Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Civil Rights and Constitutional Law Lawyer in Bluewell

Protecting Your Rights

A Guide to Civil Rights and Constitutional Claims

Civil rights and constitutional claims in Bluewell cover situations where government actors or institutions may have violated an individual’s rights under the United States Constitution or federal civil rights laws. Residents who face police misconduct, unlawful searches or seizures, wrongful arrest, denial of due process, discrimination by public entities, or violations of prisoner rights may have a claim under statutes such as Section 1983. Stephen New & Associates, a personal injury law firm based in Beckley serving Mercer County and Bluewell, handles these matters and can explain how federal and state laws apply to your situation and potential remedies available to you.

When a civil rights concern arises, the first steps typically involve preserving evidence, identifying responsible public entities or officers, and understanding procedural requirements such as statute of limitations and filing venues. Many claims proceed in federal court, though some matters may be pursued in state courts depending on the relief sought and the facts. Remedies can include monetary compensation, changes to official policies or practices, and court orders to prevent future violations. Calling Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565 will connect you with a team familiar with Section 1983 claims and constitutional litigation in West Virginia.

Why Civil Rights Claims Matter in Our Community

Pursuing a civil rights or constitutional claim serves several important functions beyond individual compensation. Such claims hold public actors accountable for unlawful conduct, create public records of wrongdoing, and can prompt systemic reforms that reduce the risk of repeated violations, benefiting the wider community. Remedies may include monetary awards for injury, orders changing problematic policies, and court enforcement to protect liberties. For survivors and families, a successful claim can also provide recognition of harm and an opportunity to recover costs related to medical care, lost wages, and other expenses tied to the violation.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Practice

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury firm based in Beckley that represents individuals across Mercer County, including Bluewell, in civil rights and constitutional matters. The firm handles litigation involving Section 1983 claims, prisoner rights and conditions, police misconduct, and wrongful arrest, pursuing both damages and injunctive relief when appropriate. The team is prepared to investigate facts, gather witness statements and documentation, and litigate in state and federal court. Clients receive direct communication about case progress and guidance on navigating the legal timeline, protective orders, and options for resolving disputes through negotiation or trial.

Understanding Civil Rights and Constitutional Claims

Civil rights litigation often rests on federal statutes and constitutional provisions that protect individuals from improper government action. Common claims involve alleged violations of the Fourth Amendment related to searches and seizures, the Fourteenth Amendment for due process and equal protection issues, and First Amendment claims about free speech and association. Section 1983 provides a civil path to seek remedy when a person acting under color of state law deprives someone of their federal rights. Understanding who acted, what authority they had, and how their conduct affected your rights is essential to building a viable claim.

Cases require careful fact gathering and timely filing. West Virginia and federal procedural rules set deadlines and govern notice and service requirements, and some claims can be barred if those rules are not met. Evidence such as video recordings, medical records, witness statements, and official reports is often central to proving a claim. Remedies can include monetary compensation, attorney fees under certain statutes, and injunctive relief to change unlawful policies or practices. Assessing potential defendants, jurisdiction, and the desired remedy guides strategy from the outset of a case.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Section 1983

Section 1983 is a federal statute that allows individuals to bring civil claims against persons acting under color of state law who deprive them of rights secured by the Constitution or federal law. It is commonly used when someone alleges unlawful police conduct, wrongful arrest, or violations of due process and equal protection. A Section 1983 claim requires showing that a government actor’s conduct caused a deprivation of a federal right. Remedies can include monetary damages and, in some cases, court orders to stop unlawful practices or policies that led to the violation.

Qualified Immunity

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that can protect government officials from personal liability if the law they are accused of violating was not clearly established at the time of the incident. Courts evaluate whether the rights alleged to be violated were clearly defined and whether a reasonable official would have understood that their actions were unlawful. Qualified immunity can be a significant issue in civil rights cases because it affects whether individual officers can be held financially responsible. Overcoming qualified immunity typically requires careful framing of the facts and legal claims to show that the right was clearly established.

Excessive Force

Excessive force refers to physical actions by law enforcement that go beyond what is reasonably necessary to accomplish a lawful objective, such as making an arrest or securing a scene. Whether force is excessive is judged by considering the circumstances from the perspective of a reasonable officer at the time, including the level of threat, the subject’s behavior, and available alternatives. Claims for excessive force often rely on video, medical records, and witness testimony to establish what occurred and the degree of harm, and such claims may support both criminal investigations and civil litigation.

