Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Defective Medical Devices Lawyer in Point Pleasant

Holding Manufacturers Accountable

Guide to Defective Medical Device Claims

If you or a loved one were harmed by a medical device in Point Pleasant, Stephen New & Associates can help you understand your legal options and pursue the compensation you may deserve. Our Personal Injury practice focuses on injuries caused by defective medical devices, from implants and surgical tools to diagnostic equipment and prosthetics. Based in Beckley and serving Mason County and the surrounding communities in West Virginia, our team will listen carefully to your concerns, explain the steps in a claim, and work to protect your interests while you focus on recovery. Call 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and learn what to do next.

Defective medical devices can cause significant physical harm, emotional distress, and financial strain when a product fails or lacks appropriate warnings. These cases often involve complicated facts about how a device was designed, manufactured, marketed, or tested, and they may require careful review of medical records, device histories, and recall information. We aim to guide clients through each stage of a claim, from gathering evidence and preserving devices to negotiating with manufacturers and insurers. Early action helps preserve important proof and improves the ability to document injuries and losses clearly for a stronger claim.

Benefits of a Defective Device Claim

Pursuing a defective medical device claim can secure funds to pay for medical care, replacement procedures, rehabilitation, lost wages, and ongoing needs related to the injury. Beyond financial recovery, a well-managed claim can document the cause of harm and prompt improved warnings or corrections that protect others. Working through a claim also provides a clear record of what happened, which can be important for future treatment and for interactions with insurers and government recall processes. The process can reduce uncertainty by setting expectations about timing, possible outcomes, and the evidence that will support a strong case.

About Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates is a Personal Injury law firm serving clients across West Virginia, including Point Pleasant and Mason County. Our firm handles a range of injury matters such as defective medical devices, product liability, car and truck accidents, and wrongful death claims. We focus on clear communication, careful preparation, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s needs. From our Beckley office we represent injured people and their families, offering guidance on medical documentation, device preservation, and claims strategies while pursuing fair compensation and accountability from responsible parties.

Understanding Defective Medical Device Claims

A defective medical device claim can be based on several legal theories including design defect, manufacturing defect, and failure to warn. Design defects arise when a device is inherently dangerous when used as intended, manufacturing defects occur when a device departs from its intended design during production, and failure to warn claims focus on inadequate instructions or risk disclosures. Establishing a claim typically requires showing that the device was defective, that the defect caused the injury, and that the injured person suffered measurable harm. Collecting medical records, device model and serial numbers, and any recall information is essential to building a solid case.

Time limits apply to defective device claims in West Virginia, and these deadlines can vary depending on the specific facts, such as when the injury was discovered. Acting promptly helps preserve evidence, including the device itself, surgery notes, and imaging. It is also important to report adverse events to the manufacturer and, when applicable, to federal reporting systems so there is an official record. Early steps typically include confirming the device model, seeking medical care, documenting all treatments and costs, and avoiding alterations to the device until it can be properly examined.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Defective Product

A defective product is a medical device that contains a flaw that makes it unsafe when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner. This can include errors in design that make the device dangerous, mistakes during manufacturing that produce a flawed unit, or inadequate instructions or warnings that fail to inform users of known risks. In a legal claim, showing a device was defective involves comparing the device to accepted standards, examining how the product was made and marketed, and documenting how the device caused physical harm to the patient.

Strict Liability

Strict liability is a legal principle that can hold a manufacturer or seller responsible for a defective device even if they exercised care in design or production. Under strict liability, the focus is on whether the product was unreasonably dangerous and whether the defect caused injury, rather than on negligence. This doctrine allows injured consumers to seek compensation without needing to prove the manufacturer acted carelessly, though other elements such as defect and causation must still be established through medical records, expert analysis, and product evidence.

Design Defect

A design defect exists when the plans or specifications for a device create an unreasonable risk of harm even when the product is manufactured exactly as designed. These defects affect every unit of a product line and often require evaluation of the intended use, alternative designs, and the risk-benefit balance. In claims claiming a design defect, investigators look at industry standards, testing and research data, and whether safer practical alternatives were available that would have reduced the risk of injury without impairing functionality.

Failure to Warn

Failure to warn refers to a device manufacturer or distributor not providing adequate instructions or risk information about the device, including proper use, warnings about potential dangers, and contraindications. These omissions can lead patients and clinicians to use a device in ways that result in preventable harm. A successful failure to warn claim typically shows that the lack of clear warnings or instructions made the device more dangerous and that a reasonable warning would have reduced the risk of injury by informing users about precautions or alternative treatments.

