Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Roundup Lawyer in Washington

Roundup Injury Claims

Complete Guide to Roundup Mass Torts

If you or a loved one used Roundup or were exposed to glyphosate and later developed a serious illness, you may be facing mounting medical bills, lost income, and difficult questions about liability. Stephen New & Associates, based in Beckley, West Virginia, provides clear legal guidance for residents of Washington, Wood County, and the surrounding areas who are exploring mass tort options related to agricultural herbicide exposure. Our team will explain how a Roundup claim works, what evidence is typically involved, and what steps you can take now to protect your rights. Call 304-355-5565 for a consultation to discuss potential claims and next steps.

This guide explains the basics of Roundup litigation in plain language so you can make informed decisions about pursuing a claim. We outline common injuries associated with glyphosate exposure, the differences between mass torts and class actions, and the types of compensation people often seek after being harmed. You will also find practical tips on preserving documents, identifying medical records, and understanding timelines for filing. While every case is different, having a clear overview helps you determine whether further investigation or legal action is appropriate for your situation in Wood County and elsewhere in West Virginia.

Why Pursue a Roundup Claim and What You Can Gain

Pursuing a Roundup mass tort claim can help people hold manufacturers accountable for harms associated with glyphosate and seek financial recovery for medical care, ongoing treatment, lost wages, and other damages. Bringing a claim can also encourage transparency about product risks and support broader consumer safety efforts. For individuals, potential benefits include compensation to cover past and future healthcare costs, help with rehabilitation or long-term care needs, and a legal record that documents the harm experienced. Understanding the possible outcomes and the process for proving exposure and causation is an important first step for anyone considering a claim in West Virginia or nearby jurisdictions.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Approach to Roundup Claims

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm serving clients throughout West Virginia from our Beckley office. We routinely handle cases involving serious injuries such as traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damage, wrongful death, medical malpractice, and mass torts including Roundup litigation. Our approach emphasizes careful fact gathering, collaboration with medical professionals, and clear communication with clients about options and likely timelines. We focus on building strong legal records and advocating for fair outcomes while keeping clients informed at each step. If you have questions about filing a Roundup claim in Wood County or elsewhere in West Virginia, our team can explain the process and next steps.

Understanding Roundup Mass Tort Litigation

Roundup lawsuits typically center on allegations that exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in many herbicides, is associated with certain types of cancer and other serious health problems. Mass tort litigation allows individuals with similar claims against a manufacturer to pursue compensation while preserving the ability to pursue individual recovery based on specific injuries. Key elements include documenting exposure, establishing a medical diagnosis related to that exposure, and demonstrating a plausible connection between the product and the injury. The legal process often involves medical records review, expert analysis, and negotiations or court proceedings to resolve claims.

Filing a Roundup-related claim typically begins with an intake and investigation into product use, purchase records, employment history, and medical treatment timelines. Evidence gathering may include medical records, witness statements, product labels, and employment or agricultural logs demonstrating exposure. Statutes of limitations and filing deadlines vary by state, so prompt action is important. While some matters resolve through negotiated settlements, others may proceed to court. Understanding your legal options and the likely path for your case helps you make informed decisions about whether to pursue a claim and how to preserve key documents and testimony.

Need More Information?

Key Terms You Should Know

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the active chemical ingredient found in many herbicides, including products marketed under the name Roundup and other brands. It is used to kill or control weeds and is widely applied in agricultural, commercial, and residential settings. Concerns about glyphosate focus on whether long-term or repeated exposure increases the risk of certain illnesses, especially some types of cancer. In litigation, documents and scientific studies relating to glyphosate’s health effects are often central to establishing whether exposure could be linked to a particular diagnosis or medical outcome for an individual claimant.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a legal process used when many individuals are harmed by the same product or conduct but each person’s injuries and circumstances remain unique. Unlike a class action, mass tort participants typically pursue individual damages while the cases may be coordinated for purposes of discovery and management. This structure allows injured parties to present their specific injuries and losses while benefitting from shared resources for investigating the defendant and common facts. Mass torts often involve complex scientific and medical issues and can lead to settlements or individual trials depending on how cases develop.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma refers to a group of cancers that originate in the lymphatic system and can vary widely in severity and prognosis. Medical research has examined potential links between certain environmental exposures, including some herbicides, and the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In the context of Roundup claims, a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma is one of the conditions frequently discussed in relation to glyphosate exposure. Establishing a plausible connection between exposure and diagnosis typically involves medical records, oncological evaluations, and review of the patient’s exposure history.

