Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure Lawyer in Shinnston

TENORM Exposure Help

Guide to Fracking-Related TENORM Exposure and Worker Claims

Workers at hydraulic fracturing sites can be exposed to TENORM, or technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, when drilling and flowback bring concentrated materials to the surface; this page explains common exposure scenarios, potential health implications, and legal options for workers in Shinnston and Harrison County. Stephen New & Associates, a personal injury law firm serving Beckley and communities across West Virginia, provides information about documenting exposure, identifying responsible parties, and pursuing compensation for injuries, medical monitoring, lost wages, and other harms. If you or a family member were exposed while working in the fracking industry, call 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and learn what steps to take to protect your legal rights moving forward.

Fracking operations can concentrate naturally occurring radioactive materials in produced water, scale, and sludge, creating potential exposure pathways for employees and contractors when proper handling and controls are not in place. This page describes how exposure can occur during well maintenance, waste handling, transport, and disposal, and outlines the kinds of evidence that support a claim, including work logs, monitoring results, witness statements, and medical records. We also explain time limits for filing claims in West Virginia and practical steps to preserve evidence and document injuries. Understanding these elements early helps injured workers pursue compensation for medical care, pain and suffering, and lost income.

Why Addressing TENORM Exposure Matters for Workers

Addressing TENORM exposure promptly can have important health and financial consequences for affected workers; securing timely medical evaluation and collecting exposure documentation supports both health management and legal claims. Pursuing a claim can provide access to funds for ongoing monitoring, diagnostic testing, specialized treatments, lost wages, and compensation for pain, suffering, and long-term care needs when contamination causes lasting harm. In addition to compensation, a well-built claim can prompt better site practices and improved safety measures, reducing the risk for other employees. Legal action may also identify multiple responsible parties, including operators, waste handlers, and contractors, which can broaden recovery options and support comprehensive relief for injured workers.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Personal Injury Practice

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm based in Beckley that represents clients across West Virginia, including those in Shinnston and Harrison County, on a broad range of workplace and environmental claims. The firm handles matters involving traumatic injury, wrongful death, workplace accidents, medical negligence, and exposure to hazardous materials such as TENORM arising from drilling and waste handling. Our approach centers on thorough investigation, working with independent scientific and medical professionals when needed, and guiding clients through the legal process while communicating clearly about options, likely timelines, and potential outcomes. Call 304-355-5565 to begin a confidential conversation about your claim.

Understanding TENORM Exposure and Related Legal Claims

Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, often called TENORM in industry literature, can become concentrated during drilling, flowback, and waste processing at hydraulic fracturing operations, creating materials that may emit low levels of radiation. Workers can encounter TENORM in scale, sludge, produced water, and contaminated equipment, and exposure can occur through inhalation of dust, skin contact with contaminated liquids, or ingestion if hygiene practices are insufficient. Health effects vary depending on exposure level and duration, and medical monitoring may be necessary to detect and manage latent conditions. Identifying how and when exposure occurred is fundamental to establishing employer or contractor responsibility under state tort law or regulatory frameworks.

From a legal standpoint, claims for TENORM exposure generally rely on showing that another party failed to exercise reasonable care in handling materials, providing protective equipment, or warning workers of risks, and that this failure caused measurable harm. Evidence that supports a claim can include monitoring reports, maintenance and waste-handling records, worksite photographs, protective equipment logs, witness statements, and medical documentation linking symptoms to workplace exposure. Claimants may pursue compensation through personal injury lawsuits, workers’ compensation where available, or other civil remedies against contractors and waste handlers, depending on the facts of the case and applicable law in West Virginia.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for Fracking-Related TENORM Issues

TENORM (Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material)

TENORM refers to natural radioactive materials that become concentrated or exposed through human activity, such as oil and gas extraction, drilling, or waste handling; in fracking operations, TENORM can accumulate in sediments, scale inside pipes, produced water, and other byproducts that are ordinarily present in trace amounts but become more concentrated during production. While radiation levels found in TENORM are often low, repeated or prolonged contact without appropriate controls can raise health concerns for workers and require monitoring and remedial measures. Understanding what TENORM is and where it is likely to be found on a job site is a first step toward documenting exposure and seeking appropriate medical evaluation and legal remedies.

