Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

NEC Baby Formula Lawyer in Fayetteville

Protecting Affected Families

Guide to NEC Baby Formula Mass Torts

This page explains how families in Fayetteville and across West Virginia can respond if an infant developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after consuming certain baby formulas. NEC is a serious intestinal condition that can lead to significant medical care, hospitalization, and long recovery periods for newborns. When product contamination or formulation problems are suspected, pursuing legal remedies can help families obtain compensation for medical bills, long-term care needs, and other losses. This guide outlines the basics of NEC-related mass torts, the types of evidence commonly needed, and the steps families commonly take when considering a claim with support from a local law firm.

Families confronting NEC often face overwhelming medical decisions, complex hospital stays, and questions about the role of feeding products in their child’s illness. In mass tort actions related to baby formula, multiple caregivers may bring coordinated claims against manufacturers or distributors when a pattern of harm emerges. This overview describes what to expect from the legal process, typical timelines, and the kinds of documentation that strengthen a case. It is intended to help caregivers in Fayetteville, Beckley, and nearby communities make informed choices about next steps while seeking medical stability and financial recovery for their family.

How Legal Action Can Help Families

Pursuing a mass tort or product liability action after an infant develops NEC can provide financial relief for immediate and ongoing medical care, reduce the burden of unexpected bills, and help families plan for any long-term needs. Legal claims can encourage transparency from manufacturers and distributors, promote safer practices in the marketplace, and may uncover systemic issues that affected multiple infants. Beyond compensation, coordinated legal action can create a record of harm that supports advocacy and prevention efforts. For caregivers, understanding what a claim can achieve helps set realistic expectations about outcomes and timelines while protecting family resources.

About Stephen New & Associates in Beckley

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm based in Beckley serving clients throughout Fayette County and nearby West Virginia communities. The firm regularly handles claims involving serious injuries and product-related harm, representing caregivers who seek accountability and fair compensation. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, responsiveness, and building comprehensive case records that reflect each family’s needs. We assist with gathering medical documentation, working with medical specialists, and coordinating with national counsel in complex mass tort matters so families have practical guidance while pursuing recovery and answers.

Understanding NEC Baby Formula Claims

Necrotizing enterocolitis is an inflammatory condition of the intestine that primarily affects premature and medically vulnerable infants. When NEC occurs after ingestion of a feeding product, investigators and caregivers will examine whether contamination, formulation problems, or improper labeling played a role. In a mass tort context, multiple similar complaints against a manufacturer can be coordinated to address common factual questions and to pursue remedies more efficiently. Families should know the usual elements of product claims, including the need to show a link between the product and the injury, relevant medical records, and how medical timelines align with product exposure.

A careful factual review is essential in NEC-related cases because these infants often have underlying vulnerabilities that contribute to illness. Legal evaluation looks at medical charts, feeding logs, hospital testing, and any product discontinuation notices or recalls. Working with medical professionals to interpret records helps clarify potential causation and the extent of injury. Additionally, coordination across multiple affected families can reveal patterns such as similar presentation timelines, batch numbers, or distribution channels that strengthen claims. Families should preserve records and samples where possible and seek legal advice to organize documentation early in the process.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for NEC Claims

Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)

Necrotizing enterocolitis, commonly called NEC, is a serious intestinal condition that causes inflammation and can damage intestinal tissue in newborns, especially those born prematurely. Symptoms often include feeding intolerance, abdominal distension, bloody stools, and changes in vital signs that prompt hospital intervention. Treatment may involve antibiotics, bowel rest, and in severe cases surgical procedures. In the context of baby formula claims, NEC is considered in relation to potential contributing factors such as contamination, improper formulation, or other product-related issues that coincide with the infant’s presentation and treatment course.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a coordinated legal process used when many individuals are harmed in similar ways by the same product or conduct, allowing individual claims to proceed with shared discovery and common factual issues. Unlike a class action, each family retains an individual claim and can seek compensation that reflects their unique medical history and losses. Mass tort coordination helps manage complex evidence, such as product testing or corporate records, while permitting individualized evaluations of damages and causation. This approach is often used for widespread product injuries where patterns emerge across multiple victims.

Product Liability

Product liability refers to legal claims made when a product causes harm due to defects in design, manufacturing, or labeling and warnings. In baby formula matters, claims may allege contamination during production, harmful ingredients, inadequate instructions, or failure to warn about known risks. Successful product liability claims typically require showing that the product was defective and that the defect caused the injury. Documentation such as batch records, recall notices, and testing reports can be central in evaluating whether a product liability claim is appropriate for a particular family’s circumstances.

