Settlement Alerts:
  • $9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
  • $6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
  • $81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
  • $18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
  • $13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
  • $225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
  • $2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
  • $70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
  • $100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
  • $650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
  • $150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
  • $285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
  • $50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
  • $40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
  • $42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
  • $30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
  • $50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
  • $100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
  • $100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
  • $45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
  • $200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
  • $1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
  • $200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
  • $26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
  • $800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
  • $925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
  • $25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
  • $125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
  • $20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
  • $1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
  • $210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
  • $100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
  • $975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
  • $4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25
View All
What Is My Case Worth?

CALL US NOW

304-355-5565
What Is My Case Worth?
5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Storage Tank Cleaning Lawyer in Harrisville

Protecting Your Rights Locally

task_01k8xe9w49ejj9vdxqyjfs2gz7_1761924784_img_2.webp

Comprehensive Guide to TENORM Storage Tank Cleaning

This guide explains what TENORM storage tank cleaning involves and what homeowners, landowners, and businesses in Harrisville should know when contamination is present. TENORM materials can result from industrial processes and may collect in storage tanks, posing regulatory, environmental, and personal injury concerns. The information here outlines typical hazards, immediate steps to preserve evidence, and the types of legal claims that can arise from improper handling or cleanup. If your property or equipment may be affected by TENORM, understanding your obligations and potential remedies will help you make informed choices about cleanup, notification, and any claim for costs or damages.

This page also describes the kinds of documentation and investigation that support a claim when a storage tank has been contaminated with TENORM by a third party or facility operations. You will learn how cleanup is coordinated with state regulators, the role of technical consultants in measuring contamination, and how timelines for remediation and claims typically unfold in West Virginia. Knowing what to preserve, whom to notify, and when to seek legal advice can influence outcomes for cleanups, cost recovery, and health monitoring. If you suspect TENORM contamination, immediate assessment and careful record keeping are essential to protect options.

Why Legal Guidance Matters for TENORM Tank Cleaning

Legal guidance helps property owners and operators navigate regulatory requirements and recover costs associated with TENORM storage tank cleaning, including investigation, disposal, and any necessary medical monitoring. Counsel can assist in identifying responsible parties, pursuing claims against insurers or operators, and coordinating with state environmental agencies to ensure remediation meets safety and legal standards. A careful legal approach promotes thorough documentation of contamination, preservation of evidence, and timely action to reduce ongoing exposure or property damage. Effective representation also helps clients evaluate settlement versus litigation based on damages, cleanup expenses, and long-term monitoring needs.

Talk to a Lawyer

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Approach

Stephen New & Associates, based in Beckley, serves clients throughout West Virginia, including Harrisville and Ritchie County, on matters ranging from personal injury to environmental contamination such as TENORM. The firm focuses on client-centered advocacy, working to obtain fair compensation for cleanup costs, property impacts, and related losses. We coordinate investigations, engage technical consultants, and pursue claims against responsible parties and insurers when appropriate. Our team also handles related matters like workplace accidents, wrongful death, and complex civil litigation, offering clear communication and practical guidance to help clients make informed decisions at each step of a claim.
Schedule a Consultation
bulb.webp

Understanding TENORM Storage Tank Cleaning Claims

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material and often appears where naturally occurring radionuclides are concentrated by industrial processes. In storage tanks, scale or residue can accumulate, creating contamination that requires specialized assessment, removal, and disposal. Understanding how contamination occurred, who operated or maintained the tank, and whether proper precautions and reporting were followed is central to any claim. Investigations typically include sampling, chain of custody documentation, and mapping of affected areas to determine the extent of contamination and the potential impact on people, property, and the environment.
The legal process begins with a thorough factual investigation that may involve regulatory filings, technical sampling, and communications with insurers and responsible parties. Technical consultants perform measurements and generate reports that document contamination levels and recommend remediation. Counsel then evaluates potential legal theories such as negligence, statutory violations, or nuisance, and pursues claims to recover cleanup costs, property damage, and related losses where appropriate. Throughout this process, preserving records, photographs, and testing results is important to support any claim and to demonstrate the nature and scope of contamination over time.

Need More Information?

Find Out If You Have a Case

Key Terms and Definitions for TENORM Cases

TENORM

TENORM refers to materials that contain naturally occurring radioactive elements which have become concentrated through industrial or commercial activities. These substances are not created in a laboratory but occur when natural radionuclides like uranium, thorium, or their decay products are gathered or intensified during processes such as mining, oil and gas production, or wastewater treatment, and then settle in equipment or storage tanks. Because concentrations can exceed typical background levels, regulatory requirements for handling, cleanup, transport, and disposal may apply. Understanding whether material is TENORM affects cleanup methods, regulatory oversight, and potential liability for contamination.

