Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Roundup Lawyer in Mullens

Mullens Roundup Claims

Comprehensive Guide to Roundup Mass Torts

This page offers a clear, practical introduction to Roundup-related mass tort claims for residents of Mullens and surrounding communities in Wyoming County, West Virginia. If you or a loved one used glyphosate-based weed killers and later developed a serious illness, this guide explains how mass tort litigation works, what types of damages are commonly sought, and what to expect from the process. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley handles injury and mass tort matters and is available to discuss potential claims with Mullens residents by phone at 304-355-5565 or through an initial consultation request online.

The information below outlines typical exposure scenarios, common legal terms, evidence that can support a claim, and the steps people often take when pursuing a claim related to Roundup. It is intended to help you understand options and timelines so you can make informed decisions about next steps. While every situation is different, the firm aims to assist clients in Mullens by reviewing medical records, exposure history, and relevant documentation to determine whether a claim may be appropriate and how it might proceed under West Virginia law.

Benefits of Pursuing a Roundup Claim

Pursuing a Roundup mass tort claim can help individuals seek compensation for medical costs, lost income, pain and suffering, and other harms linked to prolonged exposure. Beyond financial recovery, bringing a claim can provide a record of harm, promote accountability for manufacturers, and increase public awareness about product safety. For many, the ability to address bills and secure resources for ongoing care is the most immediate and meaningful benefit. The process can also lead to negotiated settlements that resolve claims without prolonged trial, depending on the facts and strength of the evidence gathered.

About Stephen New & Associates — Serving Mullens and Surrounding Areas

Stephen New & Associates is a Beckley-based personal injury law firm that represents clients across southern West Virginia, including Mullens and Wyoming County. The firm handles a range of serious injury and mass tort matters such as product liability, medical malpractice, catastrophic injuries, and wrongful death claims. The team works to gather medical records, exposure histories, and other documentation needed to evaluate potential claims, and they communicate directly with clients to explain options and the likely course of action in each case. Interested residents can call 304-355-5565 to arrange a review.

How Roundup Mass Torts Work in West Virginia

Mass tort litigation brings together many individual claims that share common facts against one or more defendants, allowing courts and parties to handle scientifically and legally complex issues more efficiently than separate lawsuits. In Roundup cases, common questions involve exposure to glyphosate, medical diagnoses such as certain cancers, and whether product warnings or design contributed to harm. While each claimant presents individual injuries and damages, coordinated procedures often include shared discovery, consolidated hearings on scientific or legal questions, and individual resolutions based on personal medical and financial circumstances.

A successful claim generally requires documentation showing exposure, the nature and timing of injuries, and medical records linking the condition to that exposure. Physicians’ notes, test results, employment and pesticide purchase records, and witness statements can all be relevant. Timelines vary by jurisdiction; West Virginia has statutes of limitation that may affect when a claim must be filed, so gathering records and beginning an evaluation early can preserve legal options. The firm can help identify important documents and explain how evidence is typically used in mass tort matters.

Need More Information?

Key Terms You Should Know

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the active chemical ingredient in many common herbicides, including products sold under the name Roundup. It is used to control weeds in agricultural and residential settings and is often applied by homeowners, landscapers, and farm workers. Scientific and regulatory discussions about glyphosate focus on potential health effects after repeated or high-level exposure, and such discussions can be important when evaluating whether a product may have contributed to an illness. Records of product purchases, labels, and application practices can help establish the nature and extent of exposure in a claim.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma refers to a diverse group of blood cancers that originate in the lymphatic system and vary considerably in presentation, severity, and treatment. Some studies and litigation have focused on potential links between long-term exposure to certain herbicides and an increased risk of developing this type of cancer, which makes accurate medical records and a clear treatment history an important part of evaluating potential claims. A medical provider can explain diagnosis, staging, and treatment options, and such information is central when assessing damages and the timeline of injury in legal proceedings.

Mass Tort

A mass tort describes a legal process where a large number of individual plaintiffs bring similar claims against one or more defendants, typically because of a widely used product or a common exposure. Unlike a single class action, mass torts allow each person to maintain an individualized claim while sharing common discovery and legal proceedings, which helps manage complex scientific evidence and consistent legal issues. Each plaintiff’s damages are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, which means settlements or awards reflect individual medical conditions, financial losses, and personal circumstances.

Compensatory Damages

Compensatory damages are monetary awards intended to reimburse a person for losses caused by another party’s product or conduct. In Roundup-related claims, compensatory damages may cover past and future medical expenses, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and other measurable harms. The amount depends on the severity of injury, ongoing care needs, documented medical costs, and how the condition affects daily life. Establishing compensatory damages relies on thorough documentation such as bills, wage records, and medical prognoses that support the monetary value of the losses claimed.

