Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Talcum Powder Lawyer in Crab Orchard

Talc Claims Assistance

Mass Torts: Talcum Powder Overview

If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and later received a diagnosis such as ovarian cancer or another serious condition linked to talc exposure, you may have a claim through mass tort litigation. Residents of Crab Orchard and surrounding areas can contact Stephen New & Associates in Beckley for a thorough review of product use, medical history, and potential claims. Our office helps people understand whether their situation fits within ongoing talc litigation and how to preserve important evidence, including medical records and product packaging. Call 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and learn what steps can protect your rights and preserve potential compensation opportunities.

Talc-related claims often involve complex timelines, multiple manufacturers, and scientific questions about exposure and causation. People who used body powders, feminine hygiene products, or other talc-containing items for years may face long-term health effects that emerge only after many years. Families in Raleigh County and elsewhere in West Virginia have pursued mass tort actions to seek compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and loss of income. Our goal is to explain the claims process in clear terms, identify the evidence that matters most, and advise on practical next steps while keeping communications straightforward and focused on your needs.

Benefits of Pursuing Talc Claims

Pursuing a talc claim in a mass tort can provide meaningful benefits to individuals and families who face mounting medical expenses and long-term care needs. A successful claim can help secure compensation for medical treatment, future care, lost wages, and non-economic harms like pain and emotional distress. Beyond monetary recovery, bringing a claim can encourage manufacturers to change labeling and safety practices and increase public awareness about product risks. Working within a mass tort framework can also streamline the handling of complex evidence and scientific issues by coordinating claims and sharing investigative resources across similar cases.

Stephen New & Associates — Talc Litigation Support

Stephen New & Associates, based in Beckley and serving Crab Orchard and surrounding communities, represents people in personal injury, product liability, and mass tort matters including talc-related claims. The firm handles a range of serious injury and wrongful death cases, from motor vehicle accidents and workplace injuries to medical negligence and toxic exposure. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with clients, careful review of medical and product records, and collaboration with medical and scientific consultants as needed. If you have questions about a potential talc claim, the firm provides a focused review to determine if joining ongoing litigation or filing a new claim is appropriate.

Understanding Talc Lawsuits

Talc lawsuits typically center on whether long-term use of talcum powder products, sometimes containing asbestos contamination, contributed to serious health conditions. Plaintiffs often allege that manufacturers knew about potential risks or failed to warn consumers about contamination and long-term hazards. Mass tort litigation brings together many similar claims to manage shared factual and scientific issues like exposure history, product identification, and medical causation. For many claimants, assembling a clear record of product use, dates, and medical diagnoses is the critical first step toward pursuing a claim through coordinated proceedings or individual lawsuits when necessary.

The legal process for talc claims can involve investigations, claims administration, discovery, and, in some cases, trials or global settlements. Evidence such as medical records, pathology reports, product receipts, photographs of packaging, and testimony from treating clinicians all play roles in building a case. Deadlines such as statutes of limitations vary by state and by the specifics of each case, so early consultation helps protect potential claims. Courts may appoint committees to manage mass torts and schedule bellwether trials to test evidence and legal theories that affect many claimants at once.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Mass Tort

A mass tort brings together many individual claims that arise from the same product, event, or conduct so common legal and factual issues can be managed together. Unlike a single plaintiff class action, mass torts allow each claimant to maintain their own case and seek individualized compensation while benefitting from coordinated discovery and shared expert analysis. This structure helps courts and parties handle large numbers of similar claims efficiently, allows for streamlined evidence gathering, and can result in negotiated settlements that address a wide range of individual circumstances and damages.

Asbestos Contamination

Asbestos contamination refers to the unintended presence of asbestos fibers in talc-based products, which can occur when talc deposits are located near asbestos deposits in the earth. When asbestos is present in talc formulations, inhalation or long-term exposure may increase the risk of serious respiratory disease and other conditions. Demonstrating contamination often requires laboratory testing of product samples, review of manufacturing records, and comparison with known geological and industrial sources. Understanding whether asbestos is implicated in a particular claim is a key element in establishing potential liability for manufacturers.

Product Liability

Product liability law addresses the responsibilities of manufacturers, distributors, and sellers to ensure their products are safe for intended use and adequately labeled. In talc claims, product liability theories may include design defects, manufacturing defects such as contamination, and failures to warn consumers of known risks. Plaintiffs must show how product characteristics or omissions caused harm, which frequently involves expert analysis, medical records, and proof of exposure. Product liability claims can be pursued through individual lawsuits or within mass tort proceedings when many people are affected by the same product issue.

