Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Lawyer in Madison

Protecting Patient Rights

A Practical Guide to Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Claims

If you or a loved one in Madison, West Virginia, suffered harm because a medical condition was misdiagnosed or diagnosis was delayed, you face complex medical and legal issues that can affect your recovery and quality of life. At Stephen New & Associates in Beckley, our firm focuses on helping injured people navigate those issues, review medical records, and pursue compensation where avoidable medical errors have caused additional injury. This guide explains how misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims typically arise, what steps to take after a suspected error, and how a local personal injury law firm can support you through the process while advocating for fair results.

Medical errors involving missed or incorrect diagnoses often create new medical complications and prolong pain and uncertainty for patients and families. Misdiagnosis may involve treating the wrong condition, while delayed diagnosis can allow a treatable condition to progress, reducing treatment options and recovery prospects. This page outlines common scenarios, key legal concepts, practical tips for preserving evidence, and typical outcomes for claims in Madison and surrounding Boone County. We also describe what to expect when investigating a case, how timelines in West Virginia apply, and how to begin taking steps to protect your legal rights and health interests.

Why Pursue a Misdiagnosis or Delayed Diagnosis Claim

Pursuing a claim after a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can secure compensation for medical costs, rehabilitation, lost income, and pain and suffering, while helping to hold responsible parties accountable. A successful claim can also provide resources for ongoing care and reduce the financial strain that follows unexpected complications. Beyond financial recovery, bringing a claim often prompts closer review of clinical practices and can help prevent similar mistakes for other patients. It is important to weigh the medical evidence carefully, understand the legal deadlines in West Virginia, and assemble documentation that demonstrates how the diagnosis process fell short and caused measurable harm.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Work in Madison

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving clients throughout West Virginia, including Madison and Boone County. Our team focuses on serious injury and medical error matters and works closely with independent medical reviewers, investigators, and treating clinicians to establish what happened and how it affected recovery. We prioritize clear communication with clients, frequent case updates, and practical advice tailored to each family’s needs. If a medical provider’s actions or omissions caused a delayed diagnosis or an incorrect diagnosis that worsened your condition, we can assist with document collection, evidence analysis, and pursuing fair compensation through negotiation or litigation when necessary.

Understanding Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Claims

Misdiagnosis occurs when a medical provider identifies the wrong condition and provides treatment that is not appropriate, while delayed diagnosis involves failure to diagnose or undue delay that allows a condition to worsen. Both situations require careful review of medical records, diagnostic tests, provider notes, and treatment timelines to determine whether the provider’s conduct fell below accepted standards of care and whether that departure caused injury. Effective investigation typically involves consulting independent medical reviewers to interpret complex clinical information, gathering hospital and clinic records, and documenting how any delay or error changed treatment options and outcomes for the patient.

Not every unfavorable outcome or diagnostic uncertainty amounts to a legal claim. Medicine can be uncertain, and some conditions present in ways that are difficult to diagnose even with appropriate care. A legal claim requires proof that the provider’s actions were unreasonable under the circumstances and that those actions directly caused additional harm. Establishing causation often means demonstrating what treatment would have occurred with timely and accurate diagnosis and comparing that to the actual harm experienced. Time limits and procedural rules in West Virginia also affect when and how claims can be filed, so timely action and record preservation are important.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for Misdiagnosis Claims

Misdiagnosis

Misdiagnosis refers to identifying the wrong medical condition for a patient and providing treatment based on that incorrect diagnosis. When a condition is misdiagnosed, the care provided may be ineffective or harmful, and the correct underlying illness may go untreated. In legal terms, establishing misdiagnosis as a basis for a claim requires showing that a reasonably careful medical provider would have reached a different diagnosis under similar circumstances and that the wrong diagnosis caused harm such as worsened illness, avoidable procedures, or delayed necessary treatment.

Medical Negligence

Medical negligence describes conduct by a health care provider that falls below the standard expected of similarly situated providers and that causes injury to a patient. It encompasses errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare, or health management. For a negligence claim based on misdiagnosis or delay, it is necessary to show that the provider breached the applicable standard of care and that this breach was a proximate cause of the patient’s damages, such as increased medical bills, lost wages, or diminished quality of life.

Delayed Diagnosis

A delayed diagnosis occurs when a medical condition that should have been diagnosed earlier is discovered late enough that the delay contributes to harm or reduces treatment options. Delays can result from missed follow-up, overlooked test results, or misinterpretation of symptoms and imaging. To support a claim for harm from a delayed diagnosis, documentation must show when the condition should reasonably have been identified, how the delay changed the clinical course, and what additional harm or costs arose because treatment began later than it should have.