PRO TIPS

Document Your Exposure Carefully

Keep a detailed record of any product names, purchase receipts, application dates, locations where glyphosate products were used, and any protective equipment worn at the time of use. Photographs of product labels and storage can help show the exact formulation involved, and notes about how often and over what period the product was applied help establish the extent of exposure. These records combine with medical documentation to form a clearer picture for evaluating a potential claim and supporting conversations with medical providers and legal advisors.

Preserve Medical Records and Treatment Details

Request copies of all medical records, test results, pathology reports, and oncology treatment summaries related to your diagnosis and care, and maintain a timeline of symptoms and medical visits. Detailed treatment notes, medication histories, and statements from treating physicians about diagnosis and prognosis are often among the most important pieces of evidence in evaluating a claim. Keeping a personal journal about symptoms, treatment side effects, and how the condition has affected daily life can also be useful when documenting non-economic losses like pain and reduced quality of life.

Avoid Quick Settlement Decisions

Insurance carriers or manufacturers may offer early resolutions that seem straightforward but do not fully account for long-term medical needs or future lost income, so it is important to carefully consider any offer before accepting. Give priority to understanding the full extent of current and anticipated expenses, and seek a careful review of records and possible future costs before agreeing to terms. A careful evaluation of options and potential outcomes helps ensure any resolution better reflects the true scope of damages and personal needs over time.

Comparing Legal Paths for Roundup Claims

When a Broader Approach Is Beneficial:

Complex Medical and Scientific Issues

Cases that involve detailed medical causation questions, complicated exposure histories, or contested scientific evidence often benefit from a comprehensive legal approach that coordinates discovery, expert testimony, and case strategy. Such coordination helps gather the technical studies, medical opinions, and historical records needed to make a persuasive case about causation and damages. A broader approach can also handle interlocutory matters, motions, and coordinated hearings that are common in consolidated mass tort proceedings and that might otherwise overwhelm an individual claimant managing matters alone.

Multiple Claimants and Coordinated Proceedings

When many people bring similar claims, courts often use coordinated procedures to address shared issues such as admissibility of scientific evidence or common liability questions, and coordination makes it easier to pursue consistent strategies across cases. Comprehensive representation helps ensure your individual claim stays aligned with broader case developments while preserving the unique facts that determine your personal damages. Coordination also helps manage communication with large-scale defendants and can streamline resolution discussions that affect many claimants at once.

When a Narrower Strategy May Be Appropriate:

Clear Liability and Limited Damages

A more focused approach can be suitable when liability is straightforward, the extent of injury is limited, and the primary need is reimbursement for a defined set of medical bills and modest economic losses. In these situations, streamlined negotiation or a narrowly tailored claim can resolve the matter without the full scope of mass tort coordination. However, even limited claims benefit from careful documentation and review to ensure the proposed resolution fairly compensates for both present and foreseeable needs related to the injury.

Faster Resolution for Simple Cases

When a claimant has clear records, a shorter treatment history, and limited ongoing care needs, pursuing a timely, focused resolution can produce a quicker outcome and reduce litigation costs and delay. This may involve negotiating directly with a defendant’s representatives or seeking a prompt settlement that addresses current bills and minor ongoing expenses. It remains important to review the full implications of any settlement so that long-term needs and potential future costs are not overlooked in the interest of speed.

Common Exposure Scenarios in Roundup Claims

Long-Term Agricultural Use

Individuals who applied glyphosate products regularly in farming or large-scale landscaping over many years may have cumulative exposure that is relevant to evaluating potential health risks and related claims, and records of employment, application frequency, and protective practices help clarify that history. Documenting the timeline of use, the types of products applied, and any workplace safety measures followed can provide essential information when medical diagnoses arise and legal options are considered.

Residential Lawn and Garden Exposure

Homeowners and family members who used or were present when glyphosate products were applied to lawn or garden areas may have exposure that contributes to later health concerns, and keeping receipts, containers, and notes about application dates can assist in creating an exposure record. Even occasional or seasonal use can be a meaningful part of an individual’s exposure history when combined with medical documentation of a related illness.

Occupational Exposure in Landscaping and Groundskeeping

Groundskeepers, landscapers, and other workers who handled or applied herbicides professionally may have higher levels of exposure, and employment records, equipment logs, and coworker statements can be important to establishing the scope of use. Collecting payroll records, incident reports, and any workplace training materials about pesticide handling can help present an accurate picture of occupational exposure during claim evaluation.

