Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure Lawyer in Despard

TENORM Exposure Claims

Guide to TENORM and Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure

Workers at hydraulic fracturing sites in Despard can face long-term health risks from TENORM, which stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material. If you spend time on fracking sites, you may be exposed to contaminated scales, sludge, produced water, or equipment residues that concentrate naturally occurring radioactive materials through industrial processes. These exposures can be insidious, occurring over weeks, months, or years, and symptoms may not appear immediately. Understanding how TENORM behaves, how exposure can happen on the job, and what evidence can support a workplace claim are important first steps when considering legal options and protecting your future health and income.

This guide explains what TENORM is, common routes of exposure at hydraulic fracturing operations, and the types of injuries and illnesses that may result from prolonged contact. It also outlines how workers can preserve evidence, seek medical evaluation, and document employer practices that may have allowed contamination to accumulate. The information here is intended to help workers and families recognize potential hazards, understand the legal pathways available in West Virginia, and learn how our firm approaches investigation and claims on behalf of those affected by workplace TENORM exposure at fracking sites.

Why Addressing TENORM Exposure Matters

Addressing TENORM exposure promptly can protect long-term health, secure compensation for medical care, and hold negligent parties accountable for unsafe workplace conditions. Pursuing a claim can fund ongoing medical monitoring, diagnostic testing, and treatment while delivering financial relief for lost wages and reduced earning capacity. Legal action may also prompt corrective steps at the site to prevent future exposures and improve safety for other workers. Collecting detailed records and early testing increases the likelihood of establishing a clear link between workplace conditions and health impacts, which benefits both the individual worker and the wider workforce by promoting safer practices.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Work in TENORM Cases

Stephen New & Associates, based in Beckley with practice in Despard and across West Virginia, represents workers facing serious injuries and occupational exposures, including TENORM from hydraulic fracturing operations. Our team focuses on investigating workplace conditions, coordinating with medical professionals for appropriate testing and monitoring, and identifying responsible parties such as contractors, site operators, or equipment providers. We assist clients in documenting exposure histories and pursuing claims to recover compensation for medical care, lost income, and other damages. Our priority is providing practical guidance, regular communication, and aggressive representation to protect clients and their families during challenging recoveries.

Understanding TENORM Exposure Claims

TENORM exposure claims involve understanding scientific, occupational, and legal elements that link contaminants found at fracking sites to worker injuries or illnesses. The legal process typically starts with a thorough review of employment records, site logs, safety reports, and any available environmental testing. Medical documentation is essential to show how symptoms or diagnoses are consistent with exposure. Investigations often involve third-party testing, consultation with industrial hygienists, and reconstructing workplace practices that may have allowed accumulation of radioactive residues. A clear timeline of exposure, protective measures used, and employer responses to complaints strengthens a worker’s ability to pursue compensation.

Navigating a TENORM claim can also require coordination with regulatory agencies, review of maintenance and disposal practices for waste and drill cuttings, and assessment of whether contractors or equipment manufacturers contributed to hazardous conditions. Workers should preserve clothing, equipment, and any photos or messages about site conditions, and seek medical evaluation that documents possible exposure-related conditions. Because occupational contamination often develops over time, legal strategies emphasize gathering both contemporaneous workplace documentation and long-term medical records to build a persuasive claim for damages, medical monitoring, and other remedies available under West Virginia law.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for TENORM Claims

What TENORM Means

TENORM refers to materials that are naturally radioactive but have become more concentrated through industrial or technological processes, such as those used in oil and gas production. In the context of hydraulic fracturing, TENORM can collect in scales, sludge, piping, produced water, and drill cuttings when naturally occurring radioactive elements are brought to the surface and concentrated by processing. Understanding this concept helps workers appreciate why seemingly ordinary waste or residue can pose heightened health risks, and why special handling and testing are often necessary to assess exposure and long-term consequences for occupational claimants.

Routes of Exposure

Routes of exposure describe how radioactive residues can enter the body, commonly through inhalation of contaminated dust or aerosols, dermal contact with contaminated materials, or incidental ingestion after handling contaminated equipment and failing to follow decontamination protocols. On fracking sites, inadequate hygiene facilities, improper handling of produced water, and lack of protective procedures can increase the risk that workers will inhale or touch materials containing TENORM. Recognizing the routes of exposure helps in documenting how workplace practices and protective measures, or the lack of them, contributed to individual exposures.

Medical Monitoring

Medical monitoring refers to periodic health examinations and diagnostic testing designed to detect early signs of disease related to workplace exposures, including those from TENORM. For workers with a history of exposure, ongoing screening can identify changes in blood counts, organ function, or other markers before serious illness develops. A legal claim can seek compensation to cover the cost of baseline and follow-up testing, imaging, and specialist consultations, ensuring that exposure-related health concerns are tracked over time and treated promptly if conditions arise.