Decontamination and Disposal

Decontamination for TENORM storage tanks involves procedures to remove or neutralize radioactive residues so the tank and surrounding area meet applicable safety criteria. This can include mechanical cleaning, chemical treatments, wet or dry removal methods, and controlled waste handling to prevent spread of contamination. Disposal requires adherence to federal and state regulations governing radioactive or hazardous waste, appropriate packaging, and transport to authorized facilities. Proper documentation of the methods used and final contamination levels is important for regulatory closure, for demonstrating remediation success, and for addressing any claims related to residual contamination or improper handling.

Remediation

Remediation describes the overall process of correcting or mitigating contamination to protect human health and the environment. For TENORM in storage tanks, remediation may include assessment, containment, removal of contaminated materials, decontamination of equipment, and ongoing monitoring. The goal is to reduce contaminant levels to acceptable limits established by regulators and to prevent further exposure or migration. Remediation plans typically involve technical evaluations, cost estimates, and approved methods for waste handling and disposal. Complete records of remediation activities support claims for reimbursement and help demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements.

Liability

Liability in TENORM storage tank matters refers to legal responsibility for contamination, cleanup costs, and any resulting damages. Potentially liable parties can include tank owners, operators, contractors who performed maintenance or cleaning, and companies that managed waste or disposal. Liability is determined by examining operational practices, contractual obligations, regulatory compliance, and negligence or wrongful conduct. Legal claims may seek recovery for remediation expenses, property value loss, business interruption, and health monitoring costs. Establishing liability requires documentation of conduct, causation, and the extent of contamination and resulting harm.

PRO TIPS

Document Conditions Immediately

When you suspect TENORM contamination in a storage tank, take photographs, preserve sampling results, and note dates of discovery as soon as it is safe to do so, because timely documentation supports both regulatory reporting and cost recovery claims. Keep records of communications with regulators, service providers, and insurers, and maintain a secure copy of all technical reports and invoices related to inspection and cleanup. Immediate, careful documentation helps establish the sequence of events and the scope of contamination, which can be decisive when negotiating remediation responsibility or resolving disputes over who must pay cleanup costs.

Engage Technical Consultation Early

Arrange for qualified technical consultation early to determine the extent of contamination and appropriate removal or disposal methods, since early assessment can limit spread and reduce long-term costs associated with TENORM residues in tanks. Technical consultants provide sampling plans, chain of custody procedures, and remediation recommendations that form the basis for regulatory submissions and cost estimates for cleanup and disposal. Early engagement also helps prioritize actions to protect workers and the public and to create defensible records for any later claims against responsible parties or insurers for remediation expenses and related losses.

Coordinate With Regulators

Coordinate proactively with state environmental and health regulators to ensure remediation plans meet applicable standards and to obtain any necessary approvals for disposal and monitoring, because compliance reduces the risk of penalties and helps confirm completion of required actions. Clear communication with regulators about sampling results and proposed cleanup measures creates a documented record and can expedite closure or required follow-up monitoring. Coordinated action protects community safety, helps determine cost responsibilities, and produces the regulatory documentation often needed to support reimbursement claims or indemnity obligations from responsible parties.

Comparing Legal Paths for TENORM Tank Contamination

When a Full Legal Response Is Advisable:

Widespread or Persistent Contamination

Comprehensive legal action is often necessary when contamination affects multiple tanks, property areas, or neighboring sites and when contamination persists over time despite initial cleanup efforts, because broader contamination can lead to larger remediation costs and more complex liability issues. In those scenarios, coordinated legal, technical, and regulatory strategies help identify all responsible parties and secure funding for long-term cleanup and monitoring. A full approach enables consolidated claims that address cleanup, property devaluation, and any business interruption tied to the contamination problem.

Disputed Responsibility or Insurance Denials

When responsible parties contest liability or insurers deny coverage for TENORM cleanup, a comprehensive legal response is often required to pursue cost recovery and to resolve complex coverage disputes, because these matters typically involve technical evidence, contractual interpretation, and thorough documentation. Legal action can compel disclosure, obtain necessary testing, and advance claims that assert operator negligence or breach of duty where appropriate. Consolidated legal efforts increase the chance of recovering remediation costs and clarifying future responsibilities for monitoring and disposal.

