Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Bad Faith Litigation Lawyer in Granville

Holding Insurers Accountable

A Guide to Bad Faith Insurance Litigation

Bad faith insurance litigation can arise when an insurance company wrongfully denies, delays, undervalues, or unreasonably contests a valid claim. In Granville and across Monongalia County, policyholders may face complicated denials after accidents, property loss, or health-related claims, leaving families and businesses uncertain how to proceed. Stephen New & Associates represents individuals pursuing fair treatment and full recovery when insurers fail to honor contractual obligations. This guide explains what bad faith means under West Virginia law, common scenarios that lead to litigation, and practical steps claimants can take to preserve evidence, document losses, and protect their legal rights through the claims process.

When an insurer refuses to pay a covered loss or unreasonably delays payment, the financial and emotional consequences can be severe. Policyholders in Granville may contend with urgent medical bills, property repairs, or lost income while an insurance company disputes liability. Understanding the legal principles that govern insurance contracts and claim handling can help people identify when a carrier’s conduct exceeds ordinary disagreement and becomes actionable bad faith. This overview outlines signs of bad faith, how bad faith claims differ from coverage disputes, and why timely documentation and clear communication are essential to building a strong case against an insurer.

Why Addressing Bad Faith Matters

Addressing an insurer’s bad faith conduct protects policyholders’ contractual rights and can restore financial stability after a covered loss. Pursuing a claim discourages unfair claim handling, helps recover the full value of losses, and may include damages beyond the policy limits when actions meet statutory or common law thresholds. For individuals and businesses in Granville, holding an insurer accountable can mean the difference between rebuilding after an accident or facing prolonged financial hardship. Timely action can preserve evidence and witness statements, strengthen the legal claim, and increase the likelihood of a more favorable resolution through negotiation or litigation when necessary.

Stephen New & Associates in Granville

Stephen New & Associates serves clients across West Virginia from offices with strong local ties to Beckley and surrounding communities. The firm handles a wide range of personal injury and insurance-related matters, including bad faith claims that arise from denied or mishandled first-party insurance claims. The team focuses on clear client communication, thorough documentation, and strategic advocacy to pursue full recovery for policyholders. For residents of Granville and Monongalia County, the firm offers practical guidance on claim preservation, negotiation strategies, and litigation planning when insurers fail to honor the obligations established by policy language and state law.

Understanding Bad Faith Litigation

Bad faith litigation addresses insurer misconduct that goes beyond ordinary disputes over coverage or value. Under West Virginia law, a bad faith claim may arise when an insurer intentionally misrepresents policy terms, unjustifiably denies a claim, fails to investigate in good faith, or unreasonably delays payment without a sound basis. Distinguishing between a coverage dispute and actionable bad faith often requires careful review of the policy, claim file, correspondence, and the insurer’s stated reasons for denial. Early investigation and documentation are essential to demonstrate that the insurer’s conduct was arbitrary, unreasonable, or in violation of statutory duties governing claims handling.

When evaluating a potential bad faith claim, it is important to collect all communications with the insurer, medical records, repair estimates, and any internal notices received. Statements by adjusters, the timing of requests for information, and inconsistencies in the insurer’s position can all be relevant. Legal remedies can include enforcement of policy benefits, consequential damages, and fees where the law allows. Policyholders should also be mindful of statutory notice requirements and limitations periods that affect when a claim must be filed. A prompt, organized approach helps protect rights and preserve options for negotiation or litigation.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Definitions

Bad Faith

Bad faith describes a pattern of insurer conduct that is unreasonable, dishonest, or intentionally misleading in the handling of a covered claim. Examples include refusing to investigate obvious losses, denying claims without a reasonable basis, misrepresenting policy terms, or unreasonably delaying payment. Under West Virginia law, proving bad faith generally requires showing the insurer acted arbitrarily or unreasonably in breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Establishing bad faith may allow recovery beyond the policy limits, depending on the circumstances and applicable statutes, making careful documentation and timing essential for claimants.

First-Party Claim

A first-party claim is a request for benefits made directly by an insured to their own insurance company under the terms of a policy. These claims typically involve property damage, medical expenses, or other losses covered by the insured’s policy. When an insurer denies or undervalues a first-party claim without reasonable justification, the insured may pursue a remedy under contract law and, where justified, a bad faith action. Preserving receipts, repair estimates, medical documentation, and correspondence with the carrier is critical to supporting a first-party claim and any subsequent claim challenging the insurer’s conduct.

