Settlement Alerts:

$9,250,000 Defamation Case Win Against The New York Times 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

$9,250,000 Defamation & False Light 8/26
$6,800,000 Wrongful Death 8/26
$81,000,000 Children Born Addicted (as part of the trial team)
$18,000,000 Product Liability 12/19
$13,000,000 Medical Malpractice – Sexual Assault 8/23
$225,000 Civil Litigation 7/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$30,000 Medical Malpractice 7/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$42,690 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/26
$2,759,223 Opioid Litigation 6/26
$70,000 Medical Malpractice 6/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 6/26
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$420,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/26
$650,000 Jail Litigation 5/26
$46,937 Opioid Litigation 5/26
$150,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 5/26
$285,000 Medical Malpractice 4/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 3/26
$50,000 Personal Injury 3/26
$40,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$32,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/26
$42,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 1/26
$30,000 Personal Injury 1/26
$50,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 12/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$77,500 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 11/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$26,668 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Personal Injury 9/25
$97,500 Personal Injury 9/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 9/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 8/25
$100,000 Wrongful Death 7/25
$45,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 7/25
$200,000 Wrongful Death 6/25
$1,200,000 Wrongful Death – Jail Litigation 6/25
$200,000 Slip & Fall 6/25
$26,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$800,000 Jail Litigation 5/25
$925,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 5/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$700,000 Jail Litigation 4/25
$25,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 4/25
$125,000 Personal Injury 4/25
$20,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$1,300,000 Jail Litigation 2/25
$210,000 Slip & Fall 2/25
$100,000 Motor Vehicle Accident 2/25
$975,000 Medical Malpractice 1/25
$4,000,000 Jail Litigation 1/25

CALL US NOW

5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice•5-Star Google Rating•BBB Rating: A+•West Virginia State Bar•The United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia•The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals•The United States Supreme Court•American Association for Justice•Opioid Justice Team•Trial Lawyers Care•West Virginia Association for Justice

Defective Medical Devices Lawyer in Dunbar

Holding Manufacturers Accountable

A Guide to Defective Medical Device Claims

If a medical device has caused you or a loved one harm in Dunbar or elsewhere in Kanawha County, you may be facing mounting medical bills, prolonged treatment, and lost time at work. Stephen New & Associates represents people with claims involving implants, surgical tools, delivery devices, and other medical products that malfunction or perform dangerously. We combine local knowledge of West Virginia courts with thorough investigation of device histories and recall data to help people pursue full recovery. Call 304-355-5565 to discuss how a careful review of your case can clarify options and next steps for recovery.

Defective medical device claims often involve manufacturers, hospitals, and potentially multiple vendors. Pursuing compensation usually requires obtaining medical records, device identification, and documentation of the harm caused. Our approach is to gather the relevant evidence early, review regulatory notices and recall information, and coordinate with medical providers to understand the scope of injury and projected care needs. Timely action preserves important evidence and supports claims for costs, future medical care, and other losses. We help clients understand the process and timeline so they can make informed decisions about moving forward.

Why Defective Device Claims Matter for Your Future

Bringing a claim for injuries caused by a defective medical device does more than seek compensation for medical bills and lost wages. It can secure funds for ongoing care, rehabilitation, and durable medical equipment while holding manufacturers and distributors accountable for design, manufacturing, or labeling failures. For many families the ability to address long-term care needs and to reduce financial uncertainty is the primary benefit. Additionally, pursuing claims can prompt better safety practices and help prevent similar injuries for others. Careful legal advocacy helps translate documentation of harm into a claim that fairly reflects present and future needs.

About Stephen New & Associates in West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates is a Personal Injury Law Firm with roots serving communities across West Virginia, including Dunbar and Kanawha County. The firm brings experience handling complex injury claims, working with medical professionals, accident reconstructionists, and outside consultants when claims involve medical devices. We prioritize clear communication and practical guidance so clients understand evidence needs, case timelines, and potential recovery options. For a direct conversation about a possible defective device claim, call our office at 304-355-5565 and we will review how we can assist you in protecting your rights and pursuing compensation.

What Counts as a Defective Medical Device Claim

Claims involving defective medical devices arise when a device causes harm due to a design flaw, manufacturing error, or inadequate warnings. Examples include implants that fail, infusion pumps that overdeliver medication, and surgical instruments that break during use. In legal terms, manufacturers and distributors can be held responsible when a product is unreasonably dangerous for its intended use. Establishing a claim typically involves medical records, device identification, item lot or serial numbers, and documentation of how the device was used. Understanding which category the defect falls into helps shape the theory of liability and the evidence that will be important in seeking compensation.