Roundup Legal Help Serving Mullens, WV

Why Mullens Residents Choose Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates represents people in Mullens and across southern West Virginia who face serious injuries related to products like Roundup. The firm focuses on helping clients gather medical and exposure records, understand potential legal options, and identify the kinds of documentation that support strong claims. By maintaining open communication and providing regular updates, the firm helps clients make informed choices about pursuing resolution through negotiation or litigation while considering the personal and financial impacts of the injury.

The firm typically evaluates Roundup-related matters on a contingency basis, which allows clients to pursue claims without upfront legal fees and to focus on recovery while the legal team manages case development, discovery, and negotiations. That approach makes legal assistance accessible to those who might otherwise postpone seeking help because of cost concerns. Clients can call 304-355-5565 to schedule a confidential consultation to review records and discuss next steps specific to their situation in Mullens and nearby communities.

Start Your Case Review — Contact Our Mullens Team

People Also Search For

Roundup lawsuit Mullens WV

glyphosate exposure Wyoming County

Roundup mass tort West Virginia

Mullens Roundup attorney

non-Hodgkin lymphoma Roundup claim

product liability Beckley firm

how to file Roundup claim

Roundup compensation Mullens

FAQS

Who can bring a Roundup-related claim in Mullens?

Individuals who believe they have been harmed by exposure to Roundup or other glyphosate-based products and who have developed a related medical condition may have grounds to pursue a claim, provided the diagnosis and exposure history align. Claims often arise from people who applied the product regularly in occupational settings, homeowners with repeated use, or those with documented exposure at work or on the property. Each claim is evaluated based on medical records, exposure documentation, and applicable law to determine whether filing is appropriate. Family members who are responsible for making decisions on behalf of an incapacitated person or who bring claims for wrongful death may also pursue legal action when a qualifying injury or death is connected to exposure. The firm can review records, talk through timelines, and explain whether the facts support an individual lawsuit or coordinated mass tort participation. Early documentation of exposure and medical care helps preserve options and clarify eligibility under West Virginia rules.

What types of illnesses are associated with glyphosate exposure?

Medical research and litigation have focused on certain cancers and other serious conditions that have been discussed in connection with prolonged or high-level glyphosate exposure, including forms of lymphoma and other blood disorders, depending on the circumstances of use and exposure. A definitive diagnosis from a treating physician, along with pathology and treatment records, is central to evaluating any potential link between exposure and illness for legal purposes. Accurate diagnosis and treatment history provide the foundation for assessing damages and the appropriate legal approach. Not every diagnosis will lead to a successful claim, and individual medical histories vary widely, so personal records and a clear timeline of symptoms, treatments, and exposure are needed to assess whether a legal claim is viable. Consulting with medical providers about causal relationships and obtaining complete medical documentation helps inform both medical decisions and the legal evaluation of a potential case in Mullens and Wyoming County.

How long will it take to resolve a Roundup claim?

The timeline for resolving a Roundup claim varies greatly depending on the complexity of medical issues, the amount and quality of evidence, whether cases are consolidated for coordinated proceedings, and whether a negotiated settlement is possible. Some matters resolve within months if liability is clear and damages are limited, while others that involve detailed scientific disputes or multiple claimants can take longer, sometimes several years. Coordination with other claimants and the court’s schedule also influence how quickly a case moves to resolution. Because timelines are unpredictable, early case evaluation and careful record collection are important to preserve legal options and allow meaningful participation in any coordinated process. The firm can help identify key documents, explain likely milestones in a mass tort or individual claim, and advise about strategies to move a matter forward while protecting the client’s rights and interests during negotiations or litigation.

What evidence is needed to support a Roundup claim?

Useful evidence for a Roundup-related claim typically includes medical records showing diagnosis and treatment, pathology or imaging reports, and physician notes linking the condition to the relevant time period. Exposure evidence such as receipts for product purchases, photographs of product containers and labels, employment records documenting use, and witness statements about application practices can also be important in establishing the nature and extent of exposure. Together, medical and exposure documentation form the evidentiary foundation for alleging causation and damages. Additional records that can strengthen a claim include records of protective measures used during application, historical safety materials or training documents from employers, and any prior complaints or reports concerning the product. Gathering this documentation as soon as possible helps ensure it remains available and accurate, and the firm can assist in identifying sources and requesting records from medical providers or employers to support a claim in Mullens and surrounding areas.

Are there fees to start an evaluation of my Roundup case?

