Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

PFAS Lawyer in Madison

Holding Manufacturers Accountable

Overview of PFAS Mass Tort Claims

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS, have contaminated drinking water and the environment in communities across the country, including areas around Madison in Boone County, West Virginia. These man-made chemicals were widely used for decades in industrial, firefighting, and consumer products, and they are linked to a variety of long-term health concerns. If you live in Madison and suspect your water supply or property has been affected by PFAS contamination, you may have the right to pursue a mass tort claim to seek compensation and remediation. This guide explains what PFAS litigation involves and how a Marshall County resident can begin assessing legal options.

PFAS cases often involve complex scientific and regulatory material, multiple defendants, and coordinated legal actions such as multidistrict litigation or consolidated state cases. Residents and workers exposed to contaminated water or soil may face mounting medical bills, long-term monitoring needs, and diminished property values. Stephen New & Associates, a Beckley and West Virginia-based personal injury law firm, handles mass tort matters including PFAS claims and can explain potential paths forward. If you have questions about exposure, testing, or eligibility for a claim, contact the firm at 304-355-5565 to discuss the circumstances affecting you and your family.

The Importance and Benefits of Pursuing PFAS Claims

Pursuing a PFAS claim can provide several tangible benefits for affected individuals and communities. Legal action can help secure compensation for medical treatment, costs of home water filtration, property damage, and other economic losses incurred because of contamination. Beyond individual recovery, litigation can incentivize cleanup, fund environmental remediation efforts, and increase public awareness about the risks of PFAS exposure. Bringing coordinated claims can also improve access to expert testing and medical monitoring programs for communities that otherwise lack resources. For residents of Madison and surrounding Boone County areas, a well-managed claim can be a practical avenue to address harm and seek accountability from responsible parties.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our PFAS Work

Stephen New & Associates is a Beckley-based personal injury law firm serving clients across West Virginia, including Madison and Boone County. The firm handles a broad range of mass tort and personal injury matters such as medical malpractice, catastrophic injury, and product liability, and it represents individuals harmed by environmental contamination including PFAS exposure. Our lawyers work to gather scientific data, coordinate with laboratories for testing, and pursue claims that may be part of larger consolidated actions or state-level litigation. If you believe you have been affected by PFAS, our team can explain possible legal strategies, relevant deadlines, and practical next steps while keeping you informed about progress.

Understanding PFAS Mass Tort Litigation

PFAS mass tort litigation typically centers on proving that certain manufacturers, industrial users, or service providers released harmful chemicals that contaminated water, soil, or air and that exposure caused or increased the risk of illness. These matters often require coordinated scientific study of contamination levels, historical product testing, and medical records that link exposure to specific health conditions. Plaintiffs may pursue claims individually or as part of consolidated proceedings that allow many similar claims to move forward together. Understanding the legal process means recognizing how discovery, expert reports, and negotiations for settlements or trial work in these complex cases.

Key steps in a PFAS case include obtaining water or biological testing, documenting health conditions, preserving evidence, and working with environmental scientists and medical professionals who can explain exposure pathways. Statutes of limitation and notice requirements vary by state, so timely action is important to protect legal rights. In many PFAS matters, plaintiffs coordinate with others in their region to pool resources, streamline legal audits, and pursue collective remedies. A careful review of where contamination originated, who manufactured or disposed of PFAS-containing products, and the pattern of local exposure will determine the most effective legal approach for each affected resident in Madison.

Need More Information?

PFAS Key Terms and Glossary

PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)

PFAS refers to a large group of man-made chemicals used in many industrial and consumer products for their resistance to water, grease, and stains. These chemicals are persistent in the environment and can accumulate over time in soil, groundwater, and human tissue. Because PFAS do not break down easily, communities near manufacturing sites, airports, or military bases where firefighting foam was used may experience long-term contamination. Understanding the nature of PFAS helps residents and attorneys evaluate exposure, identify possible responsible parties, and plan for testing, remediation, and potential legal claims aimed at addressing health and environmental impacts.

PFOA

PFOA, or perfluorooctanoic acid, is one of the more widely studied PFAS chemicals historically used in the manufacture of nonstick coatings and other products. PFOA has been linked to several health concerns in epidemiological studies and is a common focus of testing in contaminated areas. Detection of PFOA in drinking water or blood samples can be an important piece of evidence in a mass tort claim alleging exposure-related harm. Identifying PFOA and measuring concentrations over time can help establish the scope of contamination and inform legal and medical responses for affected residents in Madison and surrounding counties.