Radiation Dose and Exposure

Radiation dose describes the amount of ionizing radiation a person receives over a period of time and is a key concept when assessing potential harm from TENORM; dose depends on the concentration of radioactive material, route of exposure, time spent near the source, and whether protective measures were in place. Measuring dose typically involves specialized monitoring equipment and laboratory analysis, and results are interpreted by health professionals to assess risk and determine whether medical surveillance or treatment is warranted. For legal purposes, documented measurements and expert interpretation of dose can support claims that a worker experienced a level of exposure linked to adverse health outcomes.

Exposure Pathways and Routes

Exposure pathways are the routes by which hazardous materials like TENORM can enter the body, commonly including inhalation of contaminated dust or aerosols, dermal contact with contaminated fluids or surfaces, and ingestion when contaminants are transferred from hands to mouth; identifying the most likely pathway for an individual’s exposure helps target medical testing and supports a claim by connecting workplace conditions to observed health effects. Worksite practices that increase pathway risk include inadequate containment, poor hygiene facilities, lack of protective clothing, and improper waste transport or storage, all of which may be documented through photographs, logs, and witness testimony to establish how exposure occurred.

Medical Monitoring and Surveillance

Medical monitoring refers to a program of periodic health evaluations and diagnostic testing designed to detect early signs of disease or changes in health that may be related to occupational exposure, and such programs may be recommended for workers with documented contact with TENORM; monitoring can include blood tests, imaging, pulmonary assessments, and other exams determined by healthcare providers based on exposure type and dose. Legally, medical monitoring claims may seek funding for ongoing testing and preventive care when exposure raises a reasonably demonstrable increased risk of harm, and establishing the need for monitoring typically requires medical opinion tied to exposure evidence from the workplace.

PRO TIPS

Document Workplace Conditions Immediately

Take photographs and detailed notes about the work environment, equipment, and any visible residues or spills as soon as it is safe to do so, because visual records created close in time to the event are especially persuasive when reconstructing exposure events. Collect names and contact information for coworkers and supervisors who witnessed the conditions or who performed the same tasks, and preserve any clothing or equipment that may retain residues by storing it in sealed containers if possible. Prompt documentation supports both medical assessment and any legal claim by creating contemporaneous evidence that ties workplace conditions to your symptoms and later testing.

Seek Timely Medical Evaluation and Monitoring

Obtain a medical evaluation promptly after suspected exposure to record symptoms, baseline findings, and recommended testing, because early documentation of health effects and a provider’s assessment linking those effects to workplace exposure are important elements in later claims. Follow through with recommended diagnostic tests and any medical monitoring plan, and keep detailed medical records and bills related to each visit, test, and treatment to document the scope and cost of care. Consistent medical follow-up not only helps protect your health but also provides an evidentiary trail useful for establishing causation and damages in a legal matter.

Preserve Work Records and Communications

Keep copies of work schedules, safety training records, incident reports, email communications, and any written policies or permits that relate to waste handling and protective procedures, because these documents can demonstrate what the employer knew and did regarding TENORM risks. If possible, request exposure or monitoring records formally and note any denials or delays in providing information, since administrative interactions can be relevant to a claim and may be required before certain remedies are available. Organized documentation of workplace practices and communications strengthens the ability to identify responsible parties and supports claims for compensation and monitoring when exposure has occurred.

