Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning Lawyer in Coal Fork

Protecting Worker Rights

TENORM: Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning Guide

This guide explains legal considerations that can arise when equipment maintenance and cleaning involves TENORM in Coal Fork and surrounding areas. Tenorm incidents often involve residues generated from industrial operations, mining, or oil and gas activity that can collect on tools, tanks, and infrastructure. When maintenance or cleaning activities expose workers, contractors, or nearby residents to contamination, there can be both health and legal consequences. This introduction outlines the kinds of claims that may arise, why thorough documentation matters, and how timely legal action can preserve options for recovery and remediation while protecting rights under West Virginia law.

For people affected by TENORM during maintenance and cleaning, understanding potential sources of liability and available remedies is important. Exposure may result from inadequate decontamination procedures, failure to follow safety regulations, or poor facility oversight. Claims can involve employer responsibility, third-party contractors, equipment manufacturers, or property owners. This paragraph provides context for the legal issues discussed throughout the guide, including evidence collection, regulatory reporting, and how claims typically proceed under state and federal frameworks that apply to radiation and environmental contamination matters in West Virginia.

Why Addressing TENORM During Maintenance Matters

Addressing TENORM risks during equipment maintenance and cleaning yields multiple benefits for workers and the community, including reduced exposure, clearer chains of responsibility, and a stronger basis for compensation when harm occurs. Proper attention helps document how contamination occurred and who had control over procedures, which can be critical in legal claims. When employers or contractors implement appropriate protocols and recordkeeping, it supports prevention and may reduce liability, while failures can form the basis for recovery. Legal involvement can secure testing, medical monitoring, and financial remedies when negligence or noncompliance leads to harm.

About Stephen New & Associates and TENORM Cases

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving Beckley, Coal Fork, and communities throughout West Virginia, handling matters involving workplace injury, environmental exposure, and industrial contamination such as TENORM. The firm focuses on helping injured workers and family members understand their rights after exposure incidents, assisting with evidence preservation, claims against employers or third parties, and coordination with medical providers. The firm works to secure necessary testing and documentation and to pursue compensation for medical costs, lost wages, and other harms while navigating WV procedural and substantive law applicable to exposure and workplace claims.

Understanding Legal Claims for TENORM Exposure

Legal claims arising from TENORM exposure during maintenance and cleaning typically center on negligence, premises liability, worker compensation issues, and sometimes product or contractor liability. Negligence claims require showing that a responsible party breached a duty of care by failing to follow proper safety or decontamination procedures, and that the breach caused harm. Worker compensation systems may provide certain remedies to employees while also creating different avenues for third-party claims. Understanding the distinctions among these pathways is important to preserve deadlines, collect evidence, and evaluate potential recovery under state law.

Investigation following a TENORM exposure involves identifying contaminated surfaces, testing for radiation levels, obtaining maintenance logs and cleaning records, and interviewing witnesses. Chain-of-custody for sampling and proper documentation of testing results are essential for both regulatory reporting and litigation. In many cases, a mix of regulatory violations, inadequate safety plans, and failures to provide protective equipment can support a claim. Early legal consultation helps ensure that testing is conducted properly, records are preserved, and timely notices or claims are filed to protect rights under West Virginia statutes and applicable federal regulations.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for TENORM and Cleaning

TENORM Defined

TENORM refers to materials that contain naturally occurring radioactive elements that have been concentrated or exposed through industrial processes, such as mining, oil and gas extraction, or coal handling. When equipment maintenance or cleaning moves or disturbs these residues, radioactive particles can be released or transferred to surfaces, workers, and tools. Understanding TENORM means recognizing both the physical hazard and the regulatory framework that governs its handling, disposal, and remediation. Legal issues often turn on whether industry participants followed applicable safety standards and guidance when TENORM was present.