Reservation of Rights

A reservation of rights letter is a communication from an insurer informing the insured that the insurer will investigate or defend a claim while reserving the right to later deny coverage based on policy terms or exclusions. Such letters can affect litigation strategy because they acknowledge potential obligations while reserving legal defenses. An insured should review any reservation of rights carefully and retain all documents, as the insurer’s investigative actions and subsequent positions can be relevant to a bad faith analysis. Understanding how a reservation of rights interacts with coverage decisions helps policyholders protect their interests.

UM and UIM Coverage

Uninsured Motorist (UM) and Underinsured Motorist (UIM) coverages provide protection when a policyholder is injured by a driver who has no insurance or insufficient insurance to cover damages. Disputes over UM/UIM claims can lead to bad faith allegations when insurers unreasonably delay payment or undervalue the insured’s damages. Claimants should document medical treatment, lost wages, and other damages carefully and respond promptly to information requests. When settlement offers are inadequate compared to documented losses, pursuing a bad faith claim may be an option to obtain fair compensation and deter improper claims handling.

PRO TIPS

Document Every Interaction

Keep detailed records of every conversation, email, and letter exchanged with your insurer, including dates, times, names of representatives, and summaries of what was said. Photographs of damage, medical bills, invoices, and repair estimates should be organized chronologically to support your position. Clear, contemporaneous documentation strengthens your ability to demonstrate unreasonable delay or denial if litigation becomes necessary.

Respond Promptly to Requests

When an insurer asks for information, respond promptly with accurate records to avoid creating procedural grounds for denial and to show good faith in cooperating. Keep copies of everything you submit and note when and how materials were provided. Prompt responses help maintain control of the narrative and reduce opportunities for the insurer to claim prejudice or lack of cooperation in handling the claim.

Seek Timely Legal Guidance

If your claim is denied, delayed without reason, or the carrier’s conduct appears unreasonable, consult with a lawyer to understand your rights and deadlines under West Virginia law. Early legal input can help preserve evidence, prepare demand letters, and evaluate whether a bad faith claim is appropriate. Timely guidance also supports a strategic approach to negotiation and, if needed, litigation.

Comparing Legal Paths for Insurance Disputes

When a Full Legal Response Is Warranted:

Complex Coverage Disputes

Comprehensive legal action is often necessary when the insurer cites complex policy exclusions or when multiple coverages interact, requiring detailed contract interpretation and case law analysis. These disputes may involve substantial damages, multiple parties, or overlapping claims that demand coordinated legal strategy. A full approach helps ensure all potential remedies are pursued and procedural requirements are met.

Pattern or Practice of Misconduct

When an insurer demonstrates a pattern of denying or undervaluing claims across similar situations, a comprehensive legal response can bring broader relief and address systemic issues. Establishing a pattern often requires discovery, depositions, and examination of claim files beyond a single claim. A thorough legal strategy can seek remedies that discourage ongoing wrongful practices while securing compensation for the affected policyholder.

When a Narrow Response May Work:

Minor Disputes Over Value

A limited approach can be appropriate when the dispute concerns a relatively small difference in settlement value that can be resolved through negotiation or appraisal. In these cases, focused correspondence or a demand letter may prompt fair payment without full litigation. Concentrating efforts on documentation and direct negotiation can efficiently resolve modest claim disagreements.

Clear Policy Exclusions

If the policy language clearly excludes coverage for the reported loss and the facts are undisputed, a limited response may be appropriate, focusing on confirming coverage boundaries and mitigating losses. In such situations, contesting the insurer’s decision may not be productive and alternative recovery options should be explored. The decision to pursue broader action depends on the stakes and available remedies.

Common Situations That Lead to Bad Faith Claims

Denied Claims Without Explanation

An insurer denies a claim without providing a reasonable factual basis or explanation, leaving the policyholder with unresolved losses and unanswered questions. Such unexplained denials can be a sign that further investigation and legal review are warranted.

Unreasonable Delays in Payment

Significant, unjustified delays in processing or paying a covered claim can cause financial hardship and may support allegations of improper claims handling. Timely, documented follow-up is important to show the impact of delays.

Lowball Settlement Offers

Offers that fall far short of documented damages may indicate the carrier is not negotiating in good faith and may give rise to a bad faith claim. Gathering evidence of actual losses strengthens the case against inadequate offers.

Bad Faith Representation in Granville, WV

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates

Stephen New & Associates brings local knowledge of West Virginia insurance law and a history of handling personal injury and insurance disputes for clients throughout the region. The firm assists policyholders in identifying improper claim handling, assembling clear documentation, and pursuing appropriate remedies under contract and tort law. For residents of Granville and Monongalia County, the firm provides practical guidance on the claims process and aggressive representation when insurers refuse to meet their obligations, while maintaining direct communication and attention to each client’s circumstances during negotiations or litigation.

