Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

PFAS Lawyer in Craigsville

PFAS Contamination Help

Mass Torts for PFAS Exposure in Craigsville

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS, are man-made chemicals that have been used in many industrial and consumer products and can persist in soil and water. Residents of Craigsville who are concerned about PFAS in drinking water, private wells, or nearby environmental releases should understand their legal options for seeking accountability and compensation. Stephen New & Associates represents people in West Virginia on mass tort and individual claims related to chemical contamination, helping clients gather information, evaluate potential exposure pathways, and connect with testing resources while providing clear information about how claims typically proceed through investigation and negotiation.

If you believe you or a family member has been exposed to PFAS through a local water supply, industrial discharge, or firefighting foam, there are steps you can take right away to protect your position. Collect records about your water source, keep any testing results, and document health complaints and medical visits related to possible exposure. Our team can review those materials, explain whether a mass tort, class action, or individual claim is the best path, and outline potential timelines and next steps. Contacting our office in Beckley by phone or online inquiry will begin the process of evaluating whether a claim should be pursued.

Why PFAS Claims Matter for Craigsville Residents

PFAS contamination cases can have long-term effects on community health and local resources, and pursuing legal action can help hold responsible parties accountable while potentially funding medical monitoring, cleanup, and compensation for damages. When several people or communities are affected, mass tort or aggregated legal approaches can concentrate resources and scientific study to better establish links between contamination and harm. Bringing claims can also raise public awareness, prompt regulatory scrutiny, and help secure remediation measures for drinking water systems and private wells, which benefits both current residents and future generations living in and around Craigsville.

Stephen New & Associates — Craigsville and Beckley Representation

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving communities across West Virginia, including Craigsville and Nicholas County, with a focus on complex injury and mass tort matters such as PFAS contamination. The firm works to coordinate investigation, testing, and case development by working with environmental consultants, medical providers, and local laboratories to document exposure and harm. From initial intake through settlement or litigation, the practice emphasizes clear communication with clients about the legal process, potential outcomes, and practical steps families can take to protect their health and their claims while pursuing recovery for losses sustained from chemical exposure incidents.

Understanding PFAS Mass Tort and Contamination Claims

PFAS mass tort claims typically involve many individuals or communities who allege harm from the same defendant or group of defendants and similar exposure pathways, such as contaminated municipal water supplies or industrial releases. These claims gather evidence demonstrating how PFAS were released, how they migrated into drinking water or groundwater, and how exposure relates to reported health conditions. The legal work often requires coordination of environmental testing, review of company records, and consultation with medical professionals to connect exposure to injury. While each case has unique facts, the mass tort model allows affected people to share investigative costs and pursue coordinated claims against manufacturers or other responsible parties.

Legal timelines for PFAS claims vary based on the complexity of scientific testing, regulatory involvement, and the number of parties affected. Claim development can include sampling water and soil, obtaining medical records, and working with epidemiology or toxicology reviews to support causation. Some matters resolve through negotiated settlements after discovery and expert analysis, while others require litigation to secure remedies and cleanup commitments. Understanding applicable statutes of limitations, local rules, and the practical steps to preserve evidence is important for preserving rights and maximizing the likelihood of meaningful remediation and compensation.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for PFAS Claims

PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)

PFAS refers to a broad family of synthetic chemicals valued for water, oil, and stain resistance in products and used in industrial processes. These compounds break down very slowly in the environment and can accumulate in soil, groundwater, and human tissue over time. Because of their persistence and mobility, once PFAS enter a water source they can spread and remain detectable for many years. Health authorities and researchers have raised concerns about possible links between long-term PFAS exposure and certain health outcomes, and that concern underlies many legal claims and regulatory actions aimed at reducing contamination and compensating affected communities.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a legal process for handling many individual claims arising from exposure to a common product, chemical, or practice where plaintiffs share similar factual and legal issues. Unlike a class action, mass torts often preserve the individuality of each claimant’s injuries and damages while coordinating discovery and expert work to address shared questions. In PFAS matters, mass tort procedures allow groups of affected people to pool resources for scientific and technical investigation, streamline litigation against manufacturers or polluters, and seek relief tailored to the harms and losses experienced by individual households or communities.

