Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Oil and Gas Field Worker Exposure Lawyer in Bethlehem

Protecting Worker Health

Guide to TENORM Exposure Claims in the Oil and Gas Industry

TENORM refers to naturally occurring radioactive materials that become concentrated or more hazardous through industrial activity. Oil and gas operations can concentrate radionuclides in scale, sludge, produced water and other residues, creating exposure risks for field workers during routine tasks. Workers who handle equipment, clean scales, manage produced water, or repair pipelines can encounter contaminated materials that increase long-term health concerns. This guide explains common exposure pathways, practical steps to document hazards, and the types of legal and medical assistance available to workers and family members affected by occupational TENORM exposure in Bethlehem and surrounding areas.

If you have worked in oil and gas operations near Bethlehem, West Virginia, and believe you were exposed to TENORM materials, it is important to preserve information and pursue appropriate remedies. Stephen New & Associates represents people across West Virginia, including clients from Harrison County, helping them understand rights related to toxic exposure, medical monitoring, workers’ compensation interactions, and civil claims against responsible parties. Our office in Beckley and our local knowledge of the region allow us to coordinate investigations, collect workplace records, and connect clients with environmental and medical professionals when needed. Contacting the firm early helps protect evidence and preserve claim options.

How Legal Help Supports TENORM Exposure Claims

Legal action in TENORM exposure matters can secure important protections and financial recovery for affected workers and families. A well-managed claim can obtain coverage for medical monitoring, diagnostic testing, and treatment when exposure raises the possibility of future health effects. It also helps ensure that responsible parties are held accountable for workplace safety failures, waste handling, improper disposal and failure to warn. Legal representation can guide the gathering of workplace logs, maintenance records, sampling results and witness statements, and can work with environmental and medical reviewers to build a clear record that supports fair compensation for medical costs, lost wages and related damages.

Stephen New & Associates: Our Approach to TENORM and Toxic Exposure Cases

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving clients throughout West Virginia, including those affected by workplace toxic exposures in Bethlehem and Harrison County. The firm focuses on practical legal advocacy for people harmed by workplace hazards such as TENORM, traumatic injuries, medical negligence and other serious claims. From the initial intake through investigation and resolution, the firm emphasizes clear communication, coordinated evidence collection and working with outside technical reviewers when sampling or specialized analysis is required. Clients receive guidance on statutory deadlines, administrative claims and civil litigation options while the firm handles negotiations with insurers and responsible parties.

Understanding TENORM Exposure Claims and Worker Protections

TENORM stands for Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material and arises when naturally present radioactive elements become concentrated through industrial processes. In oil and gas operations, TENORM can accumulate in scale inside pipes, on production equipment, and in sludge or produced water byproducts. These materials can release radiation or mobilize radium and other radionuclides that pose long-term health concerns if workers inhale dust, ingest contaminated materials, or have prolonged skin contact. Understanding how and where TENORM forms is key to assessing exposure routes, timing, and which workplace practices may have allowed contamination to reach employees.

Exposure assessment typically involves reviewing maintenance logs, sampling results, and work histories to identify who handled contaminated components and when. Medical monitoring programs and environmental sampling can document current conditions and help anticipate future medical needs. Records that show protective equipment use, training, waste disposal practices and employer precautions are important for establishing employer responsibility. In many cases, multiple companies are involved in upstream and downstream operations, so identifying the chain of custody for equipment and waste streams is an early step in determining potential defendants and paths for recovery.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for TENORM Cases

TENORM (Technologically Enhanced NORM)

TENORM refers to naturally occurring radioactive materials that have been concentrated or altered by human activities such as oil and gas production. The concentration process may occur when scale forms inside pipes, when sludge accumulates in tanks, or when produced water evaporates and leaves residues. These residues can contain radium, lead and other radionuclides at levels higher than background, creating potential health and environmental concerns. Understanding TENORM involves both the scientific behavior of radionuclides and the operational practices that lead to their concentration, including cleaning, maintenance and waste handling.