PRO TIPS

Preserve the Device

If at all possible, keep the medical device in the condition it was in after the incident and avoid altering or discarding parts that could be important to a claim; doing so preserves critical physical evidence that helps establish how the device performed. Photograph the device in place and out of place, note any serial or model numbers, and keep packaging, instructions, and any receipts or correspondence related to the device for later review. Contact our office for guidance about storage and handling so evidence is preserved for testing and documentation without risking contamination or damage.

Document Your Injuries

Carefully document symptoms, treatments, and all medical visits related to the device injury, maintaining copies of medical records, imaging, operative reports, and bills to create a comprehensive picture of harm and cost. Keep a daily journal noting pain, limitations, medications, and how the injury affects daily life, and gather statements from family members or caregivers who can describe changes and impacts. Accurate, contemporaneous documentation strengthens a claim by connecting the device failure to specific injuries and demonstrating the full extent of losses for compensation purposes.

Avoid Early Settlement Pressure

Insurance companies or device manufacturers may offer an early payment that seems convenient but could undervalue long-term needs and future medical expenses, so resist quick settlement offers until you understand the full scope of your injury and recovery timeline. Consult with counsel so you can assess whether a proposal fairly compensates current and future losses, and ensure all medical outcomes are known before deciding. Taking the time to evaluate offers thoroughly helps protect your financial future and avoids accepting an amount that may not cover ongoing or unforeseen treatment needs.

Comparing Your Legal Options

When a Full Approach Is Advisable:

Complex Injuries and Long-Term Care

When an injury results in significant ongoing medical needs, rehabilitation, or permanent impairment, a comprehensive legal approach helps ensure future care is accounted for in any recovery and that claims reflect long-term costs. Complex injuries often require detailed medical reviews, life-care planning, and careful valuation of future lost earnings and support needs to achieve a fair outcome. Addressing these issues early and thoroughly helps families secure resources to cover ongoing therapy, assistive devices, or home modifications that may be necessary for the injured person’s quality of life.

Multiple Responsible Parties

When liability may rest with multiple entities, such as manufacturers, distributors, healthcare providers, or component suppliers, a broader legal strategy is often necessary to identify all responsible parties and pursue appropriate claims against each. Coordinating claims across defendants can improve recovery prospects and ensure that each source of responsibility is explored, which may involve detailed discovery, product testing, and subpoenaing manufacturing records. A comprehensive approach gives injured people the best chance to hold all accountable parties responsible for their role in causing harm and to seek full compensation for losses.

When a Narrow Approach May Work:

Minor Injuries and Clear Liability

If injuries are minor, medical expenses are limited, and liability is clear based on undisputed facts or an admitted defect, a narrower and more streamlined claims process may provide a timely resolution without extensive discovery or testing. In such cases, focusing on documentation, medical bills, and negotiation with insurers can lead to a fair settlement that avoids prolonged litigation. Still, even seemingly straightforward cases benefit from careful evaluation to ensure all losses, including pain and diminished quality of life, are considered before accepting any offer.

Quick Insurance Resolution

When an insurer recognizes responsibility early and the total damages are modest, it may be possible to resolve a claim through focused negotiation that eliminates the need for prolonged investigation or trial preparation. This route can reduce stress and provide a faster financial recovery for immediate needs such as medical bills and lost wages. Even when pursuing a quicker resolution, it is important to document all treatment and future care needs so that any settlement adequately reflects both current and foreseeable costs related to the device injury.

Common Circumstances Leading to Claims

Implant Failures

Implant failures occur when devices such as hip or knee replacements, cardiac implants, or spinal hardware break, migrate, or otherwise malfunction in a way that causes pain, infection, or the need for revision surgery, creating substantial medical and recovery needs for the patient. In these situations, careful review of manufacturing records, surgical notes, imaging, and any earlier complaints about the device can help document how the implant failed and the resulting damages to support a claim for replacement costs, treatment, and related losses.

Defective Surgical Tools

Defective surgical instruments or tools that break or malfunction during procedures can cause unintended tissue damage, additional surgeries, or prolonged recovery, and they often require coordination between treating providers and device manufacturers to identify the cause. Collecting operative reports, device identification numbers, and intraoperative imaging can be essential to determine whether a tool defect contributed to the injury and to seek compensation for corrective care and related impacts on recovery and daily life.

Inadequate Warnings

A device that lacks clear warnings, instructions, or contraindication information can lead clinicians and patients to use it in ways that result in preventable harm, and claims can focus on whether users were adequately informed of known risks. Showing that more complete or clearer labeling would have changed the use of the device and prevented injury often involves comparing the device’s instructions to industry standards and available safety data to demonstrate the impact of missing or insufficient warnings.

