Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Lawyer in Buffalo

Protecting Patient Rights

Understanding Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Claims

Misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis can have devastating consequences for patients and families in Buffalo and throughout Putnam County. When a medical condition is missed, misidentified, or not diagnosed in time, symptoms can worsen and treatment options may be lost, leading to avoidable harm and costly long-term care needs. At Stephen New & Associates we represent people and families harmed by diagnostic errors, helping them pursue compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering while holding negligent parties accountable. If you believe a delayed or incorrect diagnosis affected your health, call 304-355-5565 to discuss your situation and learn about the options available in West Virginia.

A misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis claim often depends on thorough review of medical records, timelines of care, and clear demonstration of harm caused by a missed or incorrect diagnosis. Patients should act promptly to preserve records, document symptoms and communications with providers, and seek a legal assessment to understand possible claims and deadlines. Stephen New & Associates serves clients across West Virginia, including Buffalo residents, and assists people in collecting proof, engaging medical reviewers where appropriate, and pursuing fair resolutions through negotiation or litigation. Timely action can make a meaningful difference in any potential recovery and in preventing further harm.

Why Address Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis

Addressing a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis is important not only to seek compensation for the tangible damages suffered but also to secure accountability that may reduce the risk of similar errors for others. Legal action can help pay for additional treatments, rehabilitation, long-term care, and ongoing support needs that arise when an initial diagnosis was incorrect or untimely. Pursuing a claim may also prompt improvements in medical review and recordkeeping practices, provide a clear explanation of what went wrong, and restore confidence for patients and families who face the medical, financial, and emotional consequences of diagnostic error.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Approach

Stephen New & Associates is a West Virginia personal injury law firm serving clients in Buffalo, Putnam County and surrounding communities from our regional offices. We handle a broad range of serious injury matters including medical malpractice such as misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, car and truck accidents, brain and spinal injuries, and wrongful death claims. Our approach centers on detailed case preparation, open communication with clients, and strategic advocacy to secure fair results. We focus on helping injured people understand their legal options, preserve crucial evidence, and move forward with a plan tailored to each family’s medical and financial needs.

What Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Claims Involve

Misdiagnosis occurs when a medical condition is wrongly identified, while delayed diagnosis refers to a meaningful gap between the time symptoms first appear and the time a correct diagnosis is made. Both situations can lead to inappropriate treatment, progression of disease, missed windows for effective therapy, and preventable complications. Proving these claims requires careful documentation of symptoms, clinical findings, diagnostic testing, and a comparison to the standard of care expected under the same circumstances. A thorough review of medical records and independent medical opinions are often necessary to determine whether the care provided fell below accepted standards and whether that deviation caused harm.

Legal claims for misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis typically rest on showing that a provider owed a duty of care, breached that duty by failing to act or acting incorrectly, and that the breach caused injury or worsened a condition that would otherwise have had a better outcome. Establishing causation may involve medical timelines, expert commentary from clinicians familiar with the condition, and evidence of how different treatment earlier would have changed prognosis. Recoverable damages can include past and future medical bills, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, and compensation for pain and diminished quality of life resulting from the diagnostic error.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for Misdiagnosis Claims

Misdiagnosis

Misdiagnosis refers to a situation in which a healthcare provider assigns the wrong medical condition to a patient’s symptoms, leading to incorrect treatment or a failure to treat the real condition. This can include diagnosing a less serious ailment when a more serious illness is present, confusing one disease for another, or attributing symptoms to nonmedical causes. Misdiagnosis may result from errors in judgment, failure to order appropriate tests, or misinterpretation of clinical information. The impact can range from temporary setbacks to permanent injury depending on how the error affects treatment options and disease progression.

Delayed Diagnosis

A delayed diagnosis occurs when a condition that should have been identified earlier is diagnosed after a significant amount of time has passed, allowing the underlying illness to worsen or limiting effective treatment options. Causes of delay can include missed follow-up, failure to recognize symptom patterns, breakdowns in communication, or inadequate diagnostic testing. The harm from delayed diagnosis often involves more complex treatment, lost opportunities for curative care, and increased likelihood of complications. Legal claims focus on whether timely recognition and treatment would likely have produced a better outcome for the patient.