Decontamination

Decontamination describes the processes used to remove, reduce, or neutralize contaminants, including TENORM residues, from equipment and surfaces during maintenance and cleaning. Effective decontamination protocols include proper containment, selection of cleaning agents, monitoring of residual contamination, and safe disposal of waste materials. For legal purposes, documentation of the decontamination steps taken, testing results before and after cleaning, and compliance with regulatory disposal requirements can be central to establishing whether responsible parties acted appropriately to protect workers and the environment.

Radiation Monitoring

Radiation monitoring involves measuring levels of radioactive contamination on equipment, clothing, and surfaces to determine whether exposure limits are exceeded and to guide cleanup efforts. Monitoring uses instruments calibrated to detect relevant radionuclides and requires clear recordkeeping to show when and where measurements were taken. In the context of maintenance and cleaning, monitoring results provide evidence about exposure pathways, inform medical evaluations, and may reveal whether procedures were adequate or whether additional remediation was necessary to protect health and safety.

Regulatory Compliance

Regulatory compliance encompasses the obligations set by federal and state agencies that govern handling, cleanup, transportation, and disposal of TENORM-contaminated materials. Compliance can involve reporting, permits, waste labeling, and adherence to workplace safety rules. For workers and claimants, demonstrating noncompliance by an employer or contractor can support legal claims. Conversely, showing that an entity followed applicable standards can affect the scope of liability and available remedies. Legal guidance helps interpret which standards apply and how to document any deviations that contributed to harm.

PRO TIPS

Document the Scene Immediately

When maintenance or cleaning uncovers possible TENORM contamination, document the scene right away with photos, detailed notes, and contact information for witnesses, contractors, and supervisors. Prompt documentation preserves perishable evidence such as visible residues, placement of tools, and conditions that led to exposure, and it supports later testing and chain-of-custody for samples. Early records also help reconstruct timelines and identify who was present and responsible, which can be important for establishing liability and ensuring accurate reporting to regulators and medical providers.

Secure Testing and Records

Obtain and secure all radiation testing reports, maintenance logs, cleaning schedules, and disposal manifests related to the equipment and area where TENORM was discovered. Proper testing by qualified labs and clear chain-of-custody documentation is essential so that results will be admissible and persuasive in claims or regulatory actions. Retaining copies of these documents and requesting employer incident reports can make a meaningful difference in proving exposure pathways and the extent of contamination during legal or administrative proceedings.

Seek Medical Evaluation and Monitoring

If you suspect exposure to TENORM during maintenance or cleaning, obtain a prompt medical evaluation and, where appropriate, ongoing monitoring and testing to document any health effects. Early medical records establish a contemporaneous link between the incident and health complaints, and they inform treatment and occupational health decisions. Keep records of all medical visits, diagnostic testing, and recommendations, as these documents are often necessary to support claims for medical expenses, lost income, and long-term monitoring when pursuing recovery after contamination incidents.

Comparing Legal Paths After TENORM Exposure

When a Broad Legal Approach Is Appropriate:

Multiple Potential Defendants

A comprehensive legal approach is often warranted when multiple parties may share responsibility, such as the employer, a third-party contractor, equipment manufacturer, or property owner, each with potential liability. Coordinating claims against several entities requires careful investigation, simultaneous preservation of evidence, and strategic legal planning to align deadlines and defenses. A broad approach helps identify all possible recovery sources, secure necessary testing and remediation, and ensure that claims are not forfeited by filing errors or missed opportunities to hold accountable those who contributed to unsafe maintenance or cleaning practices.

Complex Exposure and Long-Term Harm

When exposure involves complex contamination pathways or the potential for long-term health effects, a comprehensive legal strategy supports both immediate remedies and ongoing monitoring or compensation for future needs. Complex cases often require coordination with medical professionals, environmental consultants, and regulatory agencies to document exposure and its consequences. Pursuing a coordinated claim helps secure medical monitoring, future medical care planning, and compensation for both present and anticipated losses, while ensuring that technical evidence is gathered and presented effectively.

