Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

PFAS Lawyer in Bluefield

PFAS Contamination Claims

Understanding PFAS Mass Tort Claims

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS, are synthetic chemicals that have been used in many industrial and consumer products for decades. When these chemicals enter drinking water, soil, or the wider environment near Bluefield and Mercer County, they can pose long-term health concerns and lead communities to pursue legal claims. This guide explains how PFAS contamination becomes the basis for mass tort litigation, what plaintiffs typically seek, and the kinds of evidence that matter. It also outlines key steps for anyone in Bluefield who believes they have been exposed and are considering joining or filing a PFAS-related claim.

This resource is designed for residents of Bluefield and the surrounding areas who want a practical overview of PFAS litigation and how a mass tort approach works in West Virginia. You will find information about common exposure sources, potential health impacts, how claims are grouped, and what documentation helps support a case. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley represents people in personal injury and mass tort matters and can discuss potential claims with those affected by PFAS contamination. Call 304-355-5565 to arrange an initial conversation and learn more about the next steps available to you.

Why Pursue a PFAS Claim in Bluefield

Pursuing a PFAS claim can address both personal and community harms by seeking compensation for losses and remedies that aim to reduce further exposure. For individuals, claims may secure funds for medical monitoring, treatment, and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses related to contamination. At the community level, litigation can produce cleanup actions, changes in industrial practices, and settlements that fund remediation and testing. A well-run claim also helps document the scope of exposure and can support future public health measures. Understanding these benefits helps residents decide whether to move forward and how to gather the documentation that strengthens a claim.

About Stephen New & Associates in West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates is a West Virginia personal injury law firm with an office in Beckley that represents clients across the state, including Bluefield and Mercer County. The firm handles a range of serious injury matters such as mass torts, catastrophic injury, medical negligence, and wrongful death claims. When working on PFAS-related matters, the firm focuses on thorough factual investigation, gathering environmental and medical records, and coordinating with scientists and other professionals to document exposure. The firm offers case evaluations and can explain how state deadlines and other legal factors may affect a potential PFAS claim.

Understanding PFAS Litigation

PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals used in product manufacturing, firefighting foam, nonstick coatings, and other industrial applications because of their persistence and resistance to heat and water. That same persistence means PFAS do not break down easily in the environment, so they can spread through groundwater and drinking water sources and accumulate over time. Exposure pathways include contaminated wells, public water systems, food grown in contaminated soil, and consumer products. Knowing how PFAS move and concentrate locally is a first step in determining who may be liable and how a claim might be supported with testing and historical use records.

Mass tort litigation allows multiple people harmed by the same or similar conduct to pursue related claims while preserving individualized recovery for each plaintiff. Unlike a class action, a mass tort focuses on the particular injuries and damages of each person while coordinating pretrial procedures to handle large numbers of cases efficiently. Key elements include proof of exposure, causation linking PFAS to health conditions, and evidence of defendant conduct such as improper disposal or failure to warn. In West Virginia, potential claimants must also be mindful of applicable filing deadlines and the need to assemble medical and environmental documentation to support their claims.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for PFAS Claims

PFAS Defined

PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a family of manufactured chemicals used in many commercial and industrial products because of their grease-, stain-, and water-resistant properties. These chemicals are persistent in the environment and in human bodies, which raises concerns about long-term exposure. Different PFAS compounds have different properties and regulatory histories, but they are often discussed collectively due to similar behavior in water and soil. Understanding the specific PFAS compounds present in a local contamination incident helps determine potential health risks and the technical approach to testing and remediation.

Mass Tort Explained

A mass tort is a type of civil litigation where many individuals with similar injuries from the same product, chemical, or event pursue related claims against one or more defendants. Mass tort practice organizes common issues like discovery and expert evidence while allowing each injured person to recover individually based on their own injuries and damages. In PFAS cases, mass torts can consolidate technical and scientific issues such as environmental modeling and toxicology, while preserving separate trials or settlements for individuals where appropriate. This structure helps manage complex, multi-defendant litigation while addressing personal harms.

Contamination and Exposure

Contamination refers to the presence of PFAS chemicals above background levels in water, soil, sediment, or air that may create exposure risks for nearby populations. Exposure occurs when people consume contaminated water, eat locally grown food that absorbed PFAS, breathe dust, or come into skin contact with contaminated materials. Determining exposure typically involves water testing, reviewing historical industrial activity, and assessing individual use patterns such as private well reliance. Accurate exposure assessment is essential to link environmental contamination to human health effects and to evaluate the scope of a legal claim.

