Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

NEC Baby Formula Lawyer in Morgantown

Protecting Infant Health

Understanding NEC Baby Formula Mass Torts

Parents and caregivers in Morgantown and across West Virginia who suspect that a newborn developed necrotizing enterocolitis following use of a certain baby formula need clear information about legal options and the mass tort process. This guide explains how mass tort claims for NEC-related injuries are structured, what types of evidence are commonly involved, and how families can begin to evaluate potential legal paths. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley and Morgantown is available to discuss case details and next steps. If your infant was diagnosed with NEC after formula exposure, gathering medical records and maintaining a timeline of events will support any review of potential claims and next steps.

This page outlines common circumstances that lead to NEC-related mass tort actions, the differences between consolidated and individual claims, and practical advice for families navigating health, recovery, and legal options. You will find plain-language definitions of key terms, tips for preserving evidence, and answers to frequently asked questions about timelines, damages, and the settlement process. The goal is to help Morgantown families make informed choices while coping with a serious infant illness. To start a discussion specific to your situation, call Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565 or request a case review to learn how your family might proceed.

Why a Mass Tort Can Benefit Families

Participating in a mass tort can provide families with coordinated legal resources and a streamlined method for addressing similar injuries tied to the same product or manufacturer. Mass tort cases allow for shared investigation efforts, consolidated discovery, and consistent presentation of medical and scientific evidence, which can reduce individual burdens while preserving each family’s right to seek compensation. For many parents, the potential advantages include access to thorough medical record review, assistance with documentation, and representation in negotiations or litigation. While outcomes vary, a coordinated approach can make it easier to pursue recovery of medical costs, future care needs, and other damages stemming from an infant’s NEC diagnosis.

About Stephen New & Associates in West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates serves clients in Morgantown, Beckley, and throughout West Virginia with a focus on personal injury and mass tort matters, including product liability and infant injury claims. The firm emphasizes clear communication with families, careful review of medical records, and practical guidance about options and timelines. When a newborn faces a serious diagnosis like NEC, families typically need both legal direction and assistance coordinating documentation and medical follow-up. The firm’s Morgantown presence aims to provide local access to consultations, case status updates, and coordination with medical providers so parents can focus on their child’s care while legal steps move forward.

How NEC Mass Torts Work

Mass tort litigation brings together multiple plaintiffs who claim similar harms from the same product or conduct, but each claim maintains its own factual and medical specifics. In NEC-related mass torts involving baby formula, investigations typically review clinical records, feeding history, manufacturing processes, and any product testing or recalls. Discovery phases gather internal company documents, regulatory filings, and scientific studies that may be relevant to causation and liability. The process often includes appointed leadership to coordinate common tasks and discovery while allowing individual claims to pursue case-specific damages, enabling both the efficient handling of common issues and attention to each family’s distinct circumstances.

Families should expect an initial review of medical records and neonatal care notes to establish a clear timeline of symptoms, treatments, and prior health status. Early investigation may also involve consulting medical literature and obtaining independent medical reviews to clarify how NEC developed and whether formula exposure may have played a role. Throughout the mass tort process, plaintiffs commonly participate in shared litigation activities while retaining the ability to negotiate individual settlements or proceed to trial if necessary. Timelines vary depending on the complexity of medical issues and the pace of discovery, so patience and clear record-keeping help support a constructive legal response.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)

Necrotizing enterocolitis, commonly called NEC, is a serious intestinal condition that primarily affects newborns and can lead to inflammation and tissue damage in the bowel. Symptoms often include feeding intolerance, abdominal swelling, bloody stools, and signs of infection or systemic instability, and treatment can range from medical management to surgical intervention depending on severity. NEC can require intensive neonatal care, and some infants may experience long-term digestive issues or developmental impacts. In a legal context, establishing timing, feeding history, and medical responses helps determine whether exposure to a particular formula or product might be related to the onset of NEC.