When a Narrow Claim May Be Enough:

Clear Employer Liability

A more limited approach can be sufficient when the employer’s responsibility is clear under worker compensation law or where internal policies and incident reports show direct employer negligence without the need to pursue multiple parties. In those situations, focusing on timely filing with the appropriate administrative agency and documenting medical treatment and lost wages can resolve claims efficiently. However, narrowing focus should not overlook potential third-party claims or long-term medical monitoring needs that could provide additional recovery beyond workers’ compensation benefits.

Minor Exposure with Quick Resolution

When contamination is minimal, promptly contained, and medical evaluations show no lasting effects, pursuing a streamlined resolution may be appropriate to recover immediate expenses and avoid prolonged litigation. In such cases, documentation of the response, cleanup verification, and proof of short-term medical care often resolves matters without complex litigation. Even so, preserving records and testing results is important to protect against later claims of delayed effects and to ensure any settlement addresses potential future needs.

Common Situations Where TENORM Appears During Maintenance

Oil and Gas Equipment Cleaning

TENORM residues can accumulate in tanks, pipes, and separators used in oil and gas operations, creating exposure risks during cleaning and maintenance when sludge or scale is disturbed. Proper containment, testing, and waste handling are essential to prevent worker exposure and environmental release and to document compliance for legal and regulatory purposes.

Mining and Coal-Handling Facilities

Mining operations and coal-handling equipment can concentrate naturally occurring radioactive elements that become hazardous during maintenance or equipment servicing. Regular monitoring and adherence to decontamination protocols reduce risk and support legal defenses or claims depending on whether procedures were followed and documented.

Industrial Processing and Waste Transfer

Facilities that process or transfer industrial byproducts may create TENORM on surfaces and in conveyance systems, which can release contamination during cleaning activities. Detailed records of waste handling and disposal are critical for assessing liability and ensuring proper remediation when contamination is discovered.

Coal Fork TENORM and Maintenance Legal Services

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM Claims

Stephen New & Associates represents individuals and families in Coal Fork and the surrounding region facing injury or exposure from TENORM during equipment maintenance and cleaning. The firm assists with immediate steps like securing testing and medical evaluation, requesting employer incident records, and preserving evidence that supports claims. The attorneys focus on practical outcomes that include medical monitoring, compensation for medical costs, and recovery for wage loss, guiding clients through procedural requirements and communicating with regulators and responsible parties to advance claims effectively under West Virginia law.

Clients receive individualized attention to document exposure events, coordinate independent testing when needed, and gather the records that form the basis of recovery claims. The firm’s approach emphasizes careful case preparation, timely filings, and effective negotiation or litigation as necessary to secure fair compensation. For families dealing with long-term health concerns, the firm helps plan for ongoing medical needs and seeks remedies that address both present and future impacts of TENORM exposure encountered during maintenance or cleaning activities.

Contact Us About TENORM Maintenance Claims

People Also Search For

TENORM equipment cleaning Coal Fork

TENORM exposure maintenance West Virginia

radiation contamination cleanup Coal Fork

workplace TENORM claims Beckley

industrial decontamination legal help

TENORM testing and documentation WV

maintenance safety TENORM litigation

equipment cleaning contamination claims

FAQS

What is TENORM and how can it affect maintenance workers?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, which refers to naturally occurring radioactive elements that become concentrated or exposed through human activities such as mining, oil and gas operations, and industrial processing. When these materials accumulate on equipment or within residues, maintenance and cleaning activities can disturb the contamination and create pathways for worker exposure. Health effects depend on the type and extent of exposure, and legal implications arise when parties responsible for equipment or procedures fail to follow appropriate safety, decontamination, or disposal practices. Maintenance workers face distinct risks because routine servicing can contact concentrated residues and spread contamination. For legal purposes, identifying the source of TENORM, documenting the conditions of maintenance, and establishing who controlled procedures are foundational steps. Preserving testing results, maintenance logs, witness statements, and medical records helps determine exposure and supports claims for medical costs, monitoring, wage loss, and other damages under applicable West Virginia law and relevant regulatory frameworks.

