Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Lawyer in Stonewood

Compassionate Local Advocacy

Understanding Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis

If you or a loved one in Stonewood has suffered harm because a medical condition was missed, misread, or diagnosed too late, you deserve clear information and strong legal support. Stephen New & Associates represents people across West Virginia in personal injury matters involving misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, helping clients understand their rights, collect medical records, and evaluate possible claims. Medical errors of this kind can change life plans, lead to additional treatment, and create uncertain recoveries. Calling 304-355-5565 connects you with a firm that will listen carefully to your story, review the essentials, and explain the steps available to pursue accountability and compensation under West Virginia law.

Many people feel overwhelmed after discovering that a diagnosis was missed or delayed, and that reaction is understandable when care falls short of expectations. Our approach in Stonewood focuses on gathering accurate records, locating relevant imaging and test results, and arranging independent medical review when needed so you can make informed decisions. We represent clients who have experienced everything from delayed cancer diagnosis to missed infections or injuries, and we also handle cases that intersect with first party property claims, UM or UIM auto claims, and other related matters. There is no pressure—just a straightforward review by phone or in person to identify next steps and potential recovery paths.

Why Addressing Misdiagnosis and Delay Matters

Pursuing a claim for misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can provide several important benefits for survivors and families, including financial compensation for medical care that became necessary because of the missed condition, recovery for lost wages, and support for future treatment needs. Beyond monetary recovery, a careful legal review can improve access to a clear medical narrative and documentation that insurers and treating clinicians may need to consider changes in care. Acting promptly also helps preserve evidence such as records and imaging, and can lead to improved outcomes for other patients by encouraging accountability and improved recordkeeping at the institutions involved.

About Stephen New & Associates in West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates is a West Virginia personal injury law firm serving clients in Stonewood, Beckley, and throughout the state, with a focus on helping people harmed by negligent medical care, traumatic accidents, and other serious incidents. Our team is committed to clear communication, timely investigation, and building a strong record to support each claim. We handle a broad range of matters including medical negligence claims such as misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, catastrophic injury, motor vehicle collisions, and wrongful death. For a practical conversation about your case, call 304-355-5565 and our office can explain how we can assist with document collection and claim evaluation.

What Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Mean and How Claims Proceed

Misdiagnosis occurs when a medical provider identifies the wrong condition or fails to recognize the correct illness, while delayed diagnosis refers to a significant lapse between when symptoms first appear and when an accurate diagnosis is made. Both situations can lead to unnecessary treatments, worsened outcomes, or lost opportunities for early intervention. In legal terms, a viable claim typically requires showing that the care provider departed from the accepted standard of care and that this departure caused measurable harm. Gathering contemporaneous notes, test results, and treatment timelines is a foundational step in assessing whether a case has legal merit under West Virginia law.

Proving a claim often involves assembling medical records, imaging, lab reports, and witness statements to establish what occurred and when, and then consulting with independent medical reviewers to interpret those materials. It is important to demonstrate that a reasonable provider would have acted differently under the same circumstances, and that the different action would likely have changed the outcome. Timely preservation of evidence and clear documentation of symptoms, communications, and follow-up instructions can make a meaningful difference in presenting a claim and in negotiations with insurers or in court when necessary.

Need More Information?

Key Terms You Should Know

Misdiagnosis

Misdiagnosis refers to a situation in which a clinician identifies the wrong disease or condition, naming an incorrect cause for a patient’s symptoms, or providing a diagnosis that fails to reflect the actual underlying problem. This can result in treatments that are unnecessary or harmful, and may delay correct treatment that would have improved the patient’s prognosis. In legal claims, assessing misdiagnosis means analyzing clinical notes, test results, and treatment patterns to determine whether the diagnosis aligned with accepted medical judgment and whether any error directly contributed to harm.

Delayed Diagnosis

Delayed diagnosis occurs when a medical condition is present but not identified or treated within a reasonable period, allowing the condition to progress and cause additional injury or complications. This can happen because symptoms were dismissed, testing was delayed, results were lost or misinterpreted, or follow-up care was inadequate. Legal evaluation focuses on timelines, documentation of symptoms, and whether prompt diagnosis would have been likely to prevent additional harm, with emphasis on linking the delay to measurable medical and financial consequences for the patient.

Standard of Care

The standard of care describes how a reasonably competent healthcare professional in the same field would have acted under the same or similar circumstances, using generally accepted medical practices and current knowledge. Determining whether the standard was met requires reviewing clinical actions against contemporaneous guidelines, peer practices, and available diagnostic information. In a legal claim, evidence that the provider failed to meet this standard and that the failure caused harm is essential; this typically involves analysis by qualified medical reviewers and careful assembly of the patient’s timeline and records.