Statute of Limitations

A statute of limitations sets the time limit within which a civil legal claim must be filed in court after an injury or discovery of harm. The specific time period varies by state and by the type of claim, and missing a deadline can prevent a claim from moving forward. In product-related litigation like Roundup cases, determining when the clock starts can be complicated, especially if the illness was diagnosed long after exposure. It is important to consult with legal counsel early to understand relevant deadlines and to take steps to preserve evidence and protect the right to pursue compensation.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Medical and Exposure Records

Keep careful records of all medical appointments, diagnoses, imaging, pathology reports, and receipts related to treatment after suspected exposure. Also preserve any documents that show exposure, such as purchase records, employment logs, herbicide application schedules, and photographs of labels or application sites. When possible, create a timeline that links exposure events to the onset of symptoms and subsequent medical care so that your claim can be evaluated with clear documentation.

Avoid Speaking Publicly About the Case

Limit public statements about your health condition and the details of any potential claim, including social media posts that reference symptoms, treatments, or the lawsuit. Defendants may review publicly available information and use it during investigations, so maintaining privacy protects the integrity of your case. Rely on medical records and sworn testimony rather than casual or informal statements to document what happened and when.

Consult Early About Filing Deadlines

Because statutes of limitations vary and can be triggered by discovery of a diagnosis, it is important to consult about potential deadlines as soon as you suspect a connection between Roundup exposure and health problems. Early consultation helps ensure evidence is preserved and witnesses can be identified while memories and records remain fresh. Timely action also allows for thoughtful investigation and documentation that supports a claim for compensation when appropriate.

Comparing Legal Paths: Mass Tort vs. Limited Claims

When Full Representation Is Appropriate:

Complex Medical and Scientific Issues

Cases that require detailed medical analysis, long-term prognosis, or complex causation arguments often benefit from comprehensive legal representation that coordinates medical review and evidentiary development. When exposure histories are complicated or multiple potential causes must be evaluated, a coordinated approach helps assemble the necessary documentation and expert testimony. This level of preparation can strengthen negotiations or litigation strategy and ensure each claimant’s specific injuries and needs are addressed.

Multiple Claimants with Shared Issues

When many individuals have similar claims against the same manufacturer, coordinated representation can allow for efficient discovery and consistent handling of common legal matters. Combining resources for depositions, document review, and scientific analysis helps manage large caseloads while preserving each person’s right to pursue individual compensation. This coordinated model also facilitates negotiating global resolutions while keeping open the option of individual trials when necessary.

When a Narrow or Limited Legal Approach Makes Sense:

Clear, Isolated Exposure with Modest Damages

In some situations where exposure and injury are well documented and damages are more limited or straightforward, a focused claim may resolve efficiently without broad coordination. When medical records clearly show a link and recovery needs are limited to quantifiable costs, a narrower approach can reduce time and expense. That approach still requires careful documentation and a clear claim, but it may not need the same level of multi-claim coordination used in larger mass torts.

Desire for a Faster, Individual Resolution

Some claimants prefer to pursue an individual resolution quickly rather than participate in extended coordinated proceedings, especially if their goals are limited to recovering specific medical costs or compensating for a short period of lost income. An individual claim can sometimes be settled directly once liability and damages are clear, but it still requires careful negotiation and documentation. Deciding on this path depends on the scope of injuries, available evidence, and the claimant’s priorities for a timely outcome.

Common Situations That Lead to Roundup Claims

Occupational Exposure in Agriculture

Farm workers, landscapers, and others who routinely handled or applied glyphosate formulations may experience higher cumulative exposure over time, which can be relevant to a legal claim. Documenting job duties, safety practices, and duration of exposure helps establish the history necessary to evaluate a potential case.

Residential or Home Garden Use

Individuals who used Roundup products in home gardening, lawn care, or around their property may have records of purchases or household use that help document exposure. These residential use histories can support claims when symptoms or diagnoses follow repeated or prolonged application without proper protective measures.

Drift or Bystander Exposure

People who did not apply the product but were exposed due to spray drift, nearby agricultural applications, or contaminated environments may still have valid claims if exposure can be demonstrated. Medical timelines and witness statements can be useful in reconstructing these inadvertent exposure events for legal review.