Medical Monitoring

Medical monitoring is a legal remedy that can be sought when individuals face an increased risk of medical conditions due to exposure to hazardous substances like PFAS. It involves funding for regular medical examinations, diagnostic testing, and early detection measures intended to catch issues before they become severe. Medical monitoring may be appropriate where exposure cannot be definitively tied to specific illnesses yet raises credible health concerns. Courts may award monitoring when scientific evidence indicates a heightened risk and when individual medical oversight can lead to better health outcomes for those exposed.

PRO TIPS

Gather Exposure Records

Begin collecting any records that show potential exposure to PFAS, including water testing results, utility bills that indicate private well use, and local government or environmental reports about contamination. Keep medical records that describe symptoms, diagnoses, and any testing related to PFAS exposure. Maintaining a clear chronology of when exposure may have occurred and how it affected daily life will strengthen a claim and makes it easier for legal counsel to evaluate potential next steps.

Document Health and Expenses

Keep detailed records of medical visits, prescriptions, diagnostic tests, and out-of-pocket costs tied to conditions you believe are related to PFAS exposure. Record work absences, caregiving needs, and any home water treatment system purchases that resulted from contamination concerns. These financial and health records play an important role in establishing damages and support requests for reimbursement, monitoring, and compensation during settlement or trial negotiations.

Preserve Evidence and Witnesses

Preserve physical evidence such as water samples, photographs of contamination, and documentation of industrial activity near your property, and note the names and contact details of anyone who can attest to changes in water quality or suspected contamination. Talk with neighbors who may have similar concerns so records and observations can be combined to show a larger pattern of exposure. Early preservation of evidence and witness statements helps investigators and legal teams build a clearer picture of contamination sources and timing.

Comparing Legal Approaches for PFAS Claims

When a Broad Legal Approach Is Needed:

Complex Exposure with Multiple Sources

A comprehensive legal approach is appropriate when exposure stems from multiple potential sources or when more than one company may share responsibility, requiring extensive investigation and coordinated discovery efforts to identify all liable parties. Such cases often involve scientific testing, records requests, and consultation with environmental professionals to establish how PFAS moved through soil and water. Coordinating these elements increases the likelihood of fully documenting exposure pathways and helps achieve broader remedies, such as comprehensive cleanup obligations and fair compensation for those affected.

Long-Term Health Monitoring Needs

When exposure creates ongoing or uncertain health risks that may require medical monitoring or long-term care, a comprehensive legal approach can secure remedies that address future health needs as well as past damages. Litigation that organizes many claimants together can present stronger evidence of regional impact and justify funding for community-wide testing and monitoring programs. This approach is designed to ensure that both current and future medical needs are considered in settlement discussions or court proceedings.

When a Focused Claim May Be Appropriate:

Isolated, Short-Term Exposure

A narrower legal approach may be sufficient when exposure was limited in time, clearly documented, and linked to a single responsible party with straightforward liability. In those situations the factual and medical issues may be easier to resolve without the need for large coordinated discovery efforts, and a more direct claim can address individual damages efficiently. Choosing a focused path still requires good documentation of exposure and medical effects, but it can be faster and less resource intensive than broad, multi-defendant litigation.

Clear Liability and Modest Damages

When liability is clear and the damages are limited or primarily economic, pursuing an individualized claim or small group settlement may yield an efficient resolution without the need for a full mass tort framework. These cases can proceed on a more predictable timeline when defendants acknowledge responsibility or when evidence ties contamination directly to one source. Even in such situations, careful record-keeping and legal guidance are important to ensure that recovery adequately addresses medical and property losses.

Common Situations That Trigger PFAS Claims

Contaminated Drinking Water Sources

Contaminated municipal or private well water is a frequent source of PFAS exposure in communities and often prompts collective legal action to address health risks and remediation. Residents who rely on affected water supplies may seek recovery for health monitoring, medical costs, and the expense of replacing or treating water sources.

Industrial Runoff and Waste Sites

Industrial sites, manufacturing facilities, and improper waste disposal can release PFAS into nearby soil and groundwater, creating localized contamination plumes that affect neighbors and downstream users. Claims often focus on historical practices, disposal records, and testing that link facility operations to community exposure.

Firefighting Foam and Training Areas

Aqueous film-forming foam used in firefighting training and emergency response is a known source of PFAS runoff that has contaminated military bases, airports, and nearby communities. When foam use is linked to contamination of local water supplies, affected residents may seek remediation and compensation through litigation.

