Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Roundup Lawyer in Charleston

Glyphosate Claim Support

Mass Torts: Roundup Claims Overview

If you or a loved one in Charleston, West Virginia were exposed to Roundup and later received a diagnosis linked to glyphosate exposure, you may have a mass tort claim that deserves careful review. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley serves clients across the state and can help you understand how a Roundup claim works, what evidence is important, and the kinds of compensation that may be available for medical costs, lost income, and other damages. We focus on clear communication and practical steps so clients understand timelines, potential outcomes, and what documentation to gather as the case moves forward.

Roundup cases often involve scientific and medical records, exposure history, and coordination with other plaintiffs who experienced similar harms. It is important to know potential filing deadlines and the difference between a mass tort and an individual lawsuit so you can protect your rights. Our team will review medical records, pesticide product use, and work or home exposure to determine whether your situation aligns with current Roundup litigation. We aim to explain options in plain language and outline realistic next steps so you can make informed decisions about pursuing a claim.

Why Pursue a Roundup Claim

Pursuing a Roundup claim can provide compensation for medical bills, ongoing care, lost wages, and the non-economic impacts of serious illness, while also contributing to broader accountability for hazardous products. For many families, holding a manufacturer accountable through coordinated legal action delivers financial relief and a clearer path to address future medical needs. Bringing a claim can also help establish a record of exposure and harm that supports access to necessary benefits and treatment. Working with a local firm familiar with state rules helps you navigate procedural requirements and protect important deadlines while seeking fair resolution.

Stephen New & Associates in Charleston

Stephen New & Associates is a West Virginia personal injury law firm with a practice that includes mass tort litigation, including Roundup-related claims, and a long record of representing clients from Beckley to Charleston. Our approach emphasizes careful investigation, timely preservation of evidence, and consistent communication with clients at every step. We coordinate closely with medical providers to document diagnoses and gather the records necessary to support a claim. If you would like a consultation, call 304-355-5565 to discuss how a Roundup matter might apply to your situation and what practical steps can be taken next.

Understanding Roundup Mass Torts

Roundup mass torts involve many individuals who assert that exposure to the herbicide’s active ingredient, glyphosate, contributed to serious health conditions. Unlike a typical single-plaintiff lawsuit, mass torts often require coordination among plaintiffs who experienced similar injuries, shared exposure pathways, or comparable medical outcomes, and they may proceed through consolidated procedures for efficiency. Key components of a mass tort case include proving exposure, demonstrating a medically recognized diagnosis related to that exposure, and showing that the product’s use or marketing contributed to harm. Understanding how evidence, timelines, and shared litigation procedures work helps people plan next steps and preserve important documentation.

Building a Roundup claim typically requires compiling medical records, detailed exposure histories, employer or product purchase records, and witness statements that document how and when the product was used. The litigation process can involve written discovery, depositions, expert opinions from medical professionals, and negotiations toward a settlement or, in some cases, trial. Timelines can vary significantly depending on court schedules and coordination with other plaintiffs, so prompt action to secure records and identify relevant witnesses is an important part of protecting potential claims and preserving the strongest possible position for resolution.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the active chemical used in many herbicide products, including Roundup, and understanding its role is central to these claims. Scientific and regulatory discussions focus on how long it persists in the environment, typical exposure routes such as skin contact or inhalation during application, and studies that examine possible links to specific illnesses. In litigation, plaintiffs and their medical providers describe exposure circumstances and medical findings that may support a connection between glyphosate use and diagnosed conditions. Documenting the type of product, frequency of use, and any protective measures taken helps create a clearer picture of exposure for legal review.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a category of blood cancers that affect the lymphatic system and is among the diagnoses commonly referenced in glyphosate litigation. Symptoms can include swollen lymph nodes, fatigue, unexplained weight loss, fevers, and night sweats, and medical evaluation typically involves blood tests, imaging, and biopsy to establish a definitive diagnosis. When a medical provider links a diagnosis to potential environmental or occupational exposures, that connection becomes part of a claim’s factual record, and consolidating medical documentation about timing and progression supports an assessment of whether a Roundup-related case may be viable for the injured person.

Mass Tort

A mass tort describes litigation involving many plaintiffs who allege similar harm from the same product or conduct, where cases are handled in a coordinated manner to streamline discovery and avoid duplicative efforts. Each plaintiff retains an individual claim, but courts may group cases for pretrial proceedings to manage complex scientific and legal issues efficiently. Mass tort procedures can lead to global settlements, individual resolutions, or selected trials to resolve disputed issues. For those affected, understanding how claims are organized and how individual circumstances fit within the broader litigation helps clarify expectations and possible outcomes.

