Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Product Liability Lawyer in Salem

Protecting Your Rights

Guide to Product Liability Claims in Salem

Product defects can result in serious injury, mounting medical bills, lost wages, and unexpected stress for families in Salem and across Harrison County. This guide explains how product liability claims work, common types of defective products, and what injured consumers can do to preserve evidence and seek compensation. Stephen New & Associates, a personal injury law firm serving Beckley and communities throughout West Virginia, represents people harmed by dangerous or defective products. If you or a loved one suffered an injury from a consumer product, vehicle component, medical device, or other defective item, you should understand the steps to protect your rights and begin building a claim without delay.

When a consumer product causes harm, swift action often matters. Preserving the item, documenting injuries, and collecting purchase or warranty records help preserve facts that support a claim. Our firm assists clients in Salem by investigating incidents, identifying responsible parties, and coordinating the collection of medical and technical records. We also help explain the legal timeline that applies in West Virginia so you can make informed choices about pursuing recovery for medical costs, lost income, pain and suffering, and other losses. Contact Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and learn about practical next steps.

Why Pursuing a Product Liability Claim Helps

Pursuing a product liability claim holds manufacturers, designers, distributors, and retailers accountable for items that cause injury when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable way. Beyond seeking payment for medical treatment and lost wages, a claim can push for changes in design, stronger warnings, and recalls that reduce harm to other consumers. For individuals and families, recovery through a claim can fund ongoing care, therapy, or necessary home modifications after a serious injury. The legal process also creates a formal record of the incident that can be important for insurance negotiations and future needs related to the injury.

About Stephen New & Associates in West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm with roots in West Virginia and a commitment to serving clients in Salem, Harrison County, and surrounding areas. The firm handles a broad range of injury matters, including product liability, motor vehicle collisions, medical device injuries, and catastrophic loss claims. Our approach focuses on careful investigation, clear communication, and persistent advocacy on behalf of injured people and their families. We work to gather the technical and medical information needed to support claims while keeping clients informed about options and potential outcomes at every stage of the process.

Understanding Product Liability Claims

Product liability law covers injuries caused by defective or dangerous products and typically examines whether a product had a design defect, a manufacturing defect, or inadequate instructions or warnings. A design defect exists where the product is inherently unsafe when used as intended. A manufacturing defect occurs when an otherwise safe design is harmed by a flaw during production. Failure to warn refers to insufficient instructions or warnings about risks. Identifying the type of defect helps determine which parties may be responsible and what kinds of evidence, such as design records, production logs, and expert analysis, will be needed to support a claim.

The process of pursuing a product liability claim generally begins with documenting the incident, obtaining medical records, and preserving the product and related items like packaging and labels. Parties potentially liable can include manufacturers, suppliers, component makers, and retailers, depending on the facts. In West Virginia, timeliness matters, so understanding the applicable filing deadlines and acting promptly to secure evidence can protect the claim. The firm can help guide investigation strategies, coordinate technical reviews when needed, and advise on the best path forward given the nature of injuries and the strength of available proof.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for Product Liability

Design Defect

A design defect refers to a fundamental flaw in a product’s intended design that makes it unreasonably dangerous even when manufactured exactly as designed. This type of defect affects an entire line or model because the hazard stems from how the product was conceived. Proving a design defect often involves comparing the product to a reasonable alternative design that would have reduced or avoided the risk, while still serving the product’s purpose. Technical documentation, testing data, and comparisons to safer designs can be important parts of demonstrating that the design itself caused the injury.

Strict Liability

Strict liability holds certain parties responsible for harms caused by defective products regardless of fault or negligence, focusing instead on the condition of the product that caused injury. In a strict liability claim, a claimant must typically show that the product was defective and that the defect caused the injury when the product was used in a foreseeable manner. This legal theory can simplify recovery by removing the need to prove that the manufacturer acted negligently, although factual proof of the defect and the causal link between the defect and the injury remains essential.

Manufacturing Defect

A manufacturing defect arises when a product departs from its intended design during the production process, making a particular item unreasonably dangerous while other units from the same design remain safe. These defects can result from errors in assembly, substandard materials, or quality control failures. Establishing a manufacturing defect often relies on comparing the injured product to properly made units, production records, inspection reports, and testimony about factory practices. Because the defect affects only some units, identifying the production anomaly is central to proving the claim.

Failure to Warn

Failure to warn, also called inadequate warnings or instructions, occurs when a product lacks sufficient labeling, directions, or cautions about foreseeable risks associated with normal use. Even a well-designed and well-manufactured product may be dangerous without clear guidance on safe handling, maintenance, or limitations. Demonstrating failure to warn includes showing that the absence or insufficiency of warnings made the product unreasonably dangerous and that a reasonable warning would have reduced the risk. Evidence can include the product’s packaging, marketing materials, and internal communications about known hazards.