Discovery

Discovery is the pretrial phase of litigation where parties exchange information, documents, and evidence relevant to the claim, including medical records, corporate production logs, internal communications, and testing results. In mass tort matters, discovery often involves extensive document production from manufacturers and third parties as well as deposition testimony from company personnel, treating clinicians, and other witnesses. The process clarifies factual disputes, helps establish timelines, and can reveal how widely an issue may have affected consumers. Discovery can be lengthy and is a primary tool for building or refuting claims in complex product cases.

PRO TIPS

Document Medical Records Thoroughly

Keep a complete record of all medical treatment, hospital admissions, testing, prescriptions, and discharge notes related to your infant’s NEC diagnosis, and obtain copies of feeding logs and nursing notes when possible. These records form the backbone of any claim and help demonstrate the timing and severity of the injury as well as the care that was required. Early organization of medical documentation makes it easier to share accurate information with legal counsel while preserving key details about the infant’s clinical course.

Preserve Formula and Packaging

If you still have any remaining formula, packaging, lot numbers, or feeding equipment, keep those items in a safe place and avoid discarding them until advised otherwise because they may be important evidence in evaluating exposure. Photographs of labels, barcodes, and feeding instructions are also helpful to document what product was used and how it was prepared. Maintaining this physical evidence supports product testing and can help establish links between a particular batch or production run and reported illnesses.

Contact a Law Firm Promptly

Reach out to a local personal injury law firm soon after an NEC diagnosis to discuss preservation of evidence, timelines for claims, and options for documentation and medical record collection because early action can preserve critical materials and witness recollections. Prompt contact allows the firm to coordinate record retrieval, advise on next steps, and assess whether your situation may fit into a larger coordinated action. Timely legal guidance can ease administrative burdens so caregivers can focus on medical care and family needs during a difficult time.

Comparing Legal Options for NEC Claims

When Broader Representation Helps:

Complex Medical Injuries

Comprehensive representation is often appropriate when infants sustain complex or severe medical injuries that require long hospital stays, surgery, or ongoing therapies, because those situations generate extensive records and long-term care planning that benefit from coordinated legal review. A broader approach assists in gathering detailed medical evidence, consulting with treating clinicians, and presenting a complete picture of past and projected costs. Coordinated representation can also provide families with a single legal point of contact to manage administrative tasks while the medical team focuses on recovery.

Multiple Plaintiffs and Claims

When many families report similar injuries linked to the same formula or production batches, comprehensive coordination helps identify patterns, centralize document review, and pursue shared discovery that would be burdensome for individual claimants to manage alone. This collective approach can streamline investigations into manufacturing records, distribution chains, and testing, while still preserving each family’s individual claim and damages assessment. Coordinated actions can also encourage more efficient resolutions and create a clearer record of widespread impact.

When a Narrow Approach Works:

Isolated Cases with Clear Evidence

A more limited, case-by-case approach can be appropriate when an infant’s NEC appears to be isolated and the link to a specific product is direct and well documented, such as when testing confirms contamination in a single remaining sample. In these situations, pursuing an individual claim may resolve the family’s needs without the broader overhead of coordinated mass litigation. Counsel can still assist with assembling medical bills, negotiating with insurers, and pursuing compensation tailored to the family’s distinct losses.

Small Damages and Low Complexity

When economic losses are limited and medical issues are straightforward, an individual filing focused on immediate bills and recovery may be sufficient to address a family’s needs, avoiding protracted discovery or extended litigation timelines. A more focused path can be faster and less resource intensive, allowing caregivers to seek swift resolution for out-of-pocket expenses and short-term impacts. Legal counsel can evaluate whether a narrow approach matches the facts and advise on likely timelines and outcomes for individual claims.

Common Situations That Lead to NEC Claims

Premature Infants with NEC

Premature infants who develop NEC after receiving a particular baby formula or enteral feeding may prompt a review of feeding product sources, preparation, and storage practices to determine whether a product-related factor contributed to the condition. Caregivers of premature infants should preserve medical records and any remaining formula or packaging to support an investigation into potential product links and to assist legal evaluation of causation and damages.

Formula Contamination Incidents

Instances where reports indicate contamination, bacterial growth, or manufacturing irregularities associated with a batch can lead to clusters of NEC diagnoses and trigger recalls or formal investigations. In these situations, coordinated documentation of symptoms, timelines, and product identifiers strengthens the ability to assess whether a product issue contributed to infant illness.

Product Labeling Concerns

Concerns about improper labeling, inadequate instructions for preparation, or omission of safety warnings can be relevant when evaluating whether a feeding product played a role in an infant’s NEC diagnosis. Preserving labels, instructions, and any caregiver notes about preparation helps clarify whether labeling or guidance may have contributed to the outcome.