Damages and Compensation

Damages refer to the legal remedies available to someone harmed by medical misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, and may include past and future medical expenses, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, and other measurable losses. Compensation is intended to restore the injured person to the extent possible, covering the additional care and impacts that occurred because of the missed or late diagnosis. Calculating damages requires thorough documentation of costs, prognosis, and the long-term effects on daily life, and is a central focus when preparing a claim or settlement demand.

PRO TIPS

Keep Detailed Medical Records

Keeping a complete timeline of your symptoms, appointments, diagnostic tests, and communications with medical staff helps preserve the facts that matter when evaluating a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis claim. Include dates, who you saw, what was said, medications prescribed, and any instructions or follow-up recommendations you received, and retain copies of test results and imaging when possible. This documentation creates a clear narrative for reviewers and can significantly aid in determining whether a different medical approach could have produced a better outcome.

Seek Prompt Follow-Up Care

If symptoms persist or worsen after an initial visit, obtain timely follow-up care and document each interaction, including phone calls and messages left with clinics, urgent care, or hospital staff, to show efforts to address ongoing concerns. Timely follow-up can help limit the medical consequences of a missed or late diagnosis and provides a record that may be important in demonstrating when problems were first raised and how they were managed. Acting promptly also helps create a contemporaneous trail that supports later review and, if appropriate, a legal claim.

Preserve Evidence and Witness Contacts

Preserve all copies of medical bills, imaging CDs, test result printouts, and written instructions or discharge papers, and ask family members or friends who attended appointments with you to note what they observed and when. Retaining contact information for staff who treated you, as well as any witnesses to discussions or events tied to your care, can be helpful when assembling a full picture of what occurred. Early preservation of these materials reduces the risk of important evidence being lost and supports an accurate reconstruction of the timeline for review.

Comparing Approaches After a Misdiagnosis

When a Full Case Review Is Advisable:

Severe or Long-Term Injury

A comprehensive legal review is advisable when a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis has resulted in severe, permanent, or long-term harm that affects daily function and future care needs, since those claims often require detailed medical evaluation and projection of future costs. Complex damages such as ongoing rehabilitation, assistive care, or diminished earning capacity demand careful documentation and consultation with medical and economic reviewers to estimate future losses. For these claims, a full investigation allows you to assemble records, retain appropriate reviewers, and prepare a thorough presentation of damages to insurers or a jury.

Complex Medical Evidence

When the medical issues involved are complicated, such as when multiple conditions interact, prior health problems exist, or specialist interpretations of imaging and pathology are necessary, a more comprehensive approach helps sort causation and responsibility. That approach typically includes obtaining detailed records, commissioning independent medical review from appropriate medical professionals, and organizing those opinions into a clear timeline that links actions or omissions to harm. A full case review is often the best path for presenting a convincing claim when the factual or scientific record requires careful analysis.

When a Focused Review May Be Enough:

Minor or Temporary Harm

A limited legal approach may be appropriate when the harm from a missed or late diagnosis is minor and temporary, with straightforward treatment that resolved the issue and minimal lingering impact, since the resources required for a full litigation strategy may outweigh recoverable damages. In such cases, a targeted review of records and communication with the provider or insurer can achieve a fair outcome through negotiation, documentation corrections, or reimbursement for incremental costs. A focused strategy still requires careful documentation of the event, but can be more efficient for lower-value claims.

Clear Documentation and Remedial Action

If records clearly show the issue and the provider has taken prompt remedial action that addresses the harm with minimal ongoing impact, a limited strategy emphasizing documentation and recovery of tangible expenses may be appropriate. This path can include requesting full records, documenting corrective treatment, and negotiating with insurers to reimburse out-of-pocket costs or cover additional care. Even when pursuing a limited approach, preserving evidence and maintaining clear records is important to ensure any settlement or corrective steps accurately reflect the losses incurred.

Common Situations That Lead to Claims

Missed Fractures and Injuries

Missed fractures or soft tissue injuries often produce persistent pain that should prompt re‑evaluation and follow‑up imaging when symptoms do not improve, and failing to obtain or correctly interpret imaging can lead to worsening injury and delayed healing that changes the course of recovery. Documentation of initial complaints, imaging orders, and subsequent follow-up visits helps show whether there was an avoidable lapse in diagnosis that contributed to additional treatment, pain, or permanent impairment.

Misread Test Results

Incorrect interpretation of lab work, pathology, or imaging may lead clinicians to treat the wrong condition or postpone necessary therapy, and when those errors cause measurable deterioration in health they can form the basis for a claim. Preserving the original test reports, any amended reports, and notes reflecting provider decisions is important for reconstructing what went wrong and whether an alternate interpretation would have changed treatment.

