Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Roundup Lawyer in Montgomery

Montgomery Roundup Claims

Mass Torts: Roundup Overview

If you live in Montgomery, West Virginia and were exposed to Roundup herbicide, this guide explains how mass tort claims work and what to expect if you pursue a claim. Roundup contains glyphosate, and many people have raised concerns about links to certain illnesses after repeated exposure. Stephen New & Associates in Beckley represents clients from Kanawha County and surrounding areas, helping people understand deadlines, documentation needs, and possible recovery options. Calling 304-355-5565 for an initial conversation can help you determine whether a Roundup claim is appropriate for your situation and what next steps you might take.

Roundup claims are handled differently than single personal injury cases because they often involve many claimants and complex medical and scientific records. This guide covers common situations that lead to claims, typical timelines, and the kinds of evidence that matter, such as medical records and proof of product use. Our team focuses on clear communication and local knowledge of West Virginia procedures, and we work to coordinate needed information so you understand options without unnecessary complexity. If you believe your illness may be linked to Roundup exposure, collecting records and documenting exposure locations can make an important difference.

Why Pursuing a Roundup Claim Matters

Pursuing a Roundup claim can help people seek financial recovery for medical costs, ongoing care, lost wages, and other impacts of an illness connected to glyphosate exposure. Beyond individual compensation, coordinated claims can create better access to testing, records review, and negotiation resources that would be difficult to obtain alone. For many families, pursuing a claim also provides a structured way to hold responsible parties accountable while seeking support for future medical needs. The process can be demanding, and having a firm familiar with West Virginia procedures can improve the odds of an organized, effective approach to resolving your claim.

About Stephen New & Associates and Our Approach

Stephen New & Associates is a personal injury law firm based in Beckley serving clients throughout West Virginia, including Montgomery and Kanawha County. Our practice includes mass torts, motor vehicle accidents, medical negligence, and other serious injury matters. We aim to provide clear, practical guidance on the legal process and potential outcomes. When handling Roundup claims we focus on organizing medical documentation, exposure histories, and coordinating with medical providers to build a cohesive claim. Clients can reach us at 304-355-5565 to discuss their situation and obtain a straightforward assessment of possible next steps tailored to West Virginia timelines and rules.

Understanding Roundup Mass Tort Claims

Roundup mass tort claims arise when many individuals allege harm from the same product, in this case a herbicide containing glyphosate. These claims generally require documentation showing exposure, medical diagnoses consistent with alleged harm, and a link between use and injury as supported by medical records and other evidence. The mass tort framework allows coordination of cases to manage complex proof and discovery efficiently, while allowing individual claim resolution based on distinct facts and damages. Understanding how claims are grouped and how court coordination works helps claimants know what to expect and how their case might proceed in West Virginia courts.

Key steps in a Roundup claim include collecting medical records, documenting product purchases or usage, identifying exposure locations and time frames, and preserving relevant evidence such as labels or receipts. The timeline can include early case assessment, discovery, potential settlement negotiations, and in some matters, court proceedings if cases do not resolve. Insurance and manufacturer responses can affect scheduling and outcomes. Knowing filing deadlines and local rules in Kanawha County is important because delays can affect rights. We guide clients on organizing records and taking timely action to preserve claims while pursuing fair resolution.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary for Roundup Claims

Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the active chemical in many broad-spectrum herbicides, including products commonly sold under the Roundup name. It is used to control weeds in agricultural, commercial, and residential settings. In legal contexts, glyphosate is discussed with respect to medical studies, exposure history, and potential regulatory findings. If you believe a health condition is related to glyphosate exposure, documentation of when and how you were exposed, coupled with medical records that show a diagnosis and treatment history, will be important for evaluating any claim and for explaining the nature of the exposure to insurers or in court.

Mass Tort

A mass tort is a legal process used when many individuals are harmed by the same product or action but each person’s damages and circumstances differ. Unlike a class action, mass torts allow individual claimants to seek separate recoveries based on their specific injuries and losses while benefiting from coordinated discovery and case management. Mass torts are often used for large-scale product liability matters where common evidence must be collected and organized. For Roundup claims, mass tort management helps handle scientific studies, medical records, and exposure information across many cases while preserving each person’s right to individual compensation.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a category of blood cancers that can affect the immune system and lymphatic tissues. It has frequently been cited in connection with claims involving herbicide exposure, though each person’s diagnosis requires a careful review by medical providers. For claim purposes, medical documentation showing diagnosis, treatment history, and timelines that align with exposure periods is essential. Establishing a connection between a specific diagnosis and product exposure typically involves medical records, testimony from treating providers, and an assessment of other risk factors or potential causes.

