Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

PFAS Lawyer in Augusta

Holding Polluters Accountable

Guide to PFAS Mass Torts

PFAS are a group of persistent chemicals that have been linked to contamination of drinking water and other environmental media across the country, including communities near Augusta, West Virginia. Residents exposed to PFAS may face long-term health concerns and mounting medical expenses, and pursuing a mass tort or related legal claim is one way to seek compensation and promote cleanup. Stephen New & Associates, a personal injury law firm serving Beckley and surrounding areas, assists people affected by hazardous contamination. If you believe PFAS exposure has affected your health or property, contact our office at 304-355-5565 to discuss potential next steps and how claims are investigated.

This guide explains what PFAS are, how exposures are identified, and how mass tort claims or other legal options can help community members recover costs and hold accountable entities responsible for contamination. You will find plain-language definitions of key terms, practical tips for preserving evidence, and comparisons of different legal approaches so you can decide what fits your situation. Our goal is to give residents of Augusta clear, actionable information about PFAS-related claims and the types of outcomes that may be possible while outlining how a local law firm can support investigation, documentation, and negotiation throughout the process.

Why Pursue PFAS Claims

Pursuing a PFAS-related claim can deliver multiple practical benefits for individuals and communities impacted by contamination. Legal action can help recover medical costs, cover monitoring and testing, compensate for lost property value, and fund community remediation when responsible parties are required to pay. A claim or coordinated litigation also creates a formal record that can accelerate testing and cleanup efforts by prompting regulatory attention and releasing documentation about industrial practices. For many victims, the value of a legal approach lies in access to resources to document exposure, secure medical care, and achieve a resolution that addresses both personal and broader community harms.

About Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm based in Beckley, West Virginia, that represents people and families affected by serious injury and environmental contamination. The firm addresses a wide range of claims, including mass torts involving hazardous substances like PFAS, and focuses on building cases through thorough investigation, document collection, and consultation with independent scientific and medical resources when appropriate. Serving clients in Augusta and surrounding Hampshire County communities, the firm provides local, accessible support and communication throughout the claims process, helping people understand options, timelines, and potential outcomes.

Understanding PFAS and Mass Tort Claims

PFAS are man-made chemicals used for decades in many industrial and consumer products because of their water- and stain-resistant properties. Their persistence in the environment and in human bodies has led to growing concern about long-term exposure through contaminated drinking water, soil, and food. A mass tort claim brings together individual plaintiffs who suffered similar harm from the same source of contamination while preserving each person’s individual case for damages. Understanding how exposure happened, documenting health issues, and tracing contamination sources are important early steps in determining whether a mass tort, class action, or individual claim is the right path for affected residents.

The legal process for PFAS-related cases typically begins with fact-finding: identifying sources of contamination, gathering water testing and medical records, and documenting property impacts. Plaintiffs and their representatives may seek compensation for medical monitoring, treatment costs, decreased property values, and other economic and non-economic harms. Cases can develop through coordinated litigation where many similar claims are managed together, or through standalone suits against manufacturers, municipalities, or other responsible parties. Timelines vary based on the complexity of scientific evidence and discovery, so early documentation and legal consultation can preserve important rights and evidence.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)

PFAS refers to a large family of synthetic chemicals used in products such as firefighting foam, nonstick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, and industrial applications. These compounds are sometimes called “forever chemicals” because they resist breakdown in the environment and can accumulate in water, soil, and living tissues. Many PFAS types have been associated with adverse health outcomes in scientific studies, and their presence in groundwater or drinking supplies can lead to long-term exposure for nearby residents. Identifying whether PFAS are present in your water, how long contamination has occurred, and potential routes of exposure are central to any claim.

Mass Tort Claim

A mass tort claim is a legal vehicle that allows multiple individuals harmed by the same product, chemical, or conduct to pursue related claims in a coordinated way while preserving each person’s individual damages. Unlike a class action where recovery is pooled and distributed according to a set formula, mass torts typically treat each plaintiff’s injuries and compensation separately even as discovery and pretrial proceedings are managed together. Mass tort litigation is often used when many people suffer similar but not identical harms from a chemical contamination source, and it helps streamline evidence collection, expert testimony, and settlement negotiations for large groups.