Injunctive Relief

Injunctive relief is a court-ordered directive that requires a party to take certain actions or to stop particular conduct. In civil rights cases, injunctive relief can be used to require public entities to change harmful policies, improve training, or modify practices that lead to constitutional violations. Unlike monetary damages, an injunction focuses on preventing future harm and remedying systemic problems. Courts consider the need for such relief, the likelihood of success on the merits, and whether the proposed order is narrowly tailored to address the violation without imposing unnecessary burdens on the defendant.

PRO TIPS

Document Everything

When a possible civil rights violation occurs, immediately preserve all physical and digital evidence, including photographs, video recordings, medical reports, and communications related to the incident, and keep detailed notes about dates, times, locations, and the names of any witnesses. Gathering contemporaneous documentation helps establish the sequence of events and supports claims about who did what and when, and it can also reveal patterns that suggest policy or training issues. Provide collected records to your attorney so they can evaluate legal options, identify responsible parties, and prepare for any required filings or preservation letters to public agencies.

Preserve Records and Testimony

Ask witnesses for written or recorded statements while their memories are fresh and make secure copies of any official reports and medical documentation, and do not alter, delete, or discard relevant files or devices that may contain evidence. Medical and surveillance records can be essential in proving the extent of injuries and verifying accounts of an incident, while contemporaneous witness statements provide independent perspectives that courts and investigators value. Early preservation reduces the risk that evidence is lost or destroyed, helps meet procedural deadlines, and supports an informed assessment of potential claims and strategies.

Seek Timely Legal Guidance

Because deadlines and procedural rules can be strict, reach out for legal guidance as soon as possible to ensure claims are preserved and to obtain direction on communications with law enforcement and other agencies, and to determine whether immediate court actions such as temporary injunctive relief are needed. Timely advice also helps identify parties who must be notified and can guide the collection of necessary evidence before it disappears, while clarifying whether parallel administrative remedies or internal investigations are required before a civil filing. Early engagement helps shape a strategic approach focused on protecting rights and pursuing appropriate remedies.

Comparing Legal Options for Civil Rights Claims

When a Comprehensive Approach Helps:

Complex or Multi-Faceted Violations

Complex cases that involve multiple incidents, several defendants, or overlapping constitutional and statutory claims typically benefit from a comprehensive legal approach that coordinates fact development, depositions, expert analysis, and litigation strategy to pursue all available remedies and avoid missing opportunities for relief. A thorough approach identifies links between individual actions and broader policies or training deficiencies, and it can secure injunctive orders or systemic reforms in addition to compensation. Coordinating discovery and litigation efforts from the outset helps manage procedural risks and increases the chances of obtaining meaningful relief for clients and communities affected by the violations.

Claims Involving Public Policy or Practice

When the alleged misconduct reflects policy issues, such as recurring use-of-force incidents or discriminatory practices, a comprehensive strategy that combines individual claims with requests for injunctive relief may be necessary to protect future victims and bring about meaningful change. Such an approach requires careful coordination of evidence, community input, and legal filings to demonstrate a pattern or practice that courts will consider for broader remedial orders. Investing in a comprehensive plan aims to secure remedies that address both individual harms and underlying institutional problems.

When a Narrow Approach Works Best:

Clear Liability and Straightforward Damages

A limited legal approach may be appropriate where liability is clear from objective evidence, such as undisputed video of an unlawful takedown or a clearly improper arrest, and damages are readily calculable from medical bills or lost income. In such cases a focused demand for compensation and prompt negotiation can resolve the matter without prolonged litigation, saving time and expense for the client while still achieving fair recovery. Choosing a streamlined path means concentrating on gathering the most persuasive evidence and presenting a concise claim tailored to settlement or expedited resolution.

Immediate Injunctive Needs Without Extensive Litigation

If the primary goal is to stop ongoing harm, such as preventing a facility from continuing harmful practices, seeking targeted injunctive relief can be efficient and effective without pursuing broader damages claims at the same time. A narrow petition for preliminary relief focuses the court on the imminent risk and the specific actions needed to prevent further violations, and it can be filed quickly when urgent circumstances exist. This approach prioritizes prompt protective measures and can be followed later by broader claims if necessary to secure full redress.

Common Situations That Lead to Civil Rights Claims

Police Use of Force

Allegations of excessive or unnecessary force by law enforcement officers are among the most common bases for civil rights claims and often involve injuries that require medical documentation, witness accounts, and video or audio evidence to substantiate what occurred and how force was applied. Pursuing these claims can secure compensation for injury and medical costs while prompting review or reform of police tactics to protect others from similar harm in the future.

Unlawful Arrest or Detention

Instances where individuals are arrested or detained without probable cause, or held beyond lawful limits, can give rise to claims for violation of Fourth Amendment protections and due process rights, and may be proved through inconsistent witness statements, lack of supporting evidence, or procedural irregularities in arrest reports and booking records. Such claims can lead to compensation for damages and may also result in corrective measures to prevent repeat violations by the arresting agency.

