a timely resolution or settlement that addresses medical bills and short‑term losses.

Minor, Short‑Term Health Effects

When symptoms are minor, resolved with short‑term treatment, and the exposure circumstances are straightforward, a narrower claim may address immediate medical expenses and lost time from work without extensive investigation. Even then, ensuring that the record reflects the incident and the treatment received helps prevent future disputes about causation or severity. A limited approach can be efficient for resolving small claims while still protecting the worker’s rights and access to necessary care.

Common Situations That Lead to TENORM Exposure Claims

Drilling and Production Site Contamination

Contamination on drilling pads, flow lines, and storage tanks can create direct exposure risks when scale, sludge, or produced water contain elevated radioactive materials. Workers who maintain, clean, or repair equipment may come into contact with contaminated residues, increasing the likelihood of inhalation or dermal absorption without appropriate controls and monitoring.

Improper Waste Handling and Disposal

When produced water or contaminated solids are stored, transported, or disposed of without proper containment and safeguards, spills and leaks can expose workers during cleanup or transfer operations. Inadequate labeling, missing monitoring records, or shortcuts in handling procedures increase the risk of unrecognized contact with hazardous materials.

Inadequate Worker Protections and Training

Lack of training on handling TENORM, insufficient personal protective equipment, and failure to follow decontamination protocols can all lead to preventable exposures. Employers are responsible for hazard communication and reasonable safeguards; when those are lacking, workers bear increased health risks and may seek recovery for resulting injuries.

Kenova TENORM and Fracking Exposure Attorney

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM Claims

Our firm provides focused representation for workers who face potential exposure from hydraulic fracturing operations and related activities. We work to compile workplace records, safety logs, and medical documentation needed to evaluate liability and damages. Clients in Kenova and across West Virginia receive direct communication about case strategy and realistic expectations. The firm handles negotiations with insurers and responsible parties and will take a case to court if necessary to seek fair recovery for medical costs, lost wages, and related losses resulting from workplace exposure incidents.

When you contact Stephen New & Associates, we will review the details of your exposure, advise on immediate steps to preserve evidence, and discuss potential legal avenues including claims outside of workers’ compensation when appropriate. We understand the local regulatory landscape and the types of documentation that strengthen claims. Our goal is to help clients make informed decisions about pursuing recovery while minimizing additional stress during the medical and investigative process.

Start Your Case Review — Call 304-355-5565

People Also Search For

TENORM exposure Kenova WV

hydraulic fracturing worker exposure

fracking TENORM claims West Virginia

Kenova toxic exposure attorney

produced water contamination claims

radium exposure fracking workers

workplace radiation exposure claims

Stephen New TENORM representation

FAQS

What is TENORM and how can it affect fracking workers?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material and describes naturally present elements that become concentrated or mobilized by industrial activities such as drilling and production. In the context of hydraulic fracturing, TENORM can be found in scale, produced water, or sludge and may present risks through inhalation of dust, dermal contact, or accidental ingestion if proper controls are absent. Understanding how TENORM behaves on a site and what materials were present helps determine potential exposure pathways and health implications. Early documentation, medical evaluation, and site records are important to assess whether an occupational exposure could be linked to subsequent health problems and to plan an appropriate legal response.

What immediate steps should I take after a suspected exposure at a fracking site?

Report the incident through your employer’s established procedures and request that the event be logged in writing so there is an official record. Seek immediate medical attention to address any acute symptoms and to obtain contemporaneous documentation, which is often vital later when evaluating potential claims. Preserve any physical evidence you can safely retain, such as clothes or photos of the scene, and collect names of coworkers and supervisors who observed the event. Notify our office so we can advise on preserving records, obtaining monitoring data, and commencing an investigation if the circumstances warrant legal action.

Can I pursue a claim if my employer provided workers' compensation?

Workers’ compensation often covers many workplace injuries and related medical expenses, and pursuing a separate legal claim may depend on the facts of the case and the involvement of third parties. If a third party, such as a contractor, manufacturer, or waste handler, contributed to hazardous conditions, a separate claim against that party may be possible in addition to workers’ compensation remedies. Each situation is different, and coordinating between workers’ compensation benefits and potential third‑party claims requires careful assessment of liability, applicable statutes, and damage calculations. A legal review can clarify whether additional recovery avenues exist beyond workers’ compensation.

