Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Roundup Lawyer in Stonewood

Holding Companies Accountable

Mass Torts Guide for Roundup Claims

This page explains Roundup mass tort claims for residents of Stonewood and Harrison County, West Virginia, and outlines what you should know if you believe glyphosate exposure caused a serious illness. Roundup litigation has brought large groups of claimants together to pursue compensation from manufacturers and distributors. If you, a family member, or someone close to you has been diagnosed with a health condition possibly linked to long term herbicide exposure, this guide describes the types of claims pursued, common timelines, and initial steps to protect your interests and preserve important records, including medical and exposure history.

Understanding the basics of Roundup mass tort litigation can help you make informed decisions about next steps and whether to pursue a claim. Mass torts consolidate many individual claims with similar injuries into coordinated proceedings to streamline litigation, manage complex scientific and medical evidence, and ensure consistent handling of similar issues. This overview will address eligibility, common injuries associated with glyphosate, typical evidence used in claims, and the role a local firm can play in investigating your case, helping you determine whether joining a mass tort action or pursuing an individual claim is most appropriate for your circumstances.

Why Pursuing a Roundup Claim Matters

Pursuing a Roundup mass tort claim can provide financial recovery for medical costs, ongoing care needs, lost income, and the emotional consequences of a serious diagnosis. Beyond compensation, bringing claims can spotlight product safety concerns, support broader accountability, and help prevent future harm to other community members. Plaintiffs often need assistance gathering detailed medical records, exposure histories, and expert analyses to build a persuasive case, and participating in coordinated actions can reduce redundant effort while preserving individual rights. For many families in West Virginia, a thoughtful legal approach offers a path to address past harms and plan for future needs.

Stephen New & Associates — About Our Team

Stephen New & Associates, located in Beckley and serving communities including Stonewood, focuses on representing individuals affected by serious injuries and complex litigation. Our firm has handled a range of personal injury and mass tort matters, working to gather the factual and medical documentation necessary to evaluate claims involving chemical exposures. We assist clients in West Virginia with case intake, coordinating medical evaluations, and communicating with other involved counsel. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful case preparation, and pursuing fair outcomes while respecting the needs of clients who are coping with health and financial challenges.

Understanding Roundup Mass Torts

Roundup mass torts involve claims by people who allege that exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, contributed to serious health problems such as certain cancers or other long term illnesses. These matters often require thorough review of medical records, exposure timelines, product purchase and usage history, and scientific studies linking exposure to health outcomes. Mass tort proceedings allow many similar claims to move forward together while preserving individual differences in injury and damages. Gathering accurate information, including employment and agricultural records where relevant, helps determine whether you may be eligible to pursue a claim and what type of legal path is best.

The legal process for mass torts can include document collection, discovery, medical examinations, settlement negotiations, and, for some cases, trial. Coordination among plaintiffs can improve efficiency when addressing shared scientific and legal issues, while individual claims retain their own damage assessments. Understanding claims requires both legal assessment and medical review to establish causation and quantify losses. Timely action is important to preserve evidence and meet applicable filing deadlines. A local firm can assist in compiling a comprehensive case file, communicating with medical providers to obtain records, and advising on potential outcomes based on similar matters handled in state and federal courts.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Definitions

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the chemical ingredient found in many herbicide products marketed for weed control, including formulations sold under the Roundup brand. It is a widely used agricultural and residential herbicide, and concerns about possible links between glyphosate exposure and certain health conditions have led to scientific studies and litigation. In the context of legal claims, glyphosate is the substance at issue when plaintiffs allege that repeated or significant exposure contributed to an illness. Legal review focuses on exposure history, product labeling, and scientific literature to evaluate whether glyphosate likely played a role in a claimant’s condition.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a legal mechanism for handling many individual lawsuits that arise from a common product, event, or exposure while allowing each claimant to pursue compensation for their own injuries. Unlike a class action, mass torts maintain individual damage assessments and factual differences among plaintiffs, but they often coordinate discovery and pretrial proceedings to address shared scientific and legal issues efficiently. This structure can be helpful in complex cases involving technical medical evidence, allowing courts and parties to manage similar claims without forcing every case into a single judgment that overrides individual circumstances or differing levels of harm.

Causation

Causation refers to the connection between exposure to a substance and the resulting injury or disease alleged by a claimant. In Roundup claims, establishing causation typically requires reviewing medical history, timing of exposure, underlying risk factors, and scientific studies that examine whether glyphosate can lead to the claimed health outcome. Legal causation assessments often involve input from treating clinicians and medical reviewers who can explain how the diagnosis correlates with documented exposures, and whether other factors are more likely explanations for the condition. Strong causation evidence is central to a successful claim.