What should I do immediately after suspecting TENORM exposure during cleaning?

If you suspect TENORM exposure during a cleaning or maintenance activity, take immediate steps to protect health and preserve evidence. Remove yourself from further exposure, seek prompt medical evaluation, and inform supervisors about the incident. Photograph the work area, equipment, and any visible residues, and record names of witnesses and the sequence of events while details are fresh. Request that any testing or sampling be performed with proper chain-of-custody procedures and retain copies of incident reports and communications from employers or contractors. Documenting the scene and obtaining a timely medical record are essential to protecting legal rights. Medical documentation provides an early record of potential exposure-related symptoms and testing, while scene documentation supports later environmental analysis and legal claims. If possible, arrange for independent testing or consult with counsel to ensure evidence is gathered and preserved in a manner that will support administrative filings or litigation when needed.

Who can be held responsible for exposure during equipment maintenance?

Liability for exposure during equipment maintenance can rest with multiple parties depending on the facts. Employers may be responsible under workplace safety rules and duties to provide a safe work environment and adequate procedures, while third-party contractors who performed cleaning or maintenance might also bear responsibility for negligent practices. Manufacturers or suppliers of equipment and materials could be implicated if product design or labeling contributed to unsafe conditions or inadequate warnings. Property owners can also have obligations to maintain safe premises and to disclose known hazards. Determining responsibility requires careful investigation into who controlled procedures, what safety plans were in place, and whether applicable regulations were followed. Records like maintenance logs, training documentation, contractor agreements, and safety audits can identify the parties with operational control or contractual duties. In many cases, pursuing multiple potential defendants is necessary to secure full compensation for medical care, remediation, lost income, and other losses associated with exposure.

What types of evidence are most important in a TENORM exposure claim?

Important evidence in a TENORM exposure claim includes radiation testing results, chain-of-custody documentation for samples, maintenance and cleaning logs, incident reports, photographs of the scene, and witness statements. Medical records documenting symptoms, diagnoses, and recommended monitoring or treatment are also critical to link exposure to health impacts. Records showing training, safety procedures, and protective equipment availability can help show whether responsible parties acted appropriately or fell short of their duties to prevent exposure. Regulatory filings, waste manifests, and communication between employers and contractors add context about how contamination was handled and disposed of. Independent expert testing or environmental consultant reports can corroborate employer-provided data. Together, these elements build a factual record that supports claims for compensatory damages and any necessary remediation or medical monitoring, and they can establish liability in litigation or administrative proceedings.

Can I file a workers' compensation claim and a separate lawsuit?

In many cases, an employee can pursue workers’ compensation benefits for injuries or occupational illnesses while also exploring separate third-party claims against non-employer parties whose negligence contributed to exposure. Workers’ compensation typically provides no-fault benefits for medical treatment and partial wage replacement, but it may limit the ability to sue the employer directly. When a third party such as a contractor or equipment manufacturer is responsible, a separate legal action may be available against that party to recover additional damages not covered by workers’ compensation. Coordinating between workers’ compensation claims and third-party litigation requires careful handling to preserve rights and avoid procedural missteps. Timely notice to insurers, retention of medical records, and prompt investigation help maximize recovery opportunities. Legal counsel can advise on the interplay between administrative benefits and civil claims and help ensure that any settlement appropriately accounts for all sources of recovery, including future medical monitoring needs and long-term treatment.