Statute of Limitations

A statute of limitations sets the deadline for filing a legal claim and varies by jurisdiction and claim type. In West Virginia, specific time limits apply to medical injury claims and may be subject to discovery rules that can extend the period in certain circumstances. Missing the applicable deadline can bar recovery, which makes prompt consultation and action important. Understanding when the clock starts to run, whether tolling or exceptions apply, and how to preserve evidence early in the case are key steps in protecting the right to pursue a claim.

PRO TIPS

Document All Medical Interactions

Keep a detailed log of symptoms, visits, phone calls, and medications from the first moment you suspect a misdiagnosis or delay. Recording dates, provider names, locations, and what was said or advised helps reconstruct the timeline and supports claims about missed tests or follow-up. These notes, together with copies of medical records and test results, form essential evidence to show how the condition progressed and how interactions with care providers unfolded.

Seek Second Opinions Promptly

If a diagnosis is unclear or treatment is not improving your condition, arrange for a timely second opinion from a different qualified provider. A second opinion can identify diagnostic errors, confirm the correct diagnosis, and suggest alternative treatment paths that may have been available sooner. Early consultation with another clinician can also support documentation that an earlier diagnosis was reasonable and that delay or misdiagnosis caused additional harm.

Preserve and Request Records

Request complete medical records, imaging, and test results from every facility and provider involved in your care, and keep originals and copies organized. Preserving records early prevents loss or destruction of critical evidence and allows for timely review by medical reviewers or legal counsel. Additionally, retain billing statements and documentation of out-of-pocket expenses to support claims for economic damages tied to the misdiagnosis or delay.

Comparing Legal Approaches for Misdiagnosis Claims

When a Comprehensive Approach Is Advisable:

Severe or Permanent Harm

Comprehensive legal representation is often necessary when a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis results in severe, lasting harm that requires long-term care or significant future medical expenses. In such cases, a full investigation, medical review, and detailed damage analysis are needed to estimate ongoing needs and lost earning capacity. A thorough approach helps ensure all economic and non-economic losses are accounted for and presented effectively to insurers or a court.

Complex Medical Records and Multiple Providers

When care spans multiple providers, hospitals, or facilities, and the records are extensive, comprehensive legal representation helps coordinate medical review and piece together a clear timeline. Complex documentation can hide key evidence without focused attention and professional review. A coordinated investigation ensures relevant records are identified, analyzed, and presented to connect provider actions to patient outcomes in a coherent and persuasive way.

When a Limited Approach May Work:

Minor, Short-Term Harm

A limited approach may be sufficient when the alleged misdiagnosis or delay caused minor, temporary harm that resolved with simple treatment and limited additional costs. In such situations, gathering records and pursuing a short claim or demand with an insurer can be more efficient than a lengthy litigation strategy. The decision depends on the size of recoverable damages, the willingness of the insurer to negotiate, and the patient’s goals for resolution and closure.

Strong, Clear Documentation

When medical records and timelines clearly show an avoidable error and damages are straightforward, a targeted demand or negotiation may achieve fair compensation without extensive litigation. Clear documentation that links a missed test or ignored result to measurable harm increases the chance of early resolution. Even with a limited approach, careful preservation of evidence and a clear presentation of damages remain important to secure a reasonable settlement.

Common Situations That Lead to Misdiagnosis or Delayed Diagnosis Claims

Missed Fractures and Injuries

Fractures and acute injuries that are missed on initial evaluation or imaging can worsen without appropriate treatment and lead to longer recovery times, deformity, or additional procedures. When a missed injury was identifiable with reasonable care, documentation and timely imaging reviews can form the basis of a claim showing how delay increased harm and costs.

Incorrect Test Interpretation

Errors in reading X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, or lab results can lead to wrong or delayed diagnoses and inappropriate treatment plans. Demonstrating that a different, reasonable interpretation would have changed treatment is an important element in showing that the misinterpretation caused additional injury.

Failure to Follow Up or Communicate Results

Failure to inform patients of abnormal findings or to follow up on test results can allow treatable conditions to progress and complicate recovery. Showing where communication breakdowns occurred and how those lapses contributed to delayed care is often central to these claims.

Madison, WV Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Legal Help

Why Work with Stephen New & Associates for Your Claim

Stephen New & Associates serves clients throughout West Virginia, including Madison and surrounding Boone County communities, focusing on serious personal injury matters such as medical misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis. We collaborate with clinicians and medical reviewers to interpret records and to determine whether a provider’s actions fell short of accepted care. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, prompt preservation of records, and a practical strategy to pursue compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and the non-economic impacts of injury on daily life and family well-being.

