Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

PFAS Lawyer in Mannington

Holding Polluters Accountable

Understanding PFAS Mass Torts and Your Options

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS, are a group of man-made chemicals linked to long-term contamination of soil and water supplies. This guide explains how PFAS contamination can affect residents and communities in Mannington and Marion County, and outlines legal options under mass tort and product liability law. The information below is intended to help you recognize possible exposure, understand legal processes, and learn what to expect from investigation and claims. If you live near industrial sites, landfills, or military bases, this guide aims to make the legal landscape clearer so you can decide whether to pursue action.

PFAS contamination cases can be complex because they often involve scientific testing, multiple defendants, and long histories of chemical use and disposal. This guide breaks down the most important factors for people considering claims in West Virginia, including timelines, evidence, and compensation types that may be available. Stephen New & Associates represents individuals and families across West Virginia and offers help investigating exposure, identifying responsible parties, and pursuing recovery for medical monitoring, property damages, and personal injuries. Contact our Beckley office at 304-355-5565 to discuss whether a PFAS claim may be appropriate for your situation.

Why Taking Action on PFAS Matters

Addressing PFAS contamination through legal channels can protect public health, preserve property values, and hold manufacturers and dischargers responsible for cleanup costs and damages. Taking legal action can fund medical monitoring to detect health conditions early, secure compensation for medical bills and lost earnings, and require remedial measures to limit ongoing exposure. For communities in Mannington and Marion County, collective legal strategies like mass torts or class actions can combine evidence across many claimants to strengthen cases and improve chances of meaningful remediation. Pursuing claims can also incentivize safer practices and reduce future risks for families and local businesses.

About Stephen New & Associates and PFAS Work

Stephen New & Associates is a West Virginia law firm serving clients from our Beckley office and across the state on a range of personal injury and mass tort matters, including PFAS contamination. Our attorneys have handled complex environmental cases that require coordination with scientists, public health professionals, and clearinghouse resources. We focus on careful investigation, documentation of exposure pathways, and evidence collection to support claims for affected individuals and communities. If you suspect PFAS contamination in your water, property, or workplace, our team can assist with testing referrals, claims evaluation, and strategic litigation planning to pursue recovery.

How PFAS Mass Torts Work

PFAS mass tort litigation brings together claims from many individuals who share similar injuries or exposure to the same chemical sources. These substances are persistent in the environment and can travel through groundwater and surface water, making it necessary to investigate contamination from manufacturing, firefighting foam, and industrial waste. A successful claim typically requires establishing exposure, linking that exposure to specific defendants, and showing measurable harms such as medical conditions, property contamination, or monitoring needs. Mass torts and coordinated cases allow claimants to pool resources and expert testimony to address scientific and factual complexity effectively.

The legal process for PFAS claims can include formal discovery, coordinated litigation across jurisdictions, and settlement negotiations or trials when necessary. Parties may seek payment for medical monitoring, testing of private wells, property devaluation, and personal injury damages where illnesses have been linked to PFAS exposure. Because cases often involve corporate records and scientific studies, careful preservation of evidence and collaboration with environmental consultants and health professionals are essential. Plaintiffs may also participate in class actions or structured settlements, depending on how claims are grouped and the remedies available.

Need More Information?

Key Terms to Know

PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)

PFAS are a large family of human-made chemicals once widely used for their resistance to heat, stains, grease, and water. Because they do not break down easily, PFAS can persist in soil and groundwater for many years and accumulate in the human body. In legal contexts, PFAS refers to the contaminants at issue in environmental investigations, testing protocols, and claims for injury or property damage. Understanding how PFAS travel in the environment and the types of products and industrial processes that generate PFAS can be important when evaluating the strength of a potential case.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a legal device that groups many individual civil claims against one or more defendants when the claims arise from similar facts or injuries. Unlike a class action, mass torts maintain separate cases for each claimant while coordinating discovery, expert testimony, and pretrial procedures to improve efficiency and consistency. In PFAS litigation, mass torts allow multiple plaintiffs who experienced exposure from the same source to combine scientific and documentary proof to hold responsible parties accountable for cleanup, testing, and damages related to health impacts or property losses.