Compensatory Damages

Compensatory damages are financial awards meant to make an injured person whole by covering quantifiable losses like medical expenses, ongoing care costs, lost income, and future treatment needs, as well as less tangible harms such as pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. In talc cases, awards can reflect the severity of the illness, projected future medical needs, and the claimant’s personal circumstances. Each claim is evaluated on its own facts, and courts or settlement programs consider medical documentation, employment history, and other evidence to determine fair compensation for the harms suffered.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Medical Records

Keep comprehensive medical records and ensure copies of all relevant documents are secured, including diagnosis letters, pathology reports, imaging studies, and treatment summaries, because these records form the backbone of any talc-related claim and help demonstrate the connection between exposure and harm. Request records from every treating provider and obtain clear copies of operative notes, test results, and medication histories so that dates and treatments are unambiguous when claims are reviewed. Maintaining an organized timeline of symptoms, treatments, and healthcare visits will make it far easier to present a clear case during investigation and potential litigation.

Gather Product Evidence

Save any remaining product containers, receipts, photographs of packaging, and labels that identify the brand, lot numbers, or purchase dates because these items can be essential for confirming product use and enabling scientific testing when necessary. Even if you no longer have packaging, photographs of old products or records of where and when they were purchased can help investigators track potential contamination. Collecting this evidence early helps preserve information that may otherwise be lost and supports the development of claims that link specific products to health outcomes.

Document Symptoms

Write down when symptoms first appeared, how they progressed, and any conversations you had with healthcare providers about possible causes because personal notes can supplement medical records and provide context for timelines of exposure and diagnosis. Include dates, locations, and product use patterns, as well as any family history or occupational exposures that might be relevant to a full understanding of health developments. Clear documentation of symptoms and related events enables more focused investigations and can be vital when coordinating with medical professionals and legal counsel to build a strong claim.

Comparison of Legal Options

Why a Coordinated Mass Tort Approach Helps:

Complex Exposure Histories

A coordinated mass tort approach is often appropriate when claimants have long or complex exposure histories involving multiple products, brands, or time periods because combining resources allows for centralized discovery and shared scientific work that individual claimants could not manage alone. Coordinated proceedings can identify common evidence, consolidate expert analysis, and streamline litigation steps while still preserving each person’s right to individualized compensation based on their unique medical record. This approach balances efficiency with the need to address differing injury severities, exposure patterns, and personal circumstances across many claimants.

Multiple Claimants and Coordination

When numerous people raise similar claims against the same manufacturers, the judicial system often manages cases together to reduce duplication and handle common factual or scientific issues consistently, which can benefit all parties through coordinated depositions, consolidated motions, and shared expert testimony. This structure is particularly useful when laboratory testing, manufacturing records, and geological evidence require substantial time and expense to develop, as centralized efforts prevent repeated work across dozens or hundreds of cases. Claimants still retain individualized claims while gaining advantages from collective organization and strategy.

When a Narrow Claim May Be Appropriate:

Clear One-Time Injury

A narrower, individual claim can be sufficient when a claimant’s exposure and resulting injury are straightforward, well-documented, and tied to a single product with clear causation, because in such cases the legal issues may be limited and easier to resolve without broader coordination. If medical records and product evidence present a clear picture, pursuing an individual lawsuit may reach resolution more quickly than waiting for mass tort processes to develop. Each situation requires careful review to decide whether an individual approach serves the client’s goals and timeline effectively.

Early Resolution Possible

In some cases, a defendant may offer an early resolution when liability and damages are evident, and an individual claim can be negotiated without the delays that sometimes accompany complex mass tort coordination. When early settlement is realistic, pursuing a focused claim can reduce legal costs and bring needed compensation sooner for medical needs and ongoing care. Deciding whether to accept an early offer requires careful evaluation of current and future medical needs and consideration of whether a broader proceeding might yield more favorable recovery.

Common Circumstances That Lead to Talc Claims

Long-Term Talc Use

Long-term personal use of talcum powder products over many years, particularly in intimate areas, is a common circumstance that has prompted many talc-related claims because repeated exposure increases the potential for health effects to emerge after a lengthy latency period. Detailed records of product use patterns, frequency, and duration, together with medical documentation showing diagnosis and treatment history, are essential to establish a timeline that connects ongoing use to later health outcomes in litigation and claim review.

Products with Asbestos

Products that were contaminated with asbestos fibers during mining or processing of talc have been linked to respiratory illnesses and other serious conditions, and identifying such contamination through laboratory testing and manufacturing records is a key factor in many claims. When testing confirms asbestos presence in product samples or industry records reveal contamination risks, affected individuals may be able to pursue claims against responsible parties for harms tied to exposure.