PFOS

PFOS, or perfluorooctane sulfonate, is another widely used PFAS compound that has been found in the environment and human blood samples near industrial and firefighting activity. Like other PFAS chemicals, PFOS is persistent and may be associated with adverse health outcomes depending on exposure levels and duration. Detection of PFOS in local water systems, private wells, or biological samples often prompts further investigation, remediation efforts, and legal review to determine responsible parties. Understanding PFOS and its behavior in the environment is a key step when building a claim or seeking monitoring and treatment solutions for affected communities.

Mass Tort vs. Class Action

Mass tort litigation involves multiple plaintiffs with similar injuries caused by the same product, chemical, or event, with each plaintiff often maintaining an individual claim within a coordinated legal framework. A class action combines many claimants into a single representative suit when common questions of law and fact predominately affect the group. PFAS litigation can proceed as mass torts, class actions, or consolidated cases, depending on the facts, desired remedies, and how courts rule on procedural questions. Choosing the right format affects how recovery is allocated, how individual medical histories are considered, and how settlements are structured for Madison-area claimants.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Records and Test Early

Begin preserving relevant records immediately, including water testing results, medical records, property assessments, and documentation of any notices or communications about contamination. Early testing of private wells and home water supplies can provide baseline data that strengthens a future claim and helps establish exposure timelines. Acting promptly also protects legal rights, as statutes of limitation and other deadlines may apply to PFAS-related claims in West Virginia and elsewhere, so timely steps are essential to secure evidence and options for recovery.

Keep Detailed Health Documentation

Maintain thorough records of medical visits, diagnoses, lab tests, prescriptions, and any ongoing treatments that may relate to PFAS exposure. Detailed health documentation helps connect exposure to illness, supports claims for past and future medical expenses, and assists medical reviewers in assessing potential relationships between contaminants and conditions. Keeping chronological records and notes about symptoms, doctors’ recommendations, and out-of-pocket costs will streamline the claims process and strengthen the factual foundation of any mass tort action.

Coordinate with Neighbors and Local Groups

Talk with neighbors, community groups, and local officials to learn whether others are experiencing similar concerns, and to share information about testing and available resources. Coordinated community action can reduce individual cost burdens for testing and increase the visibility of local contamination concerns to regulators and potential defendants. Collective efforts also facilitate coordinated legal strategies that may be more efficient for handling complex scientific and legal issues in PFAS matters affecting multiple households in Madison and Boone County.

Comparing Legal Paths for PFAS Claims

When a Broad Legal Approach Is Appropriate:

Widespread Contamination Across the Community

A broad legal approach is often appropriate when contamination affects a wide geographic area or multiple water systems used by many families, because coordinated claims can address common patterns of harm and secure remedies that benefit the entire community. Comprehensive proceedings can consolidate discovery, reduce duplicative litigation costs, and make it more feasible to fund large-scale testing and medical monitoring programs. When many households in Madison are impacted, a unified legal strategy can be more effective at achieving meaningful environmental remediation and ensuring consistent compensation protocols across similarly affected claimants.

Multiple Responsible Parties or Complex Liability

When liability involves several manufacturers, industrial facilities, or service providers, a comprehensive legal strategy helps coordinate claims against multiple defendants and manage interrelated evidence. Complex product histories, corporate records, and supply chains often require consolidated discovery and expert analysis that benefit from a broad approach. Coordinated litigation also helps clarify legal theories and can lead to negotiated resolutions that address the scope of contamination, provide funds for remediation, and resolve claims across a larger affected population.

When a Narrow or Individual Approach May Work:

Isolated Exposure or Limited Scope

A more focused, individual claim may be sufficient when contamination appears limited to a single property, well, or household and the responsible party is clearly identifiable. In such cases, pursuing a targeted lawsuit or demand against a specific company can be more efficient and cost-effective than joining a larger consolidated action. Tailored claims allow for direct negotiation over measured damages such as property remediation, medical costs for one family, and replacement of water supplies without engaging in broad community litigation.

Distinct Medical Condition Tied to Exposure

If an individual has a distinct medical diagnosis closely connected to documented PFAS exposure, pursuing a single-plaintiff claim focused on that injury may achieve timely relief. A limited approach can prioritize personalized medical evidence, individualized damage calculations, and direct negotiation for compensation covering medical care and related losses. This pathway may be preferable for plaintiffs seeking quicker resolution over community-wide remedies, provided that the evidence clearly supports causation between exposure and illness.