Discovery

Discovery is the phase of litigation in which parties request and exchange documents, answers to written questions, and depositions to gather information supporting their claims and defenses. In mass tort matters involving Roundup, discovery often includes product records, internal company documents, medical records, and scientific studies. Proper discovery aims to uncover facts about exposure, product testing, warnings, and company conduct. Effective management of discovery helps ensure that key evidence is preserved and evaluated, and that both shared and case specific issues are addressed during coordinated pretrial proceedings before any individual settlement or trial decisions are made.

PRO TIPS

Organize Your Medical Records Early

Begin collecting and organizing all relevant medical records as soon as possible, including diagnoses, treatment notes, pathology reports, and medication lists, because these documents form the backbone of any claim and help show a timeline of illness. Keep a dated record of symptoms, doctor visits, and any conversations about potential causes to preserve facts that may be important later. Sharing organized records with a trusted local firm will speed evaluation and ensure nothing is overlooked during initial case review.

Document Exposure History Clearly

Create a detailed, dated account of your exposure to Roundup or other glyphosate products, noting locations, frequency, duration, and whether protective equipment was used, because specific exposure details help link product contact to later health issues. Include employment records or agricultural logs that corroborate exposure and identify any product labels or purchase receipts you can find. Accurate exposure documentation strengthens the factual record and supports medical and scientific evaluations needed in mass tort proceedings.

Preserve Physical Evidence When Possible

Where feasible, retain any remaining product containers, receipts, or photographs showing product use or application areas, as these items can corroborate exposure claims and may be useful in litigation or settlement negotiations. Note where and when containers were stored and who else may have contact with them, and take clear dated photos of any relevant property or equipment. Communicating this information promptly to your legal team helps secure potentially important evidence before it is lost or discarded.

Comparing Legal Paths

When a Coordinated Approach Helps:

Complex Scientific Issues

A coordinated legal approach is often appropriate when claims require extensive review of scientific literature, toxicology data, and epidemiological studies to establish links between exposure and illness, because these issues affect many plaintiffs and demand centralized management of expert input. Combining resources across similar claims allows for consistent development of technical proof and shared discovery that addresses common questions about product safety. Central coordination can reduce duplication of effort, improve access to medical reviewers, and help manage litigation timelines in a way that supports fair and efficient resolution for affected individuals.

Multiple Claimants with Similar Injuries

When many people report comparable injuries after similar exposures, a mass tort structure can help align common legal issues, such as causation and company practices, allowing plaintiffs to present coordinated evidence while preserving individual damage claims. This shared framework benefits those who seek consistent adjudication of scientific matters and negotiated resolutions that account for varying degrees of harm. For communities that experienced widespread product use, coordinated proceedings can streamline case handling and make it more feasible to pursue thorough investigation and recovery efforts for each affected person.

When an Individual Path May Work:

Isolated, Well Documented Cases

An individual claim may be appropriate when injury is isolated, documentation is comprehensive, and causation can be shown with fewer contested scientific issues, because focused cases sometimes require less broad coordination and can be handled directly with targeted medical evidence. In such situations, pursuing a single lawsuit or negotiation may allow for faster resolution tailored to a claimant’s specific damages. A detailed, organized case file that includes medical records, exposure details, and corroborating evidence may support an individual approach without the need for large scale coordination.

Urgent Personal Financial Needs

When an individual has immediate financial needs for medical care or living expenses, a focused claim or negotiated resolution might provide a quicker path to recovery, because mass tort timelines can be longer while complex scientific and procedural issues are addressed. Pursuing an individual settlement may be practical if the facts are clear and the responsible parties are willing to negotiate promptly. Discussing financial priorities and case goals with counsel helps determine whether a standalone approach or participation in coordinated proceedings is more appropriate.

Common Circumstances That Lead to Claims

Agricultural or Lawn Use Over Time

Many claims arise from repeated agricultural or home lawn use of herbicides containing glyphosate over years, where accumulation of exposure may be significant and documented through work history or product purchase records. Long term application without clear protective measures or lack of awareness about potential risks can form the factual basis for reviewing a Roundup related injury claim.

Occupational Exposure

Workers who mixed, applied, or otherwise handled glyphosate products on farms, landscaping crews, or in other occupational settings may have increased exposure that is often documented by employment records and job descriptions. These workplace histories and supporting documents can be important when evaluating whether a claim should move forward in coordinated litigation.

Unexpected Health Diagnosis

A new diagnosis of a serious illness with no clear alternative cause often prompts a review of prior chemical exposures, including glyphosate, to determine if a connection is plausible and legally actionable. Medical records and symptom timelines are central to assessing whether to pursue a claim in a mass tort setting.

