Settlement Alerts:
  • $9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
  • $6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
  • $81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
  • $18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
  • $13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
  • $225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
  • $70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
  • $100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
  • $150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
  • $40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
  • $30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
  • $100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
  • $45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
  • $200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
  • $1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
  • $200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
  • $26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
  • $800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
  • $925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
  • $20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
  • $1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
  • $210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
  • $100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
  • $975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
  • $4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25
View All
What Is My Case Worth?

CALL US NOW

304-355-5565
What Is My Case Worth?
5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Pipe Yard Worker Exposure Lawyer in Spencer

TENORM Exposure Claims

task_01k8xe9w49ejj9vdxqyjfs2gz7_1761924784_img_2.webp

Overview of TENORM Pipe Yard Exposure

Workers in pipe yards can face prolonged contact with TENORM, which stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material. When handling pipe, slag, scale, or sediment from oil and gas operations, employees may be exposed to radioactive contamination that accumulates over time. If you worked in or around pipe storage, maintenance, or cleaning in Spencer or elsewhere in Roane County, you should know how exposure can affect your health and your rights. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley can review records and workplace conditions and explain potential legal steps. Call 304-355-5565 for a confidential discussion about your situation and options.

TENORM exposure claims can involve complex science, multiple potential responsible parties, and long latency between exposure and symptoms. Many pipe yard workers experience uncertainty about medical monitoring, compensation, and whether claims fall under workers’ compensation or broader civil claims. It is important to preserve documents, employment records, and any monitoring reports. Our office helps people in Spencer understand the difference between on-the-job benefit claims and separate claims for negligence or contamination. Acting promptly improves the chance of collecting evidence and protecting legal rights, so contact the firm as soon as possible to begin gathering key information.

How Representation Helps TENORM-Exposed Workers

Legal representation tailored to TENORM exposure claims helps workers pursue medical monitoring, compensation for illness, and remediation of contaminated working environments. A dedicated legal review can identify which parties may be responsible, including employers, contractors, or manufacturers, and can coordinate with medical providers to document exposure-related conditions. Good representation also helps preserve evidence, request workplace testing results, and negotiate with insurers or opposing counsel. For many clients, having a clear plan reduces uncertainty and ensures that claims progress efficiently while prioritizing medical care and long-term health monitoring for conditions that may appear many years after exposure.

Talk to a Lawyer

About Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates is a West Virginia law firm based in Beckley that handles a wide range of personal injury, civil rights, and workplace contamination matters for clients across the state, including Spencer and Roane County. The firm is familiar with claims arising from birth injuries, catastrophic harm, traumatic brain injuries, medical malpractice, and workplace exposures such as TENORM. We focus on clear communication, thorough investigation, and coordinated advocacy. If you have questions about medical monitoring, occupational claims, or third-party liability related to pipe yard exposures, our office can evaluate your situation and outline practical next steps tailored to local conditions.
Schedule a Consultation
bulb.webp

Understanding TENORM Exposure Claims

TENORM refers to naturally occurring radioactive materials whose levels are increased or concentrated by industrial activity. In pipe yards, scale and residue inside pipes can contain elevated radioactivity, creating inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact hazards for workers involved in handling, welding, cutting, or cleaning pipe. Understanding exposure begins with documenting work tasks, protective equipment used, and any environmental testing performed at the site. Medical records and employment histories can help link health complaints to workplace conditions. Investigations may include reviewing safety data, maintenance logs, monitoring records, and testimony from coworkers to build a clear picture of exposure pathways and timing.
Proving a link between exposure and injury typically requires careful collection of workplace records, scientific testing, and medical documentation. Agencies or contractors may have performed radiation surveys or monitoring that either supports or contradicts exposure claims. In addition to immediate medical care, some workers benefit from long-term health surveillance plans. Legal claims can address compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and in some cases the cost of site remediation. Because conditions and responsible parties vary, early action to secure documents and records improves the ability to pursue all available remedies.

Need More Information?

Find Out If You Have a Case

Key Terms and Glossary for TENORM Claims

TENORM

TENORM means naturally occurring radioactive material whose concentration or exposure potential has been increased by human activities such as drilling, processing, or handling of pipes and produced materials. In pipe yards, TENORM often appears as scale, sludge, or residues inside pipes and equipment that have been used in oil and gas operations. Exposure can occur through direct contact, inhalation of dust, or transfer from contaminated clothing. Recognizing TENORM requires sampling and laboratory analysis to measure radioactivity levels. Understanding this term helps workers and advocates evaluate whether site conditions created an elevated health risk and whether corrective steps are needed.