When a Narrow Response May Work:

Isolated, Low-Level Residues

A limited approach may be appropriate when contamination is confined to a single tank or small area with low residual concentrations that can be remediated quickly and documented to regulators, because the costs and disruption of broad legal action may outweigh the potential recovery in minor cases. In such instances, documenting proper cleanup, disposal, and regulatory closure can resolve the issue without litigation, while preserving the option to pursue claims if further problems arise. Careful record keeping remains important even when taking a targeted remediation path.

Clear Responsibility and Cooperative Parties

If the party responsible for contamination acknowledges responsibility and agrees to pay cleanup costs promptly, a limited approach focused on negotiating remediation and documenting closure may be sufficient to resolve the matter, because cooperative resolution can avoid prolonged disputes and associated costs. Written agreements that specify scope, timelines, and disposal methods protect property owners and ensure regulatory compliance. Even where parties cooperate, retaining clear documentation and independent testing helps ensure the cleanup fully addresses contamination concerns and prevents future disputes.

Common Situations That Lead to TENORM Tank Cleaning Cases

Maintenance or Cleaning Residues

Routine maintenance, internal cleaning, or descaling of industrial tanks can expose accumulated TENORM residues that were previously undetected, leading to the need for controlled removal and disposal to prevent spread and exposure. Proper documentation of maintenance practices and findings helps determine responsibility for subsequent cleanup and associated costs.

Operational Byproducts

Certain industrial processes concentrate naturally occurring radionuclides in waste streams or equipment, and storage tanks used for byproducts may become contaminated over time, requiring assessment and remediation. Identifying the operational source is a key step in allocating cleanup responsibility and pursuing recovery where appropriate.

Third-Party Disposal Failures

Failures by waste handlers, disposal contractors, or other third parties can result in improper handling of TENORM and contamination of tanks or nearby property, prompting claims against those parties. When third-party conduct contributes to contamination, documentation of contracts and work performed is critical to establishing liability and obtaining reimbursement for cleanup.

Stephen Transparent

TENORM Storage Tank Claims — Harrisville Attorney Support

Contact Us About Your Case

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for TENORM Matters

Stephen New & Associates represents clients across West Virginia, including Harrisville and Ritchie County, in matters involving TENORM contamination and storage tank cleaning claims. The firm combines knowledge of state regulatory frameworks with experience coordinating technical investigations, helping clients secure payment for cleanup, disposal, and related losses. We assist with documenting contamination, preserving evidence, and engaging qualified technical consultants to measure and remediate residues. Throughout the process, our goal is to provide clear advice about legal options and practical next steps to protect property and address health and environmental concerns.

Our team also handles insurance disputes, contract claims involving waste handlers and tank service providers, and claims related to property devaluation or business interruption caused by contamination events. We communicate directly with regulators and responsible parties on behalf of clients to seek efficient resolution while preserving the right to pursue litigation if necessary. For individuals and businesses in Harrisville, the firm offers responsive representation, attention to documentation, and a focus on achieving remediation and fair compensation where responsibility can be established.

Contact Us to Discuss Your TENORM Tank Issue

304-355-5565

People Also Search For

TENORM contamination Harrisville

storage tank decontamination West Virginia

TENORM cleanup legal claim

radiological contamination tank cleaning

environmental remediation Ritchie County

industrial tank remediation WV

TENORM liability and claims

storage tank disposal regulations

Related Services

TENORM Services

Community Contamination
Community Contamination
Drilling Mud and Sludge Exposure
Drilling Mud and Sludge Exposure
Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning
Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning
Filter Sock Handling
Filter Sock Handling
Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure
Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure
Landfill Worker Exposure
Landfill Worker Exposure
Oil and Gas Field Worker Exposure
Oil and Gas Field Worker Exposure
Pipe Yard Worker Exposure
Pipe Yard Worker Exposure
Produced Water Handling
Produced Water Handling
Storage Tank Cleaning
Storage Tank Cleaning
Waste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure
Waste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure

FAQS

What is TENORM and how can it contaminate storage tanks?

TENORM stands for technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material, meaning naturally occurring radionuclides concentrated by industrial or commercial activities. In storage tanks these materials can accumulate as scale or sludge, and if disturbed during maintenance or cleaning they can present contamination and disposal challenges requiring specialized assessment and handling. Because TENORM consists of naturally occurring isotopes that become concentrated, its presence changes the way regulators and waste handlers classify and manage residues, and it can affect cleanup methods, transport, and authorized disposal destinations. Determining whether material is TENORM requires sampling and laboratory analysis conducted under proper chain of custody, followed by interpretation against regulatory thresholds. Documentation of sampling locations, methods, and results supports regulatory filings and any later claims for remediation costs. Prompt assessment is important to limit spread and to create a factual record that identifies the extent of contamination and the likely sources that led to accumulation in the tank.