Point Pleasant Defective Device Claims Assistance

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Defective Device Claims

People in Point Pleasant turn to Stephen New & Associates because we combine local knowledge of West Virginia law with focused attention to each client’s situation, including the medical and financial impacts of a device-related injury. We help clients assemble thorough records, preserve device evidence, and evaluate recall or safety notices that may be relevant to a claim. Throughout the process we prioritize clear, timely communication and practical strategies aimed at securing compensation for medical costs, lost income, and ongoing care needs, while keeping clients informed of options at every stage.

Our approach emphasizes careful preparation, aggressive advocacy when needed, and a willingness to pursue a claim through negotiation or court if necessary to protect clients rights and interests. We work with treating medical providers and appropriate third parties to document injuries, obtain necessary records, and develop persuasive case presentations. By focusing on each client’s recovery needs and financial losses, we aim to secure outcomes that reflect both past expenses and future care requirements, helping families regain stability after a device-related injury.

Contact Our Office in Point Pleasant

People Also Search For

defective medical device lawyer Point Pleasant

medical device recall Point Pleasant WV

defective implant claims Mason County

product liability attorney West Virginia

medical device injury compensation Point Pleasant

Defective medical device lawsuit Point Pleasant

surgical instrument failure claims WV

Stephen New defective device claims

Related Services

FAQS

What is a defective medical device claim?

A defective medical device claim seeks compensation when a medical product causes injury due to a design flaw, manufacturing error, or inadequate warnings. Such claims examine whether the device was made or marketed in a way that made it unreasonably dangerous when used as intended or in a foreseeable manner, and whether that defect directly caused the injury. Establishing causation typically depends on medical records, device identification, testing, and witness or provider statements that link the device malfunction to the harm experienced. Pursuing a claim involves gathering treatment documentation, preserving the device when possible, and reviewing recall or adverse event reports that may indicate broader problems. Recovery may include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and future care needs, depending on the severity and permanence of injuries. Early action and careful evidence collection help build a claim that clearly connects the defect to the losses suffered.

How long do I have to file a claim in West Virginia?

Time limits for filing defective device claims in West Virginia can vary depending on the nature of the injury and when it was discovered, and these deadlines should be confirmed promptly to avoid losing legal rights. Statutes of limitation may begin at the time of injury or at the point of discovery when the harmed person reasonably should have known an injury was caused by a device, and certain circumstances can toll or extend filing deadlines. Because these rules can be complex, it is important to ask about applicable time limits as soon as a device-related injury is suspected. Acting promptly also helps preserve essential evidence, such as the device itself, surgical notes, and medical imaging, which supports a timely and thorough claim. If you suspect a late-discovered injury from a device, document the timeline of symptoms and consultations and reach out for an evaluation to determine whether the discovery rule or other exceptions may allow a claim to proceed despite the passage of time.

What types of medical devices commonly cause injuries?

A wide range of devices can cause injuries when defective, including implants like hip and knee replacements, spinal hardware, cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators, stents, and implantable pumps, as well as prosthetic devices and surgical instruments. Diagnostic equipment, infusion pumps, monitoring devices, and certain durable medical equipment can also malfunction or fail to perform as intended, producing harm that ranges from infection and tissue damage to loss of function or organ injury. Each category of device raises specific technical and medical questions that shape investigation and recovery strategies. Recalls, safety notices, and regulatory reports often identify models with higher-than-expected failure rates, and those resources can be important when building a claim. If a device has been the subject of manufacturer communications or federal recall notices, that information should be gathered and preserved, along with treatment records and any complaints made to providers or manufacturers, to document the context and extent of the risk posed by the device.

Should I keep the device after an injury?

When possible, preserving the device and avoiding alterations is important because the physical item can provide direct evidence of a manufacturing or design problem, such as a fracture, material defect, or assembly failure. Photograph the device in place and once removed, retain original packaging and any labels that show model or serial numbers, and keep copies of surgical and procedural records that reference the device so its history can be reconstructed. Proper storage and handling are important to avoid contamination or damage that could undermine analysis. Before any testing or disposal, consult with counsel so the device can be examined using appropriate methods that preserve its evidentiary value. If the device has already been discarded or altered, other documentary evidence like operative reports, imaging, pathology findings, and witness statements may still support a claim, but preserving what remains and documenting the chain of custody strengthens the ability to demonstrate a defect and its role in causing harm.

Will my defective device case go to trial?