Dose Assessment

A dose assessment estimates the amount of radiation a person received during a particular period or event based on measurements, work tasks, and environmental data. For pipe yard workers, dose assessment may combine air sampling, surface contamination tests, and job history to approximate exposure levels. Health professionals and industrial hygienists use dose assessments to inform medical monitoring decisions and to determine whether exposure exceeded regulatory or recommended limits. Accurate dose assessment relies on good records, prompt testing, and knowledge of when and how contaminated materials were handled, so preserving evidence and documenting activities can improve the quality of any assessment.

Latency Period

Latency period refers to the interval between initial exposure to a hazardous substance and the appearance of symptoms or a diagnosable condition. For radioactive exposures, certain illnesses may not emerge for years or even decades after contact, which complicates linking work activities to health outcomes. Because of latency, early documentation of exposures and routine medical evaluations can be essential to establishing a timeline. Workers should keep records of employment, medical visits, and any workplace notices about contamination to help medical and legal professionals assess whether an observed condition may be related to past occupational exposure.

Medical Monitoring

Medical monitoring involves regular health checks intended to detect early signs of disease due to past exposure to hazardous substances. For workers who handled TENORM, monitoring can include periodic physical exams, imaging, blood tests, or other screenings tailored to potential exposure-related conditions. A monitoring program focuses on early detection and proactive management of health issues, potentially improving outcomes through timely treatment. In legal contexts, medical monitoring can be part of a claim seeking funds to cover ongoing health surveillance and related expenses when workplace exposure created a foreseeable risk of future disease.

PRO TIPS

Document Workplace Conditions Carefully

Keep a thorough record of day-to-day tasks, including dates, the specific pipes or materials handled, protective gear used, and any unusual odors, dust, or residues you observed. Photographs of storage areas, pipe scale, and work processes can be invaluable if contamination is later suspected. Collect pay stubs, time cards, safety notices, and any communication from supervisors or contractors about site conditions, since these documents help reconstruct exposure and support claims for medical monitoring or compensation when symptoms arise.

Preserve Employment and Health Records

Retain copies of job descriptions, safety training materials, and any monitoring reports or injury logs provided by your employer or subcontractors. Save medical records related to any respiratory, dermatological, or other health complaints, and keep records of all diagnostic tests and treatments. If you sought medical attention after an exposure, detailed notes about symptoms and timelines help medical professionals and legal reviewers connect workplace conditions to health outcomes and demonstrate the chronology needed for effective claims.

Report Concerns and Seek Testing

If you suspect contamination or notice unusual residues on pipes or clothing, report the situation to your supervisor and request environmental testing or a formal safety inspection. Keep copies of any incident reports or requests for testing and follow up in writing when possible. Even if immediate symptoms are not present, seek baseline medical evaluation so future changes in health can be compared to documented preexposure conditions, which strengthens medical monitoring or compensation claims down the road.

Comparing Legal Paths for TENORM Claims

When Full Representation Is Advisable:

Complex Exposure Patterns and Science

When exposure involves multiple job duties, intermittent contact with contaminated materials, or varied sites over many years, a comprehensive approach is helpful to coordinate testing, medical evaluation, and legal claims. Complex scientific questions often require independent industrial hygiene or radiological assessments to establish exposure levels and pathways. In these situations, a careful and coordinated plan to gather records, engage specialists, and present a clear timeline can make it possible to hold responsible parties to account and secure appropriate remedies for medical monitoring and other damages.

Multiple Responsible Parties or Third Parties

Claims that involve contractors, equipment manufacturers, waste handlers, and employers at different times may require a broader investigation to identify each potentially liable entity and their share of responsibility. Coordinating discovery, subpoenas, and expert analysis across multiple parties is often necessary to determine how TENORM was handled and who failed to meet safety obligations. In these cases, pursuing a comprehensive legal strategy can help ensure all avenues for compensation and remediation are explored, including third-party claims that go beyond workers’ compensation benefits.

When A Limited Approach May Suffice:

Clear Single Liability and Simple Claims

A more limited approach can work when documentation clearly shows a single responsible employer and the exposure circumstances are straightforward with prompt medical reporting. If monitoring results, incident reports, and medical records align and liability is admitted or obvious, focused negotiation or limited discovery may resolve the matter without prolonged litigation. Even in these situations, legal review helps ensure any settlement fairly covers present and reasonably foreseeable future medical needs tied to the exposure.