Prisoner Rights and Conditions

Civil rights actions may address inadequate medical care, unsafe conditions, or retaliatory discipline in correctional facilities, where both constitutional protections and statutory provisions can apply to ensure basic safety and humane treatment. Litigating these claims can result in medical care, policy changes, and monetary relief for those harmed by neglectful or abusive practices while in custody.

Bluewell Civil Rights Attorney

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Civil Rights Matters

Stephen New & Associates brings a commitment to representing members of the Bluewell and Mercer County community who believe their constitutional rights have been violated by public actors. The firm routinely handles Section 1983 claims and related constitutional matters, pursuing both monetary compensation and injunctive remedies when necessary to address systemic problems. Clients work with a team that focuses on clear communication about case developments, realistic options for resolution, and dedicated advocacy in negotiations and in court proceedings across West Virginia and in federal venues.

If a civil rights claim is pursued, the firm prioritizes thorough investigation, preserving critical evidence, and preparing persuasive filings that explain the legal basis for relief and the facts that support it. The team is available to discuss potential claims, explain likely timelines, and identify next steps while protecting your interests during interactions with government agencies. To discuss a matter affecting you or a loved one in Bluewell, call Stephen New & Associates at 304-355-5565 to arrange a confidential review of relevant facts and legal options.

Schedule a Free Consultation Today

People Also Search For

Civil rights lawyer Bluewell

Constitutional law Mercer County

Section 1983 attorney West Virginia

Police misconduct Bluewell WV

Prisoner rights Mercer County

Wrongful arrest Bluewell

First Amendment claims West Virginia

Excessive force claims Beckley

Related Services

FAQS

What is a Section 1983 claim and who can file one?

Section 1983 is a federal statute that allows individuals to pursue civil claims when a person acting under color of state law deprives them of rights protected by the Constitution or federal law, such as freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures or violations of due process. It applies to state and local government actors, and claims brought under this statute can seek monetary relief and, in some situations, injunctive orders to prevent further unconstitutional conduct. A successful claim requires showing that the defendant acted under color of state law and that their conduct caused a deprivation of federal rights. Not all situations will fit neatly into a Section 1983 claim, and whether the statute applies depends on facts such as the identity of the actor and the nature of the alleged violation. Individuals who believe their rights were violated by police, correctional staff, or other public officials may have a viable claim, and early preservation of evidence and witness information is important. Contacting counsel promptly helps evaluate whether Section 1983 or another legal path best fits the circumstances and how to proceed effectively.

How long do I have to file a civil rights claim in West Virginia?

The timeline for filing a civil rights claim is governed by the statute of limitations, which varies by jurisdiction and the type of claim; in many federal civil rights cases the clock is set by the applicable state statute of limitations for personal injury claims, which in West Virginia is generally two years for many similar actions, though exceptions and different rules can apply depending on the facts and whether the claim is brought in state or federal court. Timely action is critical because missing the filing deadline can bar a claim regardless of its merits. Because variations and tolling rules exist, it is important to consult promptly to determine the exact deadline for your case and to preserve relevant evidence and claims. Early consultation allows necessary steps such as filing protective notices, securing records, and taking other actions that protect legal rights and preserve options for relief before deadlines expire.

What kinds of damages can I recover in a civil rights case?

Damages in civil rights litigation can include compensation for physical injuries, emotional distress, medical expenses, lost income, and in some cases punitive damages designed to deter particularly egregious misconduct. Courts may also award attorney fees under certain statutes to a prevailing plaintiff, which can ease the financial burden of litigation. The specific types and amounts of recoverable damages depend on the facts of the case, applicable law, and the strength of the evidence supporting the claimed harms. In addition to monetary relief, plaintiffs may seek injunctive or equitable remedies that change policies or practices to prevent future violations, such as orders requiring improved training, supervision, or medical care in detention facilities. Evaluating potential damages and remedies requires detailed assessment of records, medical evidence, lost earnings, and the broader impact of the violation to develop an appropriate demand and litigation strategy.

Can I sue a police officer or the government for misconduct?

Yes, it is possible to sue police officers, correctional staff, or municipal entities for misconduct through civil rights and constitutional claims, but such cases often involve specific procedural and legal hurdles. Claims against individual officers are frequently evaluated in light of doctrines like qualified immunity, and claims against municipalities may require showing that a policy, custom, or failure to train led to the violation. Properly naming defendants and establishing the legal basis for each claim is a key part of initiating litigation. Because suing public actors can involve complex legal issues and deadlines, it is important to preserve evidence, document injuries, and consult with counsel familiar with civil rights litigation. An attorney can explain whether a claim should be directed at individuals, the governmental entity, or both, and can guide the collection of necessary documentation and submissions to support a viable case.