Class Action

A class action consolidates many similar claims into one lawsuit on behalf of a defined class of people who have similar legal claims against the same defendant. This approach can be efficient when injuries and remedies are common across the class, and it can centralize litigation and settlement processes. In PFAS contexts, class actions may be used where contamination and injuries are widespread and relatively uniform, but some claimants may prefer individual or mass tort routes if their damages or medical needs differ substantially from others in the group.

Exposure Pathway

An exposure pathway describes how a hazardous substance moves from its source to people, such as through contaminated drinking water, soil, air, or food. Establishing a clear exposure pathway is a central part of PFAS claims because it helps link a release or disposal incident to actual human exposure. Typical pathways include municipal water system contamination, private well infiltration, or groundwater migration from industrial sites. Demonstrating the timing, duration, and route of exposure is essential for assessing potential harm and building a legal claim for remediation and compensation.

PRO TIPS

Document Water and Health Records

Begin collecting any laboratory tests, municipal notices, or private well results related to your drinking water and store copies in a safe folder to preserve important evidence. Also keep detailed records of symptoms, medical visits, and diagnoses that may be connected to exposure, including dates, provider names, and medical tests performed. These documents help establish timelines and support claims, and they give legal counsel the information needed to evaluate potential links between contamination and health concerns.

Maintain a Symptom and Exposure Log

Keep a running log that records when symptoms began, any changes in family health, and specific instances of exposure such as water use or notices about contamination in your area. Note dates for home filters or bottled water purchases, and track any correspondence with local officials or utilities concerning water safety. This living record provides a chronological narrative that is often valuable during investigation and can clarify the duration and intensity of exposure for legal and medical review.

Preserve Physical Evidence and Communications

Retain any physical evidence that may show contamination, such as filter cartridges, water samples if advised by counsel, and photographs of visible contamination or nearby industrial activity. Save emails, letters, community notices, and social media posts from water utilities or local agencies that reference PFAS or water advisories. Preserving these materials helps build a factual record and can be essential during claims development and negotiations with responsible parties.

Comparing Legal Options for PFAS Claims

When a Broad Strategy Is Helpful:

Widespread Community Exposure

When entire communities, municipal systems, or multiple neighborhoods show contamination, a comprehensive approach helps coordinate testing, gather consistent scientific evidence, and pursue remedies that protect large numbers of people. Bringing claims on a coordinated basis allows for pooled resources to hire environmental and health consultants, manage discovery across many sites, and pursue cleanup or monitoring programs that benefit the broader community. This strategy can also lead to negotiated settlements that include both compensation and commitments to address contamination over the long term, providing a more systemic remedy than isolated lawsuits.

Complex Scientific and Medical Issues

Where the link between exposure and specific health outcomes requires extensive scientific study, a broad legal strategy facilitates coordinated expert review and unified discovery to assemble the strongest causal evidence. Handling multiple related claims together makes it easier to fund and access specialized laboratory analysis, epidemiological studies, and toxicology assessments that may be necessary to show how PFAS moved from source to humans and what health effects followed. A comprehensive model also helps ensure consistent presentation of complex scientific materials to courts, regulators, and opposing parties during settlement discussions.

When a Narrow Legal Path May Be Appropriate:

Isolated, Well-Documented Injuries

In situations where a single household or small group can clearly document a direct link between localized contamination and a specific injury, an individual claim may be sufficient to pursue compensation without broad aggregation. A focused case can target the particular responsible party, streamline discovery, and concentrate on individualized damages like medical bills, property loss, or remediation costs for a private well. This approach can be faster and more tailored to personal losses when the causation and scope of harm are clear and the needed remedies are primarily local or individual in nature.