Settlement

A settlement is an agreement between a claimant and a defendant or insurer to resolve a claim outside of trial. Settlements can provide compensation for medical bills, lost income, and other losses while avoiding the uncertainty and time of a jury trial. In mass tort contexts, settlement terms may address individual needs while relying on common factual or scientific findings developed during discovery. Deciding whether to accept a settlement involves evaluating its terms relative to projected outcomes at trial, ongoing medical needs, and potential appeals. Clear explanation of settlement components helps claimants make informed choices about resolution.

PRO TIPS

Document Your Exposure

Begin documenting any exposure to Roundup or glyphosate-based products as soon as concerns arise. Keep records of product containers, purchase receipts, labels, photographs of application areas, and notes about dates, frequency, and circumstances of use. Also record witnesses who observed your exposure or who can confirm application practices. This documentation forms the foundation of a claim and helps establish how and when exposure occurred, which is important for connecting medical diagnoses to potential causes and for responding to questions from insurers or defendants during claim evaluation.

Keep Medical Records

Maintain complete copies of medical records, test results, treatment notes, and billing statements related to any diagnosis you believe may be connected to Roundup exposure. Request copies from providers promptly, and organize them chronologically to show the progression of symptoms, diagnostic testing, and care. Accurate medical documentation is essential to demonstrate the nature and extent of injury, and it supports claim valuation during settlement discussions or litigation. If you change providers, ensure new records are added to your file so the entire treatment history is available when evaluating a claim.

Preserve Purchase Evidence

Whenever possible, keep receipts, product labels, and photographs of containers for Roundup products you purchased or used. If original containers are unavailable, note brand names, model numbers, and retail sources where the product was obtained. This information helps confirm that a particular product was in your possession and may assist in tracing manufacturing or labeling history. Detailed purchase and use records are often useful when establishing exposure timelines and can strengthen the factual basis of a claim when combined with medical documentation and witness statements.

Comparing Legal Options for Roundup Claims

When a Comprehensive Approach Helps:

Complex Medical Evidence

Complex medical records, multiple treating physicians, and disputed causation issues often require a thorough, coordinated approach. When dozens or hundreds of related claims rely on scientific studies and expert analysis, organizing discovery and ensuring consistent presentation of medical proof becomes important. A comprehensive approach can help manage detailed records, request necessary testing, and prepare clear summaries that explain how an individual’s medical history relates to alleged exposure, which supports fair negotiations or courtroom presentation when needed.

Multiple Claimants and Coordination

Where many claimants are pursuing claims tied to the same product, centralized discovery and coordinated filing can reduce delay and inconsistency. Coordination helps ensure important documents are collected and shared appropriately, that schedules are managed, and that legal strategy is informed by developments across related cases. This approach can improve efficiency in resolving claims and provides a clearer framework for settlement talks or judicial decisions. It also helps individual claimants avoid unnecessary duplication of effort while maintaining their right to distinct compensation.

When a Narrow Approach Suffices:

Clear Diagnosis and Short Exposure

In some cases where the medical diagnosis is straightforward, exposure history is brief and well documented, and liability is clear, a focused, limited approach can bring a timely resolution. Fewer contested issues about causation or identity of the product can make direct negotiation effective without extensive discovery. Even when taking a limited route, claimants still need careful documentation of treatment and exposure, and clear communication with medical providers to ensure records support the claim in a way acceptable to insurers or defendants.

Low Damages and Quick Resolution

For matters where economic damages are limited and the goal is a prompt settlement, a narrow claim strategy can be appropriate. This path focuses on presenting key medical bills, time out of work, and evidence of product use without pursuing extensive discovery or lengthy litigation. While this can save time and expense, claimants should understand potential tradeoffs, such as accepting a lower settlement in exchange for certainty and speed. Careful evaluation helps decide whether a narrow approach meets the claimant’s needs and goals.

Common Circumstances That Lead to Roundup Claims

Farm and Agricultural Use

Farmers, crop workers, and agricultural employees who handled or applied glyphosate-based products over long periods frequently report concerns about health issues that arose after repeated exposure. These situations often involve records of regular application, equipment used, and co-worker or supervisor observations that can help document exposure. Accurate logs of dates, methods of application, and safety measures taken are valuable when establishing a claim and can assist in showing patterns of use relevant to a medical diagnosis.