Roundup Attorney Serving Washington, WV

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Your Roundup Claim

Stephen New & Associates represents clients across West Virginia with a focus on serious personal injury matters, including mass tort claims related to chemical exposure. Our office in Beckley provides local access to records, medical professionals, and court resources for residents of Wood County and neighboring communities. We aim to communicate clearly about the process, potential timelines, and what evidence is typically needed to evaluate a Roundup claim. If you have questions about whether your diagnosis could be linked to glyphosate exposure, our team can help identify relevant documents and explain likely next steps.

When assessing Roundup claims we review medical histories, exposure documentation, and available scientific information to build a case-specific picture of harm and need. We discuss options for pursuing compensation, the likely stages of a claim, and the practical steps needed to preserve evidence and protect rights under West Virginia law. Our goal is to help clients make informed decisions, support them through the process, and pursue fair recovery when appropriate, while keeping communication clear and responsive throughout the matter.

Contact Our Team to Discuss Your Roundup Claim

People Also Search For

Roundup lawsuit West Virginia

glyphosate cancer claims

Roundup mass tort lawyer

Roundup exposure compensation

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Roundup

herbicide injury attorney Beckley WV

how to file Roundup claim

Roundup settlement information

FAQS

What is Roundup and why are people filing lawsuits?

Roundup is a brand name for herbicide products whose active ingredient is glyphosate. Over the years, scientific studies and public attention have examined whether long-term or repeated exposure to glyphosate is associated with certain cancers and other health issues. The suits brought against manufacturers typically allege that the companies failed to warn users about potential risks, that product testing or labeling was insufficient, and that exposure led to specific injuries for individuals who used or came into contact with the product. People file lawsuits to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from illness linked to exposure. A legal claim also provides a formal process for collecting evidence, testing causal links, and holding manufacturers accountable through settlements or court judgments. Each case depends on individual circumstances, including exposure history, medical diagnosis, and available documentation, so personalized review is important.

What illnesses have been linked to Roundup exposure?

The illnesses most commonly discussed in Roundup litigation include certain types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and related lymphatic cancers, though research is ongoing and not every scientific source reaches the same conclusions. Medical professionals and researchers evaluate factors like exposure level, timing, and individual health history to determine whether a plausible connection exists between glyphosate exposure and a particular diagnosis. Claims typically focus on cancers where there is some published research or regulatory scrutiny suggesting an elevated risk associated with long-term or high-level exposure. It is important to have a medical provider document diagnoses, treatment plans, and timelines so that legal counsel can assess whether the illness is one commonly associated with glyphosate exposure. Other conditions may arise in some situations, and each claim requires a case-specific review of medical records, occupational history, and any research that may be relevant to causation. Legal evaluation helps determine which medical conditions align with established litigation patterns for Roundup-related claims.

How do I know if I have a valid Roundup claim?

Determining whether you have a valid Roundup claim requires reviewing medical records to confirm a diagnosis, documenting the history and extent of your exposure to glyphosate, and assessing whether there is a plausible link between exposure and injury. Useful information includes treatment records, diagnosis dates, purchase receipts or employment records showing product use, and any safety or incident reports. Counsel will evaluate whether your circumstances are similar to other litigants and whether available evidence supports pursuing compensation through a mass tort or an individual claim. Every claim is unique, and the absence of one type of document does not automatically disqualify a case. Early consultation helps identify what information is missing, how it might be obtained, and what records or witness statements could strengthen the claim. Legal review will also consider applicable deadlines and whether other factors, such as preexisting conditions or multiple potential causes, require further medical analysis.

What evidence is needed to support a Roundup lawsuit?

Key evidence in a Roundup lawsuit typically includes medical records documenting diagnosis and treatment, records demonstrating exposure such as purchase receipts, job or application logs, photographs of product labels, and witness statements regarding how and when the product was used. Scientific and regulatory studies, safety data sheets, and internal company documents revealed in discovery can also play a role in showing what the manufacturer knew or should have warned about. Clear timelines linking exposure to the onset of symptoms are especially useful in establishing a persuasive claim. Collecting evidence early improves the ability to support a claim as memories fade and records become harder to locate. Medical providers can supply diagnostic reports and treatment histories, while employers or coworkers may provide statements about workplace exposure. Legal counsel can advise on additional sources of documentation and coordinate the collection of records to build a coherent and complete case file for negotiation or litigation.

How long do I have to file a Roundup claim in West Virginia?