Medical Monitoring

Medical monitoring refers to court-ordered or negotiated programs that provide ongoing health screenings and diagnostic tests for people who may be at increased risk due to exposure to toxic substances. In PFAS cases, medical monitoring can include blood tests, imaging, and periodic medical exams designed to detect developing conditions at an early, more treatable stage. Courts may award monitoring costs when exposure is demonstrated and there is a medically recognized need for periodic testing to manage potential long-term health effects.

Property Damage and Remediation

Property damage in PFAS matters covers contamination of private wells, soil, and other real property that reduces use or value, and the costs to remediate or replace contaminated systems. Remediation may include provision of alternative water supplies, well testing and replacement, soil removal, and treatment systems. Legal claims can seek compensation for both the direct costs of remediation and diminished property value, as well as for any associated economic losses sustained by property owners due to the presence of PFAS.

PRO TIPS

Document Your Exposure

Maintaining clear records of potential exposure is vital when pursuing PFAS claims. Save water testing results, correspondence with local authorities, medical records, and photos of any visible contamination or signs of compromised water systems. Detailed timelines and documentation help your legal team connect exposure to specific sources and support requests for remediation and monitoring.

Seek Independent Testing

If you suspect PFAS in your water, seek independent laboratory testing to establish baseline levels and track changes over time. Professional testing provides reliable data for both health assessments and litigation. Keep copies of lab reports and any recommendations for treatment or alternative water supplies to bolster claims for remediation costs and monitoring.

Preserve Relevant Evidence

Preserving evidence such as past utility bills, property disclosures, receipts for filtration systems, and communications with manufacturers or regulators can strengthen a PFAS claim. Avoid discarding testing results or documents that reference contamination, and alert your attorney as soon as possible so formal evidence preservation steps can be taken. Early preservation helps prevent loss of important records needed for investigation and litigation.

Comparing Legal Paths for PFAS Claims

When a Full Legal Approach Matters:

Widespread or Community Exposure

When contamination affects entire communities, comprehensive legal approaches help coordinate testing, remediation, and compensation across many impacted properties and residents. Coordinated strategies can align plaintiffs’ cases to produce shared evidence, expert testimony, and stronger negotiation leverage against large manufacturers or corporate defendants. Such approaches also help ensure consistent remedial measures and equitable distribution of settlement funds across affected residents.

Complex Source Identification

When multiple potential sources might be responsible for PFAS contamination, a comprehensive legal plan that includes environmental forensics and coordinated discovery is often necessary. This approach allows identification of corporate links, historical disposal practices, and supply chain pathways that can establish liability. Thorough investigation supports claims for cleanup costs and damages even where responsibility spans more than one party.

When a Narrow Response May Be Appropriate:

Single-Source, Localized Contamination

If PFAS contamination is confined to a single property or traceable to a single nearby facility, a more focused legal approach aimed at remediation and direct compensation may be effective. Targeted claims can prioritize immediate fixes like providing alternative water supplies or funding well replacement without broader mass tort coordination. This route can be faster when the responsible party and evidence are clear and narrow in scope.

Immediate Remediation Needs

When the urgent priority is to secure safe drinking water or remediation for one or a few households, limited legal measures such as preliminary injunctive relief or negotiated interim solutions may suffice. These actions can deliver rapid relief while longer-term liability issues are reviewed. A focused approach balances the need for quick protective steps with preserving broader claims for later resolution.

Common Situations That Lead to PFAS Claims

Contaminated Private Wells

Private wells near industrial sites or former manufacturing areas may test positive for PFAS, leading homeowners to seek testing, filtration, or replacement. Legal claims can cover testing costs, installation of treatment systems, and funding for long-term monitoring to protect household health.

Industrial and Aqueous Film-Forming Foam Releases

Firefighting training sites, airports, and military bases that used firefighting foam have been common sources of PFAS contamination. Nearby communities may be eligible to pursue remediation and health-related remedies when such releases impact local water supplies or soil.

Property Devaluation Due to Contamination

When PFAS is discovered on residential or commercial property, market values can decline and sales may be hindered, creating grounds for legal claims. Compensation may seek to restore property value or cover costs associated with clean-up and disclosure.