Scale and Sludge

Scale refers to mineral deposits that build up inside pipes and equipment during oil and gas production, and sludge is the thicker residue that collects in tanks and separators. Both can trap and concentrate radioactive elements over time, particularly where produced water and formation fluids are present. Workers who scrape, cut or otherwise disturb scale and sludge can release particulate contamination and airborne dust. Proper characterization, handling and disposal are necessary to limit worker exposure and environmental release, and the presence of contaminated scale or sludge often becomes central evidence in workplace exposure claims.

Radionuclide Contamination

Radionuclide contamination describes the presence of radioactive elements such as radium, uranium or their decay products in materials, surfaces or environmental media. In the oil and gas context, these contaminants can be present in produced water, scale, sludge, or waste streams. Contamination may spread through air, dust, water runoff or improper disposal practices. Identifying the specific radionuclides and their concentrations requires laboratory testing, which informs health risk assessments and helps determine the appropriate medical monitoring or remediation actions.

Medical Monitoring

Medical monitoring refers to ongoing health surveillance recommended for people with significant exposure to hazardous substances that could lead to delayed conditions. In TENORM matters, monitoring may include periodic physical exams, imaging, blood or urine testing and specialized assessments to detect early signs of disease. Medical monitoring programs can be a component of legal claims to ensure exposed workers receive timely evaluations and treatment if problems arise. Establishing the need for monitoring typically involves exposure assessment, expert medical opinion and documentation of workplace practices that allowed the exposure to occur.

PRO TIPS

Document Work Conditions Immediately

When you suspect exposure to TENORM, document work conditions and tasks as soon as possible to preserve key evidence for any future claim. Take dated photographs of equipment, scale, sludge and the worksite, keep copies of shift logs, maintenance records and safety briefings, and record the names of coworkers or supervisors who witnessed unsafe practices. Maintaining a contemporaneous journal that describes tasks, protective equipment used, unusual odors or visible contamination and any immediate symptoms can be invaluable when reconstructing exposure pathways and demonstrating the timing and scope of hazardous working conditions.

Preserve Records and Samples

Preserving records and any physical samples is critical to establishing a link between workplace practices and exposure. Keep pay stubs, job descriptions, incident reports, training materials and any correspondence about safety or waste handling, and if possible retain clothing or equipment that may have been contaminated, sealed in paper to avoid cross-contamination. Ask the employer for copies of air sampling or radiological testing results and document any refusal to provide records, as those refusals can be relevant during investigation and may support the need for independent sampling and review by technical professionals.

Seek Medical Evaluation Promptly

Obtain a medical evaluation promptly after suspected TENORM exposure to document any symptoms and establish a baseline for future monitoring. Inform providers about your specific job duties, the timing of exposure and any materials you handled so appropriate tests and follow up can be ordered, and keep thorough records of all visits, tests and referrals. Early medical documentation strengthens claims for medical monitoring and compensation by creating a clear record of the exposure event, the provider’s assessment and any recommended surveillance or treatment plans.

Comparing Legal Options After TENORM Exposure

When a Full Legal Response Is Recommended:

Long-term Health Monitoring Needs

Comprehensive legal action is often needed when exposure creates the prospect of long-term health monitoring or future medical conditions that are not immediately diagnosable. A full response can secure agreements for ongoing testing and care, protect benefits over time, and ensure that responsible parties fund appropriate surveillance rather than leaving individuals to shoulder future costs. Complex exposures may also require coordination with medical reviewers, industrial hygienists and environmental analysts to quantify risk and plan a durable monitoring program that protects the worker’s health interests into the future.

Multiple Potential Responsible Parties

A comprehensive approach is also warranted when multiple entities may share responsibility, such as employers, contractors, waste handlers or equipment manufacturers. Identifying each party’s role in creating or permitting exposure requires document review, chain of custody analysis and targeted discovery to allocate responsibility accurately. Pursuing claims against multiple defendants can increase the chances of meaningful recovery for medical costs, lost wages and future monitoring, and it often requires skilled coordination to manage complex liability theories and overlapping insurance policies.