Statutes of limitations determine how long you have to file a claim and vary by state and by the type of cause of action. In personal injury and product liability matters, the clock may start at the time of diagnosis or when the injured person reasonably should have discovered a link between the exposure and the illness. Because discovery can occur years after exposure, understanding how the statute applies in your jurisdiction is essential to preserving the right to file a claim. Given these complexities, it is important to consult promptly to identify any deadlines that may apply and to take steps to protect your claim. Early legal review can also help preserve evidence and begin assembling the records and testimony needed for a strong filing. Waiting too long can result in the loss of the opportunity to pursue compensation, so timely action is recommended.

Will I have to go to trial for a Roundup case to be resolved?

Many Roundup matters resolve through settlement without going to a full jury trial, but some cases proceed to court depending on the facts, the strength of evidence, and the parties’ willingness to negotiate. Settlement can provide a negotiated recovery that avoids the time and expense of trial, while a trial can produce a binding determination and potential jury award. The path for any particular claim depends on the individual circumstances, available proof, and the litigation posture of the parties involved. If a case proceeds toward trial, preparation typically involves expert testimony, disclosure of documents, depositions, and pretrial motions. Legal counsel will explain the likelihood of various outcomes, the risks and benefits of settlement versus trial, and the strategies used in negotiations and courtroom proceedings. Clients should be aware that both settlement and trial are possible and prepare accordingly with thorough documentation and realistic goals.

What compensation might be available in a Roundup claim?

Potential compensation in a Roundup claim can include reimbursement for past and future medical expenses related to the illness, compensation for lost wages and diminished earning capacity, and damages for pain and suffering. In wrongful death situations, family members may seek recovery for funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and emotional loss. The exact types and amounts of compensation depend on the severity of injury, treatment needs, prognosis, and the ability to establish liability and causation specific to the claimant’s situation. Settlement figures vary widely based on medical costs, time off work, long-term care needs, and the strength of the causal link between exposure and injury. A careful evaluation of current and projected medical needs, along with expert input, is necessary to estimate potential recovery. Legal counsel can help quantify damages, obtain appropriate supporting documentation, and present a comprehensive demand for fair compensation.

How does a mass tort differ from a class action in Roundup cases?

A mass tort coordinates many similar individual lawsuits so they can share discovery, avoid duplicate litigation tasks, and manage complex scientific issues collectively while preserving each person’s right to pursue individual damages. A class action consolidates many claimants under a single representative claim where recovery is divided among class members according to rules set in the settlement or court order. Mass torts typically allow more individualized recovery determinations based on each claimant’s specific injuries and needs. Choosing between participation in coordinated mass tort proceedings and pursuing a separate individual claim depends on case particulars, goals, and potential for individualized damages. Legal counsel can explain how coordination works, what common elements will be pursued collectively, and how individual claims are evaluated within the larger litigation structure to achieve appropriate compensation for each person.

Do I need to pay upfront fees to start a Roundup claim?

Many personal injury firms handle Roundup claims on a contingency basis, meaning fees are collected as a percentage of any recovery rather than as upfront charges. This arrangement allows individuals to pursue claims without immediate out-of-pocket costs for legal representation, while providing an incentive for counsel to pursue meaningful results. Specific fee arrangements vary by firm and by case, and you should discuss the fee structure, any potential case-related expenses, and how costs are handled early in the intake process. It is also important to understand how litigation expenses such as court filing fees, expert fees, and costs of obtaining medical records are treated. Some firms advance these costs and are reimbursed from any recovery, while others have different practices. Ask during your initial consultation for a clear explanation of fee percentages, expense handling, and any other financial considerations so you can make an informed decision about moving forward.

How can I start a Roundup claim with Stephen New & Associates?

To start a Roundup claim with Stephen New & Associates, contact our Beckley office by phone at 304-355-5565 or through our website to arrange a confidential consultation. During intake we will gather basic information about your diagnosis, treatment history, and possible exposure events, and we will explain potential next steps for investigation, documentation, and any applicable deadlines. Providing medical records and any exposure-related documents early helps us evaluate the viability of a claim efficiently and accurately. After the initial review, we will outline an approach tailored to your circumstances, including what evidence to collect and how we will proceed with investigation and potential filing. We will also explain our fee arrangement and keep communication clear about expected timelines and likely stages of the matter. Taking that first step allows us to preserve key information and advise you on the best path forward based on your particular situation.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services