Mass Tort

A mass tort involves many plaintiffs who each allege harm from the same product, device, or activity but whose cases remain individually distinct rather than being combined into a single class action. Mass torts allow common factual issues to be resolved through coordinated discovery and motions while preserving each person’s claim for individualized damages. This structure is often used when multiple people experience similar injuries that stem from shared product defects or conduct, and it enables efficient litigation of overlapping legal questions while protecting each participant’s right to seek personalized compensation for medical costs, pain and suffering, or long-term care needs.

Class Action Lawsuit

A class action consolidates many individual claims into one lawsuit on behalf of a defined group, where a single settlement or judgment applies to all class members unless they opt out. Class actions are appropriate when common legal and factual issues predominate and individual differences among claimants are minimal for purposes of determining liability and damages. By contrast, mass torts keep each plaintiff’s claim separate for damages, which can be important when medical outcomes vary widely. Choosing between a class action and a mass tort depends on legal strategy, the nature of the harms, and how well the cases align in terms of evidence and compensation needs.

Settlement

A settlement is an agreement reached between parties that resolves a claim without a trial, typically involving payment and terms for releasing liability. Settlements can be negotiated individually or as part of coordinated resolution efforts and may include provisions for medical expense reimbursement, compensation for ongoing care, and other damages related to the injury. Settling can save time and expense compared with a full trial, and it provides a degree of certainty about recovery. Families should carefully review settlement terms and ensure medical and future needs are addressed before finalizing an agreement.

PRO TIPS

Preserve Medical Records

Collect and preserve all medical records from birth forward, including hospital notes, neonatal intensive care documentation, feeding logs, nursing notes, and discharge summaries, because those documents form the foundation of any claim and help establish timing and treatment. Request complete copies directly from hospitals, clinics, and pediatricians, and maintain a secure, organized file of original records, imaging, surgical reports, and any communicated test results so nothing is inadvertently lost. Keeping a clear, dated record of medical contacts, symptoms, and treatments supports accurate legal and medical review and reduces delay when documents are requested during an investigation.

Document Symptoms and Treatment

Maintain a detailed timeline that notes symptom onset, changes in feeding, any formula type or lot numbers used, dates of medical visits, treatments given, and communication with medical providers, since these specifics help clinicians and legal reviewers understand the sequence of events. Include observable details about behavior, feeding tolerance, stool characteristics, and responses to interventions because those observations help corroborate clinical records and explain day-to-day progression. Photographs, notes about when symptoms improved or worsened, and records of subsequent follow-up visits can all strengthen a claim by providing a clear and consistent narrative of the infant’s course and care.

Limit Public Statements

Avoid posting extensive details about your child’s medical condition or case on social media and refrain from making public statements that could be misconstrued or used out of context, because public content can be discoverable and may complicate later legal steps. If family members ask for updates, consider providing short, fact-based information and direct broader inquiries to your legal representative to ensure communications are accurate and consistent. Thoughtful, measured handling of public information preserves privacy for your family and helps maintain focus on medical care and evidence preservation.

Comparing Legal Options for NEC Claims

Why a Broad Legal Approach Matters:

Widespread or Patterned Injuries

When multiple infants across hospitals or regions develop similar symptoms after using the same formula, a coordinated litigation strategy can identify common causes and streamline the investigation into manufacturing, distribution, and safety protocols. Concentrating resources through a broad legal approach enables thorough review of company records, clinical studies, and regulatory filings that would be burdensome for individual families to obtain separately. This combined effort can improve efficiency in gathering evidence and presenting common issues while still allowing individualized assessment of each infant’s medical needs and damages.

Complex Scientific Issues

Cases involving complex scientific and medical questions often require extensive analysis by medical reviewers, microbiologists, and other consultants to interpret data and causation, making a consolidated approach more practical for families seeking clarity. Pooling investigatory resources helps ensure that necessary testing, expert review, and document analysis are completed thoroughly and consistently across similar claims. A comprehensive approach can also facilitate coordinated filings and motions that address overarching legal questions, creating a clearer path forward for individual claim resolution and potential compensation.