When a Narrow Approach May Be Enough:

Isolated, Short-Term Exposure

A narrow approach may be appropriate when exposure appears isolated, brief, and well-documented with immediate testing showing limited contamination. In such cases, pursuing administrative remedies, workers’ compensation or a focused settlement with a single responsible employer can resolve medical costs and short-term impacts without protracted litigation. However, even with apparently limited incidents, thorough documentation and follow up remain important to ensure there are no lingering health effects that could emerge later and to protect the worker’s rights if symptoms develop over time.

Clear Employer Coverage and Quick Resolution

When liability is clear, insurance coverage is straightforward and the employer moves promptly to address testing and treatment, a limited claim or settlement may resolve matters efficiently. This approach can conserve resources and avoid the delay of full litigation when medical needs are immediate and compensable. Still, workers should verify that any settlement includes provisions for future medical monitoring and does not waive rights unknowingly, and they should seek a careful review of terms before accepting an offer that could limit options down the road.

Common Circumstances Involving TENORM Exposure

Field Equipment Cleaning and Scale Removal

Workers who scrape, cut or flush scale from pipes, separators and other production equipment can directly disturb concentrated TENORM deposits, releasing dust and particulates that lead to inhalation or skin contact, and these activities often occur without adequate ventilation or contamination controls in place. Because such tasks are routine for maintenance crews, repeated low-level exposures can accumulate over years and create grounds for claims when employers fail to provide proper testing, safe work procedures, containment or protective measures to limit contact with contaminated residues.

Produced Water Handling and Waste Disposal

Handling produced water and related waste streams can expose workers to radionuclide-laden fluids, and improper storage, transfer or disposal practices can spread contamination across tanks, trucks and work areas, increasing the chance of contact and environmental release. When companies dispose of contaminated waste without proper controls or fail to monitor and isolate contaminated components, affected employees and communities can face prolonged exposure and associated legal remedies that address both workplace safety failures and environmental impacts.

Improper PPE and Training

Insufficient training or lack of appropriate personal protective equipment can leave workers unprotected from TENORM materials during routine tasks and emergency responses, and inadequate hazard communication prevents workers from understanding the risks they face. Employers who fail to provide clear procedures, proper gear and monitoring records increase the likelihood of harmful exposure, and those failures often form the basis for claims seeking coverage of medical follow up and corrective workplace measures.

Bethlehem TENORM Exposure Attorney Services

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM Claims

Stephen New & Associates represents individuals and families in West Virginia who have been affected by workplace exposures, including TENORM incidents in the oil and gas sector. The firm brings experience handling claims involving toxic exposure, traumatic injury, wrongful death and related matters, and it assists clients with gathering workplace records, coordinating medical review and pursuing administrative or civil remedies as appropriate. With a focus on clear communication and practical case management, the firm helps people navigate complicated interactions with employers and insurers while protecting rights under state law.

Clients who contact the firm receive help understanding their options, including workers’ compensation, medical monitoring claims and potential civil actions against responsible entities. The firm works to preserve evidence, identify relevant parties and arrange for technical review of environmental or medical data when needed. For people in Bethlehem and throughout Harrison County, Stephen New & Associates offers guidance on deadlines, common defenses and pragmatic strategies to seek fair recovery for medical care, lost income and the costs associated with long-term health surveillance after exposure.

Contact Us for a Free Case Review

People Also Search For

TENORM exposure Bethlehem

oil and gas worker radiation exposure

TENORM claims West Virginia

Bethlehem toxic exposure attorney

radium scale exposure claims

produced water contamination lawsuit

workplace radiation exposure claim

medical monitoring claim WV

FAQS

What is TENORM and how might oil and gas workers be exposed?