Fayetteville Legal Help for NEC Formula Claims

Why Families Work with Us

Families in Fayetteville and surrounding West Virginia communities turn to Stephen New & Associates for personal injury representation because the firm focuses on serious injury matters and product-related claims, and it offers attentive client communication and local knowledge of court procedures. We help families assemble medical records, coordinate with treating clinicians, and pursue practical resolutions that address immediate and ongoing needs. Our local presence means caregivers can meet with attorneys in Beckley or consult by phone to discuss timelines, likely next steps, and how claims proceed through discovery and negotiation while preserving family priorities.

The firm understands the emotional and financial toll that NEC can impose on families and aims to reduce administrative burdens by handling insurer communications, record collection, and procedural filings on behalf of clients. We work to explain options clearly, whether a family’s situation is best addressed through an individual claim or coordinated action, and we assist in assessing potential compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and long-term care needs. Our goal is to provide steady guidance so families can focus on their child’s recovery.

Contact Stephen New & Associates Today

People Also Search For

NEC baby formula lawsuit Fayetteville

NEC mass tort West Virginia

baby formula contamination claims

product liability infant NEC

Fayette County formula lawsuit

Stephen New baby formula claims

NEC legal help Beckley WV

infant NEC compensation

FAQS

What is necrotizing enterocolitis and how is it linked to baby formula?

Necrotizing enterocolitis, often abbreviated as NEC, is an intestinal inflammatory condition that can cause tissue injury, infection, and in severe cases require surgery for affected infants. It primarily affects premature or medically fragile newborns and presents with symptoms such as feeding intolerance, abdominal distension, bloody stools, and systemic signs that prompt immediate medical attention. When NEC occurs after exposure to a particular feeding product, investigators examine whether contamination, formulation issues, or preparation practices contributed to the infant’s condition. Assessing causation involves reviewing clinical timelines, laboratory results, and any available product testing or recall information. Linking NEC to a specific baby formula requires careful review of medical records, feeding logs, and any remaining product or packaging that contains lot numbers and production details. In many cases, patterns across multiple infants who received the same product or batch strengthen the basis for investigation and legal action. Families should preserve relevant evidence, ensure complete medical documentation, and seek legal consultation to determine whether their situation aligns with other reported incidents or potential mass tort coordination.

How do I know if my infant’s NEC might be related to a specific formula batch?

Determining whether an infant’s NEC is related to a specific formula batch starts with documenting the timing of symptoms in relation to product use and collecting any available packaging, lot numbers, and purchase records. Hospitals’ clinical notes, feeding logs, and laboratory tests are reviewed to establish exposure timelines. If multiple infants who used the same formula lot develop similar symptoms, that pattern can indicate a possible link worthy of further investigation by medical and legal professionals. Laboratory testing of any preserved product samples, inspection of manufacturing and distribution records, and coordination with public health agencies or recall notices can provide objective evidence of contamination or other production problems. Legal counsel can assist families in gathering and preserving these materials, requesting testing, and identifying whether their case should be evaluated alongside other affected families to determine the scope of the issue.

What types of compensation can families seek in NEC product claims?

Families pursuing NEC-related product liability or mass tort claims typically seek compensation for past and future medical expenses associated with diagnosis and treatment, including hospital stays, surgeries, medications, and rehabilitative services. Claims may also include compensation for nonmedical economic losses such as lost wages for caregivers, transportation costs for medical appointments, and out-of-pocket caregiving expenses. In cases involving severe or long-term impairment, families may pursue awards that reflect projected future care and support needs for the child. Beyond economic losses, claims can include compensation for non-economic harms like pain, suffering, emotional distress, and the disruption to family life caused by a serious infant illness. The amount of recovery varies based on medical records, prognosis, and the strength of evidence connecting the product to the injury. Legal counsel helps quantify losses, collect supporting documentation, and present a case that reflects each family’s unique circumstances and projected needs.

Should I keep leftover formula, and how should I preserve it?

If you have leftover formula, packaging, or feeding equipment, preserve those items in their original containers when possible and store them in a cool, dry place until advised otherwise by counsel or investigators. Photograph labels, lot numbers, expiration dates, and any visible contamination, and avoid discarding wrappers or receipts for purchase. Preserved physical evidence can be central to product testing and establishing links between a specific production run and reported illnesses. If you no longer have the product, gather any purchase records, receipts, or photographs that show the brand and lot numbers, and make a record of where and when the product was acquired. Inform your medical providers and legal counsel about any product details you recall, and provide copies of hospital feeding logs or nursing notes that document what was given and when. Early preservation and detailed records improve the ability to evaluate potential claims effectively.