Causation in Workplace Claims

Causation in TENORM claims means demonstrating a reasonable connection between workplace exposure to radioactive residues and the injuries or illnesses a worker experiences. Establishing causation typically requires medical records showing a compatible diagnosis, occupational histories indicating exposure, and expert opinion or testing linking contaminants found at the site to the worker’s condition. While causation can be complex in exposure cases, a combination of workplace documentation, testing, and medical evaluation helps build a persuasive case that workplace conditions materially contributed to the worker’s harm.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Evidence Immediately

Preserve clothing, boots, respirators, and tools that may show residues or contamination and keep photos of work areas and storage or disposal practices; physical items and images taken soon after exposure are among the most persuasive pieces of evidence. Document dates, tasks, and coworkers present during potentially hazardous events and keep records of any safety complaints or incident reports filed with your employer or supervisors, as these contemporaneous notes help prove what happened and when. Reach out to a legal representative promptly to discuss evidence preservation steps that protect your claim while arranging for appropriate medical evaluation and testing.

Get Medical Evaluation and Baseline Testing

Seek medical evaluation that includes a thorough occupational history and baseline testing for conditions associated with TENORM exposure, because early documentation of symptoms and test results creates a medical record linking your health to workplace conditions. Ask your medical provider to note any possible links between workplace tasks and findings, and request copies of all reports, imaging, and lab results to preserve for legal review. Timely medical documentation strengthens the ability to demonstrate causation and the need for ongoing monitoring or treatment, which are central to occupational exposure claims.

Keep Detailed Work and Communication Records

Maintain a personal work diary that records daily duties, equipment used, protective gear available, times of unusual events, and any health symptoms that begin or change, because these contemporaneous observations help reconstruct exposure histories. Save emails, text messages, safety memos, pay records, and any incident or complaint reports related to site conditions or protective procedures, as documentary evidence can reveal systemic failures or negligence. Regular documentation and organized records improve the effectiveness of investigative steps and support requests for compensation, medical monitoring, and corrective action on the jobsite.

Comparing Legal Options for TENORM Exposure

When a Comprehensive Approach Is Advisable:

Multiple Exposures or Ongoing Contact

A comprehensive approach is appropriate when a worker has had repeated or ongoing contact with TENORM-contaminated materials, when contamination affects multiple parts of a jobsite, or when several workers report similar symptoms. Handling these cases requires gathering workplace-wide records, arranging environmental and personal testing, coordinating medical monitoring for multiple conditions, and identifying all potentially responsible parties including contractors and waste handlers. Taking broad investigative steps helps ensure that the full extent of harm is documented and that available recovery reflects both medical needs and the scope of exposure-related impacts.

Complex Causation or Multiple Responsible Parties

Cases involving complex causation, overlapping exposures, or multiple parties potentially responsible for unsafe conditions benefit from a comprehensive legal strategy that integrates scientific testing, workplace forensics, and coordinated expert review. Establishing responsibility may require tracing waste handling, equipment provenance, and maintenance practices across contractors and site operators. An approach that combines legal investigation with medical and industrial hygiene resources yields a more complete case for compensation and prevention, and it helps ensure every plausible source of exposure and every liable party is examined thoroughly.

When a Focused Approach May Be Enough:

Isolated Incident with Clear Records

A limited approach may suffice when a single, well-documented exposure incident clearly links a worker’s injury to a specific event, piece of equipment, or contractor action, and when prompt medical records and employer incident reports corroborate the sequence of events. In these circumstances, targeted evidence collection, focused medical evaluation, and direct negotiation or claim filing with one responsible party can resolve the matter efficiently. Maintaining precise documentation and immediate medical attention remains important even in narrower cases to preserve rights and establish a clear claim.

Minimal Ongoing Health Effects and Prompt Remediation

A narrower legal response might be appropriate when health effects are minimal and the employer or site operator has promptly corrected the hazard, provided the worker still secures medical documentation and records any treatment or follow-up testing. If remediation and protective measures are verifiable and there are no complex exposure pathways, a focused claim for medical costs and limited damages can resolve matters without a prolonged investigation. Even then, preserving records and obtaining a professional medical opinion remains essential to confirm the limited scope of injury and to support any compensation request.

Common Situations That Lead to TENORM Claims

Produced Water and Waste Residue Handling

Workers who handle produced water, pits, separators, or sludge without adequate controls may encounter concentrated residues containing TENORM that adhere to equipment and surfaces, increasing inhalation and dermal exposure risks. Improper disposal, inadequate containment, or lack of cleaning protocols can allow contamination to accumulate and spread, creating conditions that may justify a workplace claim.

