Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Prisoner Rights and Conditions Lawyer in Crab Orchard

Protecting Incarcerated Rights

Prisoner Rights and Conditions Guide

This guide explains the legal options available to people who are incarcerated in Crab Orchard and Raleigh County and who have experienced mistreatment, unsafe conditions, or improper denial of medical care. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley represents clients in civil rights and constitutional law matters, including Section 1983 claims against government actors. We describe common violations, the statutes and constitutional provisions that apply, and steps you can take to preserve evidence. If you or a loved one is affected, call our office at 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and learn about potential next steps tailored to your case.

Prisoner rights and conditions cases often involve complex factual records, including medical reports, incident logs, grievance filings, and witness statements. This page outlines typical patterns of abuse or neglect and explains how litigation, administrative complaints, or injunctive requests can lead to remedies and safer conditions. We also cover timelines, common legal defenses, and practical advice to protect rights while incarcerated. While each situation is unique, understanding the legal framework and preserving key documentation now can make a substantial difference if legal action becomes necessary down the line.

Why Protecting Prisoner Rights Matters

Protecting the rights of incarcerated people helps prevent harm, promotes humane treatment, and holds institutions accountable for unconstitutional practices. Legal action can secure medical care, stop abusive practices, and require meaningful changes to facility policies that affect many people, not just a single individual. Pursuing civil claims also creates public records that document problems and can prompt oversight or policy reform. For families and individuals, these legal remedies can bring compensation for harm, immediate relief to address unsafe conditions, and longer term reforms that reduce the risk of future injuries for others in custody.

About Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates is a Beckley-based law firm serving clients across Raleigh County and throughout West Virginia, handling civil rights and constitutional matters including prisoner rights and conditions. The firm represents people who have suffered medical neglect, excessive force, unconstitutional conditions, or violations of due process while detained. Our approach combines detailed investigation, careful preservation of records, and direct communication with clients and their families. We accept inquiries by phone at 304-355-5565 and work to identify the most appropriate legal path, whether that involves litigation under Section 1983, administrative complaints, or motions for injunctive relief aimed at improving facility practices.

Understanding Prisoner Rights and Conditions

Prisoner rights and conditions claims arise under the U.S. Constitution and federal law, including claims brought under Section 1983 for deprivation of constitutional rights by state actors. Key constitutional provisions include protections against cruel and unusual punishment and the right to due process. State law can also provide remedies in certain circumstances. These actions typically require demonstrating that a government official or the facility failed to act in a way that protected the safety and health of an incarcerated person, and that that failure caused harm. Understanding which legal standard applies is essential for pursuing an effective claim.

Common violations include denial of necessary medical care, use of excessive force, unsanitary living conditions, overcrowding, and interference with access to the courts or legal materials. Prisoner claims may also involve retaliation for filing grievances or for protected speech. The legal thresholds for liability vary depending on the type of claim and whether the person is a pretrial detainee or a convicted prisoner, and courts will look at facts such as the severity of the harm, the defendant’s knowledge of risk, and the adequacy of the facility’s policies and responses to complaints.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Section 1983

Section 1983 is a federal statute that permits individuals to sue state and local government actors who, acting under color of law, deprive them of rights secured by the Constitution or federal laws. A Section 1983 action can seek monetary damages, injunctive relief to stop ongoing violations, and court orders to change unlawful practices. To succeed, a plaintiff must show that the defendant was acting in an official capacity and that the conduct caused a violation of a constitutional right. Section 1983 is a primary tool for addressing prisoner rights violations in federal court.

Eighth Amendment

The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and is a cornerstone for many prisoner rights claims brought by convicted persons. Under this provision, courts evaluate whether conditions of confinement or denial of care rise to the level of cruel and unusual punishment, often through standards that consider whether facility officials knew of a substantial risk of harm and failed to take reasonable measures to abate it. The Eighth Amendment can support claims for inadequate medical treatment, abusive discipline, and other systemic or individual acts that inflict unnecessary suffering.

Deliberate Indifference

Deliberate indifference is a legal standard used in many prisoner medical care and safety claims. It requires showing that a government official knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to inmate health or safety, meaning the official was aware of facts indicating a substantial risk and yet failed to act reasonably. Mere negligence or inadvertence typically does not meet this threshold. Courts examine the severity of the medical need or risk, the official’s actual knowledge, and the adequacy of the response when applying the deliberate indifference standard.