Common Situations That Lead to PFAS Claims

Contaminated Private Wells

Private well contamination is a frequent reason homeowners seek legal help when PFAS compounds are detected in household water, creating long-term health and property concerns. Affected residents commonly need assistance with testing, treatment, replacement of wells or alternative water supplies, and pursuing compensation to cover those expenses as well as potential medical monitoring.

Industrial or Firefighting Runoff

Runoff from industrial facilities or locations where firefighting foams were used often introduces PFAS into nearby waterways and groundwater, leading to exposure for surrounding communities. In such circumstances, legal claims can focus on identifying sources, documenting contamination pathways, and holding responsible parties accountable for cleanup and damages.

Elevated Levels in Public Water Systems

Detecting PFAS above advisory limits in municipal or public water systems raises concerns for many households that rely on that supply for daily use. Coordinated claims by residents served by the same system can seek remedies for monitoring, filtration systems, and compensation for health screening where appropriate.

Madison, WV PFAS Attorney Services

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for PFAS Matters

Stephen New & Associates provides personal injury and mass tort representation to communities throughout West Virginia, including Madison and Boone County. The firm brings practical experience handling claims that involve environmental contamination, product liability, and complex personal injury litigation. We assist clients with coordinating testing, assembling medical and environmental evidence, and pursuing legal avenues that may include consolidated litigation. The team aims to keep clients informed while working to secure remedies that address both individual damages and community-wide needs arising from PFAS exposure.

When you contact Stephen New & Associates, you will speak with attorneys based in Beckley who understand West Virginia procedures, local regulatory processes, and the needs of affected families. We can explain possible next steps such as arranging water or blood testing, preserving evidence, and reviewing timelines for filing claims. The office can also advise on potential relief for medical monitoring, filtration, property remediation, and compensation for economic and non-economic losses tied to documented PFAS contamination in Madison.

Contact Us for a Free Initial Review

People Also Search For

PFAS lawyer Madison WV

PFAS contamination Boone County

PFAS mass torts West Virginia

Madison water contamination attorney

PFAS exposure legal help

PFAS medical monitoring claims

PFAS private well testing Madison

environmental contamination attorney WV

FAQS

What are PFAS and why are they a concern for Madison residents?

PFAS are a family of man-made chemicals used in many industrial and consumer products for their water- and stain-resistant properties. They are persistent in the environment and have been detected in groundwater, surface water, and soil near manufacturing sites, airports, and firefighting operations. For Madison residents, PFAS contamination is concerning because it can enter private wells and municipal supplies, leading to chronic exposure that may require medical follow-up and household remediation. Addressing PFAS begins with testing and documentation of contamination levels in water or biological samples and understanding potential exposure pathways. Legal claims often rely on establishing how contamination occurred, who is responsible, and the resulting harms. A prompt, organized response helps preserve evidence and supports potential remediation or compensation efforts for affected families and properties.

How do I know if my private well or tap water is contaminated with PFAS?

The most reliable way to determine PFAS contamination is through laboratory testing of water or biological samples. Private well owners can arrange for certified laboratories to test for common PFAS chemicals such as PFOA and PFOS, and municipal customers can request public water testing data from their utility. Local health departments or environmental agencies may also provide guidance on approved testing procedures and recommended sample chains of custody. If testing shows PFAS at concerning levels, document the results and any communications with authorities, and consider alternative water solutions such as bottled water or filtration until mitigation occurs. Legal counsel can help interpret test results, coordinate further environmental sampling, and advise on next steps for notifying agencies or pursuing claims against potential responsible parties.

What types of health problems have been linked to PFAS exposure?

Scientific studies have linked certain PFAS chemicals to a range of health issues depending on exposure levels and individual factors. Conditions that have been associated with PFAS exposure in some studies include increased cholesterol levels, certain immune system effects, thyroid problems, and some types of cancer, among other concerns. The relationship between PFAS and specific illnesses can be complex, and medical professionals usually evaluate exposure history alongside clinical findings. If you believe your health has been affected by PFAS exposure, document medical visits, tests, and recommendations from healthcare providers. Legal claims often require medical records that connect exposure to a diagnosed condition or ongoing monitoring needs. Attorneys can help coordinate with medical professionals to compile evidence that supports a claim for medical costs, monitoring, and related damages.

What legal options are available if my water supply is contaminated?