Diagnosed Health Conditions

Receiving a diagnosis such as ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or other serious conditions potentially associated with talc exposure often triggers a review of past product use and medical history to determine if a legal claim is warranted, with a focus on documenting dates, treatments, and related medical opinions. Establishing a clear medical timeline that connects diagnosis to prior exposure is an important part of preparing any claim and helps guide decisions about joining coordinated litigation or filing an individual lawsuit.

Crab Orchard Talc Claims Attorney

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates serves clients in Beckley, Crab Orchard, and throughout Raleigh County with focused attention on serious injury and product liability matters, including talc-related mass tort claims. The firm assists clients in gathering medical records, identifying relevant product evidence, and explaining complex scientific and legal issues in straightforward terms. We aim to provide clear communication, responsive service, and practical advice about pursuing claims, settlement options, and potential timelines so that families can make informed decisions about how to proceed while addressing immediate medical and financial concerns.

Local knowledge of West Virginia’s courts and practical experience with personal injury and mass tort matters allow the firm to tailor strategies to community needs and to coordinate with medical professionals and investigators when necessary. We provide an initial review of potential talc claims and explain options for preserving evidence and documenting injuries, and we will discuss paths for resolving claims through settlement or litigation. If you have questions about potential talc exposure or a recent diagnosis, contact our office at 304-355-5565 for a no-obligation conversation about next steps.

Request a Free Case Review

People Also Search For

talcum powder lawsuit Crab Orchard

talc litigation West Virginia

ovarian cancer talc claim

talcum powder attorney Beckley

mass torts talc Crab Orchard

product liability talc

asbestos in talc lawsuit

Stephen New talc claims

FAQS

What types of health conditions have been linked to talcum powder use?

Many plaintiffs in talc litigation report diagnoses such as ovarian cancer and other gynecological conditions after long-term use of talcum powder products, and some claims involve respiratory illnesses when asbestos contamination is implicated, including conditions that affect the lungs. Medical opinions, peer-reviewed studies, and laboratory testing are used to evaluate links between exposure and health outcomes, and each claim is assessed based on individual medical records, history of product use, and diagnostic findings. If you have received a diagnosis you believe may be connected to talc use, assemble your medical records and document product use timelines to help clarify the relationship between exposure and illness. Discussions with treating physicians and additional diagnostic testing can further inform the clinical picture, and legal review can determine whether your case aligns with ongoing mass tort proceedings or warrants a separate claim in state or federal court.

How do I know if I have a talc-related claim?

Determining whether you have a talc-related claim begins with a careful review of your medical history, dates and patterns of product use, and any diagnostic evidence that links symptoms to exposure. Important factors include the duration and frequency of use, the specific products involved, and whether medical records show a diagnosis consistent with talc-related conditions. An attorney can help gather and evaluate relevant documentation to assess whether a claim is viable within ongoing litigation or as an individual lawsuit. Early consultation helps protect potential claims by identifying applicable deadlines and recommending steps to preserve evidence, such as saving product packaging and requesting complete medical records. A legal review can also clarify potential defendants, available damages, and likely timelines, enabling you to make informed decisions about pursuing a claim and coordinating with others who may have similar cases.

What types of evidence are important for a talc lawsuit?

Key evidence in talc claims often includes medical records, pathology and imaging reports, documentation of product purchase or use, photographs of product packaging or labels, and any leftover product samples that can be tested. Laboratory analysis of product samples can reveal contamination with asbestos, and manufacturing records or internal company documents can be important in tracing production practices and warnings. Witness statements and employer or retail records may also corroborate product use timelines. Collecting and preserving these documents early is essential because older evidence can be lost or destroyed over time, which may weaken a claim. Legal counsel can assist in requesting records from healthcare providers, securing product samples for independent testing, and identifying other sources of evidence, and can coordinate with scientific consultants to interpret findings in a way that supports the claim.

How long do I have to file a talc claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitations and filing deadlines for talc claims vary by state, by the type of claim asserted, and by whether the claim is part of coordinated mass tort litigation, so exact deadlines depend on the specific legal theory and jurisdiction involved. Some jurisdictions run the deadline from the date of diagnosis or from when injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, making timely legal review essential to avoid losing the right to pursue a claim. Delays in seeking review can jeopardize a claim even when the underlying harm is clear. Because the applicable timeframe can be affected by medical discovery, filing rules, and procedural decisions in mass tort settings, contacting legal counsel early helps identify relevant limitations, preserve evidence, and start necessary actions. A prompt review also allows your legal team to coordinate with others and determine whether to join larger coordinated proceedings or file an individual suit within the required period.