PRO TIPS

Preserve the Product

After an injury, keep the product exactly as it was at the time of the incident and do not attempt to fix, alter, or dispose of it, because changes can destroy evidence needed to prove a claim. Photograph the product from multiple angles, capture visible damage and any identifying labels or serial numbers, and store the item in a safe location where it will not deteriorate further. Retaining the product and related packaging helps investigators and technical reviewers assess whether a design, manufacturing, or labeling problem caused the injury and supports a stronger case for recovery.

Document Your Injuries

Document every injury-related medical visit, treatment, and expense, keeping copies of medical records, bills, diagnostic imaging, and prescribed therapies to create a clear record of the harm caused by the defective product. Maintain a personal journal describing pain levels, symptoms, limitations in daily activities, and how the injury affects work and family life, because these notes provide a contemporaneous account of the impact on your well-being. Thorough documentation supports claims for compensatory damages and helps demonstrate the connection between the defective item and both short and long term consequences of the injury.

Keep Purchase Records

Save receipts, order confirmations, warranty paperwork, and records of where and when you purchased the product, since proof of purchase helps establish the product’s origin, relevant model or serial numbers, and potential timeline for production batches. If applicable, note whether the product was modified, repaired, or maintained, and gather any communications with sellers, manufacturers, or warranty providers that reference issues or complaints about the item. Collecting this information early strengthens the ability to trace the product through the chain of distribution and identify responsible parties.

Comparing Legal Options for Product Injury Claims

When a Comprehensive Approach Helps:

Complex Chain of Distribution

When multiple parties supply, design, or assemble a product, determining who bears responsibility can be complicated and benefits from a broad investigative approach that traces component origins, manufacturing steps, and distribution paths. Technical reviews of design documents, production records, and supply chain information may be necessary to link the defect to the responsible actor, and this process often requires coordination across jurisdictions and sources. A comprehensive approach ensures that all potential defendants are considered, which can increase the chance of recovering full compensation for medical costs, lost income, and non-economic harms.

Serious Long-Term Injuries

Severe injuries that produce long-term care needs, disability, or ongoing medical treatment call for a careful assessment of future costs and support requirements, and a comprehensive legal strategy will account for lifetime medical care, rehabilitative services, lost earning capacity, and quality of life impacts. Gathering detailed medical opinions, cost projections, and vocational assessments helps calculate fair compensation that can address both current needs and anticipated future expenses. A full-scale approach to these claims seeks to secure resources sufficient to cover the long-term consequences of the injury and provide stability for the injured person and their family.

When a Limited Approach May Be Sufficient:

Minor Property Damage Only

If a product incident resulted in minor property damage without personal injury, a focused approach such as an insurance claim or direct negotiation with the seller or manufacturer may resolve the issue without a full-scale litigation effort. Gathering basic documentation like photos, receipts, and a concise account of the defect can often support recovery for repair or replacement in these lower-stakes situations. A limited approach minimizes cost and time while addressing the immediate loss, but it should still preserve key evidence and consider whether broader risks to other consumers require a different response.

Clear Manufacturer Liability

When liability is obvious and the responsible manufacturer accepts fault or has acknowledged the defect, targeted negotiation and documentation may lead to a prompt settlement that compensates for medical bills and related losses without protracted litigation. In such cases, focusing on accurate billing, proof of purchase, and clear medical records can streamline resolution. Even when pursuing a straightforward claim, it remains important to ensure proposed settlements cover long term needs and to confirm that settlements address all parties who may have contributed to the harm.

Common Situations That Lead to Product Liability Claims

Defective Household Goods

Injuries from everyday household products such as electrical appliances, furniture, or children’s items often occur when a design or manufacturing flaw causes fire, choking, collapse, or other hazards that were not reasonably foreseeable by the consumer. Because these products are used frequently in homes, the potential for widespread harm means careful documentation of incidents, preservation of the involved item, and reporting to regulators or manufacturers can be important steps toward both individual recovery and preventing future injuries.

Vehicle Component Failures

Failing vehicle components like brakes, airbags, tires, or steering parts can create high-risk situations leading to serious collisions and life-changing injuries, and these cases may involve manufacturers of the part, vehicle makers, and suppliers. Thorough investigation into maintenance records, recall histories, and the specific part’s production lot often sheds light on whether a defect caused the failure and who should be held accountable for resulting losses.

Defective Medical Devices

Medical device failures, implants, and surgical tools that malfunction or cause unintended harm raise complex issues involving device makers, hospitals, and treating clinicians, and these matters often demand careful review of device history and clinical records. Victims of device-related injuries may require both immediate medical care and long-term monitoring, and pursuing recovery includes documenting how the device was used, maintained, and whether warnings or instructions were adequate.