Regulatory actions such as recalls and safety alerts from the FDA may be relevant to a defective device claim, but they do not by themselves determine legal liability. A successful case often requires showing how the defect caused specific harm and quantifying losses such as medical expenses and reduced earning capacity. Preserving physical evidence, records, and communications is important because manufacturers and insurers may investigate the circumstances. Timely action, including early requests for records and device information, helps ensure key evidence is available and supports a more complete recovery for present and future needs.

Need More Information?

Key Terms and Glossary

Strict Liability

Strict liability is a legal concept often applied to defective product claims that focuses on the product’s condition rather than the manufacturer’s intentions. Under strict liability, a claimant can pursue recovery when a device is unreasonably dangerous and causes harm while being used as intended, without needing to prove negligence. The claimant still must demonstrate that the device caused the injury and that the device was defective in design, manufacture, or labeling. This standard is intended to protect consumers and injured parties by holding manufacturers accountable for safety regardless of fault.

Design Defect

A design defect exists when a medical device’s design inherently creates an unreasonable risk of harm even when manufactured correctly. In these cases, the device’s intended design choices lead to dangerous outcomes. Proving a design defect typically involves comparing the product to safer alternative designs or showing that the design failed to meet reasonable safety expectations. Expert analysis, testing data, and industry standards are commonly used to show that the design made the device unreasonably hazardous for users or patients and directly contributed to the injury.

Manufacturing Defect

A manufacturing defect occurs when a device departs from its intended design during production, resulting in a dangerous product even though the overall design may have been acceptable. These defects can be caused by assembly errors, contaminated materials, or quality control failures. Evidence for a manufacturing defect often includes inspection of remaining devices, production records, and testing that demonstrates the device deviated from specifications. Holding a manufacturer responsible for a manufacturing defect depends on showing that the specific product that caused harm was flawed during production.

Failure to Warn

Failure to warn refers to insufficient labeling or instructions that leave users or healthcare providers unaware of risks associated with a device. When a device presents known hazards that users cannot reasonably anticipate, manufacturers have a duty to provide appropriate warnings and instructions for safe use. A claim based on failure to warn examines whether the information provided was adequate in content and placement and whether clearer warnings would have altered the decision to use the device or reduced the likelihood of harm. Documentation of guidance given to clinicians and patients is important in these cases.

PRO TIPS

Gather Medical Records and Device Information

Collecting all medical records, operative notes, and treatment summaries is a foundational step in any defective device claim. Equally important is preserving information about the device itself, including brand, model, serial or lot numbers, and any packaging or instructions that remain available. Early collection of these materials supports a full investigation into device history, potential recalls, and how the device was used in your care.

Preserve Physical Evidence When Possible

If the device or parts of it remain available, keep them secured and do not dispose of them until they have been documented by a legal team or investigator. Photographs of the device in situ, packaging, and any labeling can provide crucial context for understanding how the product failed. Preserving physical evidence helps allow independent testing and provides more reliable proof when pursuing a claim against manufacturers or distributors.

Document Symptoms, Costs, and Impact

Keep a detailed record of symptoms, medical appointments, and expenses related to the device injury, including out-of-pocket costs and travel for care. Notes about how the injury has affected daily life, work, and personal responsibilities provide important evidence of non-economic losses. Clear, contemporaneous documentation strengthens the overall claim and helps ensure that both present and future needs are considered when seeking compensation.

Comparison of Legal Options for Defective Device Claims

When a Full Case Is Advisable:

Serious or Catastrophic Injuries

Comprehensive legal representation is often appropriate when an injury is severe, long-term, or requires ongoing medical care and rehabilitation. These cases commonly demand detailed medical projections, coordination with specialists, and careful valuation of future costs and lost earning capacity. A full case approach works to secure damages that cover medical bills, life care needs, and other economic and non-economic losses while addressing liability across all responsible parties.

Multiple Parties or Manufacturers

When more than one manufacturer, distributor, or healthcare provider may share responsibility, the legal landscape becomes more complex and often benefits from thorough investigation and coordination. Complex product chains require subpoenas, discovery, and careful analysis of production and distribution records. A comprehensive approach helps identify all potentially liable entities, negotiate appropriate settlements, and, when necessary, pursue litigation to achieve a fair outcome.

When a Narrow or Limited Approach May Be Effective:

Minor Injuries with Clear Liability

A more narrowly focused approach can be appropriate when injuries are relatively minor, the device failure is obvious, and liability is clear based on documentation or existing recalls. In those situations, streamlined negotiations with the device maker or insurer may resolve the matter efficiently without prolonged litigation. Even then, careful documentation of bills and treatment is needed to ensure a fair settlement that covers recovery and related expenses.

