Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Proton Pump Inhibitors Lawyer in Parsons

Holding Manufacturers Accountable

Guide to Proton Pump Inhibitor Mass Torts

Proton pump inhibitors, commonly prescribed to reduce stomach acid, have been linked in medical research and litigation to a range of serious health concerns for some users. If you live in Parsons or elsewhere in Tucker County, West Virginia, and you believe a PPI contributed to kidney problems, severe infections, fractures, or other long-term harm, you may have a legal claim through a mass tort action. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley represents residents throughout West Virginia in large-scale pharmaceutical claims that seek compensation for medical costs, lost income, and other damages. Call 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and learn whether filing may be appropriate for you.

This guide explains how proton pump inhibitor claims typically work, what kinds of injuries and evidence are commonly involved, and how those affected can pursue recovery. A mass tort framework allows many individuals with similar injuries to pursue claims while preserving the unique medical record and circumstances of each person, instead of grouping everyone together in a single undifferentiated class action. Throughout this process you will need to gather medical records, prescription histories, and documentation of expenses, and you will want to understand timelines and potential outcomes. Contacting a local law office early helps preserve evidence and clarify next steps tailored to your situation.

Why Pursuing a PPI Claim Can Matter

Pursuing a proton pump inhibitor claim can provide remedies beyond medical care alone by seeking compensation for out-of-pocket expenses, ongoing treatment costs, lost wages, and the disruption to daily life caused by injury. Legal action can also create accountability for manufacturers and distributors when product warnings were inadequate or risks were not sufficiently disclosed. For individual claimants, participating in a coordinated mass tort can combine resources for shared discovery and litigation efficiency while preserving the need to prove each person’s injuries and losses. Effective claims require careful documentation and advocacy to help ensure that recoveries reflect the real impacts on health and finances.

About Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm based in Beckley serving clients across West Virginia, including Parsons and Tucker County. The firm handles a broad range of claims from motor vehicle collisions to complex mass tort litigation involving pharmaceuticals and medical devices. When individuals face serious injury or long-term health consequences, the firm focuses on detailed record review, coordinated investigation, and advocacy that aims to secure fair compensation. The office can assist in collecting medical and pharmacy records, consulting with medical practitioners, and guiding clients through procedural aspects of mass tort participation. Call 304-355-5565 to arrange a confidential review of your claim.

Understanding Proton Pump Inhibitor Claims

Proton pump inhibitors are medications that reduce gastric acid production and are commonly used for conditions like GERD, ulcers, and erosive esophagitis. In recent years, scientific studies and lawsuits have associated long-term PPI use with certain risks, including kidney-related injuries, some serious infections, and increases in fracture risk for some patients. A legal claim generally requires linking a specific medication and duration of use to a person’s documented medical condition, showing that the drug’s risks were not adequately disclosed or that warnings were insufficient. Establishing that connection typically depends on medical records, prescribing history, and sometimes medical opinions that explain how the drug may have contributed to injury.

Mass tort litigation combines many individual claims that share common factual or legal questions into a coordinated legal process while allowing each claimant to maintain the specific details of their case. This approach streamlines discovery and can increase efficiency in handling claims against large manufacturers, but it does not eliminate the need to prove the injury and damages for each person. Timelines vary by case and forum, and some matters resolve through negotiated settlements while others proceed to trial. Early action helps preserve records and strengthens the ability to participate in a mass tort or pursue alternate remedies where appropriate.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for PPI Claims

Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI)

A proton pump inhibitor, or PPI, is a type of medication prescribed to reduce the amount of acid produced in the stomach, commonly used to treat conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcers, and certain types of esophagitis. PPIs work by blocking the proton pump in stomach lining cells, which lowers acid production and can relieve symptoms and promote healing. In litigation, PPIs are at issue when individuals allege that prolonged use or insufficient warnings contributed to adverse health outcomes. Understanding what a PPI does and the duration of use is often central to evaluating whether an injury might be related to the medication.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a coordinated legal process for handling many individual lawsuits that arise from the same product, event, or action, where plaintiffs share common questions about the defendant’s conduct or the product’s safety but retain their separate claims for personal injury and damages. Unlike a class action, each claimant in a mass tort presents individual medical records, damages, and circumstances, while discovery and pretrial proceedings are often consolidated to improve efficiency. Mass torts allow courts and parties to manage large-scale litigation without combining all claimants into a single unitary claim, which helps preserve individualized assessments of liability and compensation.

Class Action

A class action is a lawsuit in which one or more individuals sue on behalf of a larger group with similar claims, and a single judgment or settlement applies to the entire class unless members opt out. Class actions are useful when many people have nearly identical claims and injuries, but they can limit individualized recoveries because compensation is often distributed according to a common formula. By contrast, mass torts maintain separate claims for each injured person, allowing more specific evaluation of medical evidence and damages. Choosing between pathways depends on the nature of the claims, the injuries, and the legal strategy appropriate for the situation.