PFAS Claims Assistance for Mannington Residents

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for PFAS Matters

Stephen New & Associates provides dedicated representation for people facing PFAS contamination concerns in Mannington and throughout West Virginia. Our team focuses on thorough investigation, coordinating testing, and assembling documentation that supports claims for medical monitoring, property remediation, and economic losses. We work with environmental scientists and public health professionals to assess exposure pathways and develop a legal strategy tailored to the facts of each case, and we pursue outcomes designed to protect client health and property interests.

Clients receive clear communication about case progress and options, including the potential benefits of coordinated litigation when many parties are affected. We prioritize cases with documented exposure and measurable harms, pursue all viable legal avenues for remediation and compensation, and help clients understand timelines and likely next steps. If you are concerned about PFAS exposure, contact our Beckley office at 304-355-5565 for a careful review of your situation and possible legal remedies.

Get a Free Case Review for PFAS Exposure Claims

People Also Search For

PFAS lawyer Mannington WV

PFAS contamination lawsuit West Virginia

PFAS mass torts Marion County

private well PFAS testing Mannington

PFAS remediation claims Beckley law firm

medical monitoring PFAS lawsuit

PFAS water contamination legal help

file PFAS claim West Virginia

FAQS

What are PFAS and why are they a concern?

PFAS are a family of man-made chemicals used for decades in industrial processes, firefighting foam, and many consumer products because of their resistance to heat and water. The problem with PFAS is that they are persistent in the environment and can accumulate in soil, groundwater, and living organisms. Because of this persistence, areas near manufacturing plants, airports, fire training facilities, and waste disposal sites are at higher risk for contamination. People exposed over time may worry about long-term health effects and ongoing household impacts, which is why awareness and testing are important. Regulatory agencies and public health entities have increased attention on PFAS due to growing scientific study and detection in drinking water sources. Legal claims often follow when testing confirms contamination that affects private wells or municipal supplies, or when corporate records show a pattern of use and disposal that created exposure risks. Understanding what PFAS are and how they move through the environment is an important first step when considering legal options and asserting community or individual claims.

How can I tell if my well or water supply is contaminated with PFAS?

The only reliable way to know whether your water contains PFAS is through laboratory testing that screens for the specific compounds in the PFAS family. Many public health departments and private labs can perform these tests, and results will report concentrations of common PFAS chemicals. If municipal or neighbor testing shows elevated levels nearby, arranging independent testing for your private well or water source can confirm whether you and your household face exposure. Keep copies of all test results, including chain-of-custody documentation if available, since these records are important for legal claims. If testing reveals PFAS in your water, consult local health authorities about recommended steps and consider interim measures such as bottled water or certified filtration systems while longer-term solutions are explored. Document any health symptoms, water usage changes, and expenses incurred from alternative water sources or filtration equipment. These records support potential claims for remediation costs, property mitigation, and other forms of relief while legal avenues are pursued to identify responsible parties.

What types of compensation are possible in PFAS cases?

Compensation in PFAS cases can vary depending on the harms proven and the remedies sought, but common forms include payment for medical monitoring, reimbursement for testing and replacement of contaminated wells, costs for treatment systems, remediation expenses, and compensation for diminished property value. In cases where individuals can show a link between PFAS exposure and a diagnosed health condition, claims for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and lost wages may also arise. The specific recovery depends on the evidence of exposure, causal links to health issues, and the legal theories pursued against defendants. In mass tort or coordinated litigation, settlement structures may allocate funds among many claimants based on exposure level, medical needs, and documented damages. Courts and negotiating parties may also establish long-term remediation programs and community relief funds. It is important to document all related expenses and impacts early, since detailed records make it easier to quantify damages and seek appropriate compensation during settlement or trial.

Who can be held responsible for PFAS contamination?

Potentially responsible parties in PFAS matters can include manufacturers of PFAS-containing products, industrial facilities that used or disposed of PFAS, suppliers of firefighting foams, and waste handlers who accepted PFAS-contaminated material. Identifying the correct defendants often requires review of historical records, product distribution chains, and site-specific operational details. Multiple parties may share liability when contamination results from a combination of product use, disposal practices, or failures in containment over time. Determining responsibility also involves evaluating corporate structure and historical practices, which may include successor liability or claims against contractors and service providers. Environmental forensic work, including tracing contamination plumes and reviewing documents about product formulation and disposal, helps narrow the list of potential defendants and build a case for remediation and damages against parties whose activities contributed to contamination.