Qualified Immunity

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that can protect government officials from civil liability unless they violated a constitutional right that was clearly established at the time of the conduct. In prisoner rights cases, defendants may raise qualified immunity to argue that they should not be held liable because courts had not previously ruled that the specific conduct was unlawful. Overcoming this defense often requires showing that the constitutional violation was obvious enough that a reasonable official would have known it was unlawful, which turns on legal precedent and the facts of the case.

PRO TIPS

Document All Incidents

Keep careful records of any incident, including dates, times, names of involved staff or inmates, and a detailed description of what happened. Photographs of injuries or conditions, copies of medical reports, and any written grievances or responses are especially valuable when reconstructing events. Even if you cannot obtain everything immediately, consistently documenting and preserving what you can will help build a clearer picture of the harms and can be critical if legal action is necessary.

Seek Medical Records Promptly

Request and retain copies of all medical records, treatment notes, and diagnostic reports related to an injury or illness while incarcerated. Medical documentation often provides an objective timeline of symptoms, treatments, and clinicians’ observations, which can be vital in proving denial or delay of care. If records are incomplete or missing, note that fact and attempt to document conversations with medical staff and any observable deterioration in condition to support claims about inadequate treatment.

Preserve Witness Information

Collect contact information and written statements from witnesses as soon as possible, since memories fade and people may be transferred or released. Witness accounts can corroborate details about the incident, the facility’s response, and any official practices that contributed to harm. When direct statements are not possible, keep notes about who was nearby and what you observed; this helps attorneys identify potential sources of corroboration during an investigation.

Comparing Legal Options for Prisoner Claims

When Comprehensive Representation Is Warranted:

Serious or Ongoing Medical Neglect

Comprehensive legal representation is often necessary when medical neglect leads to severe injury, long-term complications, or death, because these cases require detailed medical investigation and persistent engagement with medical evidence. An attorney can secure medical records, consult with medical reviewers, and coordinate discovery to establish causation and liability. When neglect is ongoing and endangers more than one person, a broad legal approach can pursue injunctive relief to change facility practices and protect current and future residents.

Systemic Facility Abuses

Where patterns of mistreatment, overcrowding, unsanitary conditions, or systemic policy failures affect many people, a comprehensive strategy is required to pursue institutional reform and meaningful remedies. This often involves gathering extensive records, interviewing multiple witnesses, and coordinating litigation aimed at injunctive relief to change policies and training. A wider approach also helps identify whether government entities, supervisory officials, or contractors share responsibility for systemic harms and should be included in legal actions.

When a Limited Approach May Suffice:

Single, Isolated Incident

A more focused legal approach can be appropriate when the harm stems from one isolated event involving a single officer or a particular interaction, provided the incident is well documented and there are clear, identifiable witnesses. In such situations, targeted litigation or an administrative appeal may resolve the issue without the need for broad institutional claims. A narrower case still requires thorough evidence collection, but the scope and resources required may be more limited than in systemic claims.

Administrative Remedies First

When an administrative grievance process is available and likely to result in corrective action, it can be effective to pursue those remedies first, particularly for discrete issues that do not reflect broader policy failures. Exhausting administrative options may also be a procedural requirement before filing certain lawsuits, so following that process can preserve legal rights while seeking resolution. At the same time, keeping detailed records of each administrative step helps preserve evidence if litigation becomes necessary.

Common Circumstances That Lead to Claims

Inadequate Medical Care

Inadequate medical care arises when necessary treatment is delayed or withheld, when diagnoses are missed or dismissed despite clear symptoms, or when access to specialists and diagnostic testing is unreasonably denied, and such failures can materially worsen health outcomes and lead to lasting harm. Documenting the timeline of complaints, requests for care, and any responses from medical staff is essential to show that the facility’s actions or inactions contributed to injury and require legal remedy.

Use of Force and Assault

Claims for excessive use of force arise after incidents where staff employ physical force beyond what is necessary to maintain safety, resulting in injury or severe pain, and these claims often rely on witness accounts, medical reports, and incident documentation to demonstrate that force was unreasonable under the circumstances. Allegations of assault or brutality can also prompt criminal investigations and civil claims seeking accountability, compensation for injuries, and changes to facility practices to prevent recurrence.

Unconstitutional Conditions

Unconstitutional conditions include prolonged exposure to unsanitary environments, overcrowding, lack of heat or water, or inadequate safety measures that create substantial risks to health and safety, and courts will evaluate whether the conditions amount to punishment or deliberate indifference to serious risks. Where conditions affect groups of incarcerated people, litigation can seek injunctive relief to require immediate corrective steps and systemic reforms to protect current and future residents.

Crab Orchard Prisoner Rights Attorney

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates

Clients choose Stephen New & Associates for our local knowledge of Raleigh County courts and correctional facilities and for our commitment to thorough investigation and client communication. We work to gather medical records, incident reports, and witness statements quickly to preserve evidence that may be lost over time. The firm handles civil rights and constitutional law matters related to prisoner conditions, medical neglect, excessive force, and Section 1983 litigation, and we aim to explain options clearly so clients and families can make informed decisions about pursuing relief or reform.

Our approach emphasizes practical steps to protect the safety and legal rights of incarcerated individuals while pursuing remedies through administrative channels or the courts as appropriate. We discuss potential outcomes, timelines, and costs upfront and seek efficient paths to resolution where possible. Whether the goal is to secure immediate medical treatment, stop abusive conduct, obtain compensation for harm, or pursue institutional change, we will evaluate the facts, advise on next steps, and act to preserve legal claims and client interests.

Schedule a Case Review Today

People Also Search For

prisoner rights lawyer Crab Orchard

Section 1983 claims West Virginia

inmate medical neglect Beckley

prison conditions lawsuit Raleigh County

civil rights attorney Crab Orchard WV

prisoner abuse claim West Virginia

use of force inmate lawsuit

qualified immunity prison cases

Related Services

FAQS

What constitutional protections do prisoners have?

Prisoners retain constitutional protections even while incarcerated, including protections against cruel and unusual punishment and certain due process guarantees. The Eighth Amendment often governs claims by convicted persons related to conditions of confinement and medical care, while the Fourteenth Amendment can apply to pretrial detainees and address deliberate indifference to safety and medical needs. Other rights, such as access to the courts and protections for religious practice and free speech, may also be relevant depending on the facts of a case. Courts balance security concerns with the need to protect fundamental rights. When a constitutional right has been violated by a government actor, relief may be available through federal court, often under civil claims such as those brought via Section 1983. Remedies can include money damages for harm suffered, injunctive relief to stop ongoing violations or to reform policies, and court orders requiring improved care or oversight. Each claim requires a careful factual and legal analysis to determine which constitutional provisions and remedies apply in the particular circumstances.

Can I sue for inadequate medical care while incarcerated?

Yes, claims for inadequate medical care can be brought when jail or prison staff fail to provide necessary treatment, delay care unreasonably, or ignore serious symptoms that lead to harm. For convicted individuals, such claims are typically analyzed under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, which focuses on whether officials were deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need. For pretrial detainees, similar protections arise under the Fourteenth Amendment because the state has an obligation to ensure medical care while the person is detained. Pursuing such a claim requires assembling medical records, documenting timelines of complaints and treatment requests, and showing a link between the officials’ conduct and the harm suffered. Administrative grievance processes may need to be exhausted in some cases before filing suit, and the availability of different remedies will depend on the facts and the applicable procedural rules. Early preservation of evidence and prompt legal review can be critical to a successful case.

What is Section 1983 and how does it apply?

Section 1983 is a federal law that permits individuals to sue state and local officials who, acting under color of law, deprive them of rights protected by the Constitution or federal statutes. In the prison context, Section 1983 is the standard vehicle for claims against correctional officers, facility administrators, and other government employees whose actions or policies result in constitutional violations such as denial of medical care, excessive force, or unsafe conditions. Successful Section 1983 claims can lead to compensatory damages, injunctive relief, and court orders addressing unlawful practices. To proceed under Section 1983, a plaintiff must identify the specific constitutional right at issue and show that the defendant was responsible for the deprivation. Liability can extend to individuals who directly participated in wrongdoing as well as to supervisors or entities when a policy or failure to train or supervise amounts to deliberate indifference. Each claim requires careful fact gathering and legal analysis to determine the proper defendants and available remedies.

How long do I have to file a prisoner rights claim in West Virginia?

The time limit to file a prisoner rights claim is governed by the statute of limitations, which in federal civil rights actions typically borrows the state’s personal injury limitations period. In West Virginia, that period is generally two years from the date the cause of action accrues, though certain tolling rules and discovery principles can affect when the clock starts. Because the timeline can vary based on when harm was discovered and whether administrative processes were required first, it is important to obtain legal advice promptly to preserve claims and avoid missing deadlines. There are additional procedural considerations that may affect timelines, such as exhaustion of administrative remedies in some correctional contexts or specific rules governing claims against particular government entities. Promptly gathering records, documenting dates and events, and securing legal consultation can help ensure that you meet all applicable deadlines and take required preliminary steps before filing a lawsuit.

What is qualified immunity and does it block my claim?

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that can protect government officials from civil liability unless they violated a clearly established constitutional right. The doctrine requires courts to determine whether a plaintiff has identified a constitutional violation and whether the right in question was clearly established at the time of the conduct, such that a reasonable official would have understood the conduct to be unlawful. In prisoner rights cases, defendants sometimes raise qualified immunity to seek dismissal of claims early in the litigation. Qualified immunity does not automatically block valid claims, but it can pose a significant hurdle depending on the facts and existing case law. Overcoming this defense typically involves showing that the official’s conduct was clearly unlawful in light of prior decisions or that the unlawfulness was so apparent that no reasonable official could have thought the conduct lawful. Early legal analysis is important to frame claims in a way that addresses qualified immunity issues.

Can family members file a claim on behalf of an incarcerated person?

Family members can often take action on behalf of an incarcerated person in several ways depending on the circumstances. If the incarcerated person is incapacitated or lacks capacity, a family member with appropriate legal authority may pursue claims or request medical records. When an incarcerated person dies due to alleged mistreatment, family members can pursue wrongful death claims or survival actions under state law in addition to constitutional claims, and they can seek damages and accountability through civil litigation. In many situations, direct involvement by a family member is also essential to preserve evidence, coordinate with counsel, and manage communications with the facility. It is important to establish the proper legal authority when filing claims on another person’s behalf and to consult an attorney early to ensure that filings are timely and that required procedural steps are followed, including any administrative processes that must be exhausted.

What evidence is most helpful in prisoner rights cases?

Medical records and treatment notes are among the most valuable pieces of evidence in prisoner rights cases involving health care, as they provide an objective record of symptoms, diagnoses, treatments, and clinicians’ observations. Photographs of injuries and living conditions, incident reports, grievance filings and responses, and facility logs can also be crucial. Witness statements from other incarcerated people, staff, and outside visitors help corroborate accounts and establish a timeline of events that demonstrates how conditions or actions caused harm. Preserving this evidence promptly is essential because records can be lost, altered, or destroyed, and people may be transferred or released. Documenting attempts to obtain records, keeping copies of grievances and correspondence, and writing down contemporaneous notes about events and conversations all strengthen a claim. Attorneys will also seek to subpoena records and interview witnesses during the investigation stage to build a coherent factual narrative for litigation or settlement discussions.

Will filing a complaint make things worse for the incarcerated person?

Concern about retaliation is understandable, and correctional settings can present risks when complaints are raised. Federal law prohibits retaliation for exercising protected rights, and documenting any retaliatory acts can form the basis of an additional claim. At the same time, taking steps that reduce exposure, such as using official grievance channels, seeking assistance through counsel, and preserving records rather than publicly confronting staff, can help minimize immediate risk while preserving legal claims for later action. When litigation is pursued, attorneys can seek protective measures such as injunctive relief or confidential handling of certain materials to reduce the likelihood of retaliation. Legal counsel can also coordinate with family members and external advocates to monitor conditions and ensure that complaints are made and handled in a way that prioritizes the safety of the incarcerated person while preserving legal remedies.

What remedies can a court award in prisoner rights cases?

Courts can award a variety of remedies in prisoner rights cases depending on the nature of the violation, including compensatory damages for physical and emotional injuries, and in some cases punitive damages when conduct was particularly egregious. Injunctive relief is commonly used to stop ongoing violations or to require corrective measures such as improved medical protocols, sanitation, staffing adjustments, or training. Declaratory relief, which states the rights and legal duties of the parties, can also provide a basis for enforcement of constitutional protections. Beyond monetary and injunctive remedies, successful plaintiffs may obtain court orders that require monitoring or oversight to ensure compliance with decrees, and prevailing parties may be entitled to recover attorney’s fees under certain statutes. The specific remedies available will depend on the claims brought and the facts established, and a tailored legal strategy is necessary to pursue the forms of relief most likely to address the harms experienced.

How does a civil rights lawyer investigate claims in correctional settings?

A civil rights attorney investigating correctional claims will begin by obtaining all available records, including medical charts, incident reports, grievance files, housing logs, and any video or audio recordings. The attorney will interview the incarcerated person and available witnesses, document injuries with photographs, and preserve evidence that could be lost over time. Where necessary, counsel will send preservation letters and use discovery tools such as subpoenas and requests for production to secure records from the facility and relevant agencies. In addition to documentary review and witness interviews, an investigation often involves consulting with medical reviewers, corrections practice reviewers, and other professionals who can interpret records and explain how facility practices contributed to harm. The goal is to assemble a comprehensive factual record that supports legal theories, addresses likely defenses, and positions the case for settlement, administrative resolution, or litigation as appropriate to the client’s objectives.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services