Initial evaluations of potential Roundup claims are frequently offered without charge by many law firms, including those that handle personal injury and mass tort matters, and are conducted to review medical records and exposure history to determine whether a claim is plausible. During this consultation, a firm will typically explain likely next steps, what documentation would be helpful, and whether the case may proceed on a contingency arrangement that avoids upfront legal fees. Confirming the cost structure before proceeding gives clients clarity about financial obligations and how fees are handled if a recovery is obtained. If the firm agrees to move forward, many personal injury practices use contingency fee arrangements where legal fees are paid from any recovery achieved, which helps make representation accessible to people who might otherwise be unable to pursue a claim. Clients should discuss fee agreements, potential costs for experts or depositions, and what is covered by the contingency arrangement so they fully understand how expenses and fees will be managed throughout the case.

Can family members bring a wrongful death claim related to Roundup exposure?

When a person’s death is linked to a condition allegedly caused by exposure to a product like Roundup, certain family members may be eligible to bring a wrongful death claim under state law to pursue compensation for losses such as funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and loss of companionship. Eligibility and recoverable damages depend on West Virginia statutes and the specific circumstances of the incident, so reviewing the decedent’s medical and exposure history is essential to determine whether a claim should be filed and who may bring it on behalf of surviving relatives. Gathering complete records, including the decedent’s medical files, employment history, and any documentation of product exposure, helps establish the facts needed for a wrongful death matter. The firm can guide families through the process of filing claims, explain the types of damages commonly sought, and assist with coordinating paperwork and deadlines so that family members can focus on personal and practical matters during a difficult time.

What is the difference between a mass tort and a class action?

A mass tort involves many individual plaintiffs who bring separate lawsuits that share common factual or legal issues and are often managed together for discovery, pretrial proceedings, or settlement discussions, while allowing each person’s damages to be assessed individually. A class action consolidates many plaintiffs into a single lawsuit where a representative class speaks for all members and recovery, if any, is distributed according to a court-approved plan; class actions do not always allow individualized damage awards in the same way mass torts do. The choice between these paths depends on the nature of the claims and the relief sought by plaintiffs. For Roundup matters, claimants often pursue coordinated individual claims within a mass tort framework so that shared scientific and legal issues can be addressed efficiently while preserving each person’s right to individualized compensation discussions. Legal counsel can explain how each approach would apply to a particular situation and advise on the procedural and practical implications for Mullens residents considering a claim.

How does West Virginia’s statute of limitations affect my claim?

West Virginia’s statutes of limitation set time limits for filing personal injury and wrongful death claims, and these deadlines vary depending on the type of claim and the date the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. Because diagnoses related to product exposure can occur long after initial exposure, the timing of when symptoms first appeared and when a medical diagnosis was made both influence the applicable deadline. Evaluating records promptly helps determine whether a claim is timely and what filing deadlines may apply to preserve legal rights. If a potential claim appears time sensitive, taking early steps such as collecting medical records, documenting exposure, and seeking a legal evaluation can prevent loss of recovery opportunities. The firm can review the specific timeline of exposure and diagnosis, explain applicable limitations periods under West Virginia law, and advise on necessary actions to protect the ability to file a claim before deadlines expire.

Will I have to go to trial for a Roundup claim?

Many Roundup claims resolve through settlement negotiations rather than trial, particularly when liability questions can be negotiated and the parties agree on compensation for medical bills and other damages. Settlement avoids the uncertainty and time associated with trial and can provide a timely resolution for claimants who desire compensation without a courtroom appearance. Nevertheless, not all cases settle, and some matters proceed to trial when parties cannot agree on liability or appropriate damages, especially in more complex or contested claims. Decisions about whether to take a case to trial are driven by the strength of the evidence, the degree of dispute over causation or damages, and the client’s goals and tolerance for litigation risk. A thoughtful evaluation of likely outcomes, potential recovery, and the time involved helps clients choose the path that best fits their circumstances, and legal counsel can explain the trade-offs associated with settlement and trial in your specific case.

How do I begin the process of pursuing a Roundup claim in Mullens?

To begin pursuing a Roundup claim in Mullens, start by gathering any medical records related to your diagnosis, documentation of product purchases or use, and notes about exposure dates and circumstances. Contacting a firm experienced in personal injury and mass tort matters to request an initial review is an important next step, as a legal evaluation can identify additional records to collect and explain likely options under West Virginia law. Early review can also clarify whether deadlines may apply and what immediate actions could preserve your rights. Following an initial review, the firm will typically request authorization to obtain medical and employment records, help assemble exposure documentation, and explain the process for pursuing a claim, whether through coordinated proceedings or individual litigation. Throughout the process, clear communication and timely collection of records support an efficient evaluation and help ensure your case is positioned to proceed when appropriate according to your goals and needs.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services