Potentially responsible parties for TENORM contamination vary depending on operational control, ownership, and contractual arrangements. Responsibility can fall to the tank owner, operator, companies that performed maintenance or cleaning, and entities that handled or disposed of waste incorrectly. Contracts and maintenance records often determine whether a third party assumed cleanup obligations, while operational practices and compliance with regulatory requirements help establish liability. Careful review of ownership, service agreements, and the facts surrounding discovery usually identifies which parties may be liable for remediation costs or damages. Legal claims may allege negligence, breach of contract, or statutory violations depending on the circumstances and evidence gathered. Insurers may also be implicated where policies cover pollution or cleanup costs, though coverage disputes are common and often require legal and factual analysis. Gathering complete records, photographs, and sampling data is essential to pursue claims and demonstrate the link between contamination and the responsible party’s conduct or contractual duties.

If you suspect TENORM in a storage tank, prioritize safety and regulatory requirements by restricting access, avoiding unnecessary disturbance of residues, and notifying appropriate personnel or regulators when required. Photograph affected areas, record dates and conditions, and keep any sampling results or reports in a secure location. Avoid disposing of contaminated materials in ordinary waste streams; instead, engage qualified technicians who follow regulatory protocols for sampling, containment, and removal to prevent further spread and to ensure proper documentation for later claims. Simultaneously, preserve contracts, maintenance logs, and communications with vendors or contractors who have worked on the tank, because these records help determine responsibility for contamination and potential recovery of remediation costs. Contact legal counsel early to help coordinate investigations, protect evidence, and communicate with insurers and regulators. Early coordination can reduce the chance of lost documentation or missteps that limit recovery options for cleanup expenses and related damages.

Measuring TENORM contamination typically involves a sampling plan prepared by a qualified technical consultant, careful chain of custody procedures, and laboratory analysis to quantify radionuclide concentrations. Field measurements may include surface wipe tests, core samples, and radiological surveys that map contamination across a tank and adjacent areas. The resulting reports document methods, sampling points, analytical results, and comparisons to regulatory guidance, which together form the factual basis for remediation decisions and claims for cleanup costs. Clear documentation of methods and results is essential for regulatory approvals and for establishing the scope of contamination when seeking reimbursement. Regulatory agencies may require specific reporting formats or thresholds to determine required cleanup and disposal practices, and those requirements can vary by jurisdiction. Maintaining all testing reports, lab certificates, and chain of custody records supports compliance and strengthens any legal action to recover remediation expenses. Accurate documentation also helps determine whether further monitoring is necessary after cleanup and whether additional steps are needed to protect public health and the environment.

Whether insurance covers TENORM cleanup depends on the specific policy language, any pollution exclusions, and the factual circumstances of contamination. Some commercial general liability or environmental liability policies include provisions for pollution cleanup, while others contain exclusions that deny coverage for naturally occurring radioactive material or for long-tail environmental claims. Insurance coverage disputes often hinge on policy terms, timing of discovery, and whether the contamination was sudden or gradual, so a careful review of relevant policies and claims history is necessary to evaluate potential recovery through insurance. If an initial coverage denial occurs, policyholders may need legal assistance to pursue coverage, potentially arguing that the policy terms support remediation costs or that exclusions do not apply to the particular facts. Documenting the contamination event, cleanup plans, and costs supports a claim for coverage, and early notification to insurers helps preserve rights under the policy and may influence how cleanup costs are addressed while coverage positions are negotiated.

Cleanup timelines for TENORM in storage tanks vary widely based on the extent of contamination, regulatory requirements, availability of authorized disposal facilities, and whether disputes over responsibility or coverage arise. Simple, isolated tank cleanings may be completed within weeks once a plan is approved, while complex multi-tank or site-wide remediations that require extensive sampling, engineered controls, or off-site disposal can take months or longer to complete. Coordination with regulators and scheduling of licensed transport and disposal services also affects the overall timeline for remediation activities. Legal processes tied to cleanup can extend timelines if responsibility is contested or if insurers dispute coverage. Seeking reimbursement for cleanup costs through negotiation or litigation can add time, but may be necessary to ensure full recovery of expenses. Throughout the cleanup, regular communication with technical teams and regulators maintains progress and documents completion of required steps, which helps bring matters to closure and supports any subsequent claims for damages or remediation reimbursement.