Clear Causation and Contained Impact

When testing and documentation show a contained contamination event with direct, verifiable impacts, pursuing an individual suit can allow for targeted negotiation and resolution that meets the affected party’s needs. This route may be preferable if the consequences are narrowly confined and the claimant seeks compensation for specific economic losses rather than systemic remedies. Still, even contained cases may benefit from consultation about whether joining a coordinated action could strengthen access to technical resources and evidence that reinforce causation and damages claims.

Common Situations That Lead to PFAS Claims

Contaminated Drinking Water Supplies

When PFAS migrate into municipal water systems or private wells, residents may be exposed for extended periods through routine drinking, cooking, and bathing, which can prompt legal claims for remediation, alternative water supplies, and compensation for health monitoring. Identifying the source of contamination, the timeframe of exposure, and the number of affected users is an important first step in any claim and often requires coordinated testing and historical review of industrial activity and wastewater handling in the area.

Industrial Discharge Near Communities

Industrial facilities that manufactured, handled, or disposed of PFAS compounds can release those chemicals into nearby soil and groundwater, creating exposure risks for neighboring homes, farms, and public water systems that rely on shared aquifers. Legal actions may seek to force cleanup measures, require monitoring, and obtain compensation for property devaluation, private well treatment, and potential health impacts attributable to that discharge.

Firefighting Foam Use at Local Sites

Aqueous film-forming foam used at airports, military installations, or fire training sites often contains PFAS and can seep into soil and groundwater, resulting in contamination of nearby water supplies and private wells. Claims arising from foam-related releases typically involve tracing foam application, sampling environmental media, and seeking remedies that include water treatment, testing programs, and financial compensation for affected households and businesses.

Craigsville PFAS Claims Assistance

Why Stephen New & Associates Can Help with PFAS Matters

Stephen New & Associates serves clients across West Virginia, offering guidance on complex contamination matters including PFAS and other toxic exposures. The firm coordinates environmental investigation, medical records collection, and case development to present clear, organized claims to responsible parties. We communicate regularly with clients about the status of testing and legal options, and work to connect households with local resources for water testing and interim safe drinking water solutions while pursuing legal remedies that may address both individual and community needs.

Our approach focuses on practical case management and effective communication with clients and technical consultants, aiming to develop claims that reflect the real impacts of contamination on families and properties. We discuss fee arrangements upfront and usually pursue PFAS matters on a contingency basis when appropriate, meaning you do not pay legal fees unless there is a recovery, and we handle coordination with laboratories, health providers, and regulators to build a complete record for negotiation or litigation. If you have concerns about PFAS in Craigsville, contact us to start a confidential review.

Contact Our Office to Discuss PFAS Concerns

People Also Search For

PFAS Craigsville

PFAS lawyer Craigsville

PFAS contamination West Virginia

PFAS mass tort

contaminated water claim

chemical exposure lawsuit

drinking water contamination claim

Stephen New PFAS

FAQS

What are PFAS and why are they a concern for Craigsville residents?

PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals used for many decades in industrial processes and consumer products for their resistance properties. They persist in the environment and in human bodies over long periods, which is why regulators and researchers monitor their presence closely in drinking water and groundwater supplies. Residents who learn that PFAS have been detected near their community often worry about long-term exposure and what it might mean for health and property values, and those concerns can be the basis for legal claims seeking remediation and compensation. Determining whether PFAS are a community concern involves environmental testing, historical investigation of potential sources such as industrial sites or firefighting foam use, and review of water system data. Legal claims commonly arise when tests show contamination of municipal supplies or private wells and when there is evidence tying releases to specific facilities or practices. A careful review of records, sampling results, and timelines is needed to assess potential legal options and next steps for affected households.

How can I tell if my water is contaminated with PFAS?