Scale and Sludge in Pipes and Equipment

Scale and sludge that form inside pipes, tanks, and vessels can concentrate radioactive materials and release dust during maintenance or repair, exposing workers who perform cleaning or mechanical work. Failure to identify and manage contaminated deposits, or to provide appropriate personal protection and decontamination procedures, can be grounds for legal action when exposures lead to injury.

Inadequate Protective Measures and Hygiene

Lack of adequate protective equipment, decontamination stations, or hygiene protocols increases the chance that workers will transport residues offsite on clothing and personal items, leading to ongoing exposure and family risk. Employers that fail to enforce protective practices or to remediate hazardous materials can be held responsible for resulting health consequences.

Despard TENORM Exposure Attorney Services

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM Cases

Stephen New & Associates provides focused representation for workers impacted by hazardous workplace exposures, including those involving TENORM at hydraulic fracturing sites in Despard and across West Virginia. Our team assists clients with evidence preservation, coordination of occupational and environmental testing, and gathering the medical documentation necessary to support claims. We work to identify all potentially responsible parties, pursue compensation for medical monitoring and lost income, and communicate regularly with clients to explain options and next steps. We aim to protect client rights while pursuing fair recoveries tailored to each person’s medical and financial needs.

When you contact our office, we listen carefully to your situation, review available records, and outline pragmatic steps for documenting exposure and preserving claims. We coordinate with medical providers and technical consultants to develop a clear record linking workplace conditions to health impacts, and we pursue compensation through negotiation or litigation when required. Our practice also emphasizes helping clients understand the claims process, timelines under West Virginia law, and the evidence that will support recovery for current and future medical needs related to TENORM exposure.

Speak with Our Despard Team Today

People Also Search For

TENORM exposure Despard

fracking worker contamination WV

hydraulic fracturing radiation exposure

workplace TENORM claim West Virginia

TENORM medical monitoring claim

Despard occupational exposure lawyer

produced water contamination claims

scale and sludge exposure fracking

FAQS

What is TENORM and how might it affect fracking workers?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, which are naturally radioactive elements that become concentrated by industrial activity such as oil and gas production. On hydraulic fracturing sites, TENORM can accumulate in scales, sludge, produced water, piping, and equipment, and workers may encounter it through inhalation of dust, dermal contact, or incidental ingestion. Health effects depend on the type and level of exposure, and symptoms can take time to appear, so early recognition and documentation are important for both health and legal reasons. If you suspect exposure, seek a medical evaluation that documents your symptoms and any potential exposure history, and preserve any clothing, equipment, or photos that may show contamination. Report the incident to supervisors and record the details in writing. Gathering contemporaneous records, medical documentation, and physical evidence establishes an important foundation for any investigation and potential legal claim related to workplace TENORM exposure.

What should I do immediately if I suspect TENORM exposure at my jobsite?

If you think you were exposed to TENORM at work, prioritize a medical assessment that includes a detailed occupational history and recommends appropriate tests or follow-up monitoring. Obtain written copies of all medical reports and ask your provider to note the possible workplace link in the records. Immediate medical documentation helps establish a timeline and supports causation if a claim becomes necessary in the future. Preserve evidence by saving the clothing and equipment you used during the suspected exposure, take photographs of the work area and any residues or containers, and keep copies of incident reports, emails, and communications about the exposure. Notify your employer in writing about the incident and keep a personal log of symptoms, tasks, and conversations related to the event to support future investigation or claims.

How is a TENORM exposure claim proven?

Proving a TENORM exposure claim generally requires showing that hazardous materials were present at the workplace, that an employee was exposed through a recognized route such as inhalation or dermal contact, and that the exposure is reasonably linked to the worker’s medical condition. Evidence typically includes workplace records, environmental or personal testing, medical documentation, and contemporaneous reports or complaints that show the conditions and timing of exposure. A coordinated review of workplace practices, maintenance logs, and waste handling procedures often helps establish a clear exposure pathway. Medical records that demonstrate diagnosis or symptoms consistent with exposure, along with opinions from occupational or medical professionals that the workplace likely contributed to the condition, strengthen causation. Physical evidence such as contaminated clothing or testing results that identify TENORM on equipment or in produced water supports the connection between the workplace environment and the worker’s injuries, improving prospects for compensation or settlement.

Who can be held responsible for TENORM exposure during hydraulic fracturing?

Several parties can be responsible for TENORM exposure depending on the facts, including the site operator, contractors who performed waste handling or maintenance, manufacturers of contaminated equipment, and parties involved in disposal practices. Liability often depends on who controlled site safety, training, protective equipment provision, and waste management. Where multiple entities share responsibility for operations, a claim may need to identify each party’s role in creating or failing to remediate hazardous conditions. Investigations typically examine contracts, safety documentation, and work assignments to determine responsibility, and they may involve depositions and records requests to uncover who knew about contamination and when. Identifying the correct defendants is essential to ensuring compensation for medical care, lost wages, and other damages available to workers exposed to TENORM on fracking sites.