Product Liability Lawyer Serving Salem and Harrison County

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Product Liability Matters

Stephen New & Associates provides local representation for people in Salem while drawing on experience handling complex injury matters across West Virginia. The firm focuses on careful fact gathering, clear communication with clients about realistic goals, and persistent advocacy with insurers and opposing parties. From preserving critical evidence to coordinating technical reviews and medical documentation, the team supports clients through each step of a claim and seeks to secure recoveries that address immediate costs as well as future needs related to injuries caused by defective products.

Clients in Harrison County receive hands-on attention to case details, timely updates, and help understanding the legal options available after a product-related injury. The firm evaluates claims to identify responsible parties, explores potential remedies including manufacturer or retailer liability, and develops a strategy tailored to each client’s circumstances. Those harmed by defective products can expect assistance in preparing documentation, pursuing fair negotiations, and, when necessary, taking a case to trial to pursue full and appropriate compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and diminished quality of life.

Get a Free Case Review Today

People Also Search For

product liability lawyer Salem WV

defective product attorney Salem

product injury claim Salem WV

product liability Salem West Virginia

dangerous product lawyer Harrison County

defective medical device Salem WV

consumer product lawsuit Salem

personal injury product liability Salem

Related Services

FAQS

What qualifies as a product liability claim in West Virginia?

A product liability claim typically arises when a consumer or user is injured by a product that is defective in design, manufacturing, or warning labels. To qualify, an injured person generally must show that the product was unreasonably dangerous when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable way, that the defect existed at the time it left the control of the responsible party, and that the defect caused the injury and resulting losses. Evidence such as the damaged product, medical records, purchase proofs, and records of comparable units can support the claim. Not all poor outcomes from product use lead to successful claims; the circumstances and available evidence are decisive. Some cases involve multiple potentially responsible parties, like component suppliers and distributors, which makes tracing responsibility important. Timely preservation of the product, documentation of injuries, and prompt consultation help protect legal options, while an early review of the facts can clarify whether a product liability claim is appropriate given the injuries and available proof.

Who can be held responsible for a defective product?

Multiple parties may be held responsible for a defective product depending on their role in the product’s lifecycle, including designers, manufacturers, component suppliers, distributors, and retailers. Liability can arise under theories that focus on the defect itself rather than fault, and it can also be based on negligence if a party failed to exercise reasonable care in design, production, or warnings. Identifying the correct defendant or defendants requires review of purchase records, product labels, and manufacturing information to locate the relevant companies and supply chain relationships. In complex cases, responsibility may be shared among several entities, and resolving claims can involve tracing components back to their source, reviewing contractual relationships, and analyzing how the product reached the consumer. Determining who to name in a claim helps ensure a full recovery and prevent responsible parties from avoiding accountability due to an incomplete investigation, so careful documentation and early probing of the product�s origin are important steps in building a strong case.

How long do I have to file a product liability lawsuit in West Virginia?

Deadlines for filing a product liability lawsuit vary by state and depend on the type of claim, but taking action promptly is essential to preserve evidence and legal rights. In West Virginia, statutes of limitation and statutes of repose affect when a claim can be filed and can differ based on whether the claim is framed as personal injury, negligence, or another theory. Because deadlines can be strict and sometimes shorten with time or specific circumstances, consulting with counsel early helps clarify the applicable time limits for your particular situation and avoid losing the right to sue. Even when a deadline appears distant, securing perishable evidence like the product itself, photographs, and witness statements is wise. Waiting to begin an investigation can lead to lost or altered evidence, faded memories, and reduced ability to show how the defect caused harm. Discussing the facts with a local attorney can determine important dates and ensure necessary steps are taken to file within the required window if a lawsuit is appropriate.

What types of damages can I recover in a product liability case?

Damages in a product liability case can include economic losses such as medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, future healthcare needs, lost wages, and loss of earning capacity when injuries affect the ability to work. Non-economic damages may compensate for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and diminished quality of life. In more severe cases, when conduct is particularly harmful or reckless, punitive damages may be available to punish wrongdoing and deter similar behavior, though availability depends on case facts and legal standards applicable in the jurisdiction. Accurately projecting future care costs and the long-term impact of injuries often requires medical and vocational assessments, and these evaluations inform settlement negotiations or trial presentations. Keeping thorough records of all treatment, bills, and ongoing needs helps document losses, while expert opinions or technical analyses may be necessary to show the full scope of damages tied to the defective product and justify compensation for both immediate and future consequences.

Should I keep the damaged product after an injury?