Comparing Legal Approaches for Workplace TENORM Exposure

When a Full Legal Approach Is Advisable for TENORM Claims:

Complex Exposure and Long-Term Health Risks

A comprehensive legal approach is often necessary when exposure is complex, multiple routes of contact are possible, and the health risks may emerge over many years, because such claims require thorough investigation, scientific analysis, and coordination with medical professionals to document causation and future care needs. Cases that involve large volumes of contaminated material, repeated incidents, or multiple affected employees benefit from a broader strategy that identifies all potential responsible parties and preserves long-term remedies for monitoring and treatment. When the factual and technical issues are intricate, a more expansive approach helps ensure that all avenues for recovery and protection are pursued on behalf of affected workers.

Multiple Responsible Parties and Shared Liability

When liability may be shared among operators, contractors, waste transporters, or disposal facilities, pursuing a comprehensive legal strategy is necessary to identify each potentially responsible party and allocate responsibility across the full supply chain, because isolating a single defendant can limit recovery and leave injured workers without adequate compensation. Complex chain-of-custody issues for waste materials and contractual relationships between companies often require document discovery, depositions, and coordination with technical consultants to establish who had control and notice of risks. A broad approach increases the likelihood of securing sufficient remedies for medical monitoring, lost income, and long-term care.

When a Focused Legal Approach May Be Appropriate:

Isolated, Well-Documented Incidents

A limited approach can be appropriate when an exposure incident is isolated, clearly documented, and there is a single identifiable party whose negligence caused the harm, because the facts are straightforward and liability can be established without extensive technical investigation. In such situations, pursuing a more focused claim can reduce costs and speed resolution by concentrating on the most relevant evidence and a narrow set of damages. Even when a limited strategy is pursued, it is important to preserve all relevant medical and workplace documentation in case additional issues emerge during the claim process.

Clear Liability and Low Exposure Levels

When monitoring shows low exposure levels and medical follow-up indicates no ongoing issues, and when the responsible party admits fault or policies plainly were violated, a targeted claim for immediate medical costs and short-term wage loss may resolve the matter without a larger litigation strategy. In these cases, parties often can agree to narrow settlements or workers’ compensation resolutions that address the concrete damages without pursuing broader monitoring remedies. Careful documentation and early medical evaluation remain important to confirm that limited relief is appropriate and sufficient for the injured worker’s needs.

Common Situations That Lead to TENORM Exposure Claims

Worker Exposure During Well Maintenance

Routine maintenance on drill rigs, flowback equipment, and production lines can disturb scale and sludge where TENORM has accumulated, creating dust and aerosolized particles that workers may breathe or that may contact skin, and such incidents often occur when maintenance is performed without adequate containment or decontamination protocols in place. When maintenance tasks are performed frequently and workers handle contaminated components directly, repeated low-level doses can accumulate over time and justify claims for medical monitoring and compensation tied to the workplace exposures documented by records and witness accounts.

Improper Waste Handling and Disposal

Produced water, sludge, and solid waste that are handled, stored, or transported without proper containment can expose handlers and nearby workers to TENORM, particularly if materials are transferred in open containers or spilled during loading and unloading operations. Failures in labeling, improper vendor oversight, or shortcuts by subcontractors can create conditions where multiple employees are exposed and where records are essential to identify responsible parties and the timing of contamination events that give rise to claims.

Insufficient Protective Measures and Training

When employers do not provide appropriate personal protective equipment, hygiene facilities, training, or monitoring, workers are more likely to come into contact with contaminated materials and to carry residues offsite, increasing the risk of both acute and long-term health effects. Claims often arise in settings where warnings were limited or inconsistent, safety protocols were not enforced, and workers lacked clear guidance on safe handling and decontamination procedures that would have reduced exposure risk.

Shinnston TENORM Exposure Lawyer

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM and Fracking Exposure Claims

Stephen New & Associates brings a client-centered approach to workplace exposure claims, working to identify responsible parties and assemble the medical and technical evidence necessary to support recovery for injured workers; the firm represents clients from Shinnston and surrounding communities across West Virginia and focuses on clear communication about legal options and likely timelines. We routinely coordinate with medical providers and independent consultants to document exposure and future care needs, and we pursue remedies that address medical costs, monitoring, lost wages, and pain and suffering while keeping clients informed throughout the process. Contact our Beckley office at 304-355-5565 for an initial discussion of your case.