Class Action

A class action is a lawsuit where one or more representative plaintiffs bring claims on behalf of a larger group with similar legal issues and damages, and courts may approve procedures for distributing any recovery across that group. Class certification requires meeting legal standards about commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation, and if a class is certified, each member often has the chance to opt out and pursue an individual suit instead. Class actions can be an efficient way to resolve many related claims at once, particularly when individualized damage calculations are not necessary, but they differ from mass torts in how claims and recoveries are managed.

Liability

Liability refers to the legal responsibility a person or entity may have for harm caused by its actions, omissions, or products. In PFAS-related cases, establishing liability involves showing that a manufacturer, processor, or other party released PFAS into the environment or otherwise created conditions that led to exposure, and that this conduct caused measurable harm or risk to people and property. Liability can be based on negligence, strict liability for defective products, or statutory duties, and proving it typically requires technical and factual evidence about contamination sources, corporate practices, and pathways of exposure.

PRO TIPS

Document Exposure Sources

Begin by keeping a careful record of potential exposure sources, including the location and timing of any unusual water taste, odor, or discoloration and any nearby industrial facilities, military installations, or fire training sites that used firefighting foam. Collect records of municipal advisories, testing results, and communications from local officials or water suppliers that reference contamination or testing, and take photographs of visible signs of contamination or notices in your community. Maintaining a detailed timeline and preserving written communications and test results will make it easier to establish patterns of exposure and support any future claim.

Preserve Medical Records

Request and keep copies of all medical records, laboratory tests, imaging, and physician notes that relate to symptoms or diagnoses you believe may be connected to PFAS exposure, including any specialist consultations and recommended monitoring. Keep records of prescriptions, treatment plans, and bills for medical services, and note dates when symptoms began or worsened, as this chronological information strengthens documentation of possible exposure-related health effects. Early and thorough preservation of medical documentation is essential for linking health concerns to environmental exposure and establishing the scope of damages in a claim.

Track Community Notices

Stay alert to local news reports, public health advisories, and municipal testing updates that may indicate broader contamination events or evolving information about PFAS levels and safety thresholds. Join community meetings, subscribe to official announcements, and save copies of any public notices, testing reports, or summaries distributed to residents that mention PFAS or water advisories. Being proactive in monitoring community information helps individuals understand potential risks, coordinate with neighbors who may also be affected, and compile evidence of widespread impact that can be important in coordinated claims or mass tort litigation.

Comparing Legal Options for PFAS Claims

When a Broad Legal Response Is Needed:

Widespread Community Exposure

When entire neighborhoods or municipal water supplies are affected by PFAS contamination, a broad coordinated legal response can bring resources to address many claimants’ needs while ensuring consistent investigation and strategy across cases. Such an approach helps centralize discovery, testing, and expert review so that patterns of contamination and corporate conduct are developed and presented effectively in court or settlement talks. Coordinated litigation also often increases leverage in negotiations, leading to more comprehensive settlements that can include remediation funding and long-term monitoring for the affected community.

Complex Scientific Evidence

PFAS matters frequently turn on technical issues about chemical properties, environmental transport, and medical causation that require detailed scientific review and expert testimony to clarify how exposure occurred and what harms resulted. A broad legal approach enables coordinated retention of technical consultants and consistent presentation of scientific evidence, which is important when opposing parties challenge causation or exposure pathways. Managing complex evidence through a single coordinated docket ensures discovery is efficient and expert opinions are integrated to support claims for multiple affected individuals.

