Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Roundup Lawyer in Sissonville

Roundup Claims Help

Your Guide to Roundup Mass Torts

Roundup, a widely used herbicide containing glyphosate, has been linked in many cases to serious illnesses such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Residents of Sissonville and surrounding Kanawha County who used Roundup regularly, worked in landscaping, agriculture, or were otherwise exposed may be eligible to take part in mass tort claims. This guide explains how Roundup-related cases are handled, what evidence matters, and how local procedural deadlines can affect your rights. We want to help you understand the basics so you can make informed choices about pursuing a claim and protecting your health and financial future.

Mass tort claims involving Roundup typically group many individual cases that share similar factual and legal questions. These cases can proceed through consolidated tracks such as multidistrict litigation or coordinated state court efforts, which streamline pretrial discovery and expert disclosures while preserving each person’s individual compensation claim. Gathering medical records, product purchase history, and exposure details early can make a meaningful difference. This overview describes the steps people commonly take when considering a claim and the practical timelines and documentation that support a strong case.

Why Bringing a Roundup Claim Can Matter

Pursuing a Roundup claim can help injured individuals obtain compensation for medical bills, ongoing care needs, lost income, and pain and suffering, and it can also support accountability for product manufacturers. Participating in a mass tort allows plaintiffs to share the expense of discovery and expert work while preserving the ability to present individualized evidence of harm. In addition to potential financial recovery, a claim can create a public record about product risks that may benefit others. Understanding these benefits helps people weigh whether pursuing a claim is the right step for their situation.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Approach to Mass Torts

Stephen New & Associates is a Beckley-based personal injury firm serving clients across West Virginia, including Sissonville and Kanawha County. The firm handles a range of serious injury matters such as medical malpractice, product liability, catastrophic injury, and mass tort claims like Roundup cases. Our approach focuses on careful case evaluation, clear communication with clients, and coordinating with medical professionals to document injuries and exposure histories. If you are considering a claim, calling 304-355-5565 will connect you with someone who can explain the practical steps for your situation and help collect relevant records.

What Roundup Mass Torts Cover in Practical Terms

Roundup mass tort claims center on allegations that long-term exposure to glyphosate-based products contributed to the development of conditions like non-Hodgkin lymphoma. People who used Roundup for landscaping, farming, grounds maintenance, or home gardening may have been exposed through direct application, drift from nearby spraying, or workplace contact. Eligibility for a claim usually depends on documented exposure and a diagnosed medical condition with a plausible connection to the product. Understanding the types of exposure and medical documentation that typically support a claim helps people decide whether to pursue a claim and how to begin collecting evidence.

In mass tort proceedings, individual claimants retain their own cases while pretrial work is coordinated to build the factual and scientific records that apply across many claims. This means the litigation can develop shared expert reports, records requests, and discovery procedures that benefit all participants while allowing each person to maintain unique medical facts and damages claims. Whether a case moves toward settlement or trial can depend on medical proof, severity of injury, and how the broader liability questions resolve. Learning how the process typically unfolds can reduce uncertainty and help claimants prepare.

Need More Information?

Key Terms You Should Know

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the active chemical ingredient used in many herbicide products, including Roundup. It works by interrupting certain biological pathways in plants, making it a popular choice for controlling weeds in agricultural and residential settings. Over the years, researchers and litigants have examined whether exposure to glyphosate is associated with certain cancers, and that scientific and legal discussion is central to Roundup litigation. If you were exposed to products containing glyphosate and later developed a serious illness, documenting exposure dates, product names, and use patterns is important for any claim.

MDL (Multidistrict Litigation)

Multidistrict litigation is a federal procedure that centralizes pretrial proceedings for related cases filed across multiple districts to promote efficiency and consistency. In an MDL, discovery, expert exchanges, and common legal issues are handled in a single court while individual claimants keep their own files and potential for individual trials or settlements. MDLs can accelerate the resolution of common scientific and legal questions, reduce duplicate work, and conserve resources for both plaintiffs and defendants. Participation in an MDL does not prevent an individual from seeking a separate trial when appropriate.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a group of blood cancers that originate in the lymphatic system and can present with symptoms such as swollen lymph nodes, fatigue, unexplained weight loss, and night sweats. Medical research has explored possible links between certain chemical exposures and an increased risk of developing this type of cancer. In the context of Roundup claims, a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma often forms the medical basis for an individual’s case when combined with documented exposure to glyphosate-containing products. Accurate medical records and specialist reports help establish the nature and timing of the diagnosis for any claim.