Causation

Causation refers to the link that must be shown between exposure to a substance and a resulting medical condition; in Roundup cases, showing causation typically requires medical records, documented exposure histories, and medical opinions that explain how exposure could have contributed to the diagnosis. The legal standard requires a persuasive demonstration that the exposure was more than a theoretical possibility and reasonably related to the injury in question. Establishing causation often involves reviewing scientific studies, individual health histories, and any preexisting conditions to present a clear narrative connecting product use with harm that is understandable to judges, juries, or opposing counsel.

PRO TIPS

Document Your Exposure

Start by keeping detailed records of every instance you used or were exposed to Roundup, including dates, locations, reasons for application, and any protective gear worn, and collect product labels or photographs whenever possible. Preserve receipts, employer records, and notes about co-workers or family members who may have witnessed the use, as those third-party observations can strengthen an exposure timeline and corroborate your account. These steps help assemble a clear factual picture that supports medical documentation and explains the scope and frequency of exposure in a way that is accessible to providers and legal reviewers.

Keep Medical Records

Seek medical evaluation for any symptoms that could be connected to exposure and request copies of all relevant medical notes, test results, imaging, and pathology reports to create a complete health record. Maintain records of treatment dates, referrals, medications, and communications with healthcare providers that document the progression of symptoms and any changes in diagnosis or care recommendations. Having comprehensive medical documentation makes it possible to demonstrate the timing and seriousness of a condition and supports informed discussions about how medical findings relate to prior exposure when reviewing potential claims.

Avoid Online Admissions

Limit online posts, public comments, or social media updates about your health, treatment, or the details of your Roundup exposure, because those statements can be reviewed by opposing parties and may affect how a claim is evaluated during negotiations or litigation. If contacted by an insurance company or a representative of a product manufacturer, direct communications to a legal representative before providing formal statements so that your rights and factual accuracy are protected. Keeping information about the claim and your medical condition private helps maintain the integrity of records and avoids unintended consequences that could complicate resolution efforts.

Comparing Legal Approaches for Roundup Claims

When a Full Representation Matters:

Multiple Plaintiffs and Complex Claims

When many plaintiffs share similar injuries from the same product, comprehensive representation helps coordinate discovery, manage voluminous records, and present consistent factual narratives across related cases. A coordinated approach also supports negotiation strategies where settlements may consider the full scope of damages presented by numerous claimants and allows for efficient handling of scientific evidence and medical testimony that applies to the group. In these situations, having a team who can manage the complexity of multiple concurrent filings and maintain communication with each client ensures that individual needs are not lost in the broader litigation posture.

Extensive Medical and Scientific Evidence

Cases that depend on technical medical research and detailed exposure science typically benefit from comprehensive handling to coordinate review by treating physicians and to assemble the documentation necessary to explain complex findings to courts or mediators. A full representation can manage the process of gathering studies, medical opinions, and records while maintaining a clear timeline that connects exposure to diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care needs. Thorough preparation supports more informed negotiations and ensures that claims based on scientific and medical evidence are presented clearly and consistently at every stage of the process.

When a Limited Approach May Suffice:

Clear Diagnosis and Simple Records

When a person has a well-documented diagnosis that is narrowly related to a clearly recorded short-term exposure and minimal contested medical issues, a more streamlined approach can sometimes resolve the claim without extensive multi-plaintiff coordination. Limited representation may focus on collecting essential medical records, a concise exposure history, and negotiating a settlement that reflects documented damages without prolonged discovery. This path can be appropriate when both liability and causation are straightforward and when the claimant prefers a faster resolution with less procedural complexity.

Limited Exposure Claims

Claims based on isolated or brief exposure events that nonetheless resulted in a documented medical condition may be handled more directly when the factual record is simple and there is little need for extensive scientific review. In those situations, focused investigation and clear documentation of the exposure incident, medical diagnosis, and treatment expenses can support a concise claim resolution. A limited approach can reduce time and expense when parties agree on essential facts and the claim does not require the coordinated litigation procedures typical of larger mass tort dockets.

Common Circumstances for Roundup Claims

Agricultural and Farm Use

Many claims arise from sustained use of Roundup by agricultural workers, farmers, and grounds crews who applied the product frequently over years and experienced health consequences later diagnosed as conditions linked to exposure. Detailed work histories, application records, and witness statements from co-workers or family members often strengthen these claims by establishing repeated exposure in an occupational setting.

Lawn Care and Landscaping

Homeowners, landscapers, and professional lawn care providers who used Roundup to manage weeds over a prolonged period can face similar health risks that lead to legal claims when medical diagnoses emerge. Keeping records of services, product purchases, and any illness symptoms that followed application can help connect the pattern of use to later health outcomes.