Medical Negligence

Medical negligence is a legal term describing care that falls below the accepted standard for a given medical situation, resulting in harm to a patient. It can include errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare, or health management. To establish negligence, a claimant typically must show that the provider made choices or omissions that other reasonably competent providers would not have made under similar circumstances, and that those choices led to measurable harm. Negligence claims often involve analysis of clinical decisions, documentation practices, and whether reasonable steps were taken to investigate and address patient complaints.

Causation and Damages

Causation links the provider’s breach of care to the injury suffered by the patient, showing that the misdiagnosis or delay directly produced or substantially contributed to measurable harm. Damages refer to the losses a patient may recover in a claim, including past and future medical expenses, lost earnings, rehabilitation and assistive needs, and compensation for physical pain and emotional distress. Establishing causation often requires medical analysis of timelines and treatment alternatives, while calculating damages requires careful documentation of economic losses and assessment of the long term effects on quality of life.

PRO TIPS

Document Everything Promptly

Write down dates, times, symptoms, and conversations with medical staff as soon as possible after a concerning medical visit to preserve an accurate timeline of events. Collect and organize any test results, referral paperwork, prescriptions, and discharge instructions so they can be reviewed together to identify gaps or missed steps in care. This habit of careful recordkeeping helps create a clear narrative about the course of treatment and supports any later review needed to evaluate whether a diagnosis was missed or delayed.

Request and Preserve Medical Records

Ask for a complete copy of your medical records from every facility and provider who treated you, including imaging reports, lab results, and consultation notes, and keep backups to prevent loss or alteration. Review records for inconsistencies and timelines that show when symptoms were reported and how clinicians responded, since those details often matter to assess whether care met reasonable standards. Preserving original records and maintaining a clear chain of custody allows a careful review by medical reviewers and legal counsel if you pursue a claim for misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis.

Seek Timely Legal Review

Contact a local law firm early to review the facts of your case and the timeframe for potential legal action, because West Virginia has statutes of limitation and specific procedural requirements that may affect your ability to bring a claim. An early legal review helps ensure critical documents are preserved, witnesses can be identified while memories are fresh, and any necessary medical reviews are requested in time to evaluate the merits of your claim. Prompt assessment also allows you to understand possible outcomes and the kinds of evidence that will be needed to support compensation for harm caused by diagnostic errors.

Comparing Legal Options for Misdiagnosis Claims

When Comprehensive Representation Is Beneficial:

Complex Medical Issues or Catastrophic Harm

Comprehensive representation is important in cases involving complex medical conditions or catastrophic injuries where multiple providers, extensive treatment records, and long-term care planning are involved, because these matters require detailed fact gathering and coordination across specialties. A full legal approach helps ensure medical reviewers are engaged, records are systematically reviewed, and economic losses are accurately projected for years to come. Those steps are often necessary to present a clear case that links diagnostic error to the significant, ongoing needs of the injured person.

Multiple Providers or Fragmented Care

When care involves several providers or facilities, comprehensive handling helps piece together the entire course of treatment to determine where a failure occurred and who may be responsible, because the chain of care and communication is often a critical element in these claims. A thorough legal approach coordinates requests for records from hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and specialists and seeks opinions that explain how earlier action might have changed outcomes. This level of coordination is frequently necessary to build a persuasive claim when responsibility is divided across multiple clinicians.

When a Limited Approach May Be Appropriate:

Clear Liability and Modest Damages

A limited, focused legal approach can be sufficient when liability is clear, the record plainly shows a single error that caused measurable but limited damages, and both parties favor an efficient resolution without extensive discovery. In those situations a targeted demand supported by key medical records and a concise medical opinion may resolve the claim through negotiation. This approach can reduce legal costs and speed resolution for clients whose injuries and losses are straightforward and well documented.

Urgent Deadlines with Straightforward Facts

When statute of limitations or other urgent deadlines are approaching but the underlying facts are uncomplicated and well supported by records, a limited legal action focused on preserving rights and initiating settlement discussions can be appropriate. This path emphasizes immediate preservation of records and a prompt demand while avoiding prolonged investigation when it is not necessary. Clients with clear, time-sensitive claims may benefit from this efficient course while still retaining the option to expand efforts if negotiations do not produce fair results.