Roundup Representation in Stonewood, WV

Why Work with Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates serves clients across West Virginia, including Stonewood and Harrison County, assisting individuals and families facing serious illnesses potentially linked to chemical exposure. We focus on building a complete factual picture, gathering medical documentation, and coordinating necessary reviews to assess the merits of a Roundup claim. Our team emphasizes clear communication about options, potential timelines, and likely next steps, working with clients to preserve records and to understand how participation in coordinated proceedings or individual claims may affect recovery and case timing.

Clients benefit from having a local point of contact who understands West Virginia procedures and can help manage communications with other counsel, medical providers, and third parties involved in mass tort matters. We can assist with initial intake, document assembly, and ongoing updates so clients remain informed about case developments and settlement opportunities. If you believe you have a claim, contacting our office in Beckley can help you begin the process of collecting records, discussing timelines, and evaluating whether joining coordinated proceedings or pursuing a standalone claim is the best path for your situation.

Contact Our Office Today

People Also Search For

Roundup lawsuit Stonewood WV

glyphosate mass tort West Virginia

Roundup cancer claim Harrison County

Stephen New & Associates Roundup

Stonewood herbicide exposure claim

Monsanto Roundup litigation WV

mass tort attorney Beckley WV

glyphosate compensation claims

FAQS

What is a Roundup mass tort claim and how does it differ from a class action?

A Roundup mass tort claim is an individual lawsuit filed by a person who alleges that exposure to glyphosate caused a serious health condition, and it is often handled alongside many similar individual cases to address common legal and scientific questions efficiently. Unlike a class action, each plaintiff maintains the ability to pursue damages specific to their injuries, so settlements or judgments reflect individual circumstances and losses. Mass tort coordination typically manages shared discovery and common issues while preserving separate damage determinations for each claimant. Mass tort procedures help consolidate and streamline complex litigation involving technical evidence, which can make it more practical for many affected people to pursue claims collectively while still having their unique medical histories and damages evaluated. This approach benefits plaintiffs facing sophisticated corporate defenses by allowing pooled resources for expert review and document analysis, while protecting each claimant’s right to individual recovery based on personal harm and losses.

How do I know if my condition might be linked to Roundup exposure?

Determining whether a condition may be linked to Roundup exposure involves reviewing your full medical history, diagnoses, treatment records, and a detailed exposure timeline that documents when and how you used or encountered the product. Medical professionals and reviewers will consider other risk factors and alternative explanations for the condition to assess the plausibility of a connection, and legal review will evaluate whether the factual record supports pursuing a claim in coordinated litigation or individually. If your records show repeated or significant exposure to glyphosate, and your medical timeline aligns with known patterns for the condition in question, you may have grounds for further investigation. Early collection and preservation of medical records, employment history, purchase receipts, and photographs can significantly improve the ability to evaluate a potential link and to determine the most appropriate legal path forward.

What evidence is needed to support a Roundup claim?

Key evidence for a Roundup claim typically includes medical records documenting diagnosis and treatment, detailed exposure history showing when and how frequently you encountered the product, and any employment or purchase records that corroborate use. Product labels, photographs of containers, and witness statements can also strengthen a claim, while relevant scientific studies and expert assessments support causation analysis in mass tort proceedings. Clear, chronological documentation improves the ability to present a coherent case linking exposure to health outcomes. Discovery in coordinated litigation often seeks internal documents from manufacturers about testing, warnings, and marketing practices, which can be important to broader legal issues and may support claims about product knowledge and conduct. Working with counsel to obtain and organize these materials early helps ensure key evidence is preserved and ready for review during investigation and possible settlement discussions or trial preparation.

How long will a Roundup mass tort case take to resolve?

The timeline for resolving a Roundup mass tort matter can vary widely depending on the complexity of scientific issues, the volume of claims, and court schedules, and some matters take multiple years to reach settlement or trial. Coordinated pretrial proceedings often focus on resolving common liability and causation issues, but individual damage assessments may continue after common issues are decided. Patience and steady case management are often required as scientific evidence and procedural steps are developed and resolved. Some plaintiffs may reach negotiated settlements earlier if their cases are well documented and the parties agree to resolution, while others may proceed to trial when settlement is not achieved. Discussing realistic timelines and case milestones with local counsel can help you understand expected phases, potential interim steps, and options for addressing ongoing medical and financial needs while litigation continues.

Can I join a mass tort if I live in Stonewood or elsewhere in West Virginia?