Quick Resolution Through Settlement

Some claimants prefer a quicker resolution and may accept a settlement when it reasonably covers medical costs and time away from work. A limited approach focuses on evaluating settlement offers and negotiating terms rather than pursuing complex discovery or trial preparation. This path can reduce time and legal expense, but it is important to understand whether the proposed resolution adequately addresses future care and losses before accepting an offer.

Common Circumstances That Lead to Defective Device Claims

Implant Failures and Revisions

Implant failures such as hip, knee, dental, or spinal devices that loosen, fracture, or migrate can require painful revision surgeries and lengthy recovery periods. When an implant fails prematurely or due to a manufacturing or design issue, affected patients often face additional operations, extended rehabilitation, and significant medical expenses that form the basis of a legal claim.

Defective Surgical Instruments and Tools

Surgical instruments that break, malfunction, or deliver incorrect dosages can cause immediate injury during a procedure and lead to infection, organ damage, or additional surgeries. In these situations, documentation of the procedure, instrument lot numbers, and operating room records becomes key to determining how the device contributed to the outcome and who may be responsible.

Medication Delivery and Pump Errors

Devices that deliver medication such as infusion pumps or insulin pumps that overdeliver, underdeliver, or otherwise malfunction can cause serious, sometimes life-threatening effects. Claims often examine device programming, maintenance records, and alarm logs to assess whether the device performed as intended or whether design or manufacturing defects led to harm.

Dunbar Defective Device Attorney

Why Choose Stephen New & Associates for Your Claim

Stephen New & Associates offers a local presence for clients in Dunbar and Kanawha County while drawing on experience with complex injury matters across West Virginia. The firm prioritizes a thorough investigation of device history, regulatory actions, and medical records to determine the best path forward. We coordinate with medical providers to understand treatment needs and help clients pursue compensation that addresses both immediate bills and long-term care. Call 304-355-5565 to arrange a review of your situation and learn about the practical steps available to protect your rights.

Clients can expect clear communication about case progress, realistic timelines, and thoughtful evaluation of any settlement offers. We review each matter to determine whether negotiation or additional legal action is more likely to secure fair compensation, and we work to reduce stress on families while pursuing recovery. Where appropriate, we will obtain necessary records, preserve evidence, and consult with medical and technical reviewers to build a complete picture of the injury and its consequences for future care and economic needs.

Get a Free Case Review Today

People Also Search For

defective medical device lawyer Dunbar

medical device injury attorney West Virginia

medical device recall claims

defective implant lawsuit

product liability lawyer Dunbar

medical device failure claim WV

FDA recall legal help West Virginia

Stephen New & Associates defective devices

Related Services

FAQS

What qualifies as a defective medical device claim?

A defective medical device claim typically arises when a medical product causes harm because of a design flaw, manufacturing error, or inadequate warnings or instructions. Examples include implants that fail prematurely, delivery devices that malfunction, or surgical tools that break during a procedure. To qualify as a claim, the injured person must show that the device was used as intended and that the defect was a substantial factor in causing the injury, supported by medical records and other documentation. Each claim also requires documentation of the harm and losses that resulted, including medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering. Regulatory information such as recalls or safety alerts can strengthen a claim but are not required to prove liability. Gathering device identification, operative reports, and treatment records early helps establish the connection between the device and the injury and supports a comprehensive evaluation of potential recovery.

How long do I have to file a claim in West Virginia?

The deadline to file a personal injury claim in West Virginia is governed by the state’s statute of limitations, which typically provides a limited window after the injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. Timely investigation is important because delays can jeopardize the ability to recover compensation by allowing evidence to be lost and memories to fade. Speaking with counsel early helps preserve records and protect your legal options. Certain circumstances can affect timing, including when the injury was discovered and whether there are multiple responsible parties or ongoing medical issues. For device claims, it is often prudent to act quickly to secure device information, production records, and recall data. Consulting an attorney soon after learning about a device-related injury is the best way to understand applicable deadlines for filing a case.

What evidence is needed to support a defective device case?

Key evidence in a defective device case includes medical records documenting treatment and diagnosis, operative notes showing how the device was used, and records identifying the device brand, model, lot, or serial number. Additional evidence can include images, lab reports, and testimony from treating providers regarding causation and prognosis. Where available, retaining the actual device or photographs of it can support testing and analysis to show how it failed. Regulatory notices, manufacturer communications, and recall information are also useful when available. Independent testing reports and technical analysis may be needed in complex cases to demonstrate a design or manufacturing problem. A careful collection of bills, employment records for lost wages, and documentation of pain, reduced quality of life, and related expenses is important to support both liability and damages.