The firm focuses on protecting policyholders’ rights and pursuing full recovery for covered losses, including exploring damages that may arise from an insurer’s wrongful conduct. Stephen New & Associates takes a case-specific approach that emphasizes record preservation, timely filing, and strategic advocacy tailored to the nature of the dispute. Clients receive support navigating coverage issues, settlement negotiations, and court procedures, with an emphasis on clear explanations and practical next steps to address claim denials, delays, or undervaluations.

Contact Our Granville Office Today

People Also Search For

bad faith insurance Granville WV

insurance bad faith lawyer Granville

insurance claim denial West Virginia

first party bad faith Granville

UM UIM claim dispute Granville

insurance litigation Monongalia County

unreasonable claim delay West Virginia

lowball settlement insurance Granville

Related Services

FAQS

What is bad faith insurance and how do I know if it applies to my claim?

Bad faith insurance occurs when an insurer unreasonably refuses to honor a covered claim, delays payment without a reasonable basis, misrepresents policy terms, or otherwise handles a claim in a manner that violates the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing under applicable law. Signs that bad faith may apply include denial without explanation, inconsistent reasoning from the carrier, failure to investigate obvious evidence, or repeated lowball offers that do not reflect documented losses. Careful review of correspondence, claim notes, and policy language helps determine whether the insurer’s conduct crosses the line from ordinary disagreement into actionable misconduct. To assess a potential bad faith claim, collect all claim documentation including letters, emails, recorded conversations if lawful, photographs, medical records, and repair estimates. Chronologically organize communications and make a written timeline of events showing when requests were made, when the insurer responded, and any harmful delays. Because statutory deadlines and notice requirements can affect claims, early legal assessment helps ensure evidence is preserved and options are evaluated promptly. In many cases, a formal demand and clear evidence of unreasonable carrier conduct provide the basis for negotiation or litigation.

What should I do immediately after an insurance claim is denied?

If your claim is denied, preserve all related documentation immediately and obtain copies of any denial letters, claim notes, and correspondence from the insurer. Organize medical bills, repair estimates, photographs, and witness statements, and keep a detailed record of every communication with the carrier including dates, names, and summaries of conversations. Promptly respond to reasonable information requests from the insurer while avoiding unnecessary admissions about the claim facts. This documented record forms the foundation for any dispute resolution or litigation steps that follow. Next, consider consulting with an attorney to evaluate whether the denial was legally justified or possibly actionable as bad faith. An attorney can review the denial in the context of your policy language, advise on notice and statute of limitations concerns, and prepare a targeted demand letter or administrative complaint where appropriate. Early legal involvement can help preserve evidence, prevent procedural missteps, and assess the most effective path to recovery, whether through negotiation, appraisal, or court action.

How long do I have to file a bad faith claim in West Virginia?

The time to file a bad faith claim in West Virginia is governed by statutory limitations and depends on the nature of the underlying claim and the legal theory asserted. Statutes of limitation for contract and tort claims vary, and the clock often begins to run from the date of denial, the date of discovery of improper conduct, or another legally significant event. Because these timelines can be complex and fact-specific, consulting promptly is important to avoid losing the right to pursue a claim. Delay in seeking legal review can jeopardize evidence and available remedies. A lawyer can analyze the relevant deadlines based on the specific facts, the policy terms, and applicable state law to determine the latest safe date to file suit. If there are questions about whether a tolling doctrine or other legal principle applies to extend the timeframe, prompt legal review is essential. Taking early steps to preserve records and communicate formally with the insurer can also help protect your position while deadlines are assessed and legal strategy is developed.

Can I recover damages beyond my policy limits for bad faith?

In some circumstances, claimants may recover damages beyond the policy limits when an insurer’s wrongful conduct causes additional harm or where state law permits recovery of consequential damages and statutory awards. Remedies can include compensation for emotional distress, lost wages, medical expenses not covered by the policy, and, in certain cases, punitive-type damages where the insurer’s behavior was particularly egregious under governing law. The availability of extra-contractual damages depends on the facts, the insurer’s conduct, and the statutes and case law in West Virginia. Evaluating potential recovery beyond policy limits requires careful legal analysis of the claim file, the insurer’s conduct, and precedents in state courts. Collecting evidence of actual damages, financial impact, and the insurer’s decision-making process strengthens any request for additional recovery. Because the legal standards for extra-contractual relief can be stringent and dependent on detailed factual proofs, early legal planning helps identify which damages may be pursued and how to document them effectively.

What evidence is most helpful in proving bad faith?