Compensatory Damages

Compensatory damages are monetary awards intended to reimburse an injured person for losses resulting from another party’s conduct, including medical expenses, lost wages, future care costs, and compensation for pain and suffering. In pharmaceutical litigation these damages aim to restore, to the extent possible, the financial and personal position the claimant would have occupied had the injury not occurred. Calculating compensatory damages requires documentation of medical treatment, bills, employment history, and the reasonable expectation of ongoing needs. Courts and negotiators consider both past expenses and projected future impacts when assessing appropriate compensation.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Medical Records and Prescriptions

Gathering and preserving all medical records, test results, and pharmacy records is a foundational step for any PPI-related claim because those documents establish diagnoses, treatment timelines, and prescriptions connected to your condition. Be sure to request complete records from hospitals, specialists, primary care providers, and pharmacies, and keep originals or certified copies in a safe place while you provide duplicates to your legal representative. Documenting the chronology of symptoms, treatments, and medical advice helps clarify causation and supports the evidentiary basis of a claim when coordinated with other claimants facing similar issues.

Track Symptoms and Health Changes

Keep a detailed journal of symptoms, new diagnoses, changes in health, and how those issues affect daily life, including mobility, sleep, and ability to work, because a clear record can strengthen the narrative of injury in litigation. Note dates, onset and progression of symptoms, and any communications with medical providers about side effects or concerns related to the medication, and preserve correspondence, appointment summaries, and test results. Consistent and contemporaneous records provide context that helps establish the sequence of events and can be persuasive when combined with medical evidence and pharmacy records during claim evaluation.

Document Financial and Work Impacts

Collect receipts, bills, pay stubs, and statements showing out-of-pocket medical expenses, travel for treatment, and lost income because those financial records are essential when quantifying damages for a claim. If your health condition required reduced hours, job modification, or time away from work, obtain documentation from employers about missed days, changed duties, or pay adjustments, and preserve tax returns and other income records. Organizing this information early will help your legal team assess the full scope of economic harm and pursue compensation that reflects both immediate costs and longer-term financial impacts.

Comparing Legal Options for PPI Claims

When Full Representation Makes Sense:

Multiple Serious Medical Conditions

When an individual experiences multiple significant medical conditions potentially linked to proton pump inhibitor use, comprehensive representation helps coordinate medical reviews, expert opinions, and aggregated discovery that address complex causation questions across treatments and providers. A full approach ensures thorough collection of medical records, engagement with relevant medical consultants, and strategic handling of claims to seek appropriate compensation for varied injuries and future care needs. This coordinated effort can be especially important when injuries require long-term management or when combined effects increase the claimant’s overall medical and financial burdens.

Complex Causation and Multiple Medications

Comprehensive representation is valuable where determining causation requires sorting interactions among multiple medications, preexisting conditions, and clinical test results, and where detailed medical analysis is necessary to link a PPI to a specific injury. Legal counsel able to manage extensive records and coordinate medical review can help clarify whether the PPI is a plausible contributing factor, which is essential to successful claims. In those situations, investing in thorough investigation and medical assessment helps present a convincing case that addresses both factual and scientific questions.

When a Limited Approach May Be Enough:

Minor or Short-Term Symptoms

If a person experienced only mild or transient side effects that resolved quickly and required minimal treatment, a narrower legal approach focused on documentation and negotiation may be appropriate rather than a full-scale coordinated action. In such cases, gathering concise medical records, pharmacy histories, and a brief account of expenses and lost time may suffice to pursue a discrete claim or settlement without prolonged litigation. A targeted approach can reduce time and expense while still seeking compensation for limited impacts, provided the case facts support a straightforward resolution.

Clear, Isolated Medical Evidence

When medical records clearly show a short-term adverse reaction directly after initiating a PPI and there are no complicating health issues or overlapping medications, a limited legal pathway focused on negotiation may achieve an efficient outcome. This narrower strategy concentrates on the most relevant records and a focused damage calculation, reducing the need for extensive discovery or multiple expert consultations. Claimants with straightforward, well-documented cases may benefit from pursuing those more contained options while preserving the right to escalate if settlement discussions do not resolve the matter fairly.

Common Circumstances Leading to PPI Claims

Chronic Kidney Disease After PPI Use

Some patients have developed acute or chronic kidney problems after long-term use of proton pump inhibitors, leading to ongoing treatment needs and increased medical monitoring that can be costly and disruptive. When medical records, lab tests, and prescribing history align to suggest a temporal relationship, affected individuals may consider a claim to recover costs and address long-term care needs associated with renal injury.