Many defective device cases are resolved through negotiation or settlement because litigation can be lengthy and expensive for all parties, and manufacturers or insurers may prefer to resolve claims outside of court when liability is reasonably clear. Settlement allows injured people to obtain compensation without the time and uncertainty of a trial, but any proposed resolution should be evaluated carefully to ensure it covers both current and anticipated future medical needs related to the injury. Each case is unique, and the decision to settle should be informed by a full understanding of likely outcomes and costs. Some cases proceed to trial when disputes over liability, causation, or damages cannot be resolved through negotiation, or when a manufacturer contests responsibility for the harm. Proceeding to trial may also be necessary to secure broader accountability or a larger recovery in cases involving severe injuries, multiple responsible parties, or significant punitive considerations. Being prepared for either path helps individuals and families make informed choices about how to pursue resolution that meets their needs.

How are damages calculated in a defective device claim?

Damages in a defective device claim typically include economic losses such as past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and costs for ongoing care or device replacement, as well as non-economic losses like pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. The calculation of future needs often relies on medical evaluations, life-care plans, and documentation of expected therapies or procedures to estimate reasonable future costs. Accurate records and professional assessments help ensure that compensation reflects both current bills and foreseeable ongoing expenses tied to the injury. In some cases, punitive or exemplary damages may be available where misconduct is severe, though the availability of such awards depends on state law and the conduct of the manufacturer or responsible parties. Demonstrating the full scope of damages requires collecting bills, receipts, wage statements, and clear medical documentation linking treatments and limitations directly to the device-related injury so a comprehensive recovery can be pursued.

Who can be held liable for a defective medical device?

Liability for a defective medical device can attach to a range of parties, including the device manufacturer, component suppliers, distributors, and sometimes healthcare providers or hospitals if improper handling or implantation contributed to the harm. Manufacturers are commonly named because they design and market the product, but distributors and sellers can also bear responsibility when they place products into the stream of commerce without adequate inspection or warning. Identifying all potentially responsible parties is a key step in building a complete claim. When multiple parties are involved, claims may proceed against some or all defendants to ensure full compensation for losses and to allocate responsibility fairly. Comparative fault rules can affect recovery if the injured person or a treating provider contributed to the harm, so careful factual development is necessary to determine how liability should be pursued and shared among the relevant parties to maximize recovery and reflect the relative contributions to the injury.

What if the device was implanted years before problems appeared?

Devices implanted years earlier can still give rise to claims when problems develop later, often because some defects or failures manifest only after extended use, wear, or biological interaction. In such circumstances, statutes of limitation and discovery rules can be important, because the clock for filing may begin when the injury was or should have been discovered rather than when the device was implanted. Documenting when symptoms began and when they were linked to the device helps determine whether a claim is timely under applicable law. Evaluating a late-manifesting injury typically involves reviewing prior medical records, imaging, and any earlier complaints or revisions to determine when the device first showed signs of failure. Gathering device identification details, recall histories, and communications from manufacturers can support a claim, and consulting with medical professionals to explain the relationship between the device and later symptoms is often necessary to establish causation and appropriate damages.

How much does it cost to hire your firm for a defective device case?

Our firm generally handles defective device claims on a contingency arrangement so clients do not pay attorney fees unless there is a recovery, which allows people to pursue claims without upfront legal fees while still accessing representation and resources to evaluate complex matters. There may be case costs such as records retrieval, expert analysis, and filing fees, and in many arrangements those costs are advanced by the firm and reimbursed from any settlement or judgment. Fee structures and cost responsibilities should be explained clearly during the initial consultation so clients understand how claims are handled. Because recovery is not guaranteed, contingency arrangements align the firm and client interests in achieving a fair result, and they help remove financial barriers to pursuing a claim. During your first meeting we will discuss specific fee terms, how costs are managed, and what to expect regarding timing and potential outcomes so you can make an informed decision about moving forward with a claim.

What should I bring to my first meeting about a defective device claim?

For your initial meeting bring any medical records and bills related to the injury, operative reports, imaging such as X-rays or MRIs, and any paperwork or labels that identify the device model and serial number if available, along with correspondence from manufacturers or insurers. Include notes about the timeline of symptoms, treatment dates, and names of treating providers, as well as photographs of injuries and any communications you have had with medical personnel or the device maker. Clear, organized documentation helps us evaluate the claim efficiently and identify next steps. Also bring contact information for treating physicians and the hospital where the procedure occurred, a list of medications and ongoing care needs, and any records of lost income or other financial impacts. If the device remains available, note where it is stored and whether it was altered or discarded, as that affects evidence preservation. Providing as much detail as possible at the outset enables a more productive consultation and a quicker assessment of potential claims.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services