Legal options for contaminated water supplies include individual lawsuits against identified responsible parties, participation in consolidated litigation or multidistrict actions, and negotiated settlements that fund remediation and monitoring. The right approach depends on the scope of contamination, the number of affected parties, and whether a clear source or responsible company can be identified. Coordinated actions can address communitywide remedies while individual claims can focus on specific damages like well replacement or medical expenses. Engaging counsel early helps preserve evidence, understand statute of limitations requirements, and explore regulatory avenues such as filing notices with state environmental agencies. Lawyers can also advise on interim measures like obtaining alternative water sources, seeking immediate remediation, and pursuing claims aimed at securing both compensation and corrective actions by responsible parties.

How long do I have to file a PFAS-related claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitation and other deadlines vary by claim type and by state, so it is important to seek legal advice promptly to preserve rights. Timelines can depend on whether a claim is framed as personal injury, property damage, or another legal theory, and they may be affected by when contamination was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. In some situations, regulatory actions or continuing contamination can influence filing windows. Contacting an attorney early ensures deadlines are identified and evidence is preserved while tests and medical evaluations are scheduled. Counsel can advise on gathering documentation, preparing notices if required by state law, and evaluating whether a coordinated or individual filing is most appropriate given the timing and facts in Madison.

Will I have to go to trial to get compensation for PFAS exposure?

Many PFAS matters resolve through negotiated settlements, especially when there are clear pathways to remediation and measurable damages. Settlements can secure funding for testing, filtration systems, medical monitoring, and compensation for economic losses without the time and expense of a trial. However, not all cases settle, and litigation may be necessary to achieve full accountability or an adequate remedy when defendants dispute liability or damages. A firm representing you will evaluate the strength of the case, seek to negotiate favorable resolutions when possible, and prepare for trial if negotiations fail. Preparing for trial can also strengthen settlement leverage, because defendants often consider the cost and uncertainty of litigation when deciding whether to resolve claims.

Can multiple homeowners join together in a PFAS lawsuit?

Yes. Multiple homeowners and residents frequently join coordinated legal actions when they share common exposure to PFAS from the same water source, industrial facility, or discharge. Coordinated litigation can make it more efficient to share the costs of scientific testing, expert witnesses, and discovery, and it can produce remedies that address communitywide harms such as remediation projects or public health programs. Collective action can also amplify community concerns and streamline communications with regulators and defendants. Participation in coordinated cases does not always eliminate the ability to pursue individualized recovery for particular medical conditions or property losses, so it is important to understand how a group action will handle allocation of any settlement or judgment. Attorneys can explain the structure of a coordinated claim and how individual circumstances will be considered in settlement distribution or trial strategy.

What evidence is important for a successful PFAS claim?

Important evidence for a PFAS claim typically includes environmental testing results for water, soil, or air; medical records documenting related health conditions; property assessments showing diminished value or required remediation; and historical records linking contamination to specific facilities or products. Chain-of-custody documentation for samples, engineering or scientific reports, and communications between agencies and responsible companies can also be highly relevant. Demonstrating exposure pathways and timelines strengthens the connection between contamination and harm. Collecting and preserving records early is essential. Photographs, test reports, receipts for water treatment or alternative supplies, and detailed notes about when symptoms began or when contamination was first noticed all contribute to a comprehensive claim. Legal counsel can assist in obtaining additional records through discovery and working with qualified labs and scientific consultants to analyze evidence.

How can Stephen New & Associates help with testing and medical monitoring?

Stephen New & Associates can help coordinate testing by recommending qualified laboratories and advising on sampling procedures to ensure results are legally reliable. The firm can also help secure funding avenues for testing when communitywide sampling is needed and work with environmental professionals to interpret findings. In matters involving multiple affected households, the firm can help organize collective testing strategies that provide a clearer picture of the contamination footprint and support litigation or settlement efforts. For medical monitoring, the firm can explain options for securing screening and ongoing surveillance to detect health effects early, and pursue remedies that cover those expenses when appropriate. Attorneys can work with health care providers to document conditions potentially related to PFAS exposure and present that documentation as part of claims seeking compensation or monitoring programs for impacted residents.

What types of compensation might be available in a PFAS claim?

Possible compensation in PFAS claims can include reimbursement for medical bills, costs of ongoing medical monitoring, expenses for water treatment or replacement, property remediation costs, and compensation for diminished property values. In certain cases, damages may also cover pain and suffering or other non-economic losses depending on the nature of the injury and applicable law. If multiple defendants are responsible, settlements or judgments can be structured to fund community remediation efforts as well as individual recoveries. The actual remedies available will depend on the evidence, legal claims pursued, and negotiated or adjudicated outcomes. Attorneys will analyze your specific losses, document expenses and impacts, and pursue recovery that addresses both personal and community harms while advising on practical steps to address immediate needs like safe drinking water and medical care.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services