When a Targeted Claim May Suffice:

Strong Individual Evidence

If medical records and timeline clearly link a single infant’s NEC diagnosis to a specific product exposure and the damages are well-documented, pursuing an individual claim may be an efficient path for that family. A targeted claim can focus on the distinct facts and medical needs of that infant without the time and coordination involved in mass filing. Families with clear, case-specific documentation often find that an individual approach allows more direct negotiation of damages tied to their unique circumstances and healthcare requirements.

Desire for Individual Resolution

Some families prefer to pursue a single, individualized resolution when their situation differs materially from others, such as unique medical complications or a need for tailored long-term care planning that does not fit a standardized settlement framework. An individual approach offers flexibility to address personal recovery plans and to negotiate terms that reflect specific medical prognosis and expenses. Legal counsel can explain whether an individual claim or a coordinated litigation route best aligns with the family’s goals and circumstances.

Common Situations That Lead to NEC Claims

Infant Hospitalization After Formula Use

A common circumstance prompting review is when an infant develops feeding intolerance, abdominal symptoms, and systemic signs that lead to NICU admission after exposure to a particular formula, prompting questions about timing and product history. Thorough documentation of the hospital course, feeding logs, and any tested formulas helps clarify whether the formula may be implicated and supports consideration of potential legal options.

Diagnosis of NEC Following a Formula Change

Families sometimes report that NEC symptoms appeared after a change in formula brand or lot number, making comparison of feeding records and product details an important part of the review process. Identifying the specific product, lot, and purchase timeline assists medical reviewers and lawyers in evaluating whether additional investigation into manufacturing or contamination is warranted.

Clusters of Cases in Same Facility

When multiple infants in the same hospital or NICU develop similar gastrointestinal injuries around the same time, investigators look for shared exposures, handling practices, or product sources that could explain the pattern. Such clusters can prompt broader inquiries and may support coordinated legal approaches to determine whether systemic factors or product issues contributed to the incidents.

Morgantown NEC Baby Formula Attorney

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for NEC Claims

Stephen New & Associates provides Morgantown and West Virginia families with attentive legal review and assistance in serious infant injury matters, including suspected NEC linked to formula exposure. The firm assists with obtaining and organizing medical records, coordinating medical reviews, and explaining options for pursuing compensation through coordinated or individual claims. Families can expect practical guidance about evidence preservation, timelines, and likely steps in a potential claim, delivered with sensitivity to the demands of caring for a newborn. If you are considering legal action, the firm will discuss potential avenues and help prioritize your child’s medical and recovery needs alongside legal decisions.

The firm’s approach includes timely communication about case developments, support with paperwork and record requests, and help understanding the potential benefits and trade-offs of different legal routes, such as coordinated litigation versus individual claims. Stephen New & Associates serves clients across Monongalia County and West Virginia, and can assist families in identifying relevant product information, documenting damages, and preparing for depositions or negotiations when appropriate. For many parents, having a local team to handle the legal work helps them concentrate on their child’s health while the case moves forward.

Request a Free Case Review Today

People Also Search For

NEC baby formula lawsuit Morgantown

NEC lawsuit West Virginia

baby formula mass tort Morgantown

necrotizing enterocolitis formula claim

Morgantown infant injury attorney

product liability baby formula WV

mass tort NEC claims

Stephen New Associates NEC cases

FAQS

What is necrotizing enterocolitis and how might it relate to baby formula?

Necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, is a serious intestinal condition that primarily affects newborns and can involve inflammation, tissue damage, and, in severe cases, surgical intervention. Medical professionals evaluate symptoms such as feeding intolerance, abdominal distention, bloody stools, and systemic signs of infection to diagnose NEC, and treatment may require intensive neonatal care. When NEC appears after exposure to a particular formula, investigators review timing, feeding records, clinical notes, and laboratory results to evaluate whether product exposure may have contributed to the infant’s illness. Establishing a relationship between exposure and outcome requires careful medical analysis and documentation. If you suspect a link between formula use and NEC, gather all medical records, feeding logs, and product information, including brand, lot numbers, and purchase details, and provide those materials for review. Medical reviews and independent evaluations are often part of determining whether further legal action is warranted. Consulting with counsel familiar with product identification, medical documentation, and mass tort processes can help families understand potential next steps while prioritizing the infant’s ongoing care.

How does a mass tort differ from a class action?

A class action consolidates many similar claims into a single lawsuit where a representative plaintiff or small group represents the entire class, and any settlement or judgment typically applies to all class members. Class actions can be efficient where claims are homogeneous and damages can be handled uniformly, but they may limit individual control over settlement terms and damages allocations. By contrast, a mass tort coordinates common discovery and legal issues while keeping each claimant’s damages separate, which allows individualized evaluation of medical consequences and tailored compensation decisions. For families considering legal options, the choice between a class action and a mass tort depends on how similar the claims are, the nature of injuries, and whether individualized damages are significant. Legal counsel can explain which structure best fits a case and what each option means for settlement negotiation, individual participation, and potential recovery, helping families select a path that aligns with their specific needs and expectations.

What evidence is important in NEC-related formula claims?

Key evidence in NEC-related formula claims includes complete neonatal and pediatric medical records, feeding logs, nursing notes, laboratory and imaging results, surgical reports if applicable, discharge summaries, and any records of formula brand, lot number, and purchase dates. Hospital procurement records or NICU supply logs can also be relevant when investigating product batches used in care settings. Detailed timelines that document symptom onset, feeding patterns, medical interventions, and changes in condition are valuable to clinicians and legal reviewers assessing causation and liability. Additional evidence may include internal company documents, regulatory communications, recall notices, and scientific studies that speak to product safety or manufacturing practices. Expert medical review of the records helps contextualize findings and determine whether further testing or investigation is warranted. Preserving original records and organizing documentation early in the process improves the efficiency of legal review and strengthens the ability to identify common issues across claims.

How long do NEC mass tort cases typically take?

The timeline for NEC mass tort cases varies significantly depending on factors such as the complexity of medical issues, the volume of discovery, and whether parties reach negotiated resolutions. Initial case reviews and evidence gathering can take several months, while coordinated discovery and motions may extend the timeline by a year or more. Some matters resolve through settlement during early stages, while others proceed through prolonged discovery and, if necessary, trial preparation; the duration ultimately depends on how quickly relevant documents and expert evaluations can be completed and whether parties agree to resolution terms. Families should expect communication about milestones, expected timelines for document collection, and updates on coordinated litigation activities. Regular updates and clear expectations from counsel help families manage practical matters, but patience is often required given the medical and scientific analysis necessary to support NEC-related claims. Counsel can advise on interim needs, such as securing medical follow-up and documenting ongoing care while litigation progresses.

Can families pursue individual settlements in a mass tort?

Yes, participation in mass tort litigation does not generally prevent families from pursuing individualized settlements tailored to their child’s specific medical needs and damages. While common issues may be handled collectively to streamline discovery and legal strategy, each claimant typically retains the right to negotiate a distinct settlement that reflects the infant’s unique medical history, ongoing care requirements, and financial losses. This flexibility can be important when infants have differing prognoses or distinct care plans that warrant individualized compensation. When negotiating individual settlements, counsel will review the scope of damages, estimate future medical needs, and seek terms that address both past expenses and anticipated care. Families should carefully review settlement offers to ensure they adequately cover long-term needs, and counsel can assist in evaluating proposals, requesting appropriate documentation, and negotiating terms that reflect the medical realities of the case.