Statute of Limitations

A statute of limitations sets the legal deadline for filing a civil claim, and these time limits vary by state and claim type. In West Virginia, specific deadlines apply depending on the cause of action and when injuries were discovered. Missing the applicable deadline can bar recovery, so it is important to identify and act within the relevant period once a diagnosis or injury is linked to Roundup exposure. There are exceptions and tolling rules that may extend deadlines in certain circumstances, and collecting records early helps preserve the option to seek compensation.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Medical Records Promptly

Obtain and securely store copies of all medical records, diagnostic tests, pathology reports, and treatment summaries that relate to your diagnosis and symptoms. These records form the backbone of any medical causation argument and help document the timing and severity of your condition, so request records from all treating providers early and keep organized copies. Having clear medical documentation available makes it easier to evaluate potential claims, provide materials to treating physicians for opinions, and respond to discovery requests during litigation.

Document Product Use Carefully

Collect any labels, receipts, photographs of product containers, or notes that show how and when you used Roundup or similar glyphosate-based products, and preserve packaging if available. Journals, calendar entries, or witness statements that describe application methods, frequency, and protective measures used can be valuable when reconstructing exposure. Detailed documentation of product use helps tie your medical condition to exposure patterns and supports the factual record required in mass tort proceedings and insurance or settlement discussions.

Track Symptoms and Financial Impact

Keep a contemporaneous log of symptoms, medical appointments, medications, and how the condition affects daily life and work, including dates and descriptions of functional limitations. Save invoices, receipts for travel to appointments, records of lost wages, and correspondence related to treatment costs as part of a comprehensive damages file. Presenting a clear account of both physical effects and financial impacts is essential to supporting claims for medical expenses, lost income, and compensation for ongoing care needs.

Comparing Paths: Full Representation Versus Limited Approaches

When Full Case Handling Is Most Appropriate:

Multidistrict Litigation or Multiple Plaintiffs

Comprehensive legal representation is often appropriate when your case is part of a larger coordinated litigation, such as an MDL, or where multiple plaintiffs share common claims and scientific issues. A full-service approach manages complex discovery, coordinates with medical experts, and tracks shared developments that affect many claimants while preserving your individual rights. This level of involvement is beneficial when claims raise technical medical causation questions, require extensive document review, or when negotiations with manufacturers involve broad settlement structures.

Complex Medical Histories and Severe Injuries

When an injured person has a complicated medical history, multiple contributing conditions, or needs long-term care planning, comprehensive representation helps assemble the full medical narrative and coordinate specialist opinions. This approach supports detailed proof of both liability and damages, and it helps ensure future care needs and economic losses are properly evaluated. A thorough approach is also useful when case strategy requires individualized investigation into exposure sources and timing to link the product to the injury.

When a Narrower, Focused Approach May Be Enough:

Clear Short-Term Medical Costs

A limited approach can be appropriate when medical issues are straightforward, damages are primarily near-term medical expenses, and exposure documentation is clear and uncomplicated. In these cases, targeted assistance with records collection and settlement negotiation may resolve the matter without extensive litigation. A focused strategy can reduce expense and accelerate closure when the path to resolution is direct and the claimant’s needs are well-documented and unaffected by complex causation disputes.

Minimal Documentation and Quick Resolution

When evidence of exposure and injury is readily available and the parties reach agreement quickly, a limited scope engagement that concentrates on settlement discussions can be effective and efficient. This type of approach may suit claimants seeking timely resolution for immediate costs rather than pursuing extensive discovery. A streamlined process can be advantageous for people who prioritize fast access to compensation and have straightforward damages that do not require long-term prognoses or complex expert testimony.

Typical Circumstances Leading to Roundup Claims

Agricultural or Landscaping Use

Individuals who applied Roundup or other glyphosate-based herbicides as part of farm work, landscaping contracts, or grounds maintenance often have prolonged, repeated exposure and may face heightened concern about related health effects over time. Documentation of work tasks, frequency of use, and protective practices provides important context for any claim and helps establish whether occupational exposure could be linked to a subsequent diagnosis.

Home Gardeners and Property Owners

Homeowners and hobby gardeners who used Roundup on personal property may have been exposed through application, drift, or contact with treated areas, and these domestic usage patterns can form the factual basis for individual claims. Even non-occupational exposure, when combined with a compatible medical diagnosis, can support a claim if records and recollections of product use are available and credible.

Occupational Exposure

Workers in agriculture, landscaping, groundskeeping, and related trades often faced repeated handling and application of herbicides, making workplace exposure an important focus in many Roundup claims. Employer records, coworker statements, and employment histories can help document occupational exposure patterns that are relevant to proving a relationship between product use and injury.