TENORM stands for Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material, and it arises when naturally present radioactive elements become concentrated by industrial processes, such as oil and gas production. Workers may encounter TENORM in scale, sludge, produced water residues, or contaminated equipment and surfaces. Exposure can occur through inhalation of dust, ingestion of contaminated particles, or skin contact with contaminated materials, especially during tasks that disturb scale or residues. Identifying potential exposure begins with examining work tasks, maintenance histories and any available sampling or monitoring data to determine who handled contaminated materials and under what conditions. Assessing exposure often requires technical sampling, laboratory testing and a review of workplace practices to determine the extent of contamination and likely routes of contact. Medical providers can establish baselines and recommend ongoing testing where appropriate, and legal review can identify responsible parties and preservation steps for records and evidence. Early documentation of tasks, protective measures used, and any unusual events at the worksite helps form the factual basis for tracking exposure and determining potential remedies under workers’ compensation, medical monitoring programs or civil claims.

What symptoms or health concerns should workers watch for after TENORM exposure?

Health effects from TENORM exposure can vary widely depending on the radionuclides involved, exposure level and duration, and individual health factors. Acute symptoms are uncommon unless exposure is high, but workers should be alert for respiratory irritation, unexplained skin changes, persistent fatigue or other persistent symptoms following a work incident. Because some conditions linked to radioactive exposures may take years to appear, establishing a medical baseline and documenting any early signs are important steps for long-term health protection and claim preservation. Medical professionals can recommend periodic testing, imaging or specialist referrals when exposure is confirmed or suspected, and these monitoring programs help detect changes early. Keeping detailed medical records, including the provider’s observations and any recommended surveillance, is vital for supporting future claims for treatment, ongoing monitoring or compensation if an exposure-related condition develops. Timely medical follow up also helps guide workplace corrective actions to reduce risk for other employees.

What steps should I take immediately after a suspected exposure on the job?

Immediately after a suspected exposure, preserve evidence and document what occurred by taking dated photos, noting the time and location, and recording the names of supervisors and coworkers present. Seek medical attention promptly and inform the provider about the specific materials and tasks involved so appropriate tests and baseline documentation can be completed; retain copies of all medical records, test results and referrals. If possible, secure or preserve any contaminated clothing or equipment in paper bags to limit contamination and help technical reviewers assess the event later. Request copies of workplace records related to the incident, including maintenance logs, incident reports, air or surface sampling results and safety training materials, and document any employer communications about the event. If the employer declines to provide records or access, note the refusal and preserve any witness statements from coworkers. Early documentation and timely medical evaluation strengthen both administrative and civil claim options and help establish the timeline and nature of the exposure for later review.

Can an employer be held responsible for TENORM exposure?

An employer can be held responsible for TENORM exposure when it fails to provide safe working conditions, adequate training, protective equipment or proper handling and disposal procedures for contaminated materials. Legal responsibility may arise from negligence in permitting hazardous conditions to persist, failing to monitor contamination, or not informing workers about known risks. Employers may also be responsible if they contract out hazardous tasks but retain control over methods and safety protocols, and in such cases liability can be evaluated based on who had control over workplace practices and safety compliance. Responsibility is often determined through document review, witness statements and technical analysis of how contamination was created and handled. Multiple parties can share liability, including contractors or waste handlers, depending on the chain of custody for equipment and waste streams. Legal action can pursue compensation for medical costs, lost wages, future monitoring and other damages, while administrative claims like workers’ compensation may address immediate treatment needs.

What kinds of evidence are important in a TENORM exposure claim?

Important evidence in a TENORM claim includes work histories, maintenance logs, incident reports, sampling and testing results, safety training records and PPE issuance logs. Photographs of equipment, scale deposits, waste storage and the worksite taken soon after exposure are especially helpful. Witness statements from coworkers and supervisors describing tasks performed, duration of activities and any observed safety lapses also strengthen the factual record and can corroborate exposure timelines and employer practices. Preserving contaminated materials, when safe to do so, can provide direct physical evidence for laboratory analysis and support the link between workplace conditions and exposure. Requests for employer records and independent technical sampling may be needed to confirm levels and spread of contamination. Legal counsel can assist in issuing preservation requests, coordinating expert review and ensuring important paperwork and samples are secured for later use in administrative proceedings or litigation.

How does medical monitoring work and when is it appropriate?