What is qualified immunity and how does it affect my case?

Qualified immunity is a defense that shields government officials from personal liability unless they violated a clearly established constitutional right that a reasonable official would have known was unlawful at the time. Courts apply a legal analysis to determine whether the right in question was sufficiently defined by prior decisions and whether the official’s conduct was objectively unreasonable under the circumstances. If qualified immunity applies, it can limit the ability to recover money damages from individual officers, although other remedies or claims may still be available. Overcoming qualified immunity often requires careful presentation of case facts and legal authority showing that the conduct violated a clearly established right, so early case development and legal research are important. Counsel can review relevant precedent, frame claims in a way that focuses on well-established law, and pursue alternative avenues of relief when qualified immunity presents a potential barrier to a particular claim.

What should I bring to my initial meeting about a civil rights claim?

For an initial meeting about a possible civil rights claim, bring any available documentation such as police reports, medical records, photographs or video of the incident, correspondence with public agencies, and notes describing the event, including dates, times, and the names of witnesses. If you have written complaints filed with agencies or records of internal investigations, bring copies of those documents as well. Providing as much detail and documentation as possible helps evaluate whether a viable claim exists and what legal avenues may be appropriate. If documents are limited, still schedule a meeting and provide a clear account of what happened and how you were affected, including any injuries, lost income, or emotional impacts. The attorney can advise on additional records to collect, steps to preserve evidence, and immediate protective actions that may be needed to protect your rights while the matter is being evaluated.

How long do civil rights cases usually take to resolve?

The duration of civil rights cases varies widely depending on factors such as the complexity of the facts, the number of parties involved, court schedules, and whether the case settles or proceeds to trial. Some matters can be resolved through settlement in months if liability is clear and parties agree on damages, while others involving extensive discovery, multiple defendants, or requests for injunctive relief can take several years to reach final resolution. Pretrial procedures, dispositive motions, and appeals also contribute to overall timelines in many civil rights actions. Clients should expect ongoing communication about case milestones and potential timelines, and counsel can provide estimates based on the specific circumstances of each claim. Pursuing meaningful remedies sometimes requires patience and sustained effort, but early case preparation and strategic negotiation can shorten the path to a fair resolution in many situations.

Are there alternatives to going to trial in civil rights cases?

Yes, many civil rights cases are resolved without a full trial through negotiation, mediation, or settlement conferences, which can provide timely compensation or meaningful policy changes while avoiding the time and expense of trial. Alternative dispute resolution may be especially appropriate where the parties can agree on concrete remedies such as monetary payment, corrective training, or policy revisions. Mediation can be a confidential forum to explore settlement options with the assistance of a neutral mediator who helps the parties find common ground. Settlement discussions should be informed by a realistic assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the claim, available evidence, and the relief that is most important to the client. Counsel can negotiate terms that address both compensation and non-monetary changes, review proposed agreements carefully, and advise whether a settlement serves the client’s goals or whether continued litigation is preferable.

Will filing a claim affect any criminal case related to the same incident?

Filing a civil claim for civil rights violations is a separate process from any criminal proceedings and has its own standards, purposes, and outcomes; pursuing a civil case will not necessarily interfere with a criminal prosecution, though actions in one case can affect the other in certain situations such as through discovery or witness testimony. Criminal charges focus on punishment, while civil claims seek compensation and remedial orders, and it is possible for civil and criminal remedies to proceed simultaneously or sequentially depending on the circumstances. If related criminal matters are pending, it is important to coordinate with counsel to protect rights in both forums, avoid prejudicing criminal defenses, and understand how information produced in one proceeding may be used in another. An attorney can advise on timing, confidentiality issues, and strategies to pursue civil remedies while respecting any criminal case considerations.

How do I contact Stephen New & Associates about a potential civil rights matter?

To contact Stephen New & Associates about a potential civil rights matter affecting you or a loved one in Bluewell, call the Beckley office at 304-355-5565 to arrange a confidential review of the facts and available legal options, or visit the firm’s website for additional contact details and resources. The firm serves Mercer County and surrounding areas and can discuss next steps for preserving evidence, filing claims, and addressing urgent needs such as requests for injunctive relief to halt ongoing harm. During your initial outreach you will be asked to provide a summary of the incident and any documentation you have, and the firm will explain processes, likely timelines, and potential remedies. Early contact helps ensure that critical evidence is preserved and that procedural deadlines are met while the firm evaluates how best to protect your rights.