How long do I have to bring a claim for exposure-related injury in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitation and filing deadlines vary depending on the type of claim and applicable law in West Virginia, so prompt action is important. For administrative workers’ compensation claims, there are specific notice and filing requirements that must be met within prescribed time frames, and failing to comply can jeopardize benefits. Civil claims for negligence, personal injury, or property damage typically have statutory deadlines measured from the date of injury or discovery, and those time limits can affect the ability to pursue litigation against employers, contractors, or manufacturers. Because the appropriate deadline depends on the facts and the theories of recovery, early legal consultation helps identify applicable time limits and preserve claims. Taking immediate steps to document exposure, obtain medical care, and request incident reports supports meeting procedural requirements and ensures that potential causes of action are evaluated before limitations run, protecting the ability to obtain compensation or remediation when warranted.

Will testing after the fact help my case?

Testing conducted after an exposure can provide critical evidence about the presence and extent of contamination, and appropriate testing with documented chain-of-custody enhances the credibility of results in claims or regulatory actions. Even if testing is delayed, documented measurements, laboratory reports, and comparison to baseline or regulatory levels help establish whether TENORM residues were present and how they were handled. Independent or regulatory testing can complement employer-supplied reports, particularly when there are concerns about the adequacy or accuracy of initial measurements. Prompt testing is preferable, but later testing that is properly conducted and documented still often contributes valuable information for legal proceedings. Maintaining records of who performed the testing, when samples were taken, and the methods used helps ensure that the evidence will be admissible and persuasive. Legal counsel can assist with coordinating appropriate environmental testing and obtaining the necessary technical reports to support claims and remediation efforts.

What medical monitoring or tests should I pursue after exposure?

After suspected exposure to TENORM, obtain a thorough medical evaluation that documents any symptoms and provides baseline testing or monitoring recommendations as appropriate for the type of contamination involved. Occupational medicine or physicians familiar with environmental exposure can advise on necessary tests, which may include imaging, bloodwork, or other diagnostics tailored to the radionuclides of concern and the exposure pathway. Ongoing medical monitoring may be recommended to detect delayed effects and to establish a contemporaneous record linking the incident and any subsequent health concerns. Keep detailed records of all medical visits, test results, recommendations, prescriptions, and referrals for specialist care or monitoring, as these documents support claims for medical costs and future care planning. Coordination between medical providers and legal counsel can help ensure that records capture relevant exposure history and that recommended monitoring is documented and preserved for potential claims or administrative proceedings.

How do cleanup and disposal regulations affect liability?

Cleanup and disposal regulations influence liability by setting standards for how contaminated materials should be handled, contained, transported, and disposed of after maintenance or cleaning activities. Failure to adhere to applicable federal and state rules can indicate negligence and support claims, while compliance with regulations may affect the scope of responsibility and available defenses. Documentation such as waste manifests, disposal receipts, and regulatory filings provides evidence about whether responsible parties followed required protocols and how contamination was managed following discovery. Regulatory agencies may also require remediation or monitoring, and their findings and orders can be influential in legal proceedings. Understanding which regulations apply and how compliance was achieved—or not—requires careful review of permits, agency guidance, and industry practice. Legal counsel can assist in obtaining and interpreting regulatory records and in using agency findings to support claims for remediation costs, monitoring, and other damages arising from improper handling during maintenance and cleaning.

How can Stephen New & Associates help with a TENORM maintenance claim?

Stephen New & Associates assists individuals and families affected by TENORM exposure during equipment maintenance and cleaning by helping preserve evidence, coordinate testing, and gather medical documentation needed to pursue claims. The firm works with clients to obtain incident reports, maintenance records, and environmental testing results, and to communicate with insurers and regulatory bodies as appropriate. The goal is to secure compensation for medical expenses, wage loss, remediation costs, and ongoing monitoring when contamination has impacted health or property rights. The firm also guides clients through complex procedural steps such as filing timely workers’ compensation claims, pursuing third-party claims when appropriate, and handling negotiations or litigation with responsible parties. Representation includes evaluating potential defendants, coordinating technical and medical resources, and seeking recoveries that address both immediate and long-term needs related to TENORM exposure encountered during maintenance activities.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services