Testing for PFAS requires laboratory analysis of water or other environmental samples using methods that detect low concentrations of these chemicals, and homeowners can arrange testing through certified laboratories or through local public health programs where available. Municipal utilities may post testing results or issue advisories, and private well owners can hire environmental consultants or request guidance from state agencies about appropriate sampling protocols and which compounds to test for. Getting reliable, documented test results is an important early step in evaluating whether a claim is warranted. If testing indicates elevated PFAS levels, it is helpful to preserve the water sample documentation and any notices from utilities or health departments, and to start a record of water use and any health complaints. Legal review will consider not only the test results but also the likely source, timing of contamination, and population exposed. Early evidence preservation and professional guidance can strengthen the factual foundation for possible claims and help determine whether joining coordinated actions or pursuing individual claims is the right path.

Can I join a mass tort or class action for PFAS exposure in my area?

Joining a mass tort or class action depends on the facts of the contamination, the number of people affected, and the legal strategies chosen by counsel. Mass torts bring together many individual plaintiffs who share similar exposures and legal claims while preserving individual damage assessments, whereas class actions consolidate claims under a single representative group when issues and remedies are largely common. Legal counsel can advise on whether a given PFAS situation in Craigsville is being handled through a class action, a mass tort, or individual lawsuits and what the practical implications of each route might be for a claimant. Decisions about joining a coordinated action often consider whether plaintiffs want individualized compensation for medical monitoring and property losses or whether they prefer the efficiency of a class settlement that provides standardized relief. Counsel will review the evidence, timing, and the specific harm experienced to recommend the best legal course. In some cases, people can opt into ongoing coordinated litigation; in others, they may pursue separate but coordinated claims depending on how the cases are organized and the remedies sought.

What kinds of health issues have been associated with PFAS exposure?

Researchers and public health agencies have studied associations between PFAS exposure and various health outcomes, and reported concerns include potential impacts on immune response, certain reproductive outcomes, and changes in cholesterol levels among others. Links between PFAS and specific conditions are the subject of ongoing study, and the strength of evidence can vary by compound, exposure level, and individual health factors. Because PFAS compounds cover a broad family of chemicals, understanding which compounds are involved and the duration of exposure is important when considering possible health effects and medical documentation. From a legal perspective, claims often focus on demonstrable, documented health effects that can be connected to exposure through medical records and scientific analysis. Securing medical testing, provider statements, and a timeline showing when symptoms began in relation to known contamination events can strengthen a claim. Even when the science continues to develop, legal action can seek funds for medical monitoring, treatment costs, and other damages tied to documented exposures and impacts on daily life.

How long do I have to file a PFAS-related claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitations and other time limits for filing PFAS claims vary by claim type and by jurisdiction, and it is important to consult counsel promptly to preserve rights. Some deadlines begin when contamination is discovered or when a plaintiff reasonably should have known about exposure and potential injury, while other deadlines apply from the date of actual harm or diagnosis. Because the discovery of environmental contamination can be delayed, legal rules about when a claim accrues can be complex and fact-specific, so early legal consultation helps ensure claims are filed within applicable timeframes. Additionally, mass tort and class action structures can affect timing because coordinated litigation may establish schedules for joining cases or submitting claims. If you suspect PFAS exposure, document testing and notices promptly and seek legal review to determine how statutory deadlines and case consolidation rules apply to your situation. Acting sooner preserves evidence and gives counsel time to conduct appropriate environmental and medical investigations necessary for a timely filing.

What evidence will I need to support a PFAS claim?