Can family members bring wrongful death claims related to talc exposure?

Yes, family members may pursue wrongful death claims when a death is attributable to conditions associated with talc exposure, subject to state law and the circumstances of the case. Wrongful death actions allow surviving family members to seek compensation for funeral and related expenses, loss of financial support, and the emotional toll of losing a loved one, and they typically require proof that the decedent’s exposure and resulting illness were connected to negligent or wrongful conduct by a manufacturer or other responsible party. Pursuing a wrongful death claim involves gathering medical and exposure records, establishing causation through medical opinions and testing, and complying with statutory requirements for who may bring the claim and within what timeframe. An early legal review can help family members understand available remedies, applicable deadlines, and steps to preserve evidence and coordinate claims when multiple family members are involved.

What is the difference between a mass tort and a class action?

A mass tort involves many individual lawsuits that share common factual or scientific issues but allow each claimant to seek individualized compensation, while a class action consolidates plaintiffs into a single case with common claims and collective relief, often without individualized damage assessments for each claimant. Mass torts preserve the personal nature of each injury claim while enabling coordinated discovery, shared expert work, and efficient court management, which can be valuable when exposure patterns and medical outcomes vary among claimants. Choosing between a mass tort and other legal approaches depends on the nature of the injuries, the common issues among claimants, and strategic considerations about evidence and recovery. Legal counsel can explain how mass tort procedures work, when bellwether trials may be used to test claims, and how settlement programs or individual resolutions may be structured to address both shared and individual aspects of each case.

Will I have to go to court for a talc claim?

Not all talc claims go to trial. Many cases are resolved through negotiated settlements either individually or as part of a larger settlement program associated with coordinated proceedings, and some matters proceed to trial if parties cannot agree on appropriate resolutions. Based on medical documentation, testing results, and case-specific circumstances, some claimants and defendants find settlement provides timely compensation while others pursue trial to seek a full determination on liability and damages. Whether a particular claimant will need to appear in court depends on case developments, settlement negotiations, and court scheduling; some claimants may participate in depositions or hearings, while others may be able to accept negotiated settlements without a full trial. Legal counsel can explain likely pathways based on the strength of evidence and comparable outcomes in related cases and will prepare clients for courtroom procedures if trial becomes necessary.

How are settlements or awards determined in talc cases?

Settlements and awards in talc cases are generally determined by factors such as the severity of the medical condition, documented medical costs, anticipated future care needs, lost wages, and the strength of the connection between product exposure and illness. Courts and settlement programs also consider the credibility of medical records, laboratory test results, and any admissions or internal company documents that bear on liability. Each claimant’s personal circumstances and evidence therefore play a substantial role in shaping recovery amounts. In coordinated proceedings, bellwether trials or mediation processes may influence broader settlement negotiations by testing evidence and legal positions, which can then inform resolution amounts for many claimants. Legal representation helps prepare a comprehensive damages presentation, obtain supporting medical and financial documentation, and negotiate toward fair compensation that reflects both current and projected needs.

What should I do if I still have product packaging or receipts?

If you still have product packaging, receipts, or containers, preserve them in a safe place and avoid altering the items because original packaging and labeling can be valuable evidence for identifying product brands, lot numbers, and manufacturing details. Photographs of items, the places where they were purchased, and any labeling can supplement physical evidence, and receipts or bank records that show purchases can help establish timelines of use. Early preservation increases the chances that samples can be tested or compared to other evidence in coordinated investigations. If you no longer have packaging, try to document purchase history through credit card statements, pharmacy records, or photographs of old products. Share whatever information you can with counsel so that investigators can explore manufacturing records and distributor information, and consider whether any remaining product can be safely handled and submitted for laboratory analysis when appropriate and authorized by your legal representative.

How can I start a review of my potential talc claim with Stephen New & Associates?

To start a review of your potential talc claim with Stephen New & Associates, contact the Beckley office at 304-355-5565 for an initial, no-obligation conversation to describe product use, medical diagnoses, and any available records. The firm will request medical records, product documentation, and a summary of exposure history to evaluate whether your situation fits with ongoing talc litigation or warrants a separate action, and will explain the likely next steps for preserving evidence and pursuing claims. During an initial review, the firm will discuss relevant deadlines, what records to collect, and practical considerations about the process, including potential costs and fee arrangements. If the review suggests a viable claim, the firm can assist with gathering records, coordinating testing if needed, and advising on whether to join coordinated proceedings or pursue an individual lawsuit based on your goals and circumstances.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services