PFAS Legal Assistance Serving Bluefield, WV

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for PFAS Claims

Stephen New & Associates represents clients across West Virginia, including Bluefield, in serious personal injury and mass tort matters such as PFAS contamination claims. The firm focuses on building cases through careful factual investigation, coordination with environmental testing, and close review of medical records to document potential harm. Residents who suspect exposure can expect a thoughtful review of available evidence, help locating testing records, and a clear explanation of legal options and timelines tailored to West Virginia procedures and local conditions.

The firm provides initial consultations to discuss PFAS exposure concerns and next steps without charging upfront case fees in many matters, allowing people to pursue claims without immediate financial barriers. Stephen New & Associates aims to handle the legal work while clients focus on health and family needs, coordinating necessary testing and documentation and pursuing recovery through negotiation or litigation as appropriate. Contact the Beckley office at 304-355-5565 to schedule a confidential discussion about your situation and potential remedies.

Contact Our Bluefield Team Today

People Also Search For

PFAS attorney Bluefield

PFAS lawsuit Bluefield WV

PFAS contamination Beckley

PFAS water contamination Mercer County

PFAS mass tort West Virginia

PFAS legal help Bluefield

PFAS health claims WV

PFAS class action Bluefield

FAQS

What are PFAS and how might I have been exposed in Bluefield?

PFAS are a group of manufactured chemicals used in various industrial and consumer applications, including firefighting foams, nonstick coatings, and certain textile treatments. These substances resist breakdown in the environment and can migrate through groundwater and soil, potentially contaminating drinking water sources. In Bluefield, exposure pathways may include contaminated municipal supplies, private wells, local industrial discharges, or runoff from sites where firefighting foam was used. Identifying the source and timing of exposure helps determine who may be responsible and whether other neighbors are similarly affected. To assess possible exposure, individuals should review any local water testing results, inquire with municipal water providers about PFAS testing, and consider testing private wells if contamination is suspected. Medical records documenting symptoms or conditions that could be related to PFAS are also important. Gathering utility bills, property records, and historical information about nearby industrial or training activities contributes to establishing a pattern of exposure that may support a legal claim.

What health effects are linked to PFAS exposure?

Scientific research has associated certain PFAS compounds with a range of health effects, including changes in cholesterol levels, thyroid dysfunction, altered liver enzymes, and, in some studies, increased risk for specific cancers and other serious conditions. The strength of those associations depends on the specific PFAS compound, the level and duration of exposure, and individual health factors. Public health authorities continue to study long-term outcomes, and medical monitoring may be recommended for those with documented exposure and elevated risk. If you have health concerns that may be related to PFAS exposure, begin by compiling medical records and speaking with a primary care provider about appropriate testing and monitoring. While scientific and medical assessment continues to evolve, legal claims can pursue compensation for medical monitoring, past and future medical expenses, lost income, and other damages tied to demonstrable harm. Legal evaluation helps clarify which conditions are most clearly linked to exposure and what documentation will support recovery.

How does a PFAS mass tort differ from a class action?

A mass tort and a class action both address harms affecting multiple people, but they differ in structure and outcome. A mass tort coordinates many individual lawsuits that share common factual or scientific issues while preserving the right of each person to recover individually based on their own injuries and damages. This approach allows for tailored recovery for each claimant even as common discovery and pretrial matters are organized to efficiently handle the complexity of many related claims. A class action consolidates many individuals into a single representative case where recovery is typically distributed according to a court-approved plan, which may be less individualized. For PFAS claims where injuries and exposure vary widely among victims, a mass tort framework often provides a better fit because it balances coordinated litigation with individualized compensation. Legal counsel can advise which approach makes the most sense given local circumstances and the nature of the alleged contamination.

What types of compensation can I seek in a PFAS claim?

Compensation in PFAS claims can include reimbursement for past medical expenses, payment for ongoing medical monitoring, compensation for lost income and diminished earning capacity, and recovery for property loss or diminution in property value caused by contamination. In some cases settlements or verdicts also fund community-wide remediation efforts, testing programs, and infrastructure improvements to prevent future exposure. Remedies are tailored to the losses actually incurred and to anticipated future healthcare needs directly related to documented exposure and injury. Punitive or exemplary damages may be available in limited circumstances where defendant conduct was particularly harmful, though such awards depend on the facts and applicable law. Recovering appropriate compensation requires carefully documenting medical costs, property impacts, and other economic losses, as well as presenting credible evidence about the link between exposure and health outcomes. Legal representation helps assemble this documentation and present it effectively in settlement talks or in court.

How do I know if I can join a PFAS case in West Virginia?