What records and evidence are most important for evaluating a claim?

The most important records include comprehensive medical records from hospitalizations and outpatient care, laboratory and pathology reports, surgical notes if applicable, and detailed billing statements that reflect medical expenses related to NEC. Feeding logs, nursing notes, and documentation of product exposure such as purchase receipts, lot numbers, and photographs of labels are also critical. These materials help establish the timing, severity, and treatment of the infant’s condition and support causation analysis. Additional supporting evidence can include communication with the manufacturer or retailer, recall notices, and any independent product testing results. Statements from treating clinicians that interpret the records and explain clinical decisions are also valuable. Legal counsel helps gather and organize these documents, requests necessary records from hospitals or providers, and identifies documents that are most persuasive for building a case.

Is there a time limit to file a claim in West Virginia related to NEC?

West Virginia has statutes of limitations that set deadlines for filing legal claims, and those timeframes vary depending on the type of claim and the parties involved. Because medical injuries and product liability matters often require early preservation of evidence and timely filing of paperwork, it is important to consult a law firm as soon as possible after diagnosis to confirm applicable deadlines and to avoid losing legal rights. Delays in contacting counsel can result in lost evidence or missed filing windows that limit a family’s ability to pursue recovery. Certain facts can affect the timing for filing, such as when the injury was discovered or whether the defendant is a governmental entity, so individual circumstances matter. A local law firm can review the specific facts and advise on statutory deadlines, tolling provisions, and the steps needed immediately to preserve claims while medical care continues and records are assembled.

Can multiple families bring coordinated claims against a manufacturer?

Yes. When a number of families report similar injuries linked to the same product, coordinated claims or mass tort actions are common to manage shared legal questions and discovery processes. Coordination allows parties to pool resources for discovery, testing, and fact development while preserving each family’s individual right to pursue damages specific to their case. This approach can increase efficiency in handling voluminous documents and complex technical evidence such as manufacturing records or laboratory analyses. Coordinated actions also help reveal broader patterns of harm that may not be apparent from a single case, and they can streamline communication with defendants and the courts. Families considering whether their case fits a coordinated action should gather medical and product documentation and discuss how their situation compares to other reported incidents with counsel, who can advise on the potential benefits of joining coordinated efforts.

What happens during the discovery process in a mass tort involving baby formula?

During discovery in a mass tort involving baby formula, parties exchange documents, submit written questions, and take depositions to develop the factual record, including production logs, internal company communications, quality control data, and medical records from affected infants. This phase often involves coordinated requests to manufacturers for batch testing results, distribution lists, and production procedures, which helps identify how widespread an issue may be and which consumers were exposed to specific lots or runs. Discovery can be extensive and time consuming, and it is designed to clarify causation, timelines, and responsibility. Counsel for each family works to protect client interests while pursuing necessary evidence, and coordinated discovery can reduce duplication by centralizing requests and consolidating review of large document sets. The evidence gathered during discovery plays a major role in settlement negotiations or in preparing for trial if cases do not resolve.

Will pursuing a claim delay my child’s medical care or treatment decisions?

Pursuing a legal claim should not interfere with medical care decisions for your child; medical treatment must remain the top priority, and families should continue to follow clinicians’ recommendations. Legal counsel can work around medical schedules and coordinate document collection with treating teams so that care is not delayed; attorneys commonly request records and bills directly from providers to reduce the administrative burden on families. Your child’s health needs continue to guide treatment choices while the legal process proceeds separately to address compensation and accountability. Involving counsel early helps preserve necessary evidence and ensures that legal timelines are observed without placing additional stress on caregivers. A law firm can assist by obtaining records, communicating with insurers, and advising on steps to protect legal rights while you focus on recovery. Open communication between the medical team and legal counsel, with caregiver consent, can streamline the information exchange required for a claim.

How can Stephen New & Associates help me get started with a claim in Fayetteville?

Stephen New & Associates helps families begin by evaluating medical records, documenting product exposure, and advising on preservation of evidence such as packaging, lot numbers, and feeding logs. The firm offers initial consultations to review timelines, discuss potential links to product batches or distribution, and explain the differences between individual claims and coordinated actions. From there, the firm assists with requests for medical records, communications with insurers, and steps needed to pursue compensation for medical expenses and other losses. The firm’s local presence in Beckley and familiarity with West Virginia procedures allows caregivers in Fayetteville to access guidance and support tailored to the region. Staff can coordinate consultations, collect documentation, and explain likely next steps so families understand the process and can make informed decisions while focusing on their child’s care and recovery.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services