Delayed Cancer Diagnosis

When screening, imaging, or biopsy results are not acted upon promptly, or early symptoms are dismissed without appropriate testing, a delay in cancer diagnosis can allow disease progression that reduces treatment options and survival prospects. Analyzing the timeline of investigations, communication of results, and opportunities for earlier intervention is central to evaluating whether a delayed diagnosis contributed to a worsened prognosis and related damages.

Stonewood Misdiagnosis Legal Help

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Misdiagnosis Claims

Clients in Stonewood choose Stephen New & Associates for our focus on thorough case preparation, practical communication, and dedication to guiding injured people through complex medical and legal processes. We assist with obtaining medical records, arranging independent medical review where needed, and constructing a clear timeline that explains how a missed or delayed diagnosis affected treatment and outcomes. Our office is accessible by phone at 304-355-5565 and offers initial case review so you can learn your options without delay, whether your matter involves a recent injury or a long‑standing condition made worse by diagnostic error.

Our firm handles cases on terms that align our interests with those of the people we represent, focusing on efficient investigation and practical resolution strategies tailored to each situation, including negotiation with insurers and, when necessary, trial preparation. We also coordinate with medical and economic reviewers to assemble a full picture of damages and future needs, so you can understand potential recoveries and timelines. If you are concerned about a missed or late diagnosis, contacting our office for a confidential discussion will help clarify whether a legal claim is appropriate and what steps to take next.

Contact Stephen New & Associates Today

People Also Search For

misdiagnosis lawyer Stonewood

delayed diagnosis attorney Stonewood

medical malpractice Stonewood WV

personal injury Stonewood WV

missed diagnosis claim Harrison County

medical misdiagnosis compensation West Virginia

failure to diagnose Stonewood

Stonewood misdiagnosis law firm

Related Services

FAQS

How do I know if I have a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis claim?

Determining whether you have a viable misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis claim requires reviewing medical records, timelines, and the relationship between the care provided and the harm suffered. Key factors include whether symptoms were documented, whether appropriate tests were ordered or followed up on, and whether a reasonable clinician would have acted differently under the same circumstances. Gathering similar records from all treating providers and documenting dates, symptoms, referrals, and communications will help clarify the situation and provide a foundation for legal evaluation. A careful legal assessment also explores causation, meaning whether the missed or delayed diagnosis actually caused additional harm or worsened outcomes, and whether that harm is measurable in terms of medical costs, lost earnings, or other losses. If the timeline and records suggest a departure from accepted practice that led to avoidable harm, a claim may be appropriate. An initial case review can identify the strengths and gaps in the available evidence and recommend next steps for investigation and preservation of records.

What is the statute of limitations for medical claims in West Virginia?

In West Virginia, statute of limitations rules for claims involving medical care are specific and can vary depending on the type of claim and when the injury or error was discovered. Typically, filing deadlines start to run from the date of the injury or from when the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, but there are exceptions and special rules that can affect the deadline. Missing a filing deadline can bar a claim, so it is important to seek timely legal advice to determine the applicable time limit for your particular situation and preserve any critical evidence. Because discovery rules and tolled periods can change deadlines, an initial consultation helps identify the exact timeline that governs a potential claim and whether any actions are needed immediately to preserve rights. Collecting medical records quickly, noting when you first became aware of the problem, and documenting communication with providers are practical steps that can protect your ability to seek recovery while an attorney reviews the applicable statute and exceptions.

What kinds of damages can I recover in a misdiagnosis case?

Damages in misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims can include tangible expenses such as past medical bills, costs of additional treatment required because of the missed or late diagnosis, rehabilitation expenses, medication costs, and related out-of-pocket losses. Economic damages may also include past lost wages and a reasonable projection of future lost earning capacity when the injury affects the ability to work. Establishing these losses requires documentation of bills, receipts, employer records, and expert input about future medical needs and economic impact. Non-economic damages may compensate for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress caused by the delayed or incorrect care, and wrongful death claims can include compensation for funeral expenses and loss of financial support. Each case is unique, so compiling medical documentation and economic evidence early helps define the full range of recoverable losses and supports realistic valuation in settlement discussions or court proceedings.

Do I need a medical review to pursue a claim?

A medical review by a qualified medical professional is typically necessary to evaluate whether the care provided met the applicable standard and whether a departure from that standard caused harm. Reviewers assess clinical notes, test results, imaging, and treatment decisions and provide opinions that translate medical facts into a legal framework. These independent opinions help clarify causation and support claims, and they are often required by insurers or courts to demonstrate that the medical care fell below accepted norms and contributed to injury. Even in cases where records appear straightforward, obtaining a medical review can identify important details or alternative interpretations that strengthen a claim. The review process also helps determine the elements of damages, suitable remedies, and the likelihood of success if the matter proceeds to negotiation or litigation, making it a valuable step in forming a focused legal strategy.