Common Situations That Lead to Misdiagnosis or Delay Claims

Missed Fractures or Internal Injuries

Missed fractures, internal bleeding, or other injuries that are not recognized on initial evaluation can lead to worsening pain, impaired healing, and the need for more invasive interventions later, and these errors often appear in emergency care settings or after accidents when symptoms are subtle. When the failure to identify these conditions early results in additional procedures, prolonged recovery, or permanent impairment, affected patients and families may pursue claims to cover the increased medical costs and losses associated with delayed or incorrect initial care.

Delayed Cancer Diagnosis

Delayed diagnosis of cancer can remove options for less aggressive or curative treatment and may change long-term prognosis, especially when early detection measures or follow-up testing are not timely performed. Patients who experience a delay in diagnosis that allows disease progression often face significant emotional and financial burdens and may seek redress for the additional treatment and diminished life expectancy that resulted from the delay.

Missed or Incorrect Infection Diagnosis

Failing to recognize or appropriately treat serious infections such as sepsis can lead to rapid deterioration, extended hospital stays, and permanent organ damage, and delayed identification often arises from missed signs or delayed testing. Claims in these scenarios focus on whether earlier testing or treatment would likely have avoided the severe consequences and on compensation for the resulting medical care and impact on daily life.

Buffalo Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Attorney

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Your Misdiagnosis Claim

Stephen New & Associates brings a focused approach to medical injury cases for people in Buffalo and across West Virginia, combining careful case investigation with responsive client communication and practical guidance. We prioritize listening to clients, assembling complete medical records, and explaining the legal options in plain terms so families can make informed decisions about pursuing a claim. Our work seeks fair compensation for medical care, lost wages, and other losses while pursuing accountability for medical care that caused avoidable harm.

We assist clients in coordinating medical reviews, identifying economic consequences of diagnostic delays, and preparing persuasive demands or litigation where necessary to pursue meaningful outcomes. Throughout each case we aim to keep clients informed and supported during what is often a stressful process, working to resolve claims through settlement when appropriate or through trial preparation when needed to secure just results. If you or a family member in Buffalo suffered harm from a missed diagnosis or an untimely diagnosis, contact our office to explore your options and next steps.

Schedule a Case Review Today

People Also Search For

misdiagnosis lawyer Buffalo WV

delayed diagnosis attorney Buffalo

medical malpractice Buffalo WV

wrong diagnosis claim Putnam County

diagnostic error lawyer West Virginia

medical injury attorney Buffalo

hospital negligence Buffalo WV

sepsis missed diagnosis claim

Related Services

FAQS

What should I do first if I suspect a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis?

The first step is to seek any necessary medical care to address ongoing health issues and then request complete copies of your medical records from every provider who treated you for the condition. Preserving records, documenting symptoms and conversations, and noting dates and times will help create a clear timeline that can be reviewed to determine whether a misdiagnosis or delay occurred. After securing medical care and records, contact a law firm experienced in personal injury and medical injury matters to review the facts and advise you on possible legal steps and timing. Early legal review helps ensure records are preserved, potential witnesses are identified, and any critical deadlines are observed while you focus on recovery and treatment.

How long do I have to file a misdiagnosis claim in West Virginia?

West Virginia has specific statutes of limitation for medical negligence claims, and those deadlines vary depending on the circumstances, such as discovery rules and the ages of claimants, so it is important to check the applicable timeframe for your situation immediately. Waiting too long can bar a claim, so timely consultation with counsel helps protect your rights and allows for necessary evidence collection. Certain conditions or exceptions may extend or shorten filing deadlines, such as when an injury is not discovered right away or when government entities are involved, and those exceptions require legal analysis. Prompt legal review will identify deadlines that apply to your case and ensure any required administrative steps are taken in time to preserve your claim.

What types of damages can I recover in a delayed diagnosis case?

Damages in a delayed diagnosis claim can include past and future medical expenses related to the misdiagnosed condition, the cost of corrective treatments, and rehabilitation required because the condition worsened while untreated. Economic damages also cover lost wages and loss of earning capacity when the injury affects your ability to work in the future. Non-economic damages may compensate for physical pain, emotional distress, diminished quality of life, and the loss of pleasures of daily living that result from the diagnostic error. In wrongful death cases resulting from misdiagnosis, surviving family members may be entitled to damages for funeral costs, loss of support, and loss of companionship under West Virginia law.

Do I need medical records to pursue a claim?