Yes, residents of Stonewood, Harrison County, and other parts of West Virginia can typically join mass torts involving Roundup if their injury and exposure history align with the claims under litigation, and if applicable filing deadlines have not passed. A local review will assess medical diagnoses, exposure documentation, and other relevant records to determine whether joining coordinated proceedings or pursuing an individual claim is appropriate, and counsel can explain how participation in mass torts is managed for out of state or local plaintiffs. Local firms can assist with intake, record collection, and communication with national or coordinating counsel when mass tort proceedings involve multiple jurisdictions. Early contact is important to preserve evidence and to confirm whether your case fits within existing coordinated actions or requires a separate filing in state or federal court, so you do not miss important deadlines or opportunities to participate.

What types of compensation might be available in a Roundup claim?

Available compensation in a Roundup claim can include recovery for past and future medical expenses, loss of income, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and other damages tied to the individual harm suffered. The specific categories and amounts depend on the severity of the injury, ongoing care needs, and individual circumstances such as age, occupation, and the financial impact of the condition. Demonstrating the scope of damages requires careful documentation of medical costs, treatment plans, and economic impacts on daily life and work. Some settlements in coordinated proceedings provide structured payments or lump sum awards depending on the nature of the claim, while unresolved claims may proceed to trial where judges or juries assess damages. Early planning with counsel to document costs, future care needs, and non-economic losses helps ensure a comprehensive presentation of damages to defendants, mediators, or a court when seeking fair compensation for the harms experienced.

Will my medical records and personal information be kept private?

Medical records and personal information obtained in the course of pursuing a claim are typically handled under confidentiality rules and court orders that limit public disclosure, with protective measures applied in discovery to restrict how sensitive records are shared. Counsel will explain how documents are used in litigation and what confidentiality protections exist, including the common use of protective orders to prevent unnecessary public access and to limit the distribution of private medical information to authorized parties only. While litigation requires sharing certain records with opposing counsel and the court, attorneys routinely take steps to minimize exposure of unrelated personal details and to seek sealing orders where appropriate. Discussing privacy concerns with your attorney at the outset allows them to take reasonable steps to safeguard your information throughout the case while still allowing necessary disclosures for case development and negotiation.

What are the possible costs of pursuing a Roundup claim?

The costs of pursuing a Roundup claim vary depending on whether the case is handled on a contingency fee basis, where counsel is paid from recovery, or on another arrangement, but many firms that handle mass torts work under contingency arrangements to reduce upfront financial barriers for clients. Litigation can involve expenses for obtaining medical records, expert reviews, and certain filing fees, but contingency arrangements often mean those costs are advanced by counsel and reimbursed only if the case results in recovery. Discuss fee structures and how costs are handled before proceeding to ensure you understand financial implications. Even with contingency arrangements, plaintiffs should be aware of potential out of pocket expenses for travel, duplicate records, or independent medical exams required by defendants, and counsel can provide an estimate of likely costs and how they will be managed. Clear communication about billing practices and expense handling helps clients make informed choices about moving forward without unexpected financial obligations during the process.

Can I pursue an individual lawsuit instead of joining a coordinated action?

Yes, it is often possible to pursue an individual lawsuit instead of participating in a coordinated action, and that path may make sense when a case is straightforward, when a claimant seeks faster resolution for urgent needs, or when individual damages are pronounced. An individual lawsuit focuses on the specific facts and losses of the claimant and can sometimes proceed more quickly to negotiation or trial if liability issues are simpler or the responsible parties are willing to settle. Legal counsel can evaluate the strengths and tradeoffs between individual litigation and participation in a mass tort to recommend the best approach for your situation. Choosing an individual path may also be appropriate when the claimant prefers more direct control over litigation decisions and settlement strategy, or when the facts or injuries differ materially from those in coordinated proceedings. Discussing goals, timelines, and the nature of available evidence with your attorney will help determine whether a standalone case or participation in a mass tort better aligns with your priorities and the likely path to recovery.

How do I start the process of pursuing a Roundup claim with your firm?

To start the process with our firm, contact Stephen New & Associates by phone or through our website to schedule an intake discussion where we collect basic information about your diagnosis, treatment history, and potential exposure to Roundup products. We will explain the documentation we need, help you begin assembling medical records, and advise on preserving any physical evidence or exposure records that may be important. This initial review helps determine whether your case fits within current coordinated matters or is better suited for a separate claim. After intake, our team assists in obtaining medical records, contacting treating providers for records and treatment summaries, and coordinating with other counsel or national coordinators when appropriate. We will outline the likely next steps, potential timelines, and any immediate actions to protect your rights, and we will keep you informed throughout the process so you understand how your case is progressing and what options are available for resolution.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services