When a Limited Approach May Work:

Isolated Exposure with Clear Source

In cases where PFAS exposure is limited to a single household or property and the source is straightforward and documented, an individual claim may be sufficient to recover damages without the need for broad coordinated litigation. A focused approach can streamline evidence gathering and settlement discussions when contamination and harm are well-delineated, reducing time and expense for the claimant. Where liability is clear and remedies can be narrowly tailored to one property or person, a limited claim can often resolve matters efficiently with targeted negotiation or litigation.

Minor, Short-Term Health Concerns

If health impacts appear minor and short-term, and the damages are primarily limited to monitoring or short-term treatment costs, individuals may choose to pursue a narrower claim focused on specific economic losses rather than joining a mass tort or class action. This approach can reduce complexity when plaintiffs are seeking compensation for discrete, documented expenses or one-time losses. Nonetheless, even limited claims require careful documentation of exposure and medical records to show that compensation is appropriate for the harms experienced.

Common Circumstances That Lead to PFAS Claims

Contaminated Drinking Water

One of the most common scenarios prompting PFAS claims is the discovery of elevated PFAS levels in municipal or private drinking water supplies that serve homes, schools, and businesses, creating potential long-term exposure for residents. When tests show contamination above advisory or health-based screening levels, affected people often pursue legal action to recover costs for medical monitoring, treatment, and property impacts while seeking support for cleanup and mitigation measures that protect community health.

Industrial Discharges Near Communities

PFAS releases from industrial facilities, manufacturing sites, or waste-handling operations can contaminate local soil and groundwater and lead to exposure for nearby neighborhoods and workers. Claims commonly arise when records or testing reveal a link between industrial discharges and elevated PFAS levels in community water sources, prompting affected residents to seek accountability and remediation funding from responsible parties.

Firefighting Foam Contamination

A common source of PFAS contamination is aqueous film forming foam used in fire training areas at airports, military bases, and training facilities, where repeated use can concentrate PFAS in groundwater and nearby wells. When testing shows that foam applications have migrated into community water supplies or private wells, individuals and municipalities may file claims to address testing, treatment, and long-term monitoring needs.

PFAS Claims Representation Serving Augusta, WV

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for PFAS Cases

Stephen New & Associates offers local representation to people in Augusta and neighboring Hampshire County communities, combining personalized attention with a methodical approach to documenting contamination and damages. The firm assists clients in obtaining testing information, preserving records, and coordinating with technical consultants when scientific analysis is needed. With a focus on client communication and practical case management, the firm helps households and community leaders understand legal options, evaluate potential recoveries, and pursue claims that address medical, property, and monitoring needs related to PFAS exposure.

Clients receive guidance on evidence preservation, timelines, and likely next steps from intake through resolution, and the office is available to discuss concerns at 304-355-5565. Stephen New & Associates works to ensure each client’s case is investigated thoroughly and that legal strategy is tailored to the facts of the contamination and the types of harm claimed. By focusing on clear communication and pragmatic case development, the firm aims to help affected residents secure meaningful remedies and advance cleanup where contamination has impacted local water or land.

Contact Our Office About PFAS Exposure

People Also Search For

PFAS lawyer Augusta WV

PFAS contamination attorney West Virginia

PFAS mass tort lawsuit

PFAS water contamination claim

PFAS class action West Virginia

PFAS health monitoring claims

PFAS litigation Beckley

PFAS legal help Hampshire County

FAQS

What are PFAS and why are they a concern for communities?

PFAS are a family of man-made chemicals used in industrial processes and consumer products for their water- and oil-repelling properties. Their chemical structure causes them to persist in the environment and accumulate in water supplies, soil, and living tissues over time, which is why communities with PFAS discharges often experience long-term exposure. The concern for public health arises because some PFAS compounds have been associated in studies with effects such as altered liver function, thyroid issues, immune system impacts, and elevated cholesterol, among other outcomes, and persistent contamination can affect entire neighborhoods and drinking water sources. Communities face additional challenges when PFAS are discovered because cleanup and monitoring can be expensive and technical, requiring coordinated testing and remediation plans. Public agencies may issue advisories or require testing, but the timeline for remediation can be long. For residents, documenting exposure, seeking medical monitoring, and exploring legal remedies can help address both immediate needs and long-term health protections, while also creating pressure and resources for broader cleanup efforts.