Industrial or Institutional Application

Institutions, parks departments, and industrial users who applied herbicides in large or recurring applications may have employees or members of the public with documented exposures that later resulted in medical conditions. Documentation from maintenance logs, procurement records, and institutional training or safety communications can play an important role in assessing responsibility and supporting a claim.

Roundup Attorney Serving Charleston, WV

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates

Choosing a local firm matters for both convenience and knowledge of West Virginia procedures, and Stephen New & Associates offers direct communication, prompt document collection, and experienced case management for Mass Tort matters like Roundup claims. We assist clients with compiling exposure histories, obtaining medical records, and explaining litigation timelines so people can make informed decisions about pursuing a claim. Our firm is committed to clear client communication, and we provide an initial review to identify strengths and next steps while explaining potential filing requirements and procedural considerations specific to the state.

From the first consultation through resolution or trial, our approach focuses on protecting client rights, preserving evidence, and advancing claims in a way that reflects each person’s circumstances and needs. We coordinate with treating medical providers to assemble a comprehensive record of diagnosis and treatment and maintain steady updates so clients know what to expect at each stage. If your case requires additional technical review, we will work with appropriate medical sources to explain the relationship between exposure and diagnosis while pursuing fair compensation for tangible and intangible losses.

Contact Us for a Free Review

People Also Search For

Roundup lawsuit Charleston WV

glyphosate claim West Virginia

Roundup mass tort Charleston

Roundup legal help WV

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Roundup claim

herbicide exposure lawsuit Charleston

Roundup compensation West Virginia

Stephen New Roundup cases

FAQS

What is a Roundup mass tort and how is it different from an individual lawsuit?

A Roundup mass tort refers to coordinated litigation where many individuals claim harm from exposure to the same product or chemical, typically glyphosate, and where common scientific or factual issues arise across multiple claims that justify consolidated handling. Each claimant maintains a separate individual claim for their own injuries and damages, but courts often coordinate discovery and pretrial matters to manage the complexity of medical studies, exposure evidence, and defendant responses, which allows for more efficient handling of shared legal issues while still addressing each person’s unique circumstances and damages. When you participate in mass tort proceedings, your case remains individualized with attention to your medical records, exposure history, and personal losses, while shared aspects of the litigation are managed in ways that reduce duplication and streamline the presentation of scientific evidence. This structure can lead to global resolution mechanisms, group settlements, or individual trials for representative cases, and understanding the process early helps claimants preserve evidence and align expectations about timelines and potential outcomes.

Am I eligible to bring a Roundup claim if I used the product years ago?

You may still be eligible to bring a claim even if exposure occurred years ago, but eligibility depends on factors like the timing of diagnosis, applicable statutes of limitations, and the specifics of your medical records that document when symptoms began and how the condition progressed. Courts examine both the date of diagnosis and when the harm was discovered, and state-specific rules can affect how long you have to file, so prompt review of records and careful assessment of deadlines is important to protect potential claims and prevent loss of legal rights. Documenting past exposure through receipts, employment records, witness statements, and any available product labels or photographs strengthens a claim based on historical use, and securing medical records that show the timing and nature of the diagnosis helps clarify whether the case falls within filing windows. Early contact with legal counsel can help identify necessary records and calculate relevant deadlines so you can take timely steps to pursue a claim if appropriate.

What kinds of injuries are commonly alleged in Roundup claims?

The injuries most commonly alleged in Roundup claims include hematologic cancers such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma and related conditions that treating physicians may associate with prolonged glyphosate exposure, as well as other serious illnesses that are documented in an individual’s medical history. Plaintiffs typically present detailed medical records, laboratory results, imaging, and pathology reports to establish the diagnosis and its progression, and they explain how exposure coincided with the onset of symptoms and subsequent medical care to support their claims. Beyond a specific diagnosis, claimants often seek compensation for the full scope of their losses including current and future medical expenses, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and the impact on family life. Each claim is evaluated on its medical documentation, exposure history, and the individual circumstances that explain how treatment needs and life changes resulted from the injury, and careful collection of records is essential to a comprehensive presentation of damages.

How do I preserve evidence that supports a Roundup claim?

To preserve evidence for a Roundup claim, begin by saving any physical product containers, labels, and receipts, and gather photographs that show product use or areas of application, as these can help document the type of product and conditions of exposure. Collect employment records, pesticide application logs, or service invoices that describe frequency and duration of use, and compile names and contact information for any witnesses who observed the application or can corroborate exposure events, because third-party accounts often strengthen a timeline of repeated use. Additionally, request complete copies of medical records, pathology reports, and test results from all treating providers and keep a detailed diary of symptoms, treatment dates, and communications with healthcare professionals. Protecting these documents as soon as possible helps maintain their accuracy and availability for legal review, and early legal consultation can identify further evidence to secure and any steps needed to preserve records under court timelines.