The most helpful evidence in a bad faith case includes written communications between you and the insurer, internal claim notes if obtainable through discovery, denial letters with stated reasons, photographic and repair documentation, medical records, bills, and any expert opinions that support the value of your loss. A clear timeline showing when the insurer requested information and how long it took to respond can illustrate unreasonable delay. Documentation that contradicts the insurer’s stated basis for denial or shows inconsistent treatment of similar claims can be particularly persuasive. Witness statements and contemporaneous records of conversations with adjusters also support a claim by demonstrating the insurer’s position and conduct. Preserving emails, texts, and call logs, and noting the names of representatives involved, helps reconstruct the claim history. If the insurer relied on inspections or reports, obtaining those records and any third-party evaluations can rebut the carrier’s conclusions and strengthen the case for bad faith remedies.

Will filing a complaint with the state insurance regulator help my case?

Filing a complaint with the state insurance regulator may prompt a regulator-led inquiry into the insurer’s practices and can sometimes pressure a carrier to resolve a dispute more promptly. State departments of insurance handle consumer complaints, monitor insurer compliance, and may impose administrative penalties where violations are found. While regulatory complaints can be a useful supplement to private legal action, they do not replace the right to seek monetary relief through the courts and often proceed on a different timeline with different remedies available. A regulatory complaint can be part of a multi-pronged approach, but it should be accompanied by documentation and, where appropriate, legal representation to ensure claims and rights are preserved. Discussing the regulatory route with counsel helps determine how it fits within an overall strategy to obtain compensation and address wrongful claim handling, without inadvertently affecting litigation options or timing.

How does a reservation of rights letter affect my claim?

A reservation of rights letter notifies the insured that the insurer will investigate or provide defense while reserving the right to deny coverage later based on policy terms or exclusions. Receiving such a letter does not necessarily mean coverage will be denied, but it signals caution and requires careful review of the reasons specified by the carrier. Insureds should preserve the letter and all related communications because the insurer’s investigative actions and later positions can be relevant to claims of unreasonable conduct or bad faith if a denial follows. When a reservation of rights is issued, policyholders should provide requested information promptly, seek clarification on the insurer’s basis for reservation, and consult with counsel to evaluate coverage implications. Legal review helps determine whether the carrier’s reservation is appropriate and protects the insured’s interests, including consideration of conflict issues where the insurer’s reserved defenses could affect the scope of coverage or the defense provided.

What are common defenses insurers use against bad faith claims?

Insurers commonly assert defenses in bad faith claims such as reliance on reasonable coverage interpretations, factual disputes over causation or loss extent, statutory compliance in claims handling, and assertions that the insured failed to cooperate with information requests. Carriers may argue that delays were reasonable for investigation or that denials were based on legitimate policy exclusions. These defenses emphasize that a disagreement over coverage or value does not automatically amount to bad faith without proof of unreasonable conduct. To counter these defenses, claimants must produce clear evidence showing that the insurer’s conduct was arbitrary or lacked a reasonable factual or legal basis. Demonstrating inconsistencies in the insurer’s handling of similar claims, documentation showing insufficient investigation, or proof of misleading statements can undermine common defenses. A methodical presentation of evidence and legal argumentation is often required to rebut insurer positions and establish bad faith.

Can I settle my underlying loss claim and still pursue bad faith?

It is possible to settle the underlying coverage claim and still pursue a bad faith claim in some circumstances, but doing so requires careful consideration of settlement terms and releases. Settling the underlying loss might limit or bar additional claims if the settlement agreement includes a broad release of related claims against the insurer. Conversely, a narrowly tailored settlement that preserves the right to pursue claims for bad faith or extra-contractual damages can allow both recoveries to proceed under the right conditions. Before settling, consult counsel to ensure the settlement does not inadvertently waive your right to pursue additional remedies stemming from the insurer’s conduct. A lawyer can draft or negotiate release language that protects the insured’s interests, preserve claims that are separate from the contractual claim, and advise on the best approach depending on the strength of the bad faith case and the value of the settlement offer.

How are attorney fees and costs handled in bad faith litigation?

Recovery of attorney fees and litigation costs in bad faith cases depends on statutory provisions, contract terms, and judicial discretion. In some instances, the insured may be entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees if the insurer’s conduct warrants fee shifting under state law or where the policy provides for fees. Courts carefully evaluate fee requests and the legal grounds for shifting fees, so documentation of reasonable hours and necessity of legal work is important to support such requests. Even where fee shifting is not automatic, cost-effective strategies and early negotiation can manage expenses while pursuing substantial recovery. Discussing fee arrangements with counsel, including contingency options where available, helps align incentives and makes representation accessible. Clear communication about likely costs and possible fee recovery is essential when deciding whether to proceed with bad faith litigation.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services