Can I pursue a claim if my device was recalled?

A recall can be strong supporting evidence in a defective device case because it indicates the manufacturer or regulator identified a safety concern with the product. However, a recall alone does not automatically determine legal liability; the claim still requires showing that the recalled device caused the claimant’s injury. If a recall affects your device, it is important to document the recall details, device identifiers, and how the product was used in your care. Even in the absence of a formal recall, safety communications, adverse event reports, and technical notices can inform a claim. Whether a recall exists or not, collecting medical records, device information, and any related notifications helps build a clear picture of the device’s role in the injury and can guide the strategy for pursuing compensation.

Who can be held responsible for injuries from a defective device?

Responsibility for injuries from a defective device may rest with the manufacturer, distributor, importer, or retailer of the product, depending on the facts of the case. In some situations, health care providers or facilities may also share responsibility if misuse, improper maintenance, or negligent handling contributed to the injury. Identifying the appropriate parties requires careful review of procurement records, supply chains, and how the device was used. Product liability law allows injured individuals to seek recovery from those who placed a dangerous product into the stream of commerce, even if the manufacturer is out of state. Establishing liability often involves reviewing manufacturing and distribution records, service histories, and relevant communications to determine which entities had a role in producing or delivering the defective device.

Will I have to go to trial for a defective device case?

Many defective device cases resolve through negotiation and settlement without proceeding to trial. Settlement can provide a timely resolution that covers medical costs and other losses while avoiding the time and expense of litigation. Whether a case settles depends on the strength of the evidence, the extent of injuries, and the willingness of responsible parties to reach an agreement that compensates for past and future needs. When parties cannot agree on fair compensation, a case may proceed to litigation and ultimately trial. Preparing for trial involves detailed discovery, expert analysis, and often technical review of the device. Deciding whether to pursue litigation or accept a settlement should be based on a realistic assessment of potential recovery and the client’s needs, and counsel can help weigh those options.

How are damages calculated in these claims?

Damages in defective device claims commonly include economic losses such as past and future medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, and lost wages, along with non-economic losses like pain and suffering and reduced quality of life. In some cases, punitive damages may be sought when conduct by a manufacturer is particularly reckless or demonstrates a conscious disregard for safety, though such awards depend on specific legal standards and the facts presented. Calculating damages requires projecting future care needs and costs, which often involves input from medical providers and life care planners. Documentation of ongoing treatment, anticipated procedures, and impacts on earning capacity is essential to support a damages estimate that reflects both current and long-term needs of the injured person.

What should I do with the device that caused harm?

If the device that caused harm is still available, do not dispose of it and make arrangements to preserve it safely. Photograph the device, packaging, and any labels, and keep any receipts or paperwork. Preserving the device allows for inspection and testing that can be essential to determining whether a manufacturing or design defect exists. Your legal team can advise how to maintain the device while ensuring it is available for review. If the device is no longer in your possession, detailed documentation of how it was used and any communications with providers about the device can still be valuable. Records from the treating facility and surgeon, imaging, operative reports, and any correspondence about recalls or device problems should be gathered to support the investigation into how the device contributed to your injury.

How long does it take to resolve a defective device claim?

The time needed to resolve a defective device claim varies widely based on the complexity of the case, the existence of clear device identifiers, and whether multiple parties are involved. Simple claims with straightforward liability and limited damages may resolve in months, while complex matters that require technical testing, extensive discovery, or litigation can take a year or longer. The timeline depends on the need for expert review, scheduling of medical evaluations, and court calendars when litigation is necessary. A careful early investigation helps streamline the process by identifying key evidence, potential responsible parties, and realistic avenues for settlement. While faster resolution is desirable, it is important to ensure any settlement fairly addresses both current and anticipated future costs. Regular communication with counsel about case progress helps clients plan and understand likely timeframes.

Do you handle cases on a contingency basis?

Stephen New & Associates typically handles personal injury cases, including defective device claims, on a contingency basis, which means clients do not pay upfront attorney fees and the firm receives compensation only if a recovery is achieved. This arrangement aligns the firm’s interests with those of the client and allows individuals to pursue claims without immediate out-of-pocket legal expenses. Details of the arrangement, including how costs and fees are handled, are discussed during the initial case review. Even under contingency arrangements, clients remain responsible for reasonable case-related costs as agreed in advance, but many firms advance necessary expenses and seek reimbursement only from recovered funds. Discussing fee terms and getting a clear written agreement during the first consultation helps ensure transparency and sets expectations for the process.

All Services in

Explore our complete legal services