How can I find out if PFAS have contaminated my drinking water?

To determine whether PFAS have affected your drinking water, start by checking public records and municipal testing reports from local water suppliers and health departments, which often publish sampling results and advisories. If you rely on a private well, consider arranging independent laboratory testing for PFAS through state-certified labs and keep copies of all test results; results that show levels above federal or state screening guidelines may indicate a need for further action. Local news outlets and public notices often report on contamination events, so reviewing those sources can also provide context about potential pollution sources that could affect your area. If initial tests suggest contamination, consult with public health authorities about recommended follow-up steps such as expanded testing, short-term filtration, or medical monitoring. Maintaining a file of all communications, test reports, and notices will be important if you later pursue legal remedies, as these documents can help establish the timing and extent of exposure and provide support for claims related to treatment costs, monitoring, or property impacts.

What legal options are available for people exposed to PFAS?

There are several legal paths individuals can pursue after PFAS exposure, depending on the facts. Options include individual lawsuits against identified responsible parties seeking compensation for medical costs, monitoring, and property damage, coordinated mass tort claims where multiple similar individual suits are managed together, and class actions that represent a defined group where pooled remedies may be distributed according to a court-approved plan. Each route has different procedural features and may be more or less appropriate depending on whether harms and damages are individualized or largely common across a group. The choice of approach depends on factors such as the number of affected people, availability of evidence linking defendants to contamination, and whether injuries are similar enough to support class certification or are better addressed as separate claims. Early legal consultation helps identify the best path, preserves important evidence, and can coordinate testing and expert review needed to advance a claim in support of potential compensation and cleanup actions.

How long does a PFAS-related claim or mass tort typically take?

Timelines for PFAS-related claims can vary widely because these cases often require extensive fact-finding, scientific testing, and expert analysis to establish exposure pathways and causation. Initial investigation and discovery phases may take many months to assemble testing data, corporate documents, and medical records, and litigation or settlement negotiations can extend for multiple years depending on the complexity of the issues and the number of parties involved. Some matters resolve sooner through targeted settlements when liability is clear and damages are quantifiable, while larger coordinated litigation tends to follow a longer timeline. Because of these variables, individuals should expect a potentially lengthy process and plan accordingly for interim needs such as medical monitoring and alternative water supplies if testing shows contamination. Regular communication with legal counsel can clarify expected milestones, document preservation steps, and ways to pursue compensation for immediate expenses while the broader matter proceeds toward resolution or settlement.

What kinds of compensation might be available in a PFAS claim?

Potential compensation in PFAS claims often covers economic losses such as past and future medical expenses, costs of medical monitoring to detect conditions linked to exposure, expenses for water treatment systems or alternative water supplies, and compensation for diminished property value. In some cases, claims may also seek recovery for lost income if health conditions caused impairment, and for non-economic harms like pain and suffering or reduced quality of life. The exact categories of recoverable damages depend on the governing law and the specific harms that can be proved with medical and technical evidence. Settlements in large-scale contamination cases may also include provisions for community-wide remediation, funding for long-term testing and monitoring programs, and infrastructure improvements to reduce ongoing exposure risk. Negotiated resolutions can and sometimes do allocate funds for both individual relief and broader community remediation efforts, but the outcome will depend on the scope of contamination, the parties involved, and the strength of the evidence connecting exposure to harms.

Will I have to pay upfront fees to pursue a PFAS claim?