Clostridioides difficile Infection

Prolonged suppression of stomach acid has been associated with changes in gut flora that can increase risk for serious infections such as Clostridioides difficile, which may require hospitalization and extensive treatment. When a C. diff infection follows extended PPI therapy, documenting the sequence of events and treatment becomes important to any potential legal claim seeking compensation for medical care and related impacts.

Bone Fractures and Bone Density Loss

Some studies have linked long-term PPI use to reduced bone density and a higher risk of certain fractures, particularly among older adults, which can translate into significant recovery time and increased healthcare needs. Individuals who experience fractures or clinically significant bone loss after extended PPI therapy should preserve records and discuss whether their situation aligns with reported risks and potential claims.

Parsons, West Virginia Proton Pump Inhibitor Claims

Why Contact Stephen New & Associates for PPI Claims

Stephen New & Associates serves individuals across West Virginia from its Beckley office and assists clients in Tucker County, including Parsons, with pharmaceutical litigation matters and personal injury claims. The firm’s approach emphasizes careful review of medical and pharmacy records, clear communication about the process, and practical guidance on documenting losses and coordinating medical evaluations. Clients benefit from a local touch combined with the ability to manage larger, coordinated litigation when many people are affected. If you have concerns about a PPI and your health, a confidential conversation can help clarify potential options and next steps.

We offer an initial review to determine whether your medical history and prescription records may support a claim and to explain common procedural aspects like timelines, documentation needs, and potential outcomes. Many clients pursue these claims on a contingency arrangement so they do not pay upfront legal fees while their cases are evaluated and developed, and the office will discuss how costs and potential recoveries are handled. To start a review, call 304-355-5565 or request a consultation to discuss your situation and available options in plain terms.

Contact Us to Discuss Your Claim Today

People Also Search For

proton pump inhibitor lawsuit

PPI lawsuit West Virginia

Parsons PPI attorney

proton pump inhibitor kidney disease

PPI mass tort

PPI lawsuit settlements

PPI legal claim

proton pump inhibitor side effects claim

FAQS

What are proton pump inhibitors and why are they linked to lawsuits?

Proton pump inhibitors are prescription medications that reduce stomach acid and are used to treat conditions like gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcers; common brand names are widely prescribed in primary care and gastroenterology. They operate by blocking the proton pumps in stomach lining cells to decrease acid production, which can relieve symptoms and promote healing. Scientific literature and regulatory actions in recent years have raised concerns about possible long-term side effects for some patients, prompting investigations and litigation when certain harms appear after extended use. Lawsuits arise when individuals claim that manufacturers knew or should have known about potential risks and failed to provide adequate warnings or instructions, or when the medications are linked to serious adverse outcomes. These claims typically require documentation showing regular use of a PPI, a medical diagnosis consistent with alleged risks, and evidence connecting the drug to the injury. Legal actions aim to recover compensation for medical costs, lost income, and other losses while addressing accountability for product safety and disclosure.

Who may be eligible to join a PPI mass tort?

Individuals who used a proton pump inhibitor and later developed conditions that have been reported in the medical literature as associated with long-term PPI use may be eligible to join a mass tort. Commonly claimed injuries include certain forms of kidney injury, serious infections such as C. difficile, and bone-related issues like fractures; eligibility depends on medical records, prescription history, and timing. Each person’s case must be evaluated on its own facts to determine whether the PPI likely contributed to the harm and whether relevant documentation is available. A mass tort allows many claimants with similar claims to proceed in a coordinated way while preserving individualized proof and recovery. To assess eligibility, an attorney will review medical records, pharmacy data, and details about symptoms and treatment. If sufficient evidence exists, a claimant can participate in coordinated discovery and settlement negotiations while maintaining rights to individualized damages determinations.

How does a mass tort differ from a class action?

A class action groups many claimants together under a single representative claim and a court-approved settlement or judgment generally applies to all class members, subject to opt-out rights in some cases. Class actions are appropriate when claims are nearly identical and a common resolution serves the interests of all members, but they can limit individualized compensation because awards are typically distributed according to a common formula rather than tailored assessments of each person’s losses. A mass tort consolidates pretrial proceedings for many individual lawsuits with common factual or legal questions, but each claimant retains a separate lawsuit and right to an individualized damages assessment. Mass torts are often used in pharmaceutical litigation where many people allege similar injuries but have distinct medical histories and damages; this structure balances coordinated litigation efficiency with individualized resolution of harm.

What types of injuries have been associated with PPI use?