From initial consultation through resolution, we strive to provide personalized attention and candid guidance on the strengths and risks of each claim, including timelines and likely steps in investigation, negotiation, and litigation if needed. We assist clients in gathering records, identifying relevant providers, and presenting a detailed case to insurers or the court. For residents of Madison who face the physical, financial, and emotional consequences of a missed or delayed diagnosis, we offer focused representation aimed at securing meaningful results and practical support during recovery.

Contact Our Madison Office to Discuss Your Case

People Also Search For

misdiagnosis lawyer Madison

delayed diagnosis attorney Madison

medical malpractice Madison WV

personal injury lawyer Madison WV

wrongful diagnosis claim Madison

medical misdiagnosis claim WV

hospital negligence Madison

Stephen New & Associates Madison

Related Services

FAQS

What is medical misdiagnosis?

Medical misdiagnosis occurs when a provider identifies the wrong condition and provides treatment that is inappropriate for the true underlying problem, potentially causing additional harm or delaying effective therapy. Establishing a misdiagnosis claim involves showing that the provider’s actions fell below the standard of care a reasonably careful practitioner would have provided, and that the incorrect diagnosis caused identifiable damages such as worsened illness, additional procedures, or increased medical costs. Reviewing records, tests, and the timeline of care is essential to determine whether reasonable care would have produced a different diagnosis. Not every mistaken diagnosis leads to a viable legal claim because medicine can be uncertain and conditions sometimes present atypically. A successful claim typically requires documentation showing how a reasonable provider should have acted differently and how the incorrect diagnosis changed the patient’s outcomes. Timely collection of records, independent medical review, and clear evidence linking the misdiagnosis to measurable harm strengthen the case and increase the likelihood of recovery for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

How does a delayed diagnosis differ from misdiagnosis?

A delayed diagnosis happens when a condition that should have been identified earlier is discovered only after an unreasonable lapse of time, allowing the condition to worsen or limiting treatment options. While a misdiagnosis labels a patient with the wrong condition, delayed diagnosis focuses on the timing and missed opportunities for earlier intervention. Both can cause harm, but proving a delayed diagnosis often requires demonstrating when the condition reasonably could have been detected and how the delay changed the clinical outcome. In legal terms, a delayed diagnosis claim requires showing that there was a missed opportunity to identify the illness within a reasonable timeframe and that this delay caused additional injury or costs. Evidence typically includes medical records showing symptoms and test orders, documentation of failed follow-up or missed test results, and medical review comparing the actual timeline with what should have occurred. Prompt action to preserve records and consult clinicians helps clarify whether a delay was avoidable and whether a claim is warranted.

What damages can I recover in a misdiagnosis claim?

Recoverable damages in a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis claim commonly include past and future medical expenses that resulted from the error, such as additional surgeries, rehabilitation, and ongoing care needs. Damages may also cover lost wages for time away from work due to worsened condition, loss of future earning capacity if permanent impairment occurs, and out-of-pocket costs associated with additional treatment or travel for care. Non-economic damages like pain and suffering, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life are also frequently sought when misdiagnosis causes significant impacts. To recover damages, claimants must document the harm and connect it to the provider’s conduct. Detailed medical records, billing statements, wage documentation, and independent medical opinions help quantify losses and support claims for future care and ongoing needs. Damage calculations can be complex when long-term care or permanent impairment is involved, and a thorough assessment is necessary to seek just compensation for both economic and non-economic harms.

How long do I have to file a claim in West Virginia?

Time limits for filing a medical injury claim in West Virginia vary depending on the type of claim and specific circumstances, and they can be affected by discovery rules that start the clock when the injury was, or should reasonably have been, discovered. Some claims are subject to statutes of limitations measured from the date of the negligent act, while others use the discovery rule to account for when the harm became apparent. It is important to determine the applicable deadline promptly because missing the timeframe can bar recovery regardless of the claim’s merits. Because deadlines can be complicated by factors such as the patient’s age, the nature of the injury, and when records reveal the error, consulting with legal counsel early helps ensure timely steps are taken. Early inquiries allow for record preservation and assessment of whether any tolling or exceptions apply, and they provide the time needed to prepare a claim before filing becomes impossible due to statute limitations.

Do I need medical records for a claim?