Clients working in the fracking industry often face practical and legal complexities when dealing with TENORM exposure, and our firm assists by preserving evidence, securing necessary documentation, and guiding claimants through procedural requirements and deadlines in West Virginia. We explain whether workers’ compensation or civil claims are appropriate in a given situation and pursue the most effective path to recovery based on the facts and the client’s needs, while also advocating for medical monitoring when long-term surveillance is warranted. If you have concerns about exposure or symptoms, call 304-355-5565 to arrange a confidential conversation and learn your options.

Request a Free Case Review Today

People Also Search For

TENORM exposure Shinnston

fracking worker exposure lawyer WV

hydraulic fracturing radiation claims West Virginia

TENORM personal injury Shinnston

fracking waste exposure compensation

workplace radiation exposure claims WV

Shinnston TENORM legal counsel

hydraulic fracturing worker health claims

FAQS

What is TENORM and how can it affect fracking workers?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material and refers to naturally occurring radioactive elements that become concentrated through industrial processes such as hydraulic fracturing, flowback, and waste handling; these concentrations can appear in scale, sludge, produced water, and contaminated equipment. Exposure can occur through inhalation of dust or aerosols, skin contact with contaminated fluids, or ingestion if hygiene controls are inadequate, and the health implications depend on dose, duration, and exposure route. If you suspect exposure, medical assessment and environmental testing can help determine whether TENORM was present and whether your exposure exceeded background levels; such documentation is also important for any legal claim, because establishing a link between workplace conditions and health effects typically relies on both scientific data and medical records.

How do I know if I was exposed to TENORM at work?

Signs of potential exposure include unexplained symptoms that correlate with work tasks, knowledge of spills or poor waste handling, or awareness of visible residues on equipment or clothing after a shift; however, symptoms alone do not prove exposure and medical testing and site sampling are usually needed to confirm contact with TENORM. Workers should report concerns to supervisors and seek prompt medical evaluation so baseline records and diagnostic testing are established early in the timeline. Collecting contemporaneous evidence such as photographs, shift logs, witness statements, and maintenance or waste transfer records also helps establish whether exposure occurred and who may have been responsible, and preserving clothing or samples when safe to do so can assist later analysis and support a legal claim if needed.

What types of compensation can injured workers seek for TENORM exposure?

Compensation for TENORM-related injuries can include coverage for past and future medical expenses, reimbursement for diagnostic testing and ongoing medical monitoring, lost wages and diminished earning capacity, and non-economic damages such as pain and suffering when a civil claim is appropriate and available. In some cases, wrongful death claims arise when exposure contributes to a worker’s death and survivors seek damages for funeral costs, loss of support, and other losses. The precise remedies depend on whether a workers’ compensation system applies or whether a civil tort action can be pursued against contractors, operators, or waste handlers, and careful investigation is necessary to identify all potential sources of recovery and ensure that claims are filed within applicable deadlines and procedural rules.

What evidence is important in a TENORM exposure claim?

Important evidence in a TENORM exposure claim includes medical records and test results showing symptoms or biomarkers consistent with exposure, environmental monitoring data or laboratory analysis of materials from the site, work logs that document tasks and durations, incident reports, and photographs or videos of work conditions. Witness statements from coworkers and supervisors who observed unsafe handling, spills, or lack of protective measures can also be critical to establishing how exposure occurred and who had responsibility for safety. Additionally, company policies, training records, maintenance and waste handling logs, and correspondence about safety concerns can demonstrate notice and negligence, while expert interpretation of monitoring data and medical causation opinions often tie the factual record to the claimant’s injuries and anticipated future care needs.

Should I pursue workers' compensation or a civil claim?