Sissonville Roundup Claim Representation

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for a Roundup Claim

Clients in Sissonville and the surrounding region work with Stephen New & Associates because the firm combines local knowledge of West Virginia practice with a focus on serious injury and product liability matters. We prioritize clear client communication, regular case updates, and careful management of records and filings so people understand the practical steps and timelines involved. Calling our Beckley office will put you in touch with someone who can explain how to begin collecting medical and exposure records and what to expect during the initial claim evaluation process.

The firm manages mass tort matters by coordinating document collection, working with medical providers to obtain necessary reports, and engaging technical resources when scientific issues arise. We strive to handle administrative and procedural burdens so claimants can focus on health and recovery while the firm evaluates legal options, negotiates with defense teams, and pursues appropriate compensation. If a claim moves toward a settlement or trial, we will help ensure that damages for medical care, lost income, and ongoing needs are considered in the overall strategy.

Speak with a Sissonville Attorney About Your Roundup Claim

People Also Search For

Roundup lawsuit Sissonville

glyphosate cancer claim West Virginia

Roundup mass tort Kanawha County

Roundup settlement Beckley WV

lawyer for Roundup exposure

non-Hodgkin lymphoma Roundup

product liability lawsuit Roundup

mass tort attorney Sissonville

FAQS

What is a Roundup mass tort and how does it differ from a typical lawsuit?

A Roundup mass tort is a coordinated legal process where many individuals with similar claims against the same manufacturer pursue remedies in a consolidated fashion for pretrial matters while retaining individual control over their separate damages claims. Unlike a single-plaintiff lawsuit that proceeds on its own timeline, mass torts allow common scientific and legal issues to be addressed collectively, which can reduce duplication and help develop the record on complex causation questions. Participation in a mass tort preserves your right to seek individual relief based on your medical condition and exposure history. The consolidated pretrial process often involves shared discovery, expert disclosures, and coordinated hearings to resolve common disputes, but each person typically maintains the option of pursuing an individual trial or negotiating a separate settlement. This structure can speed the overall development of cases and make shared expert work more efficient, while still allowing tailored assessment of damages, future care needs, and personal circumstances when resolving individual claims.

Who may be eligible to file a claim related to Roundup exposure?

People who used or were exposed to Roundup or other glyphosate-based products and later received a diagnosis of a qualifying condition, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, may be eligible to file a claim. Eligibility often depends on documented exposure patterns, timing between exposure and diagnosis, and medical records showing the relevant health condition. Occupational users, landscapers, farm workers, groundskeepers, and homeowners with repeated or significant exposure have all been claimants in Roundup-related litigation, provided the medical and exposure facts align with legal requirements. Determining eligibility is a fact-specific process that considers the nature and duration of exposure, product identification, and medical proof. Gathering records of product purchases, employment history, and complete medical treatment notes helps establish whether a claim is appropriate. Early evaluation and documentation are important because they inform case strategy and help identify witnesses, product labels, and other evidence that support the connection between exposure and disease.

How long do I have to file a Roundup claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitations set the deadlines for filing a lawsuit and these rules vary by state and the nature of the claim. In West Virginia, the applicable time limits depend on the theory of recovery and the date when the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, and missing the deadline can generally prevent recovery. Because these timelines can be affected by the date of diagnosis, discovery of causation, and other legal doctrines, timely assessment and action are essential to preserve legal options. If you suspect an illness is related to Roundup exposure, collecting medical records and exposure documentation promptly and consulting with counsel helps identify the specific filing deadlines that apply. There are circumstances that can extend or toll deadlines, but those exceptions are fact-dependent. Early inquiry avoids losing rights due to an expired statutory period and ensures preservation of evidence while memories and records remain available.

What types of compensation can I seek in a Roundup case?

Compensation in a Roundup case may include reimbursement for past and future medical expenses, compensation for lost wages and diminished earning capacity, and damages for pain and suffering and reduced quality of life. When a condition requires ongoing treatment, awards or settlement amounts can incorporate projected future care needs and ongoing medical monitoring. The exact categories and amounts of damages depend on medical records, prognosis, the severity of injury, and documented economic losses. Property loss or out-of-pocket expenses related to treatment, travel to medical appointments, and home modifications can also be part of a comprehensive damages claim. For claims where death occurred, family members may pursue different categories of recovery such as funeral expenses, loss of support, and other damages according to applicable state law. Detailed documentation supports accurate valuation of these losses during settlement discussions or trial.

Will a Roundup claim go to trial or be settled?