Yes, whenever possible you should keep the damaged product in the condition it was in at the time of the incident and avoid repairing, altering, or discarding it, because the item itself often provides direct evidence of the defect and how it caused harm. Photograph the product, its labels, serial numbers, and any damage, and store packaging, instructions, and receipts in a safe place. If the product is too large to store safely, document its condition thoroughly and consult with counsel about preserving it through inspection arrangements or expert review. Preserving the product also helps in communicating with manufacturers, retailers, and regulators, and it may be necessary for technical testing or analysis to determine the cause of failure. If you have already disposed of or altered the product, explain that to your attorney, who can explore alternative evidence such as photographs, witness statements, purchase records, and repair logs to reconstruct the circumstances surrounding the incident.

What evidence should I collect after a product-related injury?

Collecting evidence after a product-related injury includes preserving the product, taking clear photos of damage, injury, and the scene, keeping packaging and instruction manuals, and saving purchase information like receipts or order confirmations. Obtain and keep copies of all medical records, bills, test results, and provider notes documenting diagnosis and treatment. If there were witnesses, get their contact details and statements while memories are fresh, and note any maintenance or repair history that could be relevant to how the product was used or serviced prior to the incident. Additionally, record dates, times, and a detailed account of how the injury occurred, including how the product was being used. If the product was registered, keep registration details and any manufacturer correspondence. Early collection of these items strengthens the ability to link the product defect to the injury and supports negotiations or litigation by creating a clear factual record for review by investigators and technical reviewers when needed.

Can I sue for a defective medical device used during treatment?

Yes, injuries caused by defective medical devices can form the basis of a product liability claim when the device malfunctions, is defectively designed, is manufactured improperly, or lacks adequate warnings about risks. Medical device cases often involve careful review of surgical reports, device implantation records, maintenance and sterilization logs, and the device�s design and testing history to determine whether the product or its use contributed to harm. These matters can involve multiple parties, such as the device maker, component suppliers, and healthcare providers, depending on the facts. Because device-related claims frequently raise complex technical and medical issues, thorough documentation and coordinated review of clinical records and device information are important. Timely preservation of the device itself, if possible, and gathering operative notes, imaging studies, and follow-up treatment records help establish a causal link between device performance and injury. A structured approach to analyzing these materials strengthens the ability to pursue appropriate recovery and address ongoing medical needs.

How are manufacturers and retailers different in liability cases?

Manufacturers design and produce products and are often responsible for defects in design or manufacture, while retailers and distributors bring products to market and may be liable if they sold a defective item or failed to pass along warnings. In some cases, a retailer may be the only practical defendant if a manufacturer cannot be located or is outside the reach of the legal process, but tracing the supply chain can reveal additional responsible parties who share legal responsibility. Understanding the separate roles helps determine which parties to include in a claim to ensure full compensation for injuries. Legal theories differ by role: claims against manufacturers often focus on design or production faults, while claims against retailers may be framed around selling a product that is unreasonably dangerous or failing to convey warnings. Establishing liability may involve product labels, distribution records, warranty information, and communications among manufacturers, suppliers, and sellers. A comprehensive review helps identify all potential sources of recovery and prevents missing parties that could change the outcome of a case.

Will my case go to trial or settle out of court?

Whether a product liability case goes to trial or settles out of court depends on the strength of the evidence, the positions of the parties, insurance considerations, and the willingness of defendants to negotiate. Many cases resolve through settlement because it avoids the time, expense, and uncertainty of trial, but some claims proceed to litigation when defendants deny responsibility, when damages are disputed, or when a trial is necessary to obtain fair compensation. Preparing a case with solid documentation and persuasive proof improves prospects for a favorable settlement or trial outcome. Clients should expect a structured process that begins with investigation and demand, followed by negotiations and possible mediation, and then litigation if no acceptable resolution is reached. Throughout, decisions about settlement versus trial should reflect the injured person�s needs, the likelihood of success, and the comparative benefits of resolving the matter sooner versus pursuing a higher recovery through court. Open communication helps ensure informed choices about the path forward.

Do you handle cases on a contingency fee basis?

Many personal injury firms handle product liability matters on a contingency fee basis, meaning the firm collects attorneys fees only if a recovery is obtained through settlement or judgment, and the client does not pay upfront hourly fees for representation. Contingency arrangements align the firm�s interests with the client�s and help injured people pursue claims without immediate out-of-pocket legal costs, while also typically covering case-related expenses that are reimbursed from any recovery. Specific fee structures and expense arrangements vary, so discussing terms before beginning representation clarifies expectations. Before moving forward, a client should request a written agreement that explains the percentage for contingency fees, how expenses are handled, and any other potential costs, as well as what happens if the case is unsuccessful. Transparent communication about fees and case strategy helps clients decide whether the arrangement meets their needs and ensures both parties understand the process and financial implications of pursuing a product liability claim.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services