Whether to pursue a workers’ compensation claim or a civil action depends on the circumstances of the exposure, the parties involved, and the nature of the damages; workers’ compensation can provide quicker access to medical benefits and partial wage replacement but typically limits recovery for pain and suffering, while a civil claim can potentially provide broader damages, including non-economic losses and higher compensation when negligence by a third party is proven. In some situations, both routes may be available depending on contractual relationships and third-party liability. Evaluating the best path requires reviewing employment status, the identity of contractors and operators on site, applicable insurance coverage, and the specific injuries or monitoring needs; legal guidance helps determine the strategy that maximizes recovery while complying with procedural requirements and deadlines in West Virginia.

How long do I have to file a claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitation and filing deadlines vary based on the type of claim and the applicable law in West Virginia, with workers’ compensation claims and personal injury actions each subject to different time limits, and latent injuries often presenting additional complexities. Because delay can bar a claim, it is important to seek legal advice promptly so that necessary filings, evidence preservation, and investigative steps occur within the required timeframes. Early action also helps secure monitoring and medical documentation while memories are fresh and records are available, and preserving evidence soon after exposure increases the likelihood of establishing causation and liability if a claim becomes necessary.

Can I get medical monitoring paid for through a claim?

Medical monitoring can be a recoverable item in some claims where exposure increases the risk of future disease and objective evidence shows that the claimant was exposed to hazardous materials such as TENORM; success typically depends on medical opinion linking exposure to an elevated risk and on demonstrating that monitoring is reasonable and necessary to detect and manage potential health effects. Courts and insurers consider the nature of the exposure, scientific evidence, and medical recommendations when evaluating requests for monitoring funds. If monitoring is appropriate, claims can seek funding for periodic exams, imaging, laboratory tests, and specialist consultations tailored to the types of conditions associated with the exposure; early consultation with medical and legal professionals helps establish the scope and justification for a monitoring program within a claim.

What steps should I take immediately after suspected exposure?

Immediately after suspected exposure, prioritize medical evaluation to document symptoms and obtain any recommended diagnostic testing, because timely medical records are essential both for health care and for any later claim. Report the exposure to your supervisor in writing, request that an incident report be filed, and, if safe, take photographs of the conditions and preserve any clothing or equipment that may retain residues by placing them in sealed bags or containers. Also collect contact information for witnesses, keep copies of work schedules and training records, and avoid washing contaminated clothing until instructed by medical or safety professionals, as preserved physical evidence and contemporaneous documentation strengthen the factual record needed to support medical monitoring and legal remedies when appropriate.

How do companies typically handle TENORM waste and who can be liable?

Companies that handle TENORM typically have policies intended to control contamination, including containment of produced water and sludge, proper labeling and transport of waste, decontamination of equipment, and monitoring programs; when these practices are followed, exposure risk is reduced, but failures in oversight, subcontractor management, or adherence to procedures can lead to worker exposure. Liability may rest with the site operator, contractors engaged in waste handling, transporters, or disposal facilities, depending on contract terms and control over operations. Determining liability requires reviewing contracts, operational control, safety protocols, and transfer records to establish which party had responsibility for handling and maintaining safe conditions, and legal claims often focus on who had the duty to prevent exposure and whether that duty was breached, resulting in harm to workers.

How can I arrange a consultation with Stephen New & Associates about TENORM exposure?

To arrange a consultation with Stephen New & Associates about suspected TENORM exposure, call the Beckley office at 304-355-5565 to schedule a confidential discussion; during that initial conversation you can describe the circumstances of the exposure, share any immediate concerns about medical care, and learn what documentation and records will be helpful. The firm can advise on practical next steps for preserving evidence and obtaining medical evaluation while explaining potential legal paths, likely timelines, and what to expect from an investigation. Consultations are an opportunity to explore whether medical monitoring, workers’ compensation, or civil claims are appropriate for your situation, to identify potentially responsible parties, and to receive guidance on protecting rights in the early stages of a claim, including deadlines and required filings in West Virginia.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services