What types of compensation might be available?

Potential compensation in NEC-related claims can include reimbursement for past medical expenses, coverage of ongoing and future medical costs, compensation for pain and suffering, and recovery for related economic losses such as lost parental income during hospitalization and care. In severe cases, claims may also seek damages related to long-term disability or developmental impacts that require specialized medical or supportive services. The exact categories of recoverable compensation depend on the jurisdiction and the specific facts of each case, including the nature and extent of the infant’s injuries. Determining appropriate compensation requires careful documentation of medical bills, prognostic assessments, and estimates for future care, often informed by medical and economic experts. Counsel can help assemble this information, present clear evidence of need, and pursue a recovery that considers both immediate expenses and longer-term care requirements. Each family’s situation is unique, so case-specific evaluation guides realistic expectations about potential recovery.

How do I preserve records and proof for a potential claim?

Preserving records begins with requesting complete medical files from every provider who treated the infant, including hospitals, NICUs, pediatricians, and specialists, and maintaining originals or verified copies in a secure, organized manner. Collect feeding logs, formula packaging details, receipts, lot numbers, and any communications with medical staff or product manufacturers. Create a clear timeline that records symptom onset, medical visits, treatments, and follow-up appointments to supplement the clinical records and provide context for reviewers. It is also important to avoid altering original documents, preserve electronic messages or text communications related to the infant’s care, and maintain notes from conversations with providers. Promptly providing these materials to counsel enables efficient review, supports investigation into product sources, and reduces delays when formal discovery begins. The earlier records are gathered and organized, the stronger the foundation for medical review and potential legal action.

Will my family have to go to trial?

Not all NEC-related claims go to trial; many cases are resolved through negotiated settlements after document exchange, expert review, and mediation or negotiation. Settling can provide families with a timely resolution and financial resources to cover medical expenses and future care, but decisions about settlement depend on the strength of the evidence, the degree of medical uncertainty, and each family’s objectives. Counsel can help evaluate settlement proposals and explain trade-offs between quicker resolution and pursuing a larger recovery through litigation or trial if warranted. If a case does proceed to trial, plaintiffs and defendants present evidence, call witnesses, and argue causation and damages before a judge or jury, which can be time-consuming and unpredictable. Counsel will prepare families for what to expect if trial becomes necessary, including schedules, testimony, and the potential timeline for final resolution, and will continue to seek settlement opportunities throughout the process.

What should I do if my infant was diagnosed with NEC after formula use?

If your infant was diagnosed with NEC after formula use, prioritize medical care and follow-up, then begin gathering documentation of the hospitalization, treatments, feeding history, formula brand and lot numbers, and any purchase records. Request complete medical records from each treating provider and maintain a timeline of events that includes dates of symptom onset, changes in condition, and communications with medical staff. These steps preserve essential evidence while you focus on your child’s recovery. After medical stabilization, consider contacting legal counsel to review records and explain potential options, including investigation of product sources, possible mass tort coordination, or individual claims. A lawyer can advise on evidence preservation, requests for documentation, and the information needed to determine whether further legal action is appropriate, while helping you balance legal choices with ongoing care needs for your infant.

How can I contact Stephen New & Associates about my case?

To contact Stephen New & Associates about a possible NEC-related claim, call the office at 304-355-5565 or visit the firm’s website to request a case review and provide basic information about the infant’s medical course and formula history. Initial inquiries typically focus on gathering available medical records and identifying relevant product details so counsel can begin an informed assessment and explain potential next steps. The firm serves clients in Morgantown and across West Virginia and aims to respond promptly to family inquiries. During an initial review, the firm will explain documentation needs, potential legal pathways such as coordinated litigation or individual claims, and how the review process proceeds while prioritizing your child’s health. Confidential discussions allow families to evaluate options without obligation and to decide whether to move forward with record collection and a more detailed case evaluation.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services