Will my claim go to trial or is settlement more likely?

Whether a Roundup claim goes to trial or resolves by settlement depends on the strength of evidence, the willingness of the parties to negotiate, and the strategies of both plaintiffs and defendants, which can vary case by case. Many mass tort matters are resolved through negotiated settlements after discovery and presentation of medical evidence that support the connection between exposure and diagnosis, because settlements can provide timely compensation and avoid the uncertainty of trial, while selected cases may proceed to trial to address disputed liability or damages issues. Your situation will determine the most appropriate path, and early preparation—gathering medical records, exposure documentation, and third-party statements—positions a claim for effective negotiation and, if necessary, trial advocacy. Counsel will discuss likely scenarios, potential timelines, and available options, allowing you to weigh the benefits of settlement versus pursuing a contested trial based on the specifics of your case.

How long does it take to resolve a Roundup case?

The timeline to resolve a Roundup case can vary significantly, ranging from months for straightforward settlements to several years for cases that involve extended discovery, complex scientific review, or trial schedules. Factors that influence timing include the completeness of medical records, the need for additional medical evaluations, coordination among multiple plaintiffs, and court calendars, all of which can extend the process but are part of ensuring a thorough presentation of the facts and damages. While timing is never guaranteed, prompt action to obtain medical records, document exposure, and begin the legal review can reduce avoidable delays and ensure compliance with filing deadlines. Counsel can explain expected milestones in the process, provide periodic updates, and work to move the claim forward efficiently while protecting your interests at each stage of litigation or negotiation.

What compensation might be available in a Roundup claim?

Compensation in a Roundup claim may include reimbursement for past and future medical expenses directly related to the injury, lost income and reduced earning capacity, and damages for pain and suffering or diminished quality of life, depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the case. Economic losses are documented through bills, wage statements, and cost projections, while non-economic losses are described through the medical record, treatment history, and testimony about how the condition has affected daily life and relationships. Each claim is unique, and the amount of recovery depends on the severity of the diagnosis, the extent of medical care required, the impact on employment and household roles, and the strength of the evidence linking exposure to injury. An early review of medical and financial documentation helps estimate potential recoverable damages and supports realistic discussions about settlement value or trial objectives.

How much does it cost to start a Roundup case with your firm?

Many firms handling mass torts, including ours, offer initial consultations without charge and commonly work on a contingency-fee basis so clients do not pay attorney fees unless there is a recovery, but terms vary and will be explained at intake. We review the case, clarify fee structures, and outline any potential costs associated with obtaining records or expert medical review so you know what to expect financially before moving forward, and any agreement will be clearly documented and discussed in plain language. If you are concerned about upfront expenses, ask during the first call about how records will be obtained, whether costs are advanced by the firm, and how those costs are handled at resolution so you can make an informed choice about proceeding. Transparent communication about fees and case expenses is part of our client intake process and helps people plan for the practical aspects of pursuing a claim.

Can family members bring claims for a loved one who has died?

In wrongful death situations where a loved one may have died from a condition linked to glyphosate exposure, family members or the estate may have the right to pursue claims for medical expenses, funeral costs, loss of support, and the emotional impact of the loss, depending on West Virginia law and the specific circumstances. Statutes governing survival and wrongful death claims set out who may bring a claim and the appropriate damages, and timely review of medical records and death certificates is essential to determine whether a viable claim exists and who may pursue it on behalf of the decedent’s estate or family. If you believe a death is connected to prior Roundup exposure, an immediate review of medical and employment records can help identify the relevant deadlines and the appropriate survivors to file a claim. Our team can assist in gathering documentation, explaining statutory provisions, and pursuing a path that seeks compensation for the tangible and intangible harms suffered by the family.

How do I get started with a consultation in Charleston?

To get started with a consultation in Charleston, call Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565 or submit an online request to set up a free initial review, during which we will ask about your exposure history, medical diagnosis, and any records you have already obtained. The intake process helps identify records to collect and clarifies potential filing deadlines, and we will explain the next steps required to preserve evidence and initiate a formal case review if appropriate. Bring or arrange for release of relevant medical records, product receipts if available, and notes about exposure events when you meet so the consultation can be as productive as possible. If you cannot immediately assemble all documents, we can assist in requesting records from medical providers and employers and outline a plan to move forward while protecting your rights and ensuring important deadlines are met.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services