Evidence in PFAS claims commonly includes environmental testing results for water, soil, or other media showing the presence and concentration of PFAS compounds, as well as historical records that point to likely sources such as industrial discharges, firefighting foam use, or waste disposal practices. Medical records that document symptoms, diagnoses, and treatment linked to potential PFAS exposure are also important, as are records of property impacts, filter purchases, and related expenses. Well-kept timelines and correspondence with utilities or public agencies can further document when contamination was detected and what steps were taken in response. Gathering a comprehensive evidentiary record often requires coordinated work with environmental consultants, laboratory analysts, and medical providers to present a clear picture of exposure and harm. Legal counsel typically helps identify what additional testing or expert analysis may be necessary, coordinates discovery for company or regulatory records, and works to synthesize technical findings into a persuasive legal argument. The combination of environmental, medical, and documentary evidence is central to establishing liability and damages in PFAS matters.

Will I have to pay fees up front to pursue a PFAS claim?

Many firms that handle PFAS contamination and mass tort claims work on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients generally do not pay attorney fees unless there is a recovery through settlement or judgment. This arrangement can make it feasible for individuals and families to pursue claims without upfront legal fees while also aligning counsel’s incentives with obtaining meaningful results. It remains important to discuss fee arrangements, case costs, and any potential out-of-pocket expenses at the outset so there are no surprises about who pays for litigation-related expenses if the claim moves forward. In some matters, counsel may advance certain case costs such as expert fees, laboratory testing coordination, or court filing expenses, and those costs are typically repaid from any recovery. Clients should obtain a clear written agreement that describes fee percentages, how costs are handled, and what happens if there is no recovery. This transparency helps claimants make informed decisions about pursuing legal action while protecting their financial interests throughout case development.

How long does it usually take to resolve a PFAS mass tort case?

The timeline for resolving PFAS mass tort cases varies widely depending on the complexity of scientific issues, the volume of discovery, and the willingness of defendants to negotiate settlements. Some matters proceed through extensive investigation and consolidation steps before reaching settlement talks or trial, which can take several years. Coordinated discovery to obtain company records, industry studies, and environmental sampling data is often necessary and can extend case timelines, but it is also essential for building a persuasive case that justifies remediation and compensation for affected communities. In other situations, early negotiations or interim agreements may provide relief faster, such as funding for water treatment or testing while broader claims continue. The pace of regulatory actions and public health responses can influence litigation timing as well. While no specific timeline can be guaranteed, counsel will typically outline expected phases of the case, milestones for investigation and discovery, and how settlement discussions might proceed so clients understand the likely path and timeframe for resolving their claims.

Can businesses or farmers file PFAS claims for contaminated water or property?

Yes, businesses, farms, and other commercial entities can have legitimate claims if PFAS contamination has impaired property, damaged crops, affected livestock, or interfered with operations. Commercial claimants may pursue different types of damages such as property loss, lost income, cost of remediation, and other business-related expenses arising from contamination. Because commercial impacts can have unique economic consequences and valuation questions, these claims often require careful documentation of financial losses and expert analysis to quantify damages accurately and persuasively. Agricultural operations in particular may face contamination of irrigation sources, soil, or pastures that directly affect productivity and revenue, and commercial claimants should assemble records of production, sales, and any remediation costs incurred. Legal counsel experienced in contamination claims can assess the appropriate remedies, coordinate environmental and economic experts, and pursue claims that address both immediate operational losses and longer-term property value impacts.

How do I start a PFAS claim with Stephen New & Associates?

To begin a PFAS claim with Stephen New & Associates, start by contacting the firm via phone or online inquiry to arrange a confidential review of your situation. During that initial conversation you will be asked about water sources, any test results or notices you have received, medical complaints or diagnoses that may relate to exposure, and any actions you have already taken such as installing filters or seeking alternative water. Providing as much documentation as possible at the outset helps the firm assess potential claims more quickly and suggest next steps for investigation or testing. After the initial review, the firm can explain fee arrangements, recommend testing or documentation to strengthen your claim, and, if appropriate, begin coordinating with environmental and medical consultants to develop evidence. The office will also discuss whether your situation is best addressed through a coordinated mass tort, class action, or individual claim and explain the expected steps and timelines so you can make an informed decision about moving forward.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services