How long do I have to file a claim for exposure‑related injuries in West Virginia?

West Virginia has deadlines for filing different types of claims, including statutes of limitations that vary depending on whether a claim is brought under workers’ compensation, personal injury law, or other legal theories. These time limits start to run from the date of injury, discovery of harm, or diagnosis in some cases, and missing a deadline can forfeit the right to pursue recovery. Because exposure‑related injuries may have delayed onset, it is important to consult with counsel promptly to determine the applicable deadlines and to take steps to preserve evidence and records. Early action helps protect legal options and prevents unintentional waiver of rights due to time limits.

What types of evidence are most important in a TENORM exposure case?

Important evidence in a TENORM exposure case includes medical records, workplace incident reports, safety training documentation, maintenance and monitoring logs, photographs of the site and equipment, and witness statements from coworkers. Environmental sampling data and lab results that demonstrate the presence or concentration of radioactive materials can greatly strengthen the factual link between site conditions and exposure. Employment records showing job duties, time on site, and any protective measures provided by the employer also help establish the scope of exposure and potential negligence. Collecting these materials early preserves information that may otherwise become unavailable during later investigations.

Will environmental testing be necessary to prove exposure?

Environmental testing can be an important component of proving exposure because it provides objective data about contamination levels in fluids, scale, soil, or equipment. When testing is performed promptly and by credible labs, results may show concentrations of radionuclides or other contaminants that corroborate worker reports and link site conditions to health concerns. Testing is not always the only avenue to establish exposure, but when feasible it adds scientific support to workplace testimony and records. Legal investigators can work with environmental professionals to design sampling that targets likely sources and documents conditions that may have led to worker contact with hazardous materials.

What medical documentation is needed to support a claim?

Medical documentation should include initial treatment records, diagnostic testing such as labs or imaging, physician notes describing symptoms and history, and any specialist evaluations related to exposure concerns. Records that reference workplace conditions or an occupational history are particularly helpful to connect medical findings with potential on‑the‑job exposures. Ongoing treatment documentation, prescriptions, and records of lost work time also help demonstrate the extent of injury and the financial and personal impact. Consistent medical follow‑up and clear records improve the ability to present a comprehensive account of damages in support of a claim.

How are damages calculated in an exposure claim?

Damages in exposure claims commonly include past and future medical expenses, lost wages and lost earning capacity, and compensation for pain, suffering, and diminished quality of life when appropriate. For chronic or progressive conditions, careful projection of future medical needs and related costs is necessary to ensure recovery reflects the full impact of the injury. Quantifying damages often requires medical opinion and economic analysis to estimate future treatment, rehabilitation, and income losses. Documentation of out‑of‑pocket costs, employer records of earnings, and medical prognoses all contribute to accurate calculations of recoverable damages.

Can equipment manufacturers or contractors be held responsible?

Yes, parties beyond an employer can be potentially liable when their actions or products contributed to unsafe conditions. Manufacturers of equipment that produces contaminated scale, contractors who mismanage waste, or service providers who fail to follow safety protocols may bear responsibility in certain cases where negligence can be demonstrated. Determining whether third parties are liable requires investigating contracts, maintenance records, and the roles different entities played at the site. Identifying additional responsible parties can expand recovery options and ensure accountability for the practices that led to exposure.

How can Stephen New & Associates help with my fracking exposure claim?

Stephen New & Associates can review your incident details, identify what records and evidence to preserve, and help coordinate medical and environmental assessments to support a claim. We assist clients in compiling workplace documentation, communicating with insurers and employers when appropriate, and evaluating whether third‑party claims exist in addition to workers’ compensation remedies. Our office provides clear guidance about likely timelines, potential damages, and investigative steps to pursue a fair resolution. If litigation is necessary, we will prepare the case for court with a focus on building the factual and medical record needed to pursue recovery for medical care, lost income, and related losses.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services