Many Roundup claims are resolved through negotiated settlements, particularly when consolidated litigation narrows the scientific and legal questions and the parties reach agreements that cover multiple claimants. Settlement can provide a predictable and prompt recovery without the time and expense of a jury trial, and it often follows significant pretrial development of the evidence. However, individual cases can still proceed to trial if settlement negotiations do not produce a fair resolution for a claimant or if a claimant seeks individualized adjudication of damages. Whether a claim goes to trial depends on the strength of evidence, the unique facts of the case, the claimant’s damages, and the broader litigation context. In some situations, bellwether or individual trials may be used to test claims and inform settlement discussions for other plaintiffs. Discussing possible outcomes and trade-offs with counsel helps claimants decide the best path for their circumstances.

What evidence is important in proving a Roundup exposure claim?

Key evidence in a Roundup exposure claim includes complete medical records documenting diagnosis and treatment, records that link the timing of exposure to the onset of disease, and documents or witness statements showing product use and frequency. Product labels, purchase receipts, photographs of containers, and employer records for occupational users help reconstruct exposure history. Expert medical opinions that address causation, supported by relevant testing and specialist reports, are often central to proving the relationship between exposure and illness. Other useful evidence can include contemporaneous notes, statements from coworkers or family members about exposure events, and records of safety equipment or lack thereof. Maintaining organized files with appointment dates, medication lists, and bills strengthens a damages claim. Collecting these materials early ensures that critical evidence is preserved and available during discovery and settlement negotiations.

How does multidistrict litigation (MDL) affect my individual case?

An MDL consolidates pretrial proceedings for related federal cases to reduce duplication and create a coordinated process for discovery and expert work, but it does not merge claimants into a single lawsuit. If your case is part of an MDL, common scientific and legal questions will be addressed centrally, which can expedite development of the record and lead to more consistent rulings on shared issues. Each claimant still maintains an individual claim and the ability to seek separate trials or negotiate individual settlements when appropriate. Participation in an MDL can benefit claimants by sharing the burden of expert development and discovery costs, while preserving personalized evaluation of damages. The MDL judge manages pretrial schedules and bellwether trial selections that may inform settlement negotiations. Understanding how the MDL process operates helps claimants gauge timing and how collective developments may affect individual case strategies.

Can family members file a wrongful death claim if a loved one died after Roundup exposure?

Yes, in cases where a loved one died from a condition linked to Roundup exposure, family members may have the right to bring a wrongful death claim under applicable state law. Wrongful death claims seek recovery for losses such as funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and other damages recognized by the state, and eligibility and damages categories vary with jurisdiction and the relationship between the claimant and the deceased. Prompt evaluation of the factual record, medical history, and exposure evidence is essential to determine the viability of a wrongful death action. Because wrongful death claims involve different timelines and statutory requirements than individual personal injury claims, it is important to identify the applicable deadlines and potential beneficiaries quickly. Gathering medical records, death certificates, employment records, and documentation of financial support helps build a record for any wrongful death claim and supports negotiations or litigation on behalf of surviving family members.

How are medical expenses and future care handled in settlements?

In settlement negotiations and awards, past medical expenses are typically documented through bills, insurance payments, and medical records, while future care and monitoring needs are evaluated based on prognosis, specialist recommendations, and expected treatment plans. Financial experts or life-care planners may prepare estimates of ongoing medical needs and associated costs to support requests for future damages. Demonstrating the necessity and likely duration of future care helps ensure that settlements account for long-term expenses rather than only near-term costs. When structured properly, settlements can address both current medical bills and anticipated future care through lump-sum awards or structured arrangements tailored to the claimant’s needs. Documentation such as treatment plans, specialist opinions, and cost estimates strengthens the case for including future medical care in a damages recovery. Discussing these projections early with counsel helps ensure accurate valuation during negotiations.

How can I start a Roundup claim with Stephen New & Associates?

To start a Roundup claim with Stephen New & Associates, call the Beckley office at 304-355-5565 or send a message through the firm website to arrange an initial consultation. During that first contact, the firm will discuss basic facts about your exposure, collect consent to request medical records, and outline the steps for evaluating eligibility, including what documents to gather and how the firm approaches mass tort claims. This initial review helps identify the next practical actions for preserving records and evidence. After the initial consultation, the firm can request and review medical records, product purchase information, and employment histories as applicable, and then advise on potential timelines, filing deadlines, and likely legal options. If you choose to proceed, the firm will explain how it will manage discovery, expert coordination, and settlement negotiations on your behalf so you understand the process from start to resolution.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services