Residential Lawn Use

Homeowners and landscapers who regularly applied Roundup to lawns, gardens, or driveways may have experienced exposure that aligns with later health concerns. Receipts, pictures of product labels, and notes about application frequency can help illustrate residential use. These forms of documentation, combined with medical records, support evaluation of potential claims and contribute to building a factual record connecting household application and diagnosis.

Occupational Exposure

Workers in landscaping, grounds maintenance, municipal services, and related occupations may face elevated exposure through repeated handling or application of herbicides. Employer logs, training records, and witness statements about safety protocols and equipment can be important evidence. When such materials show ongoing contact with Roundup products, they help form the basis for a claim by corroborating exposure claims alongside medical documentation.

Montgomery Mass Torts Representation

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Roundup Claims

Stephen New & Associates brings experience handling complex injury matters for West Virginia residents, including mass tort claims like those involving Roundup. Our approach emphasizes careful document gathering, clear communication, and practical guidance about what to expect during each phase of a claim. We work with local medical providers and understand Kanawha County procedures, helping clients navigate deadlines and required filings. If you have questions about a Roundup exposure, a conversation with our team can clarify options and help you decide how to proceed based on your medical records and personal circumstances.

Clients choosing our firm can expect direct attention to case details, assistance obtaining and organizing medical records, and practical advice about claims, potential recovery, and timelines. We aim to provide straightforward assessments and to explain legal processes in plain language so you can make informed decisions. Contacting our office at 304-355-5565 lets you start a conversation about your situation and learn how we can help collect important evidence, evaluate potential claims, and pursue a resolution that addresses medical and financial needs arising from alleged exposure.

Request a Free Case Review Today

People Also Search For

Roundup lawsuit Montgomery WV

glyphosate claim Kanawha County

Roundup mass tort West Virginia

Stephen New Roundup claim

Roundup exposure Montgomery

non-hodgkin lymphoma Roundup WV

Montgomery mass tort attorney

Roundup injury claim Beckley

FAQS

What is a Roundup mass tort claim and how does it differ from a class action?

A Roundup mass tort claim is a legal action where many individuals allege harm from exposure to the same product, with each person presenting their own medical history and damages. Unlike a class action that resolves claims collectively under a single judgment, a mass tort allows each claimant to pursue compensation based on individualized evidence and losses while participating in coordinated discovery and case management aimed at handling common issues efficiently. Mass tort management helps organize scientific studies, medical records, and defendant disclosures so individual cases can be evaluated fairly. This structure keeps each claimant’s right to distinct recovery while streamlining aspects of litigation that would otherwise be repetitive, such as document collection and shared expert analysis. It is helpful to discuss the practical differences with counsel so you understand how your claim might proceed.

How do I know if my illness could be related to Roundup exposure?

Determining whether an illness is related to Roundup exposure requires review of your medical records, exposure history, and relevant medical literature. Healthcare providers play a key role in diagnosing conditions such as certain types of cancer, and timelines that link the onset of symptoms to periods of known exposure are important. Evaluating potential connections also involves considering other risk factors and the nature, frequency, and duration of use or contact with the product. A careful review by legal counsel involves collecting treatment records, dates and circumstances of exposure, and any workplace or residential documentation of product use. That information helps assess whether a claim is appropriate and what evidence will be needed to support a clear connection between your condition and alleged exposure to glyphosate-based products.

What kinds of evidence are needed to support a Roundup claim?

Key evidence for supporting a Roundup claim typically includes medical records documenting diagnosis and treatment, records showing dates and frequency of exposure, product receipts or labels, and witness statements that corroborate use or application. Medical imaging, pathology reports, and provider notes help establish the medical condition, while purchase documentation and photographs can demonstrate product possession and application patterns. Additional useful materials can include employment records, safety training logs, and any communication with employers regarding chemical use. Gathering this evidence early and organizing it chronologically strengthens the claim and speeds case assessment. Legal counsel can assist in requesting records and identifying other relevant sources of proof to build a comprehensive factual record.

How long do I have to file a Roundup claim in West Virginia?