What types of medical testing are recommended after potential TENORM exposure?

After suspected TENORM exposure, medical testing often begins with a thorough physical examination, baseline blood work, and imaging studies as indicated by symptoms and clinical findings. Testing may include blood counts, liver and kidney panels, and targeted imaging or laboratory studies that a physician deems appropriate to evaluate potential radiation-related effects and to establish a baseline for future monitoring. Specialists in occupational medicine can help interpret findings and recommend tailored surveillance plans based on exposure history. Long-term medical monitoring may involve periodic repeat testing and specialist evaluations to detect early signs of illness related to radioactive exposure, and these follow-up tests are critical for documenting changes over time. Having a clear record of baseline and follow-up testing not only supports medical care but also plays a central role in any legal claim seeking compensation for monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment associated with TENORM exposures.

Can I get compensation for future medical monitoring if I was exposed to TENORM?

Yes, compensation for future medical monitoring can be part of a claim when a worker’s exposure to TENORM creates a reasonable likelihood of increased medical needs related to that exposure. Legal claims can seek funds to cover baseline testing, periodic surveillance, specialist consultations, imaging, and any necessary diagnostic procedures that help detect exposure-related conditions early. Courts and negotiating parties recognize that ongoing monitoring can mitigate long-term health impacts and therefore may award resources to ensure appropriate follow-up care. To secure compensation for future monitoring, documentation must show the nature and degree of exposure, expert medical recommendations for monitoring frequency and type, and a credible link between the workplace exposure and the need for continued surveillance. Detailed medical opinions and a clear exposure history are central to demonstrating why ongoing monitoring is necessary and to calculating the appropriate amount to cover those future costs.

How long do I have to file a claim in West Virginia for a workplace exposure?

In West Virginia, time limits for filing claims vary depending on the type of legal action, and determining the applicable deadline often requires consideration of when an injury was discovered or should have been discovered. Occupational disease and personal injury timelines can differ, and in exposure cases the clock often begins when the worker knows or should reasonably know of a connection between workplace conditions and an injury. Because these rules can be complex and consequences of delay are serious, early consultation is important to protect legal rights. Preserving evidence and documenting symptoms as soon as they arise help protect the ability to file within the required period. If you suspect you have been exposed, do not wait to seek medical attention and to discuss your situation with legal counsel who understands occupational exposure claims and the deadlines that apply under West Virginia law.

Will workers' compensation cover TENORM-related injuries?

Workers’ compensation may cover certain injuries or illnesses that arise out of and in the course of employment, and in many cases occupational exposures are addressed through the workers’ compensation system for medical care and partial wage replacement. However, the scope of recovery under workers’ compensation can be limited compared with pursuing a civil claim against third parties who may share liability, such as contractors or equipment suppliers whose negligence contributed to hazardous conditions on site. Determining whether workers’ compensation is the proper avenue or whether a civil claim should be pursued requires careful review of the facts, including whether third parties were responsible and whether the damages sought exceed what workers’ compensation provides. Legal counsel can evaluate both options, coordinate claims process steps, and advise on the best strategy for securing full compensation and medical monitoring.

How do investigators test a site for TENORM contamination?

Investigators test for TENORM contamination by collecting environmental samples from equipment, scale, sludge, soil, produced water, and air, and then analyzing those samples in specialized laboratories equipped to detect and quantify radioactive isotopes. Sampling protocols aim to identify hotspots where residues concentrate and to measure levels that may pose health risks. Personal sampling for worker breathing zones and wipe tests of surfaces can help determine if contamination has been transferred to clothing or tools used by employees. Results are interpreted by technical professionals who consider detection levels, types of radionuclides present, and likely exposure pathways. A combination of workplace testing, review of operational practices, and medical monitoring provides a clearer picture of exposure and helps build a record that can support a legal claim seeking remediation, medical care, and compensation for affected workers.

How can I preserve evidence to support a TENORM claim?

To preserve evidence for a TENORM claim, save any clothing, gloves, boots, respirators, and tools that may show residues and keep them in separate, labeled containers to avoid cross-contamination. Photograph the work area, signage, storage and disposal sites, and any visible residues or damage; record dates, tasks, and the names of supervisors and coworkers who were present. Retain copies of incident reports, medical records, pay stubs, and communications about site conditions, and maintain a contemporaneous log of symptoms and activities related to the exposure. Avoid attempts to clean or launder contaminated items before consulting with counsel, as doing so may destroy important evidence. Promptly notifying your employer in writing and seeking a medical evaluation establishes a documented timeline. Coordinating early with legal and medical professionals preserves critical evidence and strengthens any subsequent claim for compensation and monitoring related to workplace TENORM exposure.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services