Many law firms that handle personal injury and environmental contamination matters operate on a contingency or case-fee arrangement, which means clients often do not pay upfront legal fees and instead pay agreed-upon fees and costs if there is a recovery through settlement or judgment. This approach helps make legal representation accessible to people who may lack funds for initial litigation costs while allowing a firm to manage case development and third-party consultant payments as the matter progresses. It is important to confirm fee arrangements and any potential out-of-pocket costs during the initial consultation so there are no surprises later on. If a firm does advance costs for expert consultants or testing, those expenses are typically recouped from any recovery under the terms of the agreement, or handled as court-approved costs in mass tort or class settlements. Discussing fee structures, cost advances, and how expenses are handled in the event of no recovery is an essential part of early conversations with counsel so clients understand both financial and practical expectations for pursuing a claim.

How should I preserve evidence of potential PFAS exposure?

Preserving evidence starts with collecting all available documentation that could show exposure and impacts, including water testing reports, private well test results, municipal advisories, photographs of notices or visible contamination, and any correspondence with public authorities or water suppliers. Request and keep copies of medical records, lab tests, prescriptions, and records of medical visits related to symptoms of concern, and maintain a detailed timeline of when exposures, symptoms, and communications occurred. Written notes about who you spoke with, dates, and the substance of conversations can also be valuable when combined with physical test results and records. Avoid altering or discarding potential evidence, and consider having water samples preserved or retested by certified laboratories if contamination is suspected. If nearby neighbors have similar concerns, coordinating documentation efforts can strengthen claims and demonstrate the scope of impact, but be sure to keep individual records organized and readily retrievable for counsel who will compile evidence for investigation and potential litigation.

Can a property owner sue if property value has dropped due to PFAS contamination?

Property owners can pursue claims for loss in value when PFAS contamination affects wells, municipal water reliability, or the marketability of real property, provided they can document the contamination and connect it to a measurable decline in value. Appraisals, comparative market analyses, inspection reports, and records of remediation expenses or required upgrades to water systems are useful pieces of evidence in establishing diminished property value. Legal actions may seek compensation for remediation costs, lost resale value, and other economic impacts tied to contamination. In some cases, settlements or judgments also include funding for environmental remediation that restores property use and marketability over time, and these remedies can be critical in protecting both individual owners and neighborhoods. Because each property claim is fact-specific, gathering testing data, historic records of property conditions, and expert opinions on valuation will strengthen the ability to recover appropriate compensation for property impacts caused by PFAS contamination.

What role do scientific and medical tests play in PFAS cases?

Scientific and medical evidence plays a central role in PFAS cases by clarifying whether contamination occurred, how people were exposed, and whether exposure is reasonably linked to specific health outcomes. Environmental testing identifies the presence and concentration of PFAS compounds in water, soil, or air, while environmental forensics can trace likely sources and migration patterns. Medical records, laboratory studies, and physician assessments are then used to evaluate whether a person’s symptoms or diagnoses are consistent with known or suspected effects from PFAS exposure, and expert testimony often helps interpret complex technical findings for fact-finders. Because defendants often challenge causation or the significance of detected levels, coordinated scientific analysis and peer-reviewed studies can be critical to establishing a persuasive case. Experts in toxicology, epidemiology, and environmental science may be retained to evaluate exposure pathways, dose-response relationships, and the plausibility of health outcomes attributed to PFAS, and their opinions are frequently central to settlement negotiations and courtroom presentation.

How can Stephen New & Associates help residents of Augusta with PFAS concerns?

Stephen New & Associates can help residents of Augusta by conducting an initial review of available testing and medical information, advising on steps to preserve evidence, and coordinating further investigation or testing as needed to document exposure. The firm can assist in obtaining public records, consulting with technical experts, and organizing medical documentation to build a claim tailored to the facts affecting each household or neighborhood. Local representation also means the firm can communicate with state and municipal agencies and help clients navigate practical remedies for safe drinking water and monitoring while pursuing appropriate legal action. If a coordinated litigation approach is appropriate given the scope of contamination, the firm can work with other counsel and technical consultants to develop a strategy for pursuing compensation and remediation on behalf of affected residents. From initial intake through negotiation or trial, the firm focuses on accessible communication, practical case management, and pursuing remedies that address both personal and community needs arising from PFAS contamination.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services