Eligibility to join a PFAS case in West Virginia typically depends on whether you can show exposure to contaminated water or other PFAS sources, and whether that exposure has led to measurable harm or a credible increase in medical risk. Evidence such as water testing results, municipal notices, private well testing, medical records, and records of local industrial activity can help establish a connection to contamination. A legal review will consider timing, geographic proximity, and the nature of any health concerns to determine if your situation fits an existing case or warrants an individual claim. Even if you are unsure about medical diagnoses, early consultation with a law firm can help preserve evidence and assess whether medical monitoring or further testing is appropriate. Statutes of limitation and procedural rules vary, so seeking timely legal guidance helps protect your rights and ensures that any potential claims are filed before deadlines expire. The firm can explain how county- or state-level timelines affect your options and advise on next steps.

What evidence is most important for a PFAS claim?

Important evidence for a PFAS claim includes environmental testing showing PFAS levels in water, soil, or sediment; historical records of industrial operations, firefighting foam use, or waste disposal that could explain contamination; and medical records that document symptoms, diagnoses, and treatment related to possible exposure. Records from local water suppliers or public health advisories can also be crucial, as can testimony from neighbors or former employees who observed relevant activities. Property value assessments and receipts for home water treatment systems can help quantify economic losses. Preserving evidence early is a key step: save copies of water test reports, photographs of suspected contamination, correspondence with authorities, and receipts for medical and remediation expenses. Legal counsel can help identify which documents and samples are most persuasive, coordinate additional testing where needed, and work with environmental consultants to interpret findings and trace contamination pathways back to potential sources.

How long will a PFAS case take to resolve?

The timeline for resolving a PFAS case can vary widely depending on factors such as the number of parties involved, the complexity of the scientific and medical issues, the availability of testing and historical records, and the willingness of defendants to negotiate. Some matters may reach a settlement after a period of investigation and negotiation, while others may require more extensive discovery, expert analysis, and potentially trial, which can extend the timeline considerably. Coordination among multiple claimants can add time but also can lead to comprehensive solutions for larger groups. While litigation timelines are inherently uncertain, early action to preserve evidence and begin the investigative phase helps move a case forward more efficiently. Legal counsel can provide an expected range of time based on case specifics, communicate key milestones, and pursue interim remedies such as injunctions or testing funds when appropriate. Clients should be prepared for a process that may take months or years, depending on the scope and complexity of the underlying contamination and legal issues.

Will I have to go to court for a PFAS claim?

Many PFAS matters resolve through settlement negotiations rather than a full trial, but whether you must go to court depends on how the case progresses. Negotiated resolutions can occur at various stages of litigation and can provide compensation and remediation without the time and expense of trial. Plaintiffs and defendants commonly use mediation or structured settlement talks to reach agreements that address individual and community harms while avoiding protracted litigation. If a negotiated settlement cannot be reached, a case may proceed to trial where a judge or jury determines liability and damages. Even when litigation moves toward trial, coordinated mass tort procedures often address common issues collectively to streamline the process. Your legal team will explain the likely path for your case, the risks and benefits of settlement versus trial, and how your interests will be represented throughout the process.

Can I get testing for PFAS exposure and who pays for it?

Testing for PFAS exposure can involve environmental testing of water, soil, and sediment, as well as clinical testing in certain circumstances to evaluate biomarkers and potential health impacts. Availability of testing and the type recommended depend on exposure pathways and local resources; public water systems may perform testing at the community level, while private well owners can arrange independent tests. In litigation contexts, defendants or settlement funds sometimes provide for testing and monitoring as part of remediation agreements, but initial testing is often arranged by affected residents or coordinated by counsel early in the investigation. If you believe your water is contaminated, consider arranging a certified water test and keeping detailed chain-of-custody documentation where possible. Speak with legal counsel about available resources and potential avenues to obtain testing without upfront cost, such as public health programs, community initiatives, or litigation-driven sampling. Collecting reliable test results early strengthens both individual claims and broader efforts to document contamination patterns.

What should I do right now if I suspect PFAS contamination at my property?

If you suspect PFAS contamination at your property, start by documenting any visible issues, saving correspondence with water providers or authorities, and arranging water or soil testing where feasible. Preserve any notices from public agencies, keep utility bills that show water use, and gather medical records that relate to symptoms or diagnoses you believe may be tied to exposure. Talking with neighbors to determine whether others have similar concerns can help establish a pattern of regional impact and supports collective investigation and legal action. Next, contact a law firm familiar with environmental and mass tort matters to discuss your concerns and preserve evidence within statutory timelines. Early legal consultation can help identify immediate steps such as additional testing, coordination with public officials, and preservation of relevant records, all of which strengthen potential claims. A legal review also clarifies deadlines, possible remedies, and whether joining a coordinated mass tort or pursuing an individual claim is most appropriate for your situation.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services