Yes. Medical records, test results, imaging, and provider notes are foundational evidence in misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims, as they document the timeline of care, diagnostic impressions, orders placed, and communications between providers and patients. These records show what tests were performed, how results were interpreted, and whether appropriate follow-up occurred. Without complete records, it is difficult to demonstrate what should have happened or to connect provider actions to the harm experienced by the patient. It is wise to request and preserve all relevant records as soon as possible, including hospital charts, clinic notes, lab reports, and imaging files. Copies of billing statements and documentation of out-of-pocket expenses also help quantify damages. Timely collection prevents records from being lost or destroyed and provides a clearer basis for medical review and any subsequent legal steps to pursue compensation.

Can I pursue a claim if the doctor apologized?

An apology from a doctor can be important personally and may indicate recognition of an error, but it does not automatically determine legal liability or prevent a claim. In some cases, apologies are offered without admission of fault, and legal implications depend on what else is documented and how the error affected the patient. An apology may form part of the record, but proving that the provider’s conduct caused additional harm still requires objective documentation and medical review. Whether to pursue a claim after an apology depends on the extent of injury, the cost of additional care, and the patient’s goals for compensation or accountability. Even with an apology, patients may have out-of-pocket expenses, ongoing care needs, or diminished earning capacity that justify pursuing a claim. Reviewing records, discussing options with counsel, and evaluating potential remedies helps determine the best path forward.

How much will it cost to pursue a misdiagnosis case?

Costs to pursue a misdiagnosis case vary by firm and case complexity, but many personal injury firms work on a contingency fee basis, meaning they are paid only if a recovery is obtained. Clients typically do not pay hourly legal fees upfront, but they may be responsible for certain out-of-pocket costs incurred during investigation or litigation, such as fees for obtaining medical records, expert reviewers, or court filings. Discussing fee arrangements and any anticipated expenses at the outset provides clarity on how costs will be handled throughout the case. The total financial exposure for the client often depends on the extent of medical review required and whether the case settles or proceeds to trial. A careful cost-benefit analysis helps determine whether pursuing a claim is likely to produce net recovery after fees and expenses. Transparent communication about likely costs and potential outcomes is an important part of deciding how to proceed.

What should I do immediately after suspecting a misdiagnosis?

If you suspect a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, start by seeking appropriate medical care to address your current health needs, including obtaining any tests or follow-up recommended by clinicians. Simultaneously, request copies of your medical records and bills from every provider and facility involved in your care. Keeping a detailed personal log of symptoms, conversations with providers, and dates of visits will help reconstruct events and support any future review of the case. Preserving records quickly is important because medical facilities may not keep all documents indefinitely. Consulting with legal counsel early allows a review of record completeness and guidance on any immediate steps to preserve evidence or secure independent medical opinions. Early action improves the ability to assess whether a legal claim exists and to begin compiling the documentation needed to support recovery for harms caused by a misdiagnosis or delay.

Will my case go to trial?

Many misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims resolve through negotiation and settlement with an insurer rather than going to trial, but some cases do proceed to court when parties cannot agree on responsibility or fair compensation. The decision to take a case to trial depends on the strength of the medical proof, the magnitude of damages at stake, the willingness of the insurer to offer a reasonable settlement, and the client’s objectives. A considered litigation strategy balances the costs, time, and uncertainty of trial against the prospects for a better resolution through court. Preparing a case for trial involves in-depth investigation, expert medical review, and thorough development of documentary and testimonial evidence. Even when a trial is not ultimately necessary, preparing a case as if it might go to trial strengthens settlement negotiations and demonstrates readiness to pursue full compensation if an acceptable resolution cannot be reached through discussion with insurers or alternative dispute resolution methods.

How do you investigate a misdiagnosis claim?

Investigating a misdiagnosis claim begins with obtaining and reviewing all medical records, imaging, and test results to reconstruct the timeline of care and identify possible errors or missed opportunities for diagnosis. Independent medical reviewers and clinicians are often consulted to interpret complex medical information and to compare what occurred with accepted standards of care. Investigators may also collect billing records, witness statements, and communications between providers to build a comprehensive picture of the case and to document how the alleged error produced additional harm. The investigation further evaluates causation and damages by determining what treatment would likely have occurred with timely or correct diagnosis and quantifying the resulting additional costs or impairment. Gathering and preserving evidence early, consulting qualified medical reviewers, and coordinating with treating clinicians help strengthen the factual and medical basis for a claim. This investigative work is essential to present a persuasive case to insurers or a court and to pursue appropriate compensation for harm caused by misdiagnosis or delay.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services