What is medical monitoring and can I get it in a PFAS case?

Medical monitoring is a legal remedy that provides ongoing health surveillance for people who may be at increased risk because of exposure to toxic substances such as PFAS. Courts may award payment for medical tests and periodic evaluations when plaintiffs demonstrate substantial exposure and a scientifically plausible risk of disease that can be detected through monitoring. The goal is to identify health conditions early so treatment can begin sooner, which can improve outcomes and reduce long-term costs for affected individuals. To obtain medical monitoring through litigation or settlement, claimants generally need documented evidence of exposure, professional opinions supporting the need for screening, and an established monitoring protocol. Participation in a monitoring program often requires coordination with medical providers and environmental consultants to create an appropriate schedule of tests and exams tailored to the type of exposure and potential health risks.

How long does a PFAS claim typically take to resolve?

The timeline for PFAS claims varies widely depending on factors such as the scope of contamination, the number of parties involved, and how quickly scientific and documentary evidence can be developed. Some matters that involve obvious contamination and clear defendants may be resolved through negotiation in a matter of months to a few years. More complex mass torts that require multi-district coordination, extensive discovery, and expert testimony may take several years to reach resolution through settlement or trial. While the process can be lengthy, early action to document exposure, preserve records, and secure testing helps move a case forward more efficiently. Pursuing coordinated approaches or joining consolidated litigation when appropriate can accelerate the development of shared evidence and expert reports, which may lead to earlier resolution on favorable terms for affected claimants.

Do I need scientific testing to bring a PFAS claim?

Scientific testing is often central to PFAS claims because it provides objective evidence of contamination levels in water, soil, or biological samples. Independent laboratory results help establish exposure for individual households and can be aggregated to demonstrate patterns across a community. In addition to environmental testing, expert analysis may be needed to interpret results, trace contamination sources, and link exposure pathways to defendants’ actions, which strengthens the factual basis for claims seeking remediation and compensation. Even when initial testing is inconclusive, other forms of evidence — such as corporate documents, historical site usage records, and regulatory filings — can support claims and prompt further investigation. Working with attorneys who can coordinate testing and environmental consulting helps ensure that sampling is done correctly and that evidence is preserved for potential litigation needs.

Can property owners recover diminished value due to PFAS?

Property owners can seek compensation for diminished value when PFAS contamination reduces marketability or sale price, or requires costly remediation that affects the utility of the property. Claims for property damages may cover testing, replacement of contaminated wells, installation of treatment systems, and remediation work needed to make a property safe for occupancy or sale. Documentation such as appraisals, pre- and post-contamination sales data, and repair or replacement invoices supports claims for economic loss tied to contamination. Courts and settlements may award funds specifically for property restoration and value loss, or incorporate property damages into broader remediation settlements. Acting promptly to document the condition of the property, any disclosures made during sale attempts, and remediation expenses helps substantiate requests for compensation and ensures a clearer record for valuation claims.

Will joining a mass tort or class action limit my individual recovery?

Joining a mass tort or class action can provide benefits like shared investigative resources, coordinated discovery, and the ability to combine scientific evidence across many plaintiffs, which often strengthens the fact record. These collective cases can lead to structured settlements that fund remediation and monitoring for many people at once. Participating in coordinated litigation does not automatically prevent pursuing individual damages claims, but the exact impact on recovery depends on how any settlement is structured and the terms of participation established by the litigation.

How do I start a PFAS claim with Stephen New & Associates?

To start a PFAS claim with Stephen New & Associates, begin by contacting the Beckley office at 304-355-5565 to arrange an initial review of your situation. Be prepared to provide any water test results, medical records, property documents, and correspondence related to suspected contamination. Our team will evaluate the information, advise on next steps such as independent testing or evidence preservation, and explain potential legal strategies tailored to your case and the community context. If we proceed, the firm will coordinate necessary investigations, consult with environmental and medical professionals, and work to identify responsible parties. Throughout the process, we will explain timelines, potential remedies, and any options for joining coordinated litigation or pursuing individual relief, while keeping you informed of progress and decisions that affect your claim.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services