Yes, medical records are central to any claim alleging misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis because they document symptoms, testing, clinical decisions, and follow-up recommendations that are used to evaluate whether care met the accepted standard. Pulling a complete set of records from hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and primary and specialist providers allows a reviewer to identify where critical information was missed or misinterpreted. If records are incomplete, your legal team can assist in obtaining missing documents, subpoena records if necessary, and work to reconstruct timelines using billing statements, prescription records, and witness statements. Early collection and preservation of records prevents accidental loss and helps form the factual basis needed to assess and pursue a claim.

How is causation established in a misdiagnosis case?

Causation requires showing that the provider’s misdiagnosis or delay was a substantial factor in causing harm that would likely not have occurred, or would have been less severe, if the condition had been correctly and promptly diagnosed. Establishing this link typically involves medical analysis comparing the care actually provided with the care that should have been provided and demonstrating how the outcome would have differed. To support causation, claimants often rely on medical opinions from clinicians familiar with the relevant condition who can explain the likely course of illness and the effects of delayed or incorrect treatment. Evidence such as treatment timelines, test results, and documented changes in the patient’s condition helps tie the diagnostic lapse to measurable harms and financial losses.

Will my case go to trial or can it be settled out of court?

Many misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims are resolved through settlement negotiations once liability and damages are reasonably documented, and settlements can provide faster access to compensation without the uncertainty of trial. Negotiated resolutions are common when parties prefer to avoid the time and expense of litigation and can agree on a fair resolution based on documented losses and medical opinions. However, some claims do proceed to trial when responsible parties deny liability or when settlement offers do not adequately compensate for the harm suffered. A law firm preparing a case will typically evaluate the strengths of a claim and prepare for litigation while seeking negotiated resolutions, ensuring clients are ready to go to court if necessary to secure full and fair compensation.

Can I pursue a claim if multiple doctors treated me?

Yes, you can pursue a claim when multiple doctors or facilities treated you, but cases involving several providers often require careful coordination to determine which actions or omissions caused the harm. Legal claims may name multiple defendants if each provider’s decisions contributed to the delayed or incorrect diagnosis, and attorneys will gather records from all involved sources to map the course of care. Establishing responsibility in multi-provider cases depends on timelines, the content of records, and how each clinician’s actions influenced the outcome, so a comprehensive review is needed. Your legal team will assess which parties may be liable and craft a strategy that accounts for shared or comparative fault among providers as permitted under West Virginia law.

What if the provider admits a mistake—does that mean my claim is resolved?

An admission of error by a provider can be an important piece of information, but it does not automatically resolve a legal claim or determine the amount of compensation that should be paid for harms caused. Even when a provider acknowledges a mistake, legal steps are often needed to document the full scope of medical expenses, future care needs, and other losses before any settlement or resolution is reached. Additionally, admissions may be limited in scope or followed by defenses such as contributory fault or alternative explanations for the outcome, so working with counsel helps ensure that any statements are properly considered and that settlements address all present and future consequences of the diagnostic error. Legal review protects your interests in assessing whether an admission supports a fair resolution.

How long will it take to resolve a misdiagnosis claim?

The timeline to resolve a misdiagnosis claim varies significantly depending on factors such as the complexity of the medical issues, the willingness of defendants to negotiate, court schedules, and whether the case proceeds to trial. Some claims resolve within months when liability and damages are clear and both sides agree to settle, while others can take years if extensive discovery or trial is required to establish causation and compensation levels. Clients should expect that careful medical review and preparation take time, and that reaching a full and fair settlement may require patience as economic and medical future needs are assessed. Your attorney can provide a case-specific estimate based on the facts and guide you through each stage of the process to manage expectations and timelines.

How are legal fees handled in medical malpractice and misdiagnosis cases?

Many medical malpractice and misdiagnosis lawyers handle cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning they are paid a portion of the recovery only if the claim is successful, which allows injured people to pursue claims without upfront legal fees. Contingency arrangements are usually documented in a written agreement that explains the fee percentage, how expenses are handled, and when fees are payable from any settlement or judgment. Clients should discuss fee structure, likely case expenses, and how costs such as obtaining medical records, expert reviews, and filing fees will be advanced and repaid so there are no surprises. Transparent fee agreements help clients understand financial responsibilities and align the attorney’s incentives with achieving the best possible outcome for the case.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services