Medical monitoring is an ongoing program of evaluations intended to detect early health changes associated with prior exposure to hazardous materials. In TENORM situations, monitoring may include periodic physical exams, imaging, blood or urine testing and consultations with specialists who can assess the potential effects of radionuclide exposure. The goal of monitoring is to identify treatable conditions at an early stage and to provide documented follow up that supports appropriate medical care and any related claims for compensation. Determining whether monitoring is appropriate depends on exposure assessment, laboratory findings and medical judgment about the likelihood of future disease. Legal claims can seek to fund medical monitoring where exposure creates a reasonable basis for concern, and properly framed monitoring programs are tailored to the type and degree of exposure, the radionuclides involved and recognized medical guidance, ensuring that surveillance is targeted and practical for the affected individual.

What is the difference between workers’ compensation and a civil claim for exposure?

Workers’ compensation provides benefits for injuries and occupational illnesses that arise out of and in the course of employment, including certain exposures, and it often covers medical treatment and partial wage replacement without requiring proof of employer fault. However, workers’ compensation remedies can be limited in scope and may not provide full recovery for long-term monitoring needs, certain non-economic losses or claims against third parties whose actions contributed to the exposure. A civil claim against a third party or in certain cases against an employer outside workers’ compensation can seek broader damages, including compensation for future medical monitoring, pain and suffering and other losses not covered by workers’ compensation. Determining the best path depends on the facts of the exposure, applicable state law and the identity of potentially responsible parties, and legal review can help workers pursue the most appropriate combination of remedies.

How long do I have to file a claim related to workplace exposure in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitation and filing deadlines vary by the type of claim and jurisdiction, and timely action is important to preserve legal rights. In West Virginia, deadlines differ for workers’ compensation claims, personal injury suits and environmental or property claims, and the clock can run from the date of exposure, discovery of injury, or diagnosis depending on the legal theory. Given the potentially delayed onset of medical conditions from TENORM exposure, awareness of discovery rules and exceptions is essential to avoid missing a filing window. Because deadlines are fact-specific and can involve tolling or other exceptions, contacting legal counsel early helps ensure relevant dates are identified and preserved. Early documentation, preservation of evidence and prompt requests for workplace records can also prevent disputes about when exposure and injury were discovered, and a timely review will clarify which procedural steps are required for protection of rights in West Virginia.

Can contractors, subcontractors or equipment manufacturers be held liable?

Yes. Contractors, subcontractors and equipment manufacturers can be held liable when their actions or products contribute to TENORM exposure. For example, a contractor responsible for maintenance or cleaning that failed to follow safe handling practices could be accountable for unsafe conditions, and a manufacturer of equipment that releases contaminated residue due to defective design or inadequate warnings might share liability. Determining responsibility involves tracing the chain of custody, identifying who controlled the process and reviewing contractual obligations and safety protocols in place at the time of exposure. Legal claims against multiple parties often require detailed factual investigation and technical review to allocate fault among different entities. Evidence such as contracts, work orders, maintenance records and expert analysis of equipment and waste handling can show whether a given party breached duties or failed to provide appropriate guidance, training or warnings to prevent worker exposure, making it possible to pursue recovery from all implicated entities.

How can Stephen New & Associates help with a TENORM exposure matter?

Stephen New & Associates helps clients by conducting an initial review of the exposure circumstances, preserving relevant evidence and advising on immediate steps to protect health and legal rights. The firm assists in collecting workplace records, arranging for independent sampling when needed, coordinating with medical providers for baseline evaluations and advising on administrative claim options such as workers’ compensation. This early case management helps ensure that critical documents are preserved and that medical needs are promptly addressed while legal options are being evaluated. When appropriate, the firm pursues civil claims to seek compensation for medical monitoring, current and future treatment costs, lost wages and other damages, and it engages technical reviewers to support causation and exposure assessments. For people in Bethlehem and surrounding areas of West Virginia, the firm offers practical guidance on deadlines, evidence requirements and negotiated resolutions, aiming to achieve fair outcomes while minimizing additional stress for affected workers and families.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services