How much does it cost to pursue a misdiagnosis claim?

Many personal injury firms, including those that handle misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims, use fee arrangements that align client and attorney interests, commonly working on a contingency basis so fees are paid from any recovery rather than upfront hourly billing. This arrangement allows people to pursue claims without immediate out-of-pocket attorney fees, though clients may remain responsible for certain case costs advanced during investigation and expert review in some situations. The specific fee percentage and cost arrangements vary, so discussing terms in a confidential consultation clarifies expectations and what happens if there is no recovery. Understanding potential costs also involves considering expenses required for obtaining records and securing medical reviewers or other consultants, and discussing those needs early helps set realistic timelines and budgets. A transparent fee conversation during the initial review will outline how fees and costs are handled, what services are included, and any payment responsibilities, so you can make an informed decision about moving forward.

How long will a misdiagnosis claim take to resolve?

The time to resolve a misdiagnosis claim varies widely based on the complexity of the medical issues, the extent of damages, the need for independent reviews, and whether the case settles or proceeds to trial. Some matters are resolved within months through negotiation once records and reviewer opinions are obtained, while more complex claims involving permanent injury, multiple providers, or contested causation can take a year or longer to reach resolution. The discovery process, scheduling of medical reviewers, and court calendars all factor into the timeline. Early and thorough preparation generally speeds the process by ensuring records are complete and expert opinions are ready for negotiation, but unexpected developments can extend timelines. A firm handling your claim should provide regular updates, set realistic expectations, and pursue efficient strategies to gather evidence and approach settlement discussions with a clear valuation of the case.

What should I do immediately after discovering a missed or late diagnosis?

If you discover a missed or late diagnosis, begin by gathering and preserving all medical records, test results, imaging, and correspondence related to the condition and prior care. Document dates, symptoms, and any discussions with medical staff, and keep copies of bills and receipts for treatment linked to the condition. These materials form the foundation of a factual timeline and are essential when seeking independent review or preparing a claim, so collecting them promptly helps avoid loss or destruction of key evidence. It is also wise to seek appropriate follow-up medical care to address ongoing symptoms and to create a record of continuing concerns and treatment needs. Contacting a law firm for a confidential review will help you understand legal options and timelines and can guide additional preservation steps, including obtaining complete records from all providers and documenting any communications about test results or follow-up recommendations.

Can I pursue a claim if the healthcare provider admitted a mistake?

An admission by a healthcare provider that a mistake occurred does not automatically resolve claims for damages, but it can be a relevant factor in settlement discussions and negotiations with insurers. Admissions should be documented in records, and it remains important to show how the mistake caused measurable harm and financial loss, because liability and damages are separate questions. Legal counsel can help evaluate the admission, confirm what was documented, and determine whether additional medical review is needed to link the admission to compensable injury. Even with an admission, insurers may contest the extent of harm or the amount of recovery, so preserving records and obtaining professional opinions about causation and future needs remains important. Counsel can negotiate for appropriate compensation, secure necessary documentation, and advise whether additional steps such as corrective care or independent assessments are needed before a fair resolution can be reached.

How important are medical records in these claims?

Medical records are central to misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims because they document what symptoms were reported, what tests were ordered and their results, and how providers documented their assessments and follow-up plans. Complete records help establish a timeline, reveal potential gaps in care, and support opinions from medical reviewers about whether the care met accepted standards. Missing or incomplete records can hinder the ability to reconstruct events, so requesting full files, imaging, and lab results from all treating providers early is essential for a thorough evaluation. When pursuing a claim, counsel will review the records to identify key entries, discrepancies, or opportunities to obtain additional documentation such as nurse notes, consent forms, or follow-up communications. Having a detailed bundle of records expedites the review process, clarifies the factual basis for damages, and supports negotiations with insurers or preparation for litigation if necessary.

How do I start a case with Stephen New & Associates?

To start a case with Stephen New & Associates, call our office at 304-355-5565 or complete an online inquiry to schedule a confidential initial review where we will listen to your account and request relevant medical records to begin a preliminary evaluation. During this review we will discuss the timeline of events, the records you already have, and any immediate preservation steps that are necessary, and we will explain possible next steps including medical review, records collection, and potential recovery paths under West Virginia law. If we agree to move forward, our team will assist in obtaining complete medical files, coordinate independent medical evaluations when appropriate, and handle communications with insurers and opposing parties on your behalf. We strive to provide clear guidance on likely timelines, fee arrangements, and the types of evidence needed to support your claim so you can make informed decisions about pursuing recovery.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services