Regulatory reporting requirements depend on the nature of the contamination, the quantities involved, and state rules, and there are circumstances in which discovery of TENORM must be reported to environmental or public health authorities. Reporting obligations aim to protect worker and public safety and to ensure appropriate remediation and disposal measures. Failure to notify regulators when required can result in penalties and complicate later claims for cleanup cost recovery, so it is important to determine reporting duties promptly when contamination is suspected or confirmed. Legal counsel can assist in identifying applicable notification requirements and in coordinating communications with regulators to document the discovery and proposed response. Proper notification and documented cooperation with regulators often facilitate timely approvals for remediation plans and can limit administrative penalties while ensuring the remediation meets state standards for protecting health and the environment.

Damages recoverable in a TENORM claim can include remediation and disposal costs, expenses for sampling and monitoring, diminution in property value caused by contamination, business interruption losses, and costs for medical monitoring when exposure risks exist. The exact types of recoverable damages depend on the facts, the applicable law, and the ability to link the defendant’s conduct to measured contamination and resulting losses. Comprehensive documentation of expenses, technical reports, and expert opinions on damages enhances the ability to recover remediation and related costs from responsible parties or insurers. In addition to economic damages, some claims may seek compensation for out-of-pocket expenses and the reasonable costs of long-term monitoring where contamination could pose ongoing concern. Careful calculation of both immediate cleanup costs and potential future expenses is necessary when negotiating settlements or presenting claims in litigation, and legal counsel can help assemble the necessary evidence to quantify and support those claims.

Contractual agreements with contractors, waste handlers, or service providers often include provisions that allocate responsibility for cleanup, establish indemnity obligations, or limit liability. Reviewing those contracts is essential to determine whether the contractor agreed to assume cleanup responsibilities or whether the owner retained ultimate liability for tank condition and maintenance. Contractual terms such as indemnities, warranties, and insurance requirements can shift financial responsibility for remediation and influence whether direct claims against contractors or insurers are appropriate. When contracts are silent or ambiguous about TENORM risks, factual investigation into the scope of work, industry practices, and communications between parties can establish whether the contractor’s conduct contributed to contamination. Preserving service records, invoices, and scope-of-work documents helps clarify expectations and obligations, and legal review can identify potential contract-based remedies or comparative fault arguments if multiple parties share responsibility for contamination.

Statutes of limitation and other deadlines for bringing claims related to TENORM contamination vary by the type of claim and the jurisdiction. In West Virginia, different time limits may apply to negligence, contract, or property damage claims, and the discovery rule—starting the limitation period when contamination is discovered or should have been discovered—can be relevant in contamination cases. Because these timelines can be complex and because delayed discovery of contamination is common, early legal consultation helps ensure that claims are filed before deadlines expire and that any tolling doctrines or equitable defenses are considered. Prompt preservation of evidence and careful tracking of discovery dates strengthen the ability to assert timely claims and to respond to defenses based on delay. If you suspect TENORM contamination, consulting with counsel early helps evaluate applicable limitation periods, preserve potential claims, and undertake any necessary investigative steps that support future recovery of cleanup costs and related damages.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services

Personal Injury

All Personal InjuryBirth InjuriesBoating & Jet Ski AccidentsBurn InjuriesBus AccidentsCar AccidentsCatastrophic InjuryConstruction Site InjuriesDaycare & School InjuriesDefective Medical DevicesHospital & Nursing NegligenceMedical MalpracticeMisdiagnosis & Delayed DiagnosisMotorcycle AccidentsPedestrian AccidentsProduct LiabilitySpinal Cord Injury & ParalysisSurgical ErrorsToxic Exposure & Chemical InjuriesTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Truck AccidentsWorkplace AccidentsWrongful Death

Mass Torts

All Mass TortsAsbestos MesotheliomaJUUL Vaping Lung InjuriesLead PaintNEC Baby FormulaPFASProton Pump InhibitorsRoblox Gaming Sexual HarassmentRoundupSocial Media HarmTalcum PowderToxic Baby FoodUber/Lyft Sexual Assault

TENORM

All TENORMCommunity ContaminationDrilling Mud & Sludge ExposureEquipment Maintenance & CleaningFilter Sock HandlingFracking Worker ExposureLandfill Worker ExposureOil & Gas Field Worker ExposurePipe Yard Worker ExposureProduced Water HandlingStorage Tank CleaningWaste Hauler Truck Driver Exposure

Insurance Law

All Insurance LawBad Faith LitigationFirst Party Property ClaimsUM/UIM Auto Claims

Civil Rights

All Civil RightsPrisoner Rights & ConditionsSection 1983 Civil Rights Claims

Legal Services