Filing deadlines, called statutes of limitations, vary by state and by the nature of the claim, and they depend on when an injured person knew or reasonably should have known about the injury and its cause. In West Virginia, timeliness rules can affect the ability to pursue a claim, so it is important to consult a local attorney as soon as possible to understand applicable deadlines and whether any exceptions or tolling provisions apply. Delays can risk losing the right to seek recovery, so prompt action to gather records and begin evaluation is advised. If you believe you may have a claim tied to past Roundup exposure, contacting a firm familiar with West Virginia procedures can help determine the relevant filing timeline and preserve necessary evidence while assessing options.

Will I have to go to trial for a Roundup case?

Many Roundup claims resolve through settlement negotiations before trial, but resolution paths vary depending on the strength of the evidence, the defendant’s willingness to negotiate, and case-specific factors. Settlements can provide timely compensation without the uncertainty of trial, but they must be evaluated carefully to ensure they meet a claimant’s medical and financial needs. Some matters, however, proceed to trial when parties cannot reach agreement or when a jury determination is necessary. Whether your case goes to trial depends on the factual issues, the parties’ positions, and strategic considerations. Legal counsel can explain the likelihood of settlement versus trial in your particular case and help you weigh the benefits and risks of accepting settlement offers or proceeding to litigation, keeping your long-term needs in mind.

Can I still file a claim if I used Roundup many years ago?

Claims based on exposure that occurred years ago can still be possible, particularly for illnesses with long latency periods between exposure and diagnosis. What matters is whether you file within the applicable statute of limitations and whether medical and exposure records support a plausible link between past contact with the product and a later diagnosis. Older cases may require extra effort to retrieve historical records, but they remain viable when evidence supports a claim. When exposures are distant in time, collecting historical employment records, purchase receipts, and medical histories is especially important. Counsel can help locate older records, request archives from medical providers, and gather testimony from co-workers or family members who can corroborate exposure timelines, all of which support a thorough claim review.

How are settlements typically paid in Roundup cases?

Settlement payouts in Roundup cases are typically structured to compensate for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and future care needs, depending on the claimant’s losses. Payment terms vary and may include lump-sum payments or structured settlements over time. Each proposed settlement should be reviewed to ensure it adequately addresses medical needs, financial losses, and potential future expenses related to the condition. Before accepting any settlement, claimants should understand tax implications, the effect on benefits, and whether future medical needs are covered. Legal counsel can review offers, explain payment options, and negotiate terms that reflect both current damages and anticipated long-term needs so you can make an informed decision about resolution.

What medical records should I gather before contacting a law firm?

Start by gathering all medical records related to the condition you believe is connected to Roundup exposure, including hospital records, provider notes, diagnostic reports, pathology results, and billing statements. Also collect documents that show treatment timelines, prescriptions, and referrals to specialists. A clear medical chronology helps legal counsel assess the nature and extent of injury and how it aligns with exposure history. In addition to medical records, compile evidence of product use such as purchase receipts, product labels or photos, workplace records, and witness names who can confirm exposure. Employment records, safety logs, and any correspondence about chemical use are also helpful. Having these materials ready allows a law firm to begin a prompt and efficient evaluation of your potential claim.

Do I need to pay upfront to start a Roundup claim?

Many personal injury and mass tort firms, including those handling Roundup claims, operate on a contingency basis where clients do not pay upfront attorney fees and only pay if the claim recovers money. This arrangement allows claimants to pursue legitimate claims without immediate out-of-pocket legal expenses. However, there may be costs associated with obtaining records, expert review, or other case expenses that are handled according to the firm’s policies and discussed at the outset. It is important to ask a prospective firm about how case costs are managed, any responsibilities you may have, and how fees and expenses will be deducted from a recovery. Transparent discussion of financial arrangements up front helps claimants understand the process and decide whether to proceed with representation.

How can Stephen New & Associates help with my Roundup claim?

Stephen New & Associates can assist by reviewing your medical and exposure records, helping locate missing documentation, and explaining how West Virginia rules apply to your potential claim. We guide clients through collecting necessary evidence, preparing demand materials, and evaluating settlement offers while keeping you informed about likely timelines and next steps. Our local presence aims to reduce confusion about procedural requirements and to provide clear communication throughout case assessment and negotiation. If a claim proceeds, we coordinate discovery, work with medical providers to clarify treatment histories, and help present a coherent account of exposure and injury for settlement or litigation. We also help clients understand practical considerations such as projected future medical needs and the implications of settlement structures so they can make informed choices about pursuing and resolving their Roundup claims.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services