Reported and litigated injuries associated with proton pump inhibitor use include certain types of kidney injury such as acute interstitial nephritis and chronic kidney disease, serious intestinal infections like Clostridioides difficile, and an increased risk of bone fractures in some populations after long-term use. Other reported concerns include electrolyte disturbances and reduced absorption of certain nutrients, which can have downstream health effects. The scientific literature assesses associations with these outcomes, and individual medical records determine whether a particular claimant’s condition aligns with reported risks. Not every user of a PPI will experience these issues, and the presence of other medical conditions or medications can affect diagnosis and causation. In legal claims, careful review of medical history, timing of prescriptions, laboratory tests, and provider notes is necessary to evaluate whether a claimant’s injury plausibly relates to PPI use and whether the case fits the factual pattern in ongoing litigation.

How long do I have to file a claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitations set time limits for filing personal injury claims and vary by state; in West Virginia the limitations period for many personal injury claims is generally two years from the date the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, but exceptions and specific rules can apply depending on circumstances. Because determining the applicable deadline can be complex in cases involving latent injuries or delayed diagnosis, it is important to review the facts promptly and preserve evidence to protect your rights within any relevant timeframe. If you believe a PPI contributed to an injury, contact a law office soon so counsel can assess when the statute of limitations begins to run in your situation and take appropriate steps. Early consultation helps ensure records are retained, preserves the ability to file a claim in a timely manner, and enables counsel to advise on investigative steps and potential deadlines that may affect your options.

Will my PPI case go to trial or be settled?

Many pharmaceutical claims resolve through negotiated settlements before trial, but some matters proceed to trial when parties cannot agree on fair compensation or when complex legal and factual issues must be adjudicated by a court or jury. Whether a specific case will settle or go to trial depends on the strength of the medical and documentary evidence, the extent of damages, the willingness of the defendant to negotiate, and procedural posture within coordinated litigation or multidistrict settings. Preparing a case as if it may go to trial often strengthens settlement prospects because it demonstrates readiness to litigate and present evidence, while also preserving the client’s right to seek full compensation through the courts if necessary. Clients should discuss likely trajectories, potential timelines, and expected steps with their attorney to make informed choices about settlement offers and trial preparation.

How much will it cost to pursue a PPI claim?

Many law firms handle PPI and other pharmaceutical claims on a contingency fee basis, meaning legal fees are paid as a percentage of any recovery rather than as upfront costs, which can make pursuing a claim accessible to those without immediate funds. There may also be case-related expenses for medical records, expert review, and filing costs that are advanced by the firm and reimbursed from any recovery, and the firm should explain fee structure and who is responsible for costs during the intake process. It is important to obtain a clear written fee agreement that outlines percentages, expenses, and how any settlement or verdict will be distributed so you understand net recovery. Discussing fee arrangements and expected outlays during an initial consultation helps set realistic expectations and ensures transparency about financial aspects of pursuing a claim.

What evidence is needed to support a PPI claim?

Key evidence for a PPI claim typically includes complete medical records showing diagnoses and treatment, pharmacy records documenting prescriptions and duration of use, lab and imaging results, and provider notes that discuss symptoms and possible causes. Documentation of financial losses such as medical bills, receipts, and proof of lost income is also important to demonstrate compensable damages. In many cases, medical opinions or affidavits from treating clinicians and independent medical reviewers are used to explain how the medication may have contributed to the injury. Because causation can be contested, coordinated collection and organization of records is essential, and timely preservation of all relevant documents strengthens the claim. Your attorney can assist in obtaining records, identifying gaps, and arranging medical review so the available evidence is presented clearly and persuasively in negotiations or litigation.

Can I file a claim if I stopped taking the PPI years ago?

It is possible to file a claim even if you stopped taking a proton pump inhibitor years ago, because some associated conditions may appear or be diagnosed after extended use or following a lag between exposure and clinical recognition. The viability of such a claim depends on the timing of symptom onset, medical documentation that links the past medication use to the diagnosed condition, and whether the applicable statute of limitations allows filing; medical records showing the prescription history and subsequent diagnoses are especially important in these situations. Because deadlines and evidence needs vary, speak with a legal representative to evaluate whether your circumstances support a claim despite a gap since last PPI use. Early review helps determine the best approach, including whether further medical evaluation or documentation is needed to substantiate a connection between prior medication use and current health concerns.

How do I start a claim with Stephen New & Associates?

To start a claim with Stephen New & Associates, contact the Beckley office by phone at 304-355-5565 or request an initial consultation to review your medical records and prescription history. During the intake, provide details about your health concerns, dates and names of medications taken, treating providers, and any medical bills or records you already have, and the firm will explain procedural options, likely next steps, and fee arrangements in clear terms. If your case moves forward, the firm can assist with obtaining complete medical and pharmacy records, coordinating medical review, and representing your interests in coordinated pretrial proceedings or settlement negotiations. Initial consultations are confidential and designed to help you understand whether participation in a mass tort or another legal pathway may be appropriate for your situation.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services