Minor, Isolated Exposures with Full Records

When exposure was brief, well-documented, and resulted in minor, treatable health effects with clear paperwork, a targeted claim for medical costs and related losses may be appropriate. In such cases, preserving employment and medical records and presenting a concise factual narrative can be sufficient to obtain compensation or monitoring without a broad investigative effort. Timely action to assemble documentation and seek medical opinion remains important to resolving these matters efficiently and fairly.

Common Situations That Lead to TENORM Claims

Improper Material Storage and Handling

When pipes, scale, or residues contaminated with TENORM are stored without containment, labeling, or appropriate safeguards, workers can encounter direct contact or airborne contamination across routine tasks, and those exposures may go unnoticed until symptoms develop. Documentation showing inadequate storage practices, lack of decontamination, or failure to follow industry safety guidance can be important evidence when seeking medical monitoring and compensation for exposures tied to poor controls at the worksite.

Inadequate Protective Measures and Training

Failure to provide appropriate respiratory protection, gloves, decontamination facilities, or training about handling pipe scale can increase the risk of exposure during cutting, welding, or maintenance operations. Records of missing or improperly used protective equipment, combined with training logs and supervisor communications, help document whether the employer met its obligations and whether additional remedies are warranted for affected workers.

Ineffective Decontamination and Site Cleanup

When decontamination procedures are incomplete or cleaning is not performed after pipe maintenance, residues can persist on surfaces, clothing, and tools, creating ongoing exposure risks for workers returning to the site. Evidence of inadequate cleaning protocols, repeated contamination events, or ignored testing results can support claims for remediation and for monitoring to address long-term health concerns linked to persistent contamination.

Stephen Transparent

TENORM Pipe Yard Exposure Attorney Serving Spencer, West Virginia

Contact Us About Your Case

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM Claims

Our firm serves clients across West Virginia from our Beckley office and represents individuals affected by workplace contamination, catastrophic injuries, medical malpractice, and civil rights violations. For pipe yard exposures in Spencer and nearby areas, we focus on obtaining and preserving workplace records, coordinating environmental testing, and working with medical providers to document injury and monitoring needs. We handle matters involving birth injuries, spinal cord trauma, traumatic brain injury, and other severe outcomes, and can discuss how TENORM exposure intersects with these concerns. Call 304-355-5565 to arrange a confidential review of your situation.

When handling claims related to radioactive material and workplace contamination, clear communication and careful documentation are essential. We prioritize keeping clients informed about investigative steps, timelines for claims, and available options for compensation and monitoring. Whether a claim involves workers’ compensation, a third-party negligence claim, or a request for remediation funds, we strive to pursue practical results that address medical needs and restore financial stability for affected workers and families. Reach out to discuss what actions may be appropriate in your case.

Contact Us for a Confidential Case Review

304-355-5565

People Also Search For

TENORM exposure lawyer Spencer WV

pipe yard radioactive exposure claim

TENORM compensation West Virginia

pipe scale contamination Spencer

workplace radiation exposure attorney WV

pipe yard worker medical monitoring claim

occupational exposure legal help Spencer

radiation contamination claim Roane County

Related Services

TENORM Services

Community Contamination
Community Contamination
Drilling Mud and Sludge Exposure
Drilling Mud and Sludge Exposure
Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning
Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning
Filter Sock Handling
Filter Sock Handling
Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure
Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure
Landfill Worker Exposure
Landfill Worker Exposure
Oil and Gas Field Worker Exposure
Oil and Gas Field Worker Exposure
Pipe Yard Worker Exposure
Pipe Yard Worker Exposure
Produced Water Handling
Produced Water Handling
Storage Tank Cleaning
Storage Tank Cleaning
Waste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure
Waste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure

FAQS

What is TENORM and how might pipe yard workers be exposed?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, which is material whose natural radioactivity becomes concentrated or altered by industrial processes. In pipe yards, TENORM can appear as scale, sludge, or residue inside pipes and fittings used in oil, gas, and other resource industries. Exposure pathways include inhalation of dust during cutting or cleaning, ingestion from hand-to-mouth contact if proper hygiene is not observed, and dermal contact with contaminated surfaces. Because these materials can remain hazardous over long periods, workers who handle or disturb contaminated pipe can face cumulative exposure risks. Identifying potential exposure often requires environmental sampling and review of work practices, such as whether pipes were cleaned before handling and what protective measures were provided. Medical professionals may use exposure histories and diagnostic testing to assess potential health impacts. Keeping records of job tasks, protective equipment, and any workplace complaints or incident reports helps document the circumstances and supports further investigation into site conditions and potential remedies.

If you suspect TENORM exposure, take immediate steps to protect your health and preserve evidence. Seek medical attention to document any symptoms and obtain baseline records that can be compared to future findings. Inform your employer about the concern and request any existing testing results, incident reports, or safety documentation. Photograph contaminated materials, storage areas, and any conditions you believe contributed to the exposure, and keep copies of pay stubs, time sheets, and training records that show your job duties and duration of exposure. Documenting communications with supervisors and keeping a detailed timeline of activities and health changes strengthens the foundation of any claim. Follow up medical recommendations and retain all test results and treatment records. If testing or inspection is not performed after you report concerns, note the response in writing and consider consulting with a legal professional who can advise on next steps, including requesting environmental sampling or advocating for appropriate medical monitoring.

Compensation for medical monitoring and future health surveillance can be sought when workplace exposure creates a foreseeable risk of disease even if a diagnosable condition has not yet developed. Such claims often rely on documentation showing significant exposure potential and credible scientific basis for concern. Medical monitoring remedies are designed to cover the costs of periodic exams, tests, and screenings that would help detect illnesses at an early, manageable stage. The specific scope of monitoring depends on the exposure characteristics, available testing methods, and medical recommendations appropriate to the situation. Successfully pursuing monitoring often requires assembling workplace records, exposure measurements, and medical opinions supporting the need for ongoing surveillance. Legal review can help determine which parties may be responsible for funding monitoring, whether through workers’ compensation, settlement, or other civil claims. Early action to preserve evidence and document exposure enhances the likelihood of securing monitoring resources that protect long-term health.

Time limits to file claims vary by the type of claim and governing law. Personal injury and negligence claims in West Virginia generally have specific statutes of limitations that set deadlines for filing suit, and these limits can differ from workers’ compensation filing periods. Because TENORM-related illnesses can have delayed onset, determining when the clock begins to run may require careful legal analysis of when the injury was discovered or should reasonably have been discovered. Acting promptly to consult with counsel helps ensure you do not miss critical deadlines and preserves the ability to pursue both compensation and monitoring remedies. If you have concerns about timing, gather employment dates, medical records, and any notices related to workplace testing or complaints and bring them to a legal review as soon as possible. An experienced advisor can evaluate whether your circumstances fall within discovery rules, tolling provisions, or other exceptions that may affect filing deadlines. Early documentation also strengthens the ability to link exposure and resultant health effects, which can be important when latency complicates timing questions.

Workers’ compensation can provide benefits for injuries or illnesses that are proven to arise out of and in the course of employment, and in many cases it covers medical treatment and wage replacement for occupational harm. For TENORM exposures, workers’ compensation may cover immediate medical needs and rehabilitation when a diagnosed condition is linked to workplace exposure. However, workers’ compensation systems vary in scope and remedies, and some injured workers also pursue separate civil claims against third parties when negligent handling, manufacturing defects, or contractor conduct contributed to the exposure. Understanding whether workers’ compensation is the sole remedy or whether additional claims are available requires examining the facts, including who owned or controlled the contaminated materials, whether contractors were involved, and what safety measures were provided. Legal review helps clarify available benefits and whether pursuing a third-party claim in addition to benefits is appropriate to address long-term monitoring, pain and suffering, or other damages not fully covered by compensation systems.

Key evidence in an exposure claim includes workplace testing and monitoring data, maintenance logs and safety records, incident reports, photographs of contaminated materials or conditions, and employment records showing the tasks and duration of exposure. Medical records that document symptoms, diagnoses, and recommended testing or treatments are also essential. Statements from coworkers and supervisors about work practices and protective equipment can corroborate exposure scenarios. The more contemporaneous and specific the records, the easier it is to reconstruct exposure events and make the case for monitoring or compensation. Scientific and technical reports, such as industrial hygiene assessments or dose reconstructions, often play an important role when exposure levels are contested or when the link between exposure and future risk must be established. Preserving physical evidence such as contaminated clothing and obtaining timely environmental sampling improves the quality of technical analysis. Early coordination with medical providers and independent testing resources helps ensure the most compelling evidence is available when negotiating claims or pursuing further legal action.

Yes, multiple employers, contractors, waste handlers, or manufacturers can sometimes be held responsible when exposure resulted from actions or omissions by several parties. For example, one entity may have failed to properly decontaminate pipe, while another was responsible for storage or transportation. When multiple entities had roles affecting worker safety, a coordinated investigation can identify each party’s contribution to the hazard. Bringing claims against multiple defendants helps ensure that compensation and remediation can address the full scope of harm and that responsibility is appropriately apportioned among those involved. Establishing the roles of different parties often requires discovery of contracts, maintenance records, and communications between companies involved in the pipeline lifecycle. Legal action can compel production of these documents and enable technical experts to evaluate how handling, storage, or processing practices at each stage may have increased exposure risks. Complex multi-party situations benefit from a deliberate approach to ensure all relevant sources of liability are explored and presented effectively.

Establishing causation involves showing a credible link between workplace exposure and the health condition or reasonable risk of disease. This typically combines exposure documentation, medical records, and scientific opinion to explain how the levels and duration of exposure could lead to the observed condition. Dose assessments, epidemiological data when available, and expert medical views help translate workplace measurements into meaningful statements about risk. A clear timeline showing when exposure occurred and when symptoms or findings developed strengthens the argument that the workplace event contributed to the harm. Because definitive proof can be challenging when illnesses have long latency, legal approaches often focus on showing a plausible and scientifically supported connection, supported by workplace testing and medical evaluation. Where direct causation for a diagnosed disease is difficult to establish, claims for medical monitoring may rest on showing a significant potential for harm based on exposure circumstances. Collecting detailed job histories and prompt medical documentation helps weave the factual and scientific elements needed to support causation claims.

Symptoms and conditions potentially associated with TENORM exposure can vary depending on the type, level, and duration of exposure, and many effects develop over time. Some exposures are primarily associated with increased risk for certain cancers or other radiation-related conditions, while other complaints may include chronic respiratory symptoms, skin irritation, or other localized effects from contact with contaminated materials. Because presentations differ, medical testing and specialist evaluation guide the identification of conditions plausibly linked to exposure and inform appropriate monitoring plans. If you notice persistent respiratory problems, new unexplained physical symptoms, or have been diagnosed with a condition that could plausibly relate to radiation exposure, document the timeline and seek medical follow-up. Baseline and ongoing medical evaluations can detect changes over time and help clinicians determine whether additional testing or interventions are warranted. Early documentation and ongoing surveillance are important to address health needs and support any legal claims for monitoring or compensation.

Cost arrangements for legal assistance vary by firm, but many personal injury and exposure-oriented practices use contingency arrangements for civil claims, meaning fees are a percentage of any recovery rather than an upfront hourly charge. This structure allows injured workers to pursue claims without paying large fees in advance. There may be reasonable costs associated with obtaining records, technical testing, or expert analysis, and these expenses are often advanced by the firm and reimbursed from any recovery, but arrangements differ so it is important to clarify billing and cost policies at the outset. For workers’ compensation matters, representation may follow different fee rules governed by the benefits system, and the firm can explain how fees are handled in that context. During an initial consultation the firm will outline anticipated costs, fee arrangements, and what to expect during the investigation so you can make an informed decision about next steps. Clear communication about fees helps clients weigh options and proceed with confidence.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services

Personal Injury

All Personal InjuryBirth InjuriesBoating & Jet Ski AccidentsBurn InjuriesBus AccidentsCar AccidentsCatastrophic InjuryConstruction Site InjuriesDaycare & School InjuriesDefective Medical DevicesHospital & Nursing NegligenceMedical MalpracticeMisdiagnosis & Delayed DiagnosisMotorcycle AccidentsPedestrian AccidentsProduct LiabilitySpinal Cord Injury & ParalysisSurgical ErrorsToxic Exposure & Chemical InjuriesTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Truck AccidentsWorkplace AccidentsWrongful Death

Mass Torts

All Mass TortsAsbestos MesotheliomaJUUL Vaping Lung InjuriesLead PaintNEC Baby FormulaPFASProton Pump InhibitorsRoblox Gaming Sexual HarassmentRoundupSocial Media HarmTalcum PowderToxic Baby FoodUber/Lyft Sexual Assault

TENORM

All TENORMCommunity ContaminationDrilling Mud & Sludge ExposureEquipment Maintenance & CleaningFilter Sock HandlingFracking Worker ExposureLandfill Worker ExposureOil & Gas Field Worker ExposurePipe Yard Worker ExposureProduced Water HandlingStorage Tank CleaningWaste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure

Insurance Law

All Insurance LawBad Faith LitigationFirst Party Property ClaimsUM/UIM Auto Claims

Civil Rights

All Civil RightsPrisoner